Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Anna Suszter ᠌ photo
1 Level
33 Review
0 Karma

Review on MICHELIN X-Ice North 4 205/55 R16 94T winter by Anna Suszter ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The purchase brought only positive emotions.

Middle-of-the-road winter tires that perform really well. They retain their shape during thawing, are easy to maneuver, and show consistent behavior on ice. Low-temperature features and all-terrain performance were sacrificed in favor of a tougher compound and handling, making these models less suited for use in severe frosts than their predecessors.

Pros
  • Very good winter and off-season performance on both dry and rainy roads. They are only slightly louder than a normal conversation, they handle the road surface excellently (the sidewalls are quite strong even on the 65 profile, the push wheel does not break in corners), and it does not sag at positive temperatures. Unlike the XIN2, changing to winter tires (from summer Michelin PS4s to winter Michelin PS55s with an even higher load index and a very stiff sidewall) does not feel like going from a vehicle to a swamp. On ice, the grip is not as "anchor" as the 8 Hakkapelita, but control is considerably more predictable; skidding does not occur suddenly as the lateral load grows, but the car begins to be somewhat dragged long before the breakdown into a skid. When driving on ice, it seems like you have coarse sandpaper instead of spikes on your tires; this gives you a wonderful sense of control over your vehicle's placement and its holding power.
Cons
  • Because their sidewalls are stiffer than those of the XIN2, they "flatten" less and row less efficiently on soil or a yard covered in snow. It has poor directional stability in "track after a heavy snowfall" circumstances and requires continual taxiing, but it slows down more effectively than XIN2 on rolling snow. The composition of this rubber raises serious concerns about its performance at -40 degrees.