Ford Mondeo car. I recently took a replacement Potenza (they stood from the factory, departed 5 seasons without problems) 235/45 R17 in the same size (I must say that visually the profile seems to be larger in Turanza and the sidewall is somehow barrel-shaped, in general, the tire is not handsome :-)). Compared to potency: - Reactions to the steering wheel are not so sharp and clear. If the potenza rides like it's on rails, then the turanza feels more like Velcro. + They write noise, but you…

Parameters: 15 diameter, 195/55. Handling is super, there is nothing to compare with, since I just bought a car and put rubber of this width on it. But! Aquaplaning is amazing, at a speed of 110 it just slows down, but does not swim, this is understandable, the width of the longitudinal treads is also amazing. That is, you can put your finger in there. I thought it would be poor handling on dry pavement, but nothing like that, it holds just as well, I'm delighted with the rubber. Someone wrote…

Stands on Mondeo 4, size 215/60/16. The profile is deliberately chosen a little higher for comfort. Installed new in April, production Hong Kong. I have not driven faster than 210 yet, but at this speed the handling is excellent, checkers are also good) Hydroplaning does not bother up to 160i. I consider this an excellent result. Very satisfied . Before that I used the same ones, but Japan, erased them to the indicators, but even in this condition they were perfect (except for hydroplaning)…

There were stock tires from the purchase of the Bridzhik ER 300 215/55 r16 car, they were super, although some say they are noisy, there are Bears on the second car with something to compare. It's time to change the tires, I read the reviews for a long time, there were many options, in the end I decided to take Bridget T001 205/60 r16 again, the reviews were also different, but all the same I took it. Feels like a delight after the old heaven and earth, in the car now you can really only hear

before that was Turanza er300 on forged wheels. very strong and reliable rubber. to break through its problem. a little quieter er300. satisfied with the purchase.

With its pros: Excellent handling on asphalt Departed 60 thousand. Quiet in my opinion. Its cons: Due to the rigidity, not pleasant bumps when driving over bumps, even small ones, therefore breaks the suspension

-Market delivered the freshest batch of rubber, week 8, 2022, that is, the rubber was released at the end of February, and I received it in April. I am writing a review after a month of use. I am satisfied with the purchase, I recommend the tires. With its pros: Soft rubber, very quiet, perfectly balanced. Without small hernias in places of cord soldering. On wet asphalt, the road is good. I would say that it is predictable on the road. On the new asphalt, rubber is not audible at all. I drove…

Excellent tires. Tears with the standard Cordiant Standard. Very soft, oh-oh-very good grip. At a speed of about 60-70 km / h, I decided to check the braking distance on wet smooth asphalt, and was amazed at the result. The car stood almost rooted to the spot. Everything that was in the back seat was imprinted in the windshield. It enters corners without skidding. In the mud, of course, I would not say that it is passable, but after all, this is still not a tractor, but an ordinary track…

I really liked the rubber. On a car with a mediocre Shumkov, I did not particularly hear the wheels. I ride in different ways, but in an aggressive manner, the tires performed well, in the dry they are very tenacious both in zigzags and in tight turns. I also liked it in the wet. Several times I fell into deep holes at speed, but not the slightest hint of a breakdown. Harsh, but strong.

I drive an Astra and a Nissan Premiere, they are on a Nissan 205/60/16, the price was 3800 in March 2022, I think that they are worth the money, the rubber forgives a lot of big holes, it slows down perfectly, and at 0 degrees on the street it almost didn’t get hard, a hernia it’s unrealistic to fill, the sidewall is dense, it’s better not to pump over (I have 2.0) it gently edits, only the impression that it’s been skipped, because the side is round, don’t pay attention to this - this is quite

Took 55 thousand ago. Japanese production. Balanced easily. They brake well. ABC did not chirp like Bridgestone B250 and softer than them. Does not collect stones on gravel. On a wet road up to 100 km / h, by the end of their service life, they normally hold. I wanted to buy the same ones, but now you can see only the production of the 2022 and the quality, judging by the reviews, has collapsed.

Some pros: Relatively soft, handling is acceptable, smooths out bumps well, soft With its cons: Wear resistance is not very good (3 seasons, very far to ER300), does not like rutting, noisy, 1-2 punctures per season are easy

I just bought it, I haven’t driven it yet, but be careful, look at the markings on the tire where it was made - Japanese with a hard sidewall, 2022 with a thin and soft sidewall, about 2.5 times softer than the Japanese one. Ran so in one store 2 Japanese and 2 of our gave, considered already at home. Either ours save money like this, or they began to make it softer, but not as much . I took them precisely for the sake of a solid sidewall according to reviews, by the way, the reviews are very…

Tires are on Nissan Maxima. Who does not know - this is such a road liner, completely not intended for sudden movements, acceleration, braking, rebuilding. Tires are ideal for those who drive slowly. But even in an emergency they will not let you down - they slow down well, wear out for a long time, they are not afraid of poking into curbs, as well as 2022 pits. An ideal option for reasonable money.

I took it in the spring for the summer season of 2022, skated a little more than 20 thousand km, wear is minimal, handling and comfort are pleasing. I put 205/55 r16 on lada vesta.

Asphalt is very well kept, dry and wet, good drainage. Excellent lateral grip. Solid sidewall compared to, for example, the Continental. But if you plan to sometimes move on the dirt road, it is better to choose something else. During the season, thin diagonal depressions were filled with small stones. It doesn't improve grip. Stones are very difficult to extract. One stone per 9 mm. went inside the tread (not a through hole, but annoyingly). They didn’t wear out during the season, I hope that…

Pros below: Made in 2022, it's a pig in a poke. In fact, these are not confirmed characteristics of the tire. Be sure, tires of another manufacturer (not 2022) have these markings! Got cons: In fact, these are not confirmed characteristics, they are simply absent (which means they were not certified according to them): Temperature A, B or C The heat resistance of tires at high speeds on the test bench (A is the best indicator). Treadwear; relative expected mileage compared to a specific US stan

I bought it in late February-early March 2022, as soon as the snow melted. . Managed to ride in the cold on dry pavement. The tire holds up well even at temperatures near or slightly below 0. The rubber has excellent grip on the road. It was possible to enter into sharp turns and at a decent speed, there was no demolition of the car (there is no ESP). Reliability and more reliability. Dangled to the south - serpentines, regional roads, mountain roads, Shaumyan pass withstood with a bang. A…

Skated 5 seasons. Excellent tires value for money. Now the new t005 is much better. Quieter and softer, plus they are made in Poland. Think it makes sense to pay extra.

I drive front-wheel drive, mechanics. Departure on this rubber all season, mileage of about 10,000 km. Happy as an elephant. Before that, I went to Nokian Nordman SX, the bridge is many times better, stronger and more reliable. It's already October, it's time to change to winter tires, I think I'll also buy Bridgestone for winter. Has pros: 1. Excellent handling on both dry and wet pavement 2. Virtually silent 3. Holds the road well in tight corners 4. Cheap Got cons: I did not notice any…