Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 139
  • 5
    77
  • 4
    38
  • 3
    17
  • 2
    2
  • 1
    5

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best offers, glad I bought it.

Supplied to Kia Rio 2022 size 185/65 R15 88H, before that there were Kumho solus from the factory 185/65 R15 88H, also worthy tires, but they are like glass and with a constant slip, it was demolished when cornering, then they were bought by Pirelli centurato p1 195/65 R15 88H are very comfortable soft and inaudible tires, but the car doesn’t ride on them and rolls in corners, the suspension is like jellied meat and ate more per liter for sure. Now with the Breeches, the golden mean is straight

Pros
  • Yes, the tires are great! Especially for those who do not like to "vomit" in the right lane! They start from a standstill without slipping and whistling, along the highway at a speed of 120-140 km / h, like on rails, the steering wheel has become clear and sharp, not rolly in turns, moderately noisy, they slow down super and on wet asphalt and on dry, in the countryside after rain, they also ride great and do not slip, puddles are not small at a speed of 70-80 km / h are not noticeable, rutting is invisible and the car does not rearrange, there is something to compare, see below. They say they are wear-resistant, we'll see in another year. I think that I was lucky with the shinki, made in Japan * I am supplementing the review after a year of use, the opinion on the cut has not changed. it saddens, it wears off quickly, I think for another summer and change
Cons
  • they thump in the pits, now it’s pumped up 2.2, I’ll probably lower it to 2

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good product, more pros than cons.

Rubber for those who rides on the highway at high speed. Her element is 150 km/h and above. At this speed, with this rubber, no pits are terrible. She needs smooth asphalt. Otherwise, the noise penetrates the interior very much. Due to its rigidity, my consumption on it is higher than on the studded Hakapelite 7 Better for high speed did not meet anything. For high speed you need a stiff suspension and Turanza is the same here. The impression sometimes that you go on plastic wheels But at high…

Pros
  • Extremely durable rubber. Holds up to the toughest hits. Doesn't break through holes Good to steer Slow wear Opens at high speed
Cons
  • Increased fuel consumption noisy

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not my best purchase, you could have found something else.

Be carefull! This rubber began to be made in the 2022, its quality is strikingly different from the quality of the Japanese rubber. There was a Japanese turanza, served faithfully. Bought one new set, put forward. The feeling that this car rides on summer tires in winter . Terribly upset by the fact that even the technology of the 2022 cannot do anything .

Pros
  • Relatively silent
Cons
  • Road grip, stopping distance

Revainrating 4 out of 5

No minuses as such, comfortable to use.

My choice fell on this manufacturer not by chance, I already came across Bridges a few years ago. They came with me as a set for Matryoshka in 2022. To be honest, I don’t remember what kind of model it was, but my impressions were very positive. One of its main advantages emphasized wear resistance. With my aggressive driving style, it lasted me 3 full seasons. Previous tires were Hankook Ventus Prime 2. Bought it on the advice of a friend. Rubber, frankly, so-so. Lived 2 seasons with a big…

Pros
  • Sustainability. Good grip in all weather
Cons
  • The occurrence of hydroplaning at high speed in a rut.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A really necessary purchase, Im glad I found this product.

Tires 195/65 R15 91V, car Ford Focus 2 restyling Chia. I drive 60% highway, 30% city. Everything about this tire is excellent except for durability. Half a year after installation, I began to notice how the tread was thinning right before my eyes. Before that, I went to the Continental (I went 70,000 - 80,000 km on a summer tire and sold the previous car with it, I would have gone another 15,000 km). The total mileage purely on this rubber is 60,000 km. Stones are not clogged, the grip on the…

Pros
  • It proved to be excellent on a wet road, excellent grip, it is almost impossible to start the car in the skid, skidding, the ABS did not work even once, it keeps the road perfectly - the car drives like a stone, not a single puncture in 3 years. Installed and forgot about them until next winter
Cons
  • Weak wear resistance

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Overall pretty good, an equal number of pros and cons.

I bought for 7 thousand in May 2022 2 tires on the front axle (size 205/60/16) specially the same size as they were on my minivan before. Tires DO NOT MEET my parameters in terms of size and mass index . but Japanese women had been walking fine before (approximately 7-8 years) and there was a feeling that smaller but strong wheels can be perfectly dispensed with! But having bought a new tire of domestic production, all illusions were dispelled: after a trip to Hong Kong, during which the tire…

Pros
  • Wear resistance, handling, sidewall strength of the old model made in japan
Cons
  • Softness, fast erasing, cottony feeling when driving made in 2022

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good purchase.

Traveled a year on it, went to the new car. I noticed that after storage in the cold, it becomes very stiff, and you need to wait a couple of weeks for the elasticity to recover, I smeared it all over with a restorer for Docto Wax tires, so it recovered faster. Then I changed it to goodyer efficientgrip perfomance, I expected that the softness and noise would greatly improve, but there was even more noise, and the differences in hardness were small. T001 is elastic, and the horn is rolly. There

Pros
  • Interesting taxiing (sharp elastic heavy steering wheel, feedback) Always slow down Pleasant elastic stiffness Not felling On good asphalt, the noise is turned off No rumble on rough pavement In the rain sticks to the asphalt, cuts puddles Very strong and durable Weight for this size Noisy in the midrange range, which is solved by noise. (In low frequencies, it is not solved by noise)
Cons
  • Reads rough asphalt in detail but makes noise in the midrange Getting louder every season After storage in the cold, it becomes fiercely stiff, but passes

In operation 2 seasons, mileage 35 thousand kilometers, wear is approximately 65%. Does anyone think it's noisy? You just didn't drive the Turanze ER300. Rubber is very quiet. Excellent grip on wet roads, good grip at temperatures of +5 to +10 degrees. At high speed (over 150 km / h) floats, the reaction to the steering wheel is smeared. However, it is not intended for sports use (who needs it Potenza, which, in turn, is extremely oaky, noisy and does not work due to not warming up at speeds up

Pros
  • Quiet, comfortable
Cons
  • Poor handling at high speed

skated in fact a little more than a season (I took the car at the end of May 2022, in the middle of July I put this rubber on myself, the date of writing the review is the end of September 2022) they make less noise (according to sensations) than a cross-climate bear 185/65, despite the fact that the turanza is 205/55 (although the turanza has an asymmetric pattern, and the bear has a symmetrical herringbone, which kag be hints at) the strength is excellent (I flew into the pits at speed, I…

Pros
  • noise level strength cornering grip wet grip dry grip extended warranty
Cons
  • Thousands were enough for 25 runs fuss with warranty longer than competitors

I had from 2022 to 2022. The same tires, but Made in Japan. I skated the last season of 2022 and bought a new kit of the same model and brand. But it turned out that it is made in 2022. Long doubted, but bought. I skated 2022 and now 2022. I am not satisfied with the result. On wet pavement, when braking, the ABS often turns on, this was not the case on the Japanese. And the most important thing is the vibration at speeds of 130. I kept thinking that after the first tire fitting it was…

Pros
  • Didn't find benefits
Cons
  • Poor grip on wet pavement. Abs works. Runout at 130km/h. Wear is average.

Granddaughter ER30, also runs, but more vulnerable in comparison with her grandmother))) In principle, good tires, I drive aggressively, but she doesn’t care, the sidewalls are soft: a little touched the curb and already a noticeable cut. Allows you to cut corners and beautifully exit the turn. Would you buy the same? Yes, but . I monitored the market for much longer and still the choice would have fallen on this tire.

Pros
  • Stability on the road, turns like a knife through butter.
Cons
  • Wear resistance, too soft tire sidewalls.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Not a bad product, quite normal quality.

Departure 2 seasons on Focus 2. For 1 season (~ 22,000 km) the protectors on the front wheels were worn out almost under "0" (I drive calmly, without "drift"). The new ones were a finger deep, now a quarter of a finger deep. The rear wheels were in slightly better condition, about half a finger deep. But at the same time, they did not lose their driving characteristics at all. There were several situations when I had to urgently brake on the CADE from a speed of 120 km / h. And there were…

Pros
  • Excellent grip on dry and wet pavement. Excellent stability during emergency braking. Not very noisy. Light.
Cons
  • Erased quickly. Overpriced.

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Worst product ever, disappointed with the purchase.

I had standard tires on a toyota avensis turanza er30, when the front tires wore out, I bought 2 turanza t001 rollers, changed them . and went nuts! chatting on the track almost like 7ke! 140 on a crooked road dumb to go! before that, confidently without a hint of buildup! I drove 23 thousand km on it, another 5-10 thousand and went to a landfill (average speed on the highway 130 km per hour) I didn’t notice any flaws in Shumko, norms.

Pros
  • Have not found
Cons
  • handling, durability

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I am completely satisfied, item complies with description.

I compare it with Nokian Hakka Green made in 2022 and Yokohama from Malaysia (or Indonesia), I don’t remember it was before Nokian. dimension 205x60R16. Nokian lived for three seasons, ran about 45 tkm. Wear is very large. I drive carefully and this is the first tire that was changed due to wear at such a mileage, usually 65 - 70 tkm. Otherwise, Nokian did not create any problems, as it wore out, it became noisier, in the rain it was average, duble at temperatures below +8 degrees. Yokohama was

Pros
  • Not noisy, good in the rain and on wet pavement, does not tan at temperatures below +10.
Cons
  • If this can be called a disadvantage - the shape of the sidewalls is a little strange, a bagel. Because of this, it seems that it is already than it really is. and the contact patch is possibly smaller., .

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Unsatisfactory, upset by this product.

Has pros: They hold the road well, turn easily into turns, the noise is average, in general they liked them and I could even recommend them, but what went wrong is below Has some cons: Unfortunately, the rear right wheel burst on the track at a speed of 90 km / h, during the inspection, no visible serious damage was found that could lead to such an outcome.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Valuable purchase, nothing but pluses!

The main criteria in choosing tires for me were: 1. Good handling and traction, both in rain and dry weather 2. The presence of a strong sidewall, since the roads are not so hot and for some reason I really don’t like repairing tires. The choice was made in favor of breeches. I have been driving this Japanese-made 205/5516 tires since April this year on kia ceed 2022. From the moment of purchase to this day, I have traveled about 10,000 km, so I have already got some impression of Turanza. Of…

Pros
  • 1. Good handling and traction on both dry and wet pavement 2. Strong sidewall 3. Hydroplaning resistance
Cons
  • 1. Noise, especially on coarse-grained asphalt 2. Harsh when meeting bumps 3. Wear resistance (according to my preliminary calculations, a maximum of 40 thousand km will pass. Not critical, but not supernatural)

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not a bad product, but I expected a little more.

Got pros: The quality of workmanship and the strength of the sidewalls, rutting does not bother much on the track, but it also makes itself felt, balanced characteristics Cons below: noise at speeds after 80, tough for a Citroen C4 with its oak suspension and awful noise

215/60/16. Photo of condition after 5-6 years, ~ 60 thousand. Remaining 1.8-2.3 mm in minimum places. Strong wheel. Rolled both Japanese and French. 2022 did not try. Both are wear-resistant! At least 4 seasons. I have ~ 60 thousand for 6 seasons (I changed my shoes not earlier than in May and for the winter in mid-October - to the detriment of winter ones). I changed shoes for 4 seasons with installation and dismantling - a strong and thick cord, the tire did not deform. It was balanced…

Pros
  • Strength, wear resistance, complete absence of hernias and side cuts for 6 seasons, excellent handling, eats up pits and joints without consequences for the wheel! It balances well
Cons
  • Hard, a little noisy