I bought it as a replacement for the 18-55 kit and was not disappointed. I tested 3 lenses in the store - canon 28-105 f / 3.5-4.5 USM, canon 17-85 f / 4-5.6 IS USM and subject. The subject won, moreover, 17-85, being equal in cost to the subject, and $ 100 more expensive than 28-105, I liked it least of all (I don’t know why - I washed it on test shots). Test shots - in "my photos", in the album "Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS"

As a travel zoom for a beginner photographer, it's one of the best solutions considering its price. A fairly light, comfortable lens that covers 95% of the focal range required by most. When there is nothing to compare with - a very convenient lens that will delight. Of the minuses of operation - it collects dust quite strongly - for a couple of months of not intensive use I caught about 3 dust particles for the front lens. After the purchase of 24-105, 70-200, tokins 11-16, the imperfection

Good glass for every day. The bag doesn't weigh much. Comfortable grip and good weight, which is also in +. With proper use, good quality for the money, it's hard to find something similar with such a spread of F. R. For printing from 10 * 15 to A4, it will do just fine ! Colors, composition, distortions, noises and all buzzwords can be adjusted programmatically. Do you want quality - 2.8 70-200

Despite all the shortcomings, this is a very decent model, especially for the money. This is the best lens for learning and further understanding whether you are ready to vote with a for prettier shots. There is a backlash, over time a bit of a trunk leaves, but it does not affect the "quality". I repeat, with abstaining from auto mode and minimal ideas of "how this works" good photos. Everyone writes about dust! I don’t know, I don’t have it, although I don’t shoot in sterile conditions.…

All the advantages compensate for the shortcomings, a good puff corrects the photo in the room, but it is not suitable for twilight - dark. I immediately bought a protective filter and a lens hood for it to get rid of "injuries" because with such dimensions it often hits something. The only alternative for your money, the best replacement for whale, ideal for reporting, and just do for all occasions. Complete with a fast fifty dollars - a super set :) I am very pleased with the purchase, I have

I took it to replace the whale, there are also 50 1.4 for a 500d crop. FR is just amazing! It draws beautifully only at 100 and higher, there is also a beautiful bokeh, quite sharp! more often than a whale! the color rendition is an order of magnitude better than that of a whale, and even approximately like a fifty dollars. however, it is very difficult to make the background blurred)) in fact, I aim no matter where and the whole frame together with the background turns out to be sharp as…

This is a good lens for: people on a budget beginners in photography tourists. If you don’t expect that having bought a lens for 10000r you will become a super photographer, then it is recommended to purchase the above citizens, the lens is somewhat better in quality than 18-55 kit and has a more convenient range of focal lengths, the only thing that will infuriate you is that in product for $ 300 could not put at least a trunk lock button, it gets out always and everywhere.

Bought complete with 60d to replace 400d + Kit18-55. After several shots in various conditions, I was very disappointed in the new camera - the pictures were blurry . But putting an 18-55 lens from an old 400d for a test, I got sharp pictures. I immediately sold 18-135, it is in demand on the secondary market, I bought 24-105L, now I don’t know any problems. Maybe I came across a low-quality copy, but I don’t advise buying 18-135, it’s better to save up and take a normal lens.

The stabilizer works with a bang, as an "every day" lens is quite suitable. the only thing that seems to me it is a bit dark, I have a Zenith optics, helios 44-2 (f 2), industrial 50-2 (f 3.5) and Jupiter 37A (f3.5) with helios, it is clear that it is lighter, but Jupiter, which is almost the same in size, will be lighter than this canon. I think it is clear to everyone that Zenith optics are much better than this one, but it is not suitable for all shots, and this lens is very good. at 18…

Someone may expect from such a universal zoom the quality of pictures as from L-series fixes, but personally I realized what it was like and I don’t regret the acquisition at all. I am very satisfied with the quality of the Japanese assembly. A very good option for most people who need a camera for the most part just to take pictures on trips and gatherings with friends, as well as for beginner photographers to figure out what they want from a DSLR. I do not like that it does not recognize…

Sometimes 18-55 is better than this one, but each has its own shortcomings and the listed shortcomings may seem like nonsense to an inexperienced user, but I would not buy it. Maybe not all 15-135 lenses have such characteristics as mine, but it remains a fact, maybe someone will come across a good copy. This lens is good for shooting outdoors in good weather, but it doesn't do well indoors, especially in low light.

It was purchased complete with a carcass (I think that the price and quality in a whale is acceptable, with a separate purchase it is not worth the requested money). I’ve been renting them for several months, it seems that preferences are beginning to emerge - for buying fixes. As an initial lens, in my opinion, the best option (at the price at which it is included in the kit).

The lens was taken with the D550 and was my only lens for almost a year. Convenient on trips, as it has a universal range of 18-135, which covers almost all needs: both portrait and landscape! When choosing a camera, I read a lot of negative about 18-55, I took it purposefully from 18-135, which I don’t regret in principle. Of course, you can take a carcass and an elka separately, but for an amateur or a beginner, I think it will be a waste of money.

Good zoom. I took mine with Canon 600D cameras. I liked it more than the STM version, simple convenient glass for everyday tasks, you can’t imagine better to start shooting. Just a huge range of focal lengths, which is very good for walking, and shooting a landscape at 24mm and taking a picture of birds at 135 is also good. It is also convenient for video, produces good images. Well, real focal lengths on the APS-C matrix 29-216, which, again, are amazing values ​​! But still, at the short end,

First experience with SLR cameras. I chose it instead of whale, which I am very glad about. Not only does he have a more serious appearance)) I would say menacing, but also an excellent increase. Sometimes I can't get used to the distance to the subject, especially when shooting macro. But in such cases, you can easily switch to the manual mode, and there will be no problem! I am very pleased!

I use it with 50D. What I like most about glass is that it covers all the necessary FRs, an excellent lens for its price (a new one cost me less than 10,000 on the Internet). For all occasions. Excellent color reproduction, outdoor portraits look very juicy and bright. The hole closes sharply with an increase in FR, because of this it is difficult to use in a dark room without a flash. The focus hits the target in 99 out of 100 cases, it aims at the sun instantly, it gets dull in the dark, but…

I use it with 500D, I take pictures in RAW, people, nature. Photos constantly have to be pulled out by the camera software. If people come out more or less sharply, then nature is disgusting, I'm talking about a focal length of 18-50, I'm thinking about buying a fifty dollars, but the budget, it all depends on it. If you decide to buy, then pay attention to the build quality, they all play, here and there, the question is where is the least. Good luck, all creative success.

I originally bought it as a universal spare lens for holidays. Now it is often used as a universal one for reporting (for work), when you need a very quick change in focal lengths and there is no time to re-stitch, and you are too lazy to carry 2 cameras. At a short focus it “soaps”, but tolerably, at a long focus it often shoots better than 70-200 / 2,8 USM (already bought the 2nd one, but it “soaps” and misses more often - perhaps an unsuccessful sample). Of course, you should not expect a…

I use it with the 500D, as a standard lens, it suits me completely. All lenses have these shortcomings to a greater or lesser extent, and for its price 18-135 works quite well, most of the shortcomings are easily corrected in the editor. I read reviews, some write about "soap soap", I don't know if these are such specimens, maybe the owners have such hands, or maybe they have high expectations. But you can’t demand sharpness from a zoom over 10 thousand as from an L fix. My lathers only at a…

I took it with a k600d whale, then for a long time and strongly I didn’t understand what and how, because a friend who had 18-55 advised me to take exactly 135. Well, of course, at first it didn’t work, but then I began to figure out what and how and I realized that at 135mm I almost and I don’t take pictures, with rare exceptions, at a maximum of 70. I began to understand what f3.5 is and sometimes this is not enough to get what I want. I am writing a review a year after the purchase, and not…