Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
new canon ef-s 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 is standard zoom lens for canon dslr cameras (white box) logo

New Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Standard Zoom Lens for Canon DSLR Cameras (White Box) Review

66

·

Very good

Revainrating 4 out of 5  
Rating 
4.2
👓 Lenses, 📷 Camera & Photo

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(3)
img 1 attached to New Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Standard Zoom Lens for Canon DSLR Cameras (White Box)
img 2 attached to New Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Standard Zoom Lens for Canon DSLR Cameras (White Box)
img 3 attached to New Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Standard Zoom Lens for Canon DSLR Cameras (White Box)

Photos by authors

(1)
img 4 attached to New Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Standard Zoom Lens for Canon DSLR Cameras (White Box)

Details

BrandCanon
Lens TypeTelephoto
Compatible MountingsCanon EF-S
Camera Lens Description135 millimetres
Maximum Focal Length135 Millimeters

Description of New Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Standard Zoom Lens for Canon DSLR Cameras (White Box)

Characteristics of the Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Standard Zoom Lens

The Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Standard Zoom Lens is a versatile and high-quality lens designed specifically for APS-C cameras. With its 18-135mm focal length range and f/3.5-5.6 aperture, this lens provides photographers with flexibility in capturing a wide variety of subjects. The lens features dedicated image stabilization, ensuring sharp and steady images even in challenging shooting conditions. Its lens construction of 16 elements in 12 groups contributes to superior optical performance, delivering clear and deta...

Reviews

Global ratings 66
  • 5
    28
  • 4
    26
  • 3
    9
  • 2
    2
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 4 out of 5

As such, there are no disadvantages, it is convenient to use.

I bought this lens separately, it didn’t come with me in the kit, I made my choice consciously, and over time I got a little disappointed in the purchase, but what it is is what it is. The lens has been serving me for the fourth year already, I mainly use it only for zoom, since it is mediocre at the wide-angle position, the focal lengths that are optimal in terms of sharpness are 24-85mm, I do not recommend using extreme positions, as the sharpness drops. That is, this lens seems to be…

Pros
  • Metal mount. Convenient focus ring. The versatility of this lens is certainly at its best, especially for shooting reportage video, as the conditions are different, and this lens copes well with them. The stabilizer is very good, even at 135mm it holds well, and given that the lens is not fast, the stabilizer is very useful here. Good bokeh already from medium focal lengths.
Cons
  • At the wide-angle position, it is unrealistic to achieve ringing sharpness, you need to cover the aperture, which means lengthening the shutter speed, this is not possible in all shooting conditions. There is no distance scale on the focus ring. The lens sucks dust more powerfully than a vacuum cleaner, filters do not protect in any way. The lens is very large, I had to buy a bag, since the camera with the lens could no longer fit in the old bag, perhaps this is subjective, but the fact is the place to be.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Unsatisfactory, upset by this product.

Got pros: Advantages? ! Probably just the cost and the variety of available focal lengths. With these drawbacks: - soap - worse (well, or at least not better, that's for sure) than whale 18-55, a third of the photographs are full of soap, it' it didn't help, maybe I got such a copy, but this does not make it easier for me to understand what's going on here.

Below are some advantages: Lens durability!:) Despite landing on my pavement, he appeared to have suffered just minor injuries.) As well as its cost. Below are some downsides: 1) The phenomenon of chromatic aberration 2) A lack of clarity, which is notably noticeable when the topic is more than seven meters distant. 3) A bit "soapy" The assembly is not very good; everything is hanging off of it)

The benefits of it include: It was taken with a 500D, and it flawlessly covers the range of distances between 28 and 110 millimeters. Photos may be produced even at 1/4 and 1/6 of a millimeter. Got cons: There is some noticeable HA and roll at the broad end, but Photoshop makes it quite easy to fix both of these issues, as well as the second and third.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

I purchased it to replace the 28-135 because there was no option to get a wide angle lens in addition to that one) and the trunk was outrageously angry at the 28-135 even though of course I want a rapid fix and a telephoto lens in addition to that:) but this lens fulfills the most of my shooting requirements.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like the product, the quality did not disappoint.

I managed to hold the lens rather securely without using a tripod, and although I considered focal lengths up to 200, I decided on 135 with a 1.6 crop "behind the eyes." Of course, what we were able to do was: page=5 :

Pros
  • For me, a not-very-advanced user, the change from 18-55 to 18-135 IS left an indelible impression; the difference is very apparent. I use it with 1100D (I dream of 700D, 750 D) to be able to do it without a tripod at long focal lengths, but the results far exceeded my expectations; lovely bokeh, the trunk doesn't fall out at all, it's also quite good in low light (of course you need
Cons
  • The lid should presumably be tied, but I haven't.

it is necessary to use a sturdy tripod and, if necessary, In the dark, sometimes it focuses poorly - you can use additional illumination with a flashlight or shoot in manual mode. 18 mm is quite enough to shoot landscapes, if not enough, then you can glue a panorama of 2-3 shots, I practically don’t use 135 mm, Ru/users/dukex/albums/

Pros
  • Good lens for your money
Cons
  • Not

Revainrating 3 out of 5

I expected more from the purchase, but not the worst option.

I required a lens that was at the very least comparable to, if not significantly better than, the whale 18-55. At first glance, it appeared as though - wow, how wonderful he is, how wonderful he is! You have the ability to wind the filters, there is a simple focus ring, and (as a result of the proportions), it is much easier to show off in front of the young ladies. But . It's possible that this is the fault of a particular specimen that I came across, but in comparison to a whale, it has the…

Pros
  • Obtains a better approach and appears to be more robust than the whale:)
Cons
  • Unsharp, dark, no trunk retainer.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

I pair it with the Canon 50D. Glass is an amazing lens for its price, and the fact that it covers all of the necessary FRs is what I enjoy best about it (a new one cost me less than 10,000 on the Internet). For every possible situation. Great color reproduction, and outside portraits come across as very luscious and vibrant. Due to the fact that the hole shuts down very quickly when the FR is increased, using it in a dimly lit environment without a flash can be challenging. The focus is…

Pros
  • - universal focal lengths incredibly crisp on a covered aperture even in bright sunlight gorgeous solid appearance (particularly when using the hood) good color reproduction fantastic 4-stage stabilizer
Cons
  • - a vacuum cleaner - darkish - build quality, but again the price compensates for this - noticeable vignetting at the long end - the 18 millimeter barrel is pretty powerful

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Nice price, good quality.

Theft during a vacation: ( If it weren't for this, I probably would have done more with it. Because of the flaws, I won't be making another purchase. Chromaticity is the most important factor! For the price (today you can find one for 11,000), you can purchase a lens that is fairly adequate for photography. Given 5.6 at a long focus, I used it without UV protection, and it did save a little bit of energy. Pros: The sharpness is substantially sharper, and the lens is lighter than the bulky 18-55

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for money, one of the best offers.

I needed a high-quality alternative to the soap dish, so I purchased it in early August 2022 along with the 550D as a universal lens for all occasions. I made the purchase because I was looking to replace the soap dish. The lens is quite effective at performing its function. It is imperative that we keep in mind that there is no such thing as universal quality or anything else, particularly for such money. If you rely on photography as your primary source of income, you should consider…

Pros
  • adaptability, a price that is pretty reasonable, an integrated stabilizer, and a rapid autofocus system.
Cons
  • photos that aren't very clear at a long focus (I tried using a tripod and the self-timer, but it didn't help), a tiny backlash, and sometimes the trunk can slightly move out by itself under its weight if the camera is turned with the lens down.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good product, I recommend that you try it.

Has pros: I bought the price for 6 thousand. I work out my money in full. It lathers a little at 18-24, everything else works well in tandem with a cheap fix 50 mm 1.8 Some cons: It soaps a little at 18-24, everything else is fine, but I would not call this a disadvantage for cheap glass.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Cool product, happy with the purchase, maybe I'll buy it again.

The lens was included with the 60D purchase (KIT). I made a conscious decision to go with this particular lens because. Since I upgraded to a DSLR from a 12x ultrazoom, I was looking for a replacement lens with comparable capabilities. I didn't want to burden myself by bringing along a large number of lenses. To a certain extent, content with the lens. With time, I became accustomed to its shortcomings, and as a consequence, I am satisfied with the quality of the photographs it produces…

Pros
  • The appearance of being solid. Excellent picture quality even at the distant end. Production of lenses of the highest quality (Taiwan).
Cons
  • The barrel and the pillow, in addition to being powerful at short focal lengths. But, it is dark. The 60D is successful in some way. Autofocus that is both sluggish and noisy. Manual focus control requires some practice because the ring used to adjust focus is located a considerable distance from the camera.

As a regular lens, I use it with the 500D, and I find that it works perfectly for me. All lenses suffer from these issues to a more or lesser degree; nonetheless, the 18-135 performs fairly well considering its price point, and the most of these issues can be easily fixed in post-production software. I read reviews, and some of them mentioned something called "soap soap." I don't know if these are actual specimens; perhaps the owners have particularly large hands, or perhaps they have very high

Pros
  • - convenient focal lengths - crisp at nearly all of the available focal lengths - great stabilizer - reasonable pricing
Cons
  • froths at a broad 45 degree angle - it gets darker along the frame's edges as it moves toward the long end - HA

It was necessary for me to replace the whale, and there are also 50 1.4 lenses for a cropped 500d. FR is absolutely fantastic! It only draws beautifully at 100 and above, and there is also a beautiful bokeh and quite a sharpness to it! a frequency comparable to that of a whale! The color reproduction is even about comparable to a fifty dollar bill, despite being an order of magnitude better than that of a whale. However, it is very challenging to get the background to blur. In fact, no matter…

Pros
  • superior to a whale by a factor of ten in every way.
Cons
  • does not draw as a fix)

I used a K600D whale to take the picture, and afterward, for a very long time and to the fullest extent, I didn't understand what and how it was done, because a buddy of mine who owned an 18-55 told me to use exactly 135 for the exposure. Now, of course, at first it didn't work, but then I began to figure out what and how, and I found that at 135mm I nearly never shoot images at a maximum of 70, with only a few exceptions. I started to grasp the concept of f3.5, but I've found that it's not…

Pros
  • The most important quality for individuals who are lazy is adaptability. Televisions are not taken into consideration in any way!
Cons
  • dark.

In spite of all of its flaws, this is still a very respectable machine, particularly when considering the price. This is the best lens for learning and further understanding whether you are ready to vote with a for prettier shots. If you want prettier shots, vote with an. Backlash occurs, and over the course of time, a small portion of the trunk falls off, although this does not damage the "quality." I again restate that good images can be taken without using the auto mode and with only a few…

Pros
  • 1 Value for money 2 The range of available focal lengths 3 Acceptable performance under enough illumination 4 Diameter of the lens
Cons
  • 1 Soap 2 Noises 3 HA is frequently used, particularly when combined with P. No. 2 4 Dark. A flash from the outside should be used inside, but the sun should be used outside! 5 The autofocus fails frequently. 6 Anything has a negative impact