Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Standard Zoom Lens: Perfect for Canon DSLR Cameras Review

Initially, I bought a lens because the zoom was sorely lacking, and I shot 18-55 I don’t know about you - but for me the trunk lock button only works for the 18 hood separately, with flash, Focal was 130 Jpg http://cs407730 Me/v407730242/bf3d/sMwCiCnybu8 Jpg http://cs407730 Me/v407730242/bef5/f00i6k5 Jpg http://cs407730 Me/v407730242/be2f/M4 Jpg

Unbiased insights on this purchase.A good lens, so I don’t advise them to shoot parties (flash helps out) they are equipped with 50D, on the third day after purchase),

With its pros: but only in some cases (if you move far away from the person and get very close) there is also a manual one. Some cons: It may not always convey colors, but since this is a TELE lens, it was not originally calculated for this.

Used 4 the first year the picture was tastier, the lens lock is folded :( It’s better not to take it in aquariums, but shots with a shutter speed of less than 1/25 from my hands seemed blurry to me.

A great model to start a career as a young photographer! focuses quickly enough, if it fails to focus, it continues to try to implement it! Well, for the Kitov model, distortion and chromatic aberration are quite normal, I do a little barrel in the background, but all this is nonsense to begin with! And yes, the price is great Has pros: overlapping focal length from 18 to 200 is sorry 2 lenses ! smart enough, comfortable, pleasant, relatively light, does not up dust very much, easy to use and…

Its pros: Accurate and fast focusing. On focus very rarely makes mistakes. Good luminosity. Has cons: At the long end, in low light, it lathers. The tube moves out under its own weight.

Different pros: Excellent focal length (11x!), there is an image stabilizer, quite clear. Different cons: Heavy, the "trunk" constantly leaves, does not focus at dusk and also on close objects.

Some pros: Very pleased with the quality of the pictures. It seemed that it was even better than 18-55 :) You can shoot from a fairly large distance) Cons below: When you shoot from a long distance, it can take a long time to catch the focus. Sometimes, if you shoot without a flash, everything is blurry.

I opted to purchase a lens after realizing that the 18–55mm focal length range was grossly inadequate for my photography needs. The Canon 450D provides the body. I don't know whether this is the case for you, but the only button that actually locks my trunk is the 18mm one. This company routinely uses antiquated equipment. Unfortunately, the EW-78D hood was not included in the sale, but it is a must-have for me. Since the lens's diameter isn't the narrowest it might be, employing the flash…

In spite of all the negatives, let it be. Yet, extremely specialized lenses are an absolute necessity for creative endeavors. The advantages of it include the following: As a travel lens for lazy newbies like myself, not bad. It is unfortunate that you are unable to put 3+ because the pull for the complete four does not work. The image quality is comparable to that of my whale 18-55, but it's not quite as good. Absolutely not for those who make their living doing it! But, alternatively, you may

Bought for 50D. There were no problems. A good option for the average/newbie photographer. I recommend taking it on trips. Has pros: Wide focal length range, versatility (no need to change lenses). Stabilizer (by the way, it works really well). Easy to use (ideal for a beginner). It gives quite good images (not like an "Elka", of course, but for its price it draws very decently). Not heavy. Has cons: In some situations, there is not enough aperture, but not critical. The trunk comes out…

Before that, I went with a similar Sigma. Earth and sky - Canon is many times sharper in the open than Sigma at 8-9, colors are not distorted, focus is faster, stub is better. A real travel zoom, a very handy thing on any trip. Repulsed my desire to carry over the hill 24-70 and 70-200. With its pros. Range. 11x is strong and comfortable. Normal design - nothing backlashes and does not leave, although this could be expected with such a length of the trunk. The stub performs 3-4 steps…

In general, I am satisfied with the lens. Particularly pleased with a good stabilizer and FR range. But 2 zooms with complementary FRs give a much better result. Has pros: 1) Stabilizer. 2) The design is not bad, but it is far from decent glasses. The mount is metal, everything else is plastic. Its cons: 1) FR range. It is worth elucidating here. Even after the purchase, I noticed that the picture after 135 MM FR almost does not change, but I considered that these were my nit-picking and…

The model fully meets the needs and requirements of not professionals, but people like me - inquisitive beginners of the middle class))) I advise recommend! Good luck and good photography! With its pros. I can not yet boast of "advancement" in matters of photography, but curiosity and the desire to learn how to take good pictures drives me. I bought this lens to replace the 18-55 lens that came with the Canon 450D camera. Connoisseurs understand the difference))) It is very convenient for…

An ideal solution for beginners, amateurs, and just for those places where you can’t take two or three glasses. After buying a telephoto and portrait lens, I use this glass exclusively for the sake of a wide angle. Camera Canon 50D. Has pros: Canon's only truly versatile lens. In the presence of autofocus and a stabilizer - with such a aperture without it, nowhere. Small, light, cheap. Allows you to create frames that are creatively smeared around the edges, when you change the zoom back and…

Its pros: With all its large range of focal length, it gives an excellent deep picture, there are almost no chrome, the stub is just super (at 1/10 you can really take a clear picture with your hands) Cons below: on the extreme focus. distance gives a small barrel, at 18mm with a built-in flash at the bottom of the picture, a shadow from the edge of the lens (it is long, but at 24mm and more everything is fine)

Despite all the cons, so be it. But, for creativity, highly specialized lenses are definitely needed. Different pros: As a travel lens for lazy beginners like me, not bad. It is a pity that you can not put 3+, because the whole 4 does not pull. The image quality is somewhat better than my whale 18-55. Certainly not for professionals! But, or a set of lenses for all shooting situations, or if you need to shoot quickly and not really thinking about quality - 18-200. But, there is an opportunity…

good choice, I'm happy as an elephant, the trace model will be 24-105) but first she needs to shoot, but will there be a difference) /? With its pros. great copy, good zoom, you can compare with 28-135, but the picture is better, and the wide-angle range. inappropriate to carry 2 (was 17-85 and 100-300) now there is no need to change glasses 10 times a day. universal, ideal for the hobbyist Has some cons weight, when used indoors, 17-85 would be better suited. on the range of 17 it lathers…

A good lens, but miracles do not happen. In extreme positions, I do not advise shooting. Sometimes it misses by 18 mm if you want to shoot a person against the backdrop of an architectural object. A bit dark, so I don’t advise them to shoot parties (flash helps out). But for the zoom, I consider the aperture ratio acceptable. Indispensable on a journey instead of a set of fixes! Or for those who have not decided yet. Still, they are equipped with 50D, and this is already a serious technique.

I took it to the mountains . everything that he shot requires a very long processing in the shop, it is unrealistic to sculpt panoramas, you have to pick each photo, and then sew, I think if a beginner buys this zoom, then either the shop or the glass will beat off the craving for photography . although if you teach to photograph an urka at gunpoint, then this is the most))))) newbie! take something else, but remember, there is nothing better than a fix,)) PS: I sold it in tandem with 450D…