I chose between Canon EF 24-70f (2.8L USM) and this model. Having lost in aperture ratio, I received a larger range of focal lengths and decent cost savings. The lens stands on the Canon EOS550D crop as a staff member, suitable for all types of shooting, for all occasions: "And to the feast, and to the world, and to good people." You can fight all his "childhood illnesses": by holding down the aperture, raising the ISO, and yes, the professionals will forgive me: Flash has not been canceled…

External puff is needed, because. at 24mm, a shadow from the lens hood remains in the frame - but these are trifles, a protective filter is also needed, because. The 77mm lens just begs to be scratched)))). There is a small back focus, I will adjust it programmatically through 50D. I have long wanted to buy this glass for myself. Convenient focal length, easy in comparison with other L-kami - analogues. That min. FR-24, so it suits me quite well, because I don’t need a pronounced barrel on a…

the red strip L is given undeservedly, in general, everything that is darker than 2.8 should not be awarded L! I use technology professionally, I think that high-quality optics should be plastic (read fast). This lens, according to the "none" pattern, does not roll on artistic pictures under any sauce. The exception is shooting in the studio, when you need to "so that everything is sharp" . Well, travel.

bought instead of 15-85, which cost me 22k. This one came out in 28k. to be honest, I thought that I was changing the awl for soap, but the difference turned out to be so huge that absolutely everyone noticed it with absolutely naked eyes. not always a plus, in fact, not everyone likes portraits now, all the small hairs on the face, all the wrinkles and so on have become visible. I use 60D on the crop, the focal length at the end is 170mm and f4, the portraits are gorgeous.

Great lens for all occasions! Its main advantage is versatility. I used to use it with 400D, now I use it with 5D mark II. Of course, this lens is designed for full frame, but at such a high resolution (22MP) chromatic aberration is noticeable. I think if you use it with a device with a lower resolution (for example, 5D), then this problem will not be. Despite the minor flaws, very pleased with it, not going to change it anytime soon!

This is a great professional reportage lens. I like it because of its versatility, reliability and predictable results. I saw reviews here complaining about "unsharpness" - guys, there are no unsharp lenses in Canon's professional line. After the purchase, any autofocus glass must be dragged to the official service for alignment along with the "carcass"! The stabilizer is excellent, it fully compensates for the "darkish" f/4 aperture. I recommend it to everyone - for full frame and crop - as

I shot a lot on it, both on the street and in the studio and reporting . the amount of marriage was reduced almost to its absence, it focuses smartly, unlike my other glasses (18-55, 50 \ 1.8, 55-250) misses 1 per hundred. and that is my fault. Alas, the sharpness is not enough . the colors are good. Ergonomics are on top, but the zoom ring could have been made thicker. I took a new one, made firmly, the rings go tight. Heavy but that's just +

There are a lot of comments, as I understand it, from experienced seasoned photographers who often find fault with this glass, confusing beginners like me. I tell the same beginners - this is a great glass! I shoot on 500D - the difference between a whale lens and this one is indescribable. Those. Feels like it's 2 different cameras. The lens is pleasant to the touch, focuses quickly and almost never misses, excellent colors, sharpness, fairly high (compared to a whale) aperture and a…

I use it on crop, the range of focal lengths covers almost all needs. For interior shooting there is a width. Most of the time, this lens is on the carcass. Sharpness is very good, although worse than that at 70-200/4 IS. The lens hood is not the most successful, in my opinion, it should have been made deeper, although in FF it could have entered the frame. I can’t share such enthusiastic reviews about this lens - rather, it’s just a good, solid lens for every day, not much outstanding, but at…

I'll tell you in detail here. I switched to it immediately with the purchase of FF after the crop: I purchased it in a kit configuration from 6d. Before that it was 600d and 17-55,2,8. I expected a huge difference, but despite the fact that I am very impressionable, I was even disappointed: after the first wedding he shot, almost all the pictures taken indoors went to the marriage. There are more stray colors than when using a cropped kit. Some gray shades come out where they were not there…

A normal workhorse, in fact, they can be used both as a portrait painter and as a landscape painter and as a telephoto camera, in fact glass for all occasions. Took for weddings, photo shoots and "cultural photography". In fact, the best of the "universal lenses". Of course, there is the next move 24-70 F4 IS, perhaps the next move, but the overpriced price is IMHO too much, and the reviews about it are ambiguous, and it also has flaws, so if we put the hierarchy of Kenon universal lenses…

I have long wanted to write about this lens. I think that one of the most underrated Canon lenses. The lens is only for full-frame cameras - that's for sure! He owned a crop - the lens was at the level of a cheap whale zoom. On the full frame, the picture appeared, and sharpness, and bokeh - in short, all the strengths. It is indispensable as a universal reportage and studio zoom for both the photographer and the videographer. This is my very first lens that I bought for crop. And the only one…

"wider! and longer!" - for dilettantes. "Not a big aperture"? 4 - relative hole. What's this? Not everyone knows. "Despite the presence of a stabilizer, it is better not to use it." Pearl on pearl! Illiterate, funny. Whether you need this lens or not is up to you. No one is allowed to try before buying. Ask the professionals? There is only one answer: - "How without it?"

The lens is great. In reportage shooting is irreplaceable. In portraits, she is sharp and plastic. This is my third L-ka - having tried L once, it is already impossible to refuse. Many people write about the instability of the quality. Perhaps I was lucky, but I deliberately took it from the whale, it turned out to be sharp from 4 and without fronts and backs in the entire range! The stabilizer helps a lot - if the object is motionless, then I get a cut of 1/13, of course, from my hands. I use…

It makes sense to buy this lens for full-frame shooters, or for those who plan to switch to it soon. For those who stop at the crop, there is an excellent 17-55 / 2.8 IS lens. Both 24-xx L-zooms lose their wide angle on the crop, which makes them unsuitable for “regular” use. 24-105 makes sense to compare only with 24-70, as it is the closest to it in class and price. It is not worth comparing it with budget zooms like 28-135, this is a technique of a different class, therefore, in the pros…

Bought in tandem with 5D Mark II and shot for six months. As a travel zoom, it is good, versatile, covers the current focal lengths. But from the point of view of creative photography, I like luminous lenses more. So I sold it and bought a 135mm f/2. The role of the staffer is played by 50mm f / 1.4, so aperture 4 was simply not enough for me, and I am a supporter of fixes. When buying, he was paired with a mark at a good discount, otherwise he would not have bought for that kind of money

My copy is 5 years old - there is not a speck of dust and I shot it in the rain, everything is fine. I recently switched from 60D to 6D and the problem with aperture ratio has practically disappeared (FF is FF). If a responsible frame, make sure and shoot in the RAF in parallel. There is also fifty dollars 1,4, but you won’t achieve ringing sharpness from it, as from 24-105 even in manual mode and in RAF, you can tighten up the color rendition no worse than fifty dollars, so 95% use it (5%…

a month ago I bought a 50D kit EF-S 18-200 3.6-5.6 IS a month later I realized that my 18-200 (I can’t say anything bad about it) does not reach the sharpness that I would like. sold them within a few weeks and took EF 24-105 f/4L IS USM instead. It was difficult, of course, to move from 200 mm to 105 mm, especially since I am fond of reportage shooting. I even thought about taking 24-70, but it's already too short (for me personally) and even without a stabilizer. but, in general, the…

The lens is good, but I want to draw attention to the problem with the stabilizer. Maybe it's just my lens. With the aperture (4) open, the stabilizer works as it should. If we set the aperture to any other value, for example 10, then the images with the stabilizer on are blurred. Pictures with IS off are generally better than those with IS on. The image in the viewfinder after each shot is shifted to the side and its stabilizer, within 1 second after the shot, returns to the original focus…

I have been using the 5D for about 2 years. I took it from a friend, and in the fall I bought it for myself. My friend, in the presence of a very large fleet of lenses, completely refused to sell me his own. I took a used lens via the Internet with a production date just February 2022, when, according to reviews, there were complaints about the work of the stub. A comprehensive check did not reveal any shortcomings, the glass is absolutely working. I took a Canon EF 28-135mm f / 3.5-5.6 IS USM…