Pros
- 1. New DualPixel autofocus technology (in video and LiveView mode). Now it has become realistic to use autofocus on a DSLR. Very fast and accurate, without any yaws and jerks. Tracking mode - weigh! And with STM lenses, it's just so chic: quiet and fast! 2. Rotary and touch screen. For shooting video, as well as for taking photos from a low or high point, it is simply irreplaceable. Moreover, the quality of the sensor itself is beyond praise, as on modern smartphones! 3. Ability to adjust autofocus (adjustment) for several lenses separately. 4. High working ISO, even at 3200 is acceptable. Noise, of course, but not fatal. 5. Comfortable grip. When compared with the three-digit models from Canon, in which my little finger constantly dangled in the air. 6. Excellent, large and bright viewfinder, again, when compared with three-digit models. 7. Autofocus system (through the viewfinder) from the older model. Multipoint, fast and very accurate. 8. Convenient control.
Cons
- 1. Lack of 60 fps in FullHD mode. 2. WiFi… Some kind of useless… In video mode, you can’t start shooting. Yes, and control from a smartphone / tablet is somehow meager . You can, of course, use the DSLR Controller for Android (the video still won’t start). 3. No focus peaking. Such a trifle, but very comfortable. 4. No headphone output. 5. Shutter priority/aperture priority modes do not work when shooting video. Only fully manual (M), or full automatic (P). 6. There is no dedicated button on the case for white balance (you can’t even assign it) . Only through “Q”. 7. Does not remember the last settings for photos and videos separately (they are common). Partially solved by the "C" mode. 8. No built-in intervalometer for time lapses. Resolved by DSLR Controller.
Pros
- - Ergonomics of older models. - High rate of fire for a camera of this class. - Excellent autofocus (by points, by zones, manual point selection, manual adjustment). Quick. Very fast. - The highest convenience of shooting video and picture quality. - Wide and informative viewfinder. - Touch screen.
Cons
- - Own battery grip. - Wifi not very clear
Pros
- touch screen, flip screen
Cons
- no BB button, automatic BB options are all brown !, heavy and large, somehow not of high quality to the touch
Pros
- - The new autofocus mechanism in LiveView mode is just awesome - Flip-down display, convenient to take off and hold the device with your hands at a distance. - Convenient touchscreen on the folding display. - Good picture at high iso. Approached closely to full-frame models. - Competent implementation of Wi-Fi
Cons
- - One SD card slot - Weak built-in flash, like on previous crops. Doesn't work well in dark rooms. Built-in flashes on Nikons work an order of magnitude better, no worse than an external head-on flash.
Pros
- Excellent autofocus, very good Live View mode, well, in general, read the reviews.
Cons
- No
Pros
- The swivel touch screen is incredibly convenient. The quality of the photos is very good, maybe because I always shoot only in RAW. Light weight is very important when traveling.
Cons
- Video shooting is not very convenient, but you can shoot if you want. A year later, the built-in flash stopped popping up, although I almost never use it, but it's still unpleasant.
Pros
- - excellent autofocus with face tracking - rotary touch screen, focusing on the selected point on the screen - the model is still relevant and gives good quality material - non-stop video recording up to 30 min. split into 4GB files without spaces - support for alternative firmware Magic Lantern - digital zoom 3-10x - full working ISO up to 1600 - a common type of battery among the main product line XXD and XD - the ability to adjust various lenses for front-back focus using camera software - built-in flash allows you to control external flashes - good Auto BB
Cons
- - the video start button has a too deep stroke, i. E. when pressed, there is a chance that the recording will not start. - when using digital zoom 3-10x, autofocus does not work - in the alternative ML firmware, there are no sound path settings at all. - in M mode, it is impossible to set different shooting parameters for video and photo, switching from video to photo does not change the exposure - poor location of the built-in microphones towards the operator - lacks more fine-tuning of autofocus for specific tasks - the built-in flash can overheat in the "machine gun" mode and the device will write you "busy" - there is no BB quick setting button, only two hands can be reached - the face in profile is not recognized and the focus may be lost
Pros
- 1. The main thing is that the new matrix still turned out great. All sorts of dual-pixels, etc. I don’t care deeply and forever, but the detailing has become better, and the working ISO 6400 is excellent! For printing in a good format, it's still bad, but for the web, it's more than enough. 2. Swivel screen - very convenient for macro and in general for shooting from all sorts of wild positions - from below, from the ground, upwards, to the corner, etc . 3. AF - turned out to be unexpectedly accurate and accurate. 4. Lightweight. In principle, a double-edged sword, but for an amateur with "ordinary" glasses, it's rather good. 5. AF adjustment - relevant for all sorts of buggy sigmas. 6. Precise exposure metering. In any case, even when focusing on the sides, the percentage of undershoots did not go beyond the acceptable range. This makes me happy. 7. Fast buffer - the more pleasant that it is unexpected.
Cons
- 1. Rate of fire. Both the card format and the small buffer are cons for me. SD, of course, is convenient for its versatility, but I do not like them. And you can’t shoot long series, the camera hangs. 2. Ergonomics and control. The device, in principle, is normal, I got used to it quickly, but not very well. Menu control for younger boxes is kind of the norm, but the wheels are still more convenient. 3. The plastic is easily soiled, a couple of days of intensive shooting in the outdoors - everything is wiped, dusty, the box looks like it was lying in the dust for half a year. Although it is well made - no cracks, backlashes. 4. There is no AF backlight - it is very strange, it does not interfere much, but bewilderment remains. 5. When shooting handheld with a fast telephoto lens, there is no balance, support is necessary. 6. Shutter speed 1/8000, of course, is sometimes needed - after all, crop, it’s a sin not to shoot in the open, the depth of field allows. But - no, twist the filters.
Pros
- A modern DSLR with a bunch of useful gadgets: - touch rotary screen; - Wi-Fi; - diopter corrector; - the device quickly turns on - turn the lever and you can immediately shoot; - focuses quickly and well - you press the button without delay in the middle, right away - it catches everything perfectly; - capacious battery, enough for a long time; - an excellent choice of settings, modes, etc. For example, it is convenient for me that by setting RAW + JPEG, you can separately select the quality for each format. I have the highest quality RAW, and the JPEG quality is S2 (1920x1280), as a preview, enough to see, and the disk clutters less than when you select only the general quality, like many manufacturers, when you put the best quality RAW and get in gipegi gift for 20-30 MB; - many different other useful bells and whistles; - excellent color rendition - I shoot pictures with scales, and practically do not have to correct, it conveys color one to one; - acceptable price.
Cons
- - He loves light, without it it makes noise, so if you are too lazy to work with noise reduction, you can not set ISO more than 400. At 6400, noise reduction does not help either; - Just like all other devices, both Canon and other manufacturers, it doesn't make coffee, it doesn't vacuum the floor, there is no "Masterpiece" button, you have to work with your head and hands to get a good shot.
Pros
- - good AF - touchscreen, flip screen - convenient management
Cons
- - heats up in Lifeview and when shooting video - you can get used to the rest
Pros
- Easy to manage; Very well assembled. The sound of pressing buttons and scrolling wheels is not audible at all. Nice touch; Large capacity battery (1800 mAh). The same, for example, in 5D mark III; Quick transition between photo and video modes; Focuses very fast Availability of weather protection; Thanks to the location of the large battery in the grip, holding the camera in your hand is very convenient; Displaying the electronic level in the viewfinder. It helps a lot to not overwhelm the pictures.
Cons
- The "CA" mode, as it was, remained useless (filmed on the 600D). The settings are not saved.
Pros
- After 1100 - the feeling that he moved from Zaporozhets to Mercedes.
Cons
- Didn't find it. The only thing I would like to wish the developer is to make a standard battery that would fit different models. And then every photo is a new battery.
Pros
- they don’t exist . maybe those who have nothing to compare with write positive reviews, I changed companies - I was completely disappointed in kenon .
Cons
- I read reviews and bought it. it doesn't fit perfectly for photos. autofocus is fast, but there is absolutely no clarity in this place. image quality is worse than in previous models. all photos are yellow, faces are all brown. clarity no. no brightness. no saturation. no contrast.
Pros
- Flip-down swivel screen. High definition, picture quality. Good even at high ISO. Decently writes video, with good sound even without a separate microphone. High-speed continuous shooting. Lots of focus points.
Cons
- Heavy, but in principle, she knew what she was getting into.
Pros
- Very cool video camera (I was not mistaken - video camera) for such money. I would have appeared a little earlier I would not have bought myself a now unnecessary Sony nx70p . for shooting very dynamic scenes (wedding ransom or something like that) Autofocus is just a buzz, the eyes do not strain to look at the screen and think whether I got into the sharpness zone or not (after all, when shooting a video, everything is twisted into a minus-picture is very faded). With 24 -105 an excellent bunch is obtained.
Cons
- For me, no, only the delight of this product.
Pros
- Moved from 600D The main, in my opinion, why it can be chosen: 1. Large viewfinder compared to the 600D (not bright: it is very similar in brightness to the 600-ku; Nikon, by the way, has lighter viewfinders). But only with the 600D and other entry-level DSLRs. The numbers of coverage percentages and increases indicated by manufacturers, to be honest, do not reflect anything. After 70 matches in 600 you look like through a keyhole. And he immediately compared it with 6D . and so, if you need a LARGE viewfinder - you go there, you can see EVERYTHING in it, the viewfinder seems to be 1.5 times larger. Although, we must pay tribute, in the 70-ke it is already possible to aim manually with a shallow depth of field. 2. Functionality - almost everything in terms of shooting that you can dream of. 3. Rate of fire. The buffer is large, but for long series in RAV you still need a fast SD card. 5. Battery capacity compared to the younger model. If you do not use the main screen, you forget about frequent charging. When shooting for yourself enough for 2-3 weeks. 6. Video on STM lenses has become really convenient: tracking, autofocus - quietly, smoothly and accurately. 7. Touch screen is responsive. Macro photography made simple with touch focus. 8. Prog EOS-Remote with Wi-fi. Although you expect more functionality from it. 9. Precise exposure metering. 10. The carcass is more comfortable for an average male hand, with a slight increase in the weight of the device. 11. Nimble built-in SD card controller. The case when throwing off a photo is much faster by connecting the carcass with a wire. Although I used to always use a card reader. 12. Again in this line there is a fine adjustment of the focus of the lenses - you can not depend on the jambs of Sigma and alignment services. The noisiness of the matrix is not much - by a step - but still improved. On older 18-megapixel sensors, black started to turn purple from ISO 6400, and at 12800 it was generally a mess. Here ISO 6400 has become practically working, color reproduction suffers little due to noise, details almost do not disappear, 12800 is tolerable (we are talking about RAW).
Cons
- 1. Dust on the mirror and the matrix has become a frequent guest. Previously, I owned only entry-level DSLRs, and I didn’t often encounter such a nuance on them. I suspect the reason is in the large mirror, which is located close to the mount cutoff, as a result of which it constantly catches garbage during lens changes. On younger models, it is smaller and deeper. I had to get acquainted with a pear for cleaning. And after changing the lens, it will not be superfluous to turn off and turn on the camera so that it shakes off the matrix. 2. Trouble for owners of Tamron lenses with a mechanical drive, such as 17-50 f / 2.8. Autofocus in liveview and video is buggy. If you focus manually - no problem. On the machine, it starts to crawl back and forth and after 1-2 seconds the carcass loses contact with the lens. It is treated by turning it off and on. 3. Many complain about the lack of a white balance button (WB). For some reason, Canon thought this was an extremely rarely used feature. The main thing is that it is NOT in the list of those functions that can be reassigned to different buttons! And to access - you need to keep the main screen on. 4. Compatibility with external flashes of third-party brands - Nissin Di622 of the first revision did not work in any mode. Only slave from built-in. 5. The image noise is noticeably higher than that of the direct competitor Nikon D7100, the dynamic range also lags behind. The progress in picture quality is noticeable only when switching from older 18-megapixel models.
Pros
- 1) Excellent autofocus! 2) In video mode, focusing is super ! combined with a touch screen is a pleasure! Smooth and accurate! 3) Rate of fire 4) Very convenient connection to WI-FI, works great with an apple. set up the fotik once, enjoy! 5) Powerful noise reduction 6) Very convenient control! 6) and much more has already been described in the reviews
Cons
- one)! same noise level as 60d (everything is of course relative, see comments)
Pros
- Ergonomics, controls and menus are comfortable and familiar, like all Canon, I didn’t have to relearn from the 650D. Operation with only one right hand. The ability to customize for yourself, quick control of zones and focus points and other settings. Programmable mode C. Excellent adjustment for every lens. Top screen with buttons. You can turn off the main screen completely, which I do. 20 megapixels is very enough, no more is needed. RAW processing in the device with the possibility of applying artistic effects. Multiple exposure is an interesting feature, I tried it, but so far I haven’t applied it adequately. There is little noise, I limited auto ISO as much as 6400, but I shoot in RAW. The built-in flash can work as a master flash for external ones. I can’t understand why Canon doesn’t put built-in flashes on FF cameras for at least the same purpose. Capacious battery, especially when the display is off. Dust and moisture protection. Tried only in light drizzle, no problems. But I also used lenses without such protection, there were no problems either. Good autofocus performance, not even with STM lenses. Well, and a convenient swivel touch screen, which for some reason really interferes with ascetic whiners.
Cons
- Cons: As HDR did not work in the 650D, it does not work on this one. There is only one programmable mode C. And you need two. Or three. One SD card slot. We are behind our competitors. Autofocus illumination with a flash, and red-eye with a separate lamp. I think it would be more logical to do the opposite.
