Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 69
  • 5
    27
  • 4
    8
  • 3
    14
  • 2
    8
  • 1
    12

Type of review

Revainrating 2 out of 5

I didn't see good quality, solid disadvantages.

Listened to a friend, bought. Only the price pleases. The first 5000 held the water, it seemed to be quiet. Then how they changed it. You need to catch along the track, entering a puddle you can fly away to the side, it became noisy (more and more with wear). Enough for 50 thousand. I do not recommend for foreign cars.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Satisfied with the product, I recommend it to everyone.

I went to Michelin Energy for many years, I got used to it, I know its habits and features, I decided to buy a new cordiant sport 3 to try, it immediately caught my eye that it slows down very badly, abs works, there was no such thing on Michelin, the braking distance increased probably 1.5 times , at the start, even with a little gas on clean asphalt, a squeal! I keep the pressure according to the passport - 2.2 atm. Excellent in ruts in puddles! Doesn't swim at all! Holds up well in corners…

Pros
  • inexpensive, good anti-aquaplaning, modern look, cornering stability, good sidewall
Cons
  • poor grip, poor brakes, skidding at the start

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is top notch, be sure to try it.

Some pros: Inexpensive, fairly quiet, speed index V Definitely better than the Chinese. Holds the road, does not wag much in a rut, slows down in the rain. Has cons: Naturally heavy and curve, balanced + 40-50 grams per wheel. Considering the price, there are no cons.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Nothing unusual, normal product.

The price is certainly less than that of competitors, but in return you get a lot of noise from the wheels and the question of quality, think about it ! It seems like a guarantee appeared at Cordiant and their representative offices, the same as that of Nokian. When buying, specify if the wheels become square whether they can be handed over ! I also have a winter set of Cordiant Snow Cross, I am completely satisfied with winter tires, there is not a noise and a hook like khaki 7 !

Pros
  • Wear resistance at a height xs what needs to be done to erase it .
Cons
  • The quality of the rubber is terrible - hum and noise, the wheels are square ! I don’t recommend it to anyone - I don’t mean square wheels, but actually out of 4 wheels - 3 curves, the square rubber itself can be seen on the balancing machine !

Revainrating 1 out of 5

The product is absolutely worthless, don't buy it.

Thought I'd be lucky, but alas. there was no money, so I decided to buy cheap wheels. bought. The store did a tire fitting. They began to balance. First wheel 0/40 second 0/40 third 15/25 fourth 5/75! I say, damn it, let's do something. Turned the rubber relative to the disk, it became 25/15. Well, it seems to be better. I went. Super! softly, quietly, after crooked bald Michelins it's nice to ride. And joyful, I went to check how they are at speed. Amazing! Overclocked to 120, the steering…

Pros
  • Price, availability
Cons
  • Curves and more curves, balancing does not help

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like it, thanks for the quality product.

They stood on the Camry for 2 years (16-18 g), put it on the Lexus Es250 r17 55 × 215 (on both cars). During the entire period of operation there are no problems. Quiet, soft, but keep the road. Up to 140 km it is very comfortable, over 180 it blows a little So, addition May 2022: I support everything that I wrote earlier. A very decent tire. Quiet, holds up to 140 well, is not afraid of aquaplaning, brakes well on dry pavement, you need to keep your distance on wet pavement, because it is…

Pros
  • Quiet, well kept in the rain, dry excellent. Good wear resistance. One of the best in its price range Changed 11/10/22: Durability could be better.
Cons
  • Haven't noticed in 2 years. The only thing is that do not pump, otherwise it will eat the middle. Changed 11/10/22: full wear on 2 wheels (pictured), standing on the front end. Flaking of the sides after 2 years and 40-45 t/km. Price in 2023 for 7tr, which eats up the pros. Not intended for soil and wet grass - there will be no hook.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Mediocre goods, most likely I will not use.

For the money, tires can, and nothing, but the handling is clearly lame. In heavy rains you ride like skating. More or less dry. Those who say that the tires are good, they themselves write that they compare sorry with Kama. And when compared with tires not for flowerbeds, but for driving - very mediocre, I set myself 2 seasons ago instead of bald Yokohama, honestly - the bald Jap coped with the task better.

Pros
  • Price
Cons
  • Weak handling, wear

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A valuable purchase, some advantages!

Has some pros: The rubber is in good contact with the road surface. I drove 1500 km on it, including a section with a bad road near Gavrilov Yam. Also tested in heavy rains at the intersection of Hong Kong, Hong Kong and Hong Kong regions. I bought the kit out of emergency, maybe Pirelli bought it from my hands earlier, it turned out to be life-threatening. The cords came out, there were big cracks inside. Cordiant Sport 3 turned out to be better than I expected. And taking into account the cos

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The right product for me, the price suited me.

Just ordered. According to reviews, like rubber on a solid 4, I went last season on the standard, as usual, the cordiant makes noise, but copes with other tasks. As for the patency outside the asphalt, I will say one thing, any rubber with a sport attribute is aimed at driving exclusively on asphalt, but outside of course it’s bad. Comrades, if you want rubber for mud, then choose a more aggressive tread pattern. I chose this rubber because of the price and the road pattern, there is no place…

Pros
  • Price

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality exceeds all expectations, I recommend to buy.

Drove about 6 thousand So far, only positive impressions. It seems to me a little harsh compared to the previous Dunlop Sp Sport. On wet pavement confidently holds the road, not afraid of puddles. No aqua planning. On dry surfaces, it also performs well.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Bad product, not worth the money.

I have owned a Honda Accord 8 since 2022, I had Dunlop Sport tires and it's time to change. After reading the reviews, I took this 2022 product. Yes, size 205 60 R16. Before my ears rested, but now the noise in the car! It’s interesting for me to ask those who write that it’s quiet tires, what did you drive before ? Well, the road seems to hold normally! But noisy! Of the four tires, three turned out to be not symmetrical (oval), no matter how you balance it, vibration is all the same !

Pros
  • Probably the price
Cons
  • Very noisy!

I bought a specially purely domestic manufacturer, I read a lot of reviews, including here. It was very embarrassing that there were so many complaints about quality, that it is poorly balanced, the shape of an egg, etc. I drive a Camry 50, before that there was a Yokohama Stokowski, which I ated 2 times. runs great, no complaints. I decided to take a cordiant, I repeat, to try a purely 2022 production. Pluses - the price, at the very bottom of the market, is cheaper than just a few positions…

Pros
  • price
Cons
  • not yet discovered

At this price, I don’t recommend more than 4000 (2500-3000 can still be taken to get by). I put it on two cars. R13 and r15. R13 sidewall torn in a small hole, coasting passed. R15 in general skated nuuuu maximum 15t km. The front ones literally fell apart. The back seems to be alive. Before that, like on rails, bumps, figure eight, vibration to the floor, suffered for 4 months, patiently drove, rolled, wanted to see how long they would last, pumped willpower. Now I'm standing with a flat tire…

Pros
  • As long as the new one is ok
Cons
  • It is easier to describe the dignity, but he is only one

Revainrating 3 out of 5

There are deviations, in general it is tolerable.

In general, I will tell you about my experience with this tire. It was time to change tires at the FFZ, but since I planned to sell a car, it was a pity to buy good tires. Decided to take CORDIANT SPORT3 215/55/17 (took 3 per wheel). The first impression, when I loaded the tires into the car, is that it is very heavy (compared to the same size winter Chinese and native Michelin) In general, after driving for almost a year on this rubber, I can say that the tires are normal. Not super…

Pros
  • From dignity, I can say this is definitely the price, strength, wear resistance, good handling due to the pattern. Predictable braking distance.
Cons
  • Rigid. On good asphalt goes smoothly. On small irregularities, everything passes to the steering wheel. Maybe such a composition of rubber, less rubber, more graphite of some kind. Such tires are most likely suitable for cars with soft suspension such as Sonata or Mondeo.

The car is heavy - Volvo XC-90. Always traveled on expensive European tires. Given the situation and prices, I decided to look towards Cordianta. Rubber is needed mainly for the city and the highway. I read, probably, all the reviews))) There were a million doubts. Including, it is for Sport. But, nevertheless, he decided. On Sport 3. Took in July. I didn't write a specific review. It's November now. Results: super tires. There were no problems. The car stands on it confidently. Holds up very…

Pros
  • Excellent quality. Not noisy. Holds up well in water. On the track, I liked the handling on it (both in summer and autumn). High wear resistance.
Cons
  • No!

Revainrating 4 out of 5

No minuses as such, comfortable to use.

3a 2 seasons (approximately 20220 km) hernias appeared. I never raced and did not fly into the pits at speed. I think it's the problem with these tires. All hernias were repaired on time, but there is an unpleasant aftertaste.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best I ever used, recommend it to everybody.

Excellent rezya, skated on it for 2 seasons, I mainly drive along the St. Petersburg Ring Road, Hong Kong Ring Road, m-11 and m-4 Well, the city is also present, respectively. I was especially pleased with the fact that on serpentines from Hong Kong to Hong Kong it behaves smartly in corners. I rode it at night along serpentines like in karting: 3rd gear, sneaker on the floor with breaks for weaving behind trucks. 2 summers lived chic, indicator "6" is still deep Not affected by sea water after

Pros
  • + price + excellent grip in tight turns at about 80 + did not catch hydroplaning + wear resistant + rigid, which again + to manageability, this is especially felt in comparison
Cons
  • - SO MUCH noisier than my previous dunlop, but not exactly, I don’t remember anymore - in a width of 205, the consumption has slightly increased relative to 185, which is natural and normal

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The product is working, I will not repeat it for sure.

Some pros: except perhaps the price, but I'm not sure that it's worth its denyuk. Some cons: 1) curve. installers twisted 4 times, they said there would be vibrations. it seems like it is not considered a marriage, you have to travel. 2) noisy, the rumble is PPC.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I didn't expect the quality to be so high.

Departure for them in the amount of 215/65/16 on the Camry for about 90 thousand. Before that, there were Bridzhik Potenza S001. Potency is better. But at the beginning of operation, the difference is not noticeable, aquaplaning is immediately better with Cordiant. The driving style is very active (the tires last for a maximum of 2 years), the demolition is predictable, the “hold”, although not ideal, is good. You can ride up to -2 (of course, not on "ice"). At the moment, the remaining tread…

Pros
  • Everything is good, fully corresponds to the price-quality criterion
Cons
  • Premiums are of course a little better, but the price is 2-3 times more.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

The purchase is a failure, very dissatisfied.

I have size R16 205 65 the price tag is very enticing, I live in the Crimea and here the roads are a fierce star, especially inside towns and rural areas. I took it because I was led by the seller's stories about the strong sidewall and durability. During the month of operation drove 10000km trip to St. Petersburg + pokatushki across the Crimea and as a result 2 bumps. I also didn’t like howling rubber, especially at speeds of 80-100 . So two tires to throw away and buy something with a…

Pros
  • Price, manageability.
Cons
  • Noise.