Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 42
  • 5
    30
  • 4
    11
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good product for me, I was satisfied with the price.

If you have 10 thousand, then in no case do not buy this percentage, even if there is a motherboard for it (as I had). For 10 thousand now you can buy a new Ryzen 5 3600 for 6 cores and 12 threads ! Pros: 1. Cold 2. Since it is skylake, it supports overclocking on the bus with a locked multiplier. I got up to 4200 mHz, you can go up to 4500+ Some cons: 1. 4 cores and 4 threads - incredibly small even for 2022, let alone 2022 2. It works relatively normally only during overclocking, at the base…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent product, the best quality.

Overclocked i5 6400 to 4.59ghz m/n: Asrock z170pro4 All I did was install the latest driver from the Asrock website "3.00 Support Sky OC". From the BIOS I set the constant voltage to 1.35v., and the frequency to the BCLK multiplier of 170mhz. The idle temperature is 36C (28C in stock), under load, stress tests warmed up to 68C (34C in stock), throttling was not turned on, it is worth considering that the CPU operating mode is up to 71C (throttling is then turned on). The fan speed on the…

Pros
  • Price-performance, the possibility of overclocking is not K version. i5 6400 skylake review
Cons
  • I'm not critical, but still. During acceleration: The temperature sensor on each of the cores does not work. Not all M / P are suitable for overclocking. Embedded video is disabled AVX instructions slow down (a rare thing used for specific tasks) Also, the power-saving functions on the processor do not work. Measurements of electricity consumption. energy at the input to the system unit (Stock: idle 50w, CPU load 70w; Overclocked 4.59ghz: idle 74w, CPU load 104w), even without these functions the result is excellent, considering that overclocking is 70%! from the face value, and this is 4 cores at 4.59ghz (for comparison, my old PC, where there is a single-core stump4 2.6ghz, the system unit consumes 120w in idle time)

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is good, there are only a few minor flaws.

Good processor for the money. For calculations and prof. applications the most. In stock games, in some places it loses to the stock i3 6100 and 6300. Whoever says anything, but in professional applications (working with CAD and graphics), even the cheapest DDR4 gives a significant increase. Has some pros Full 4 cores Price. Got it for 12 thousand. Overclocking takes even 980 Ti Low heat dissipation With its cons. Very muddy overclocking: the bios, although official, are very raw, you can’t

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Everything about the product satisfied me, the price is perfect.

I assembled a computer for myself: Core i5 6600 ASUS GeForce GTX 950 Motherboard ASUS Z170-K RAM 4x4 Gb DDR 4 SSD KINGSTON 240GB cooler DEEPCOOL GAMMAXX S40 Nothing freezes, nothing slows down, without overclocking Fallout 4 at ultra 60+ fps, Battlefront did not fall below 60 ultra. Nothing makes noise, it doesn’t get very hot, the video card warmed up to 65 degrees, no more.

Pros
  • works and doesn't get hot
Cons
  • did not find

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Full compliance with the manufacturers assurances, high quality.

Previously, this processor could compete with the i5-6600K and FX-8370, but now, after changing the Intel policy regarding overclocking on the bus, the i5-6500 is interesting as a budget option for the cheapest motherboards based on the H110 chipset. That said, if you don't want Intel on principle, AMD's eight-core FX outperform the 6500 by a significant margin at a lower price point.

Pros
  • Very cold (40 degrees in games with a boxed cooler), the performance is enough for any games in conjunction with a fairly powerful video card. When overclocking the bus to 4.4 GHz with a not-so-top-of-the-line cooler, the Cryorig H5 only heats up to 50 degrees in the stress test!
Cons
  • The graphics core is weaker than that of Broadwell and much weaker than even the most garbage AMD processors. For those who buy a motherboard now, bus overclocking is no longer possible.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Valuable purchase, nothing but pluses!

I thought about taking the 6400, but then I decided to take the middle model and not bother. I'm not going to overclock (although if you believe the videos on YouTube, you can, if you really want to and your mother allows it). What can I add. Intel is Intel. Happy with the processor. Pros: A cold stone, even with a mediocre cooler, the idle temperature is 30 degrees (ie, you can and should save on the cooler. of course, if you do not overclock the CPU and if the case is normal). Under load 40 -

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great product, a pleasure to use.

I decided to change the system and build on the basis of Intel. After studying the market, I came to the conclusion that this i5-6600k model is optimal, except for the price. Overall, a decent product that pays for itself over time. Still, it's a pity that when compared with AMD, the difference is too huge. With its pros. 1. Cold with an appropriate fan. 2. Currently a Decent Option for the Average Consumer (2022) 3. Process technology compared to AMD. 4. Copes with tasks without…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm very happy, it really is worth buying.

has been overclocking at 4.7 for half a year)) before that it was 8350 at 4.8 . the difference is noticeable in everything . especially in games . with dropsy at the peak of 61g after replacing the paste 50-52g . percent is excellent but for moderate money . not for 17000 as we sell it Has pros: adequate percentage . I took a new one purely by chance for 12022 6600k . Got cons: paste under the lid . after scalping and replacement with noctua n14 . the temperature dropped ash by 10g

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well the product is made, just magically!

Review of 6600K Well, I'll be the first, so let's go. Before him stood AMD 740 + Mother A85 from GB miniitx. The difference in processing power is HUGE! In ordinary window applications, AMD, subjectively, seemed more responsive, there were fewer microfreezes, although the I5 cannot be called a brake. In games, the i5 is noticeably better, but the 740 bought for 2022r worked out every penny. I won't open America here, it's the same 4690K + 3-6% / cycle due to new instructions and a faster…

Pros
  • 1. 14 nm 2. The maximum temperature is 100C, up to this temperature it works without throttling without problems. 3. Good overclocking potential. 4. Durable despite the thinness of the substrate. 5. Very good heat dissipation performance in stock
Cons
  • 1. Again, an incomprehensible substance instead of thermal paste 2. Thin substrate and the crystal itself is very small 3. PRICE!

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great quality, happy with it one hundred percent!

BCLK multiplier - 170 (4.6 GHz). Next come the dependencies. It seems that most do. For overclocking, you need a motherboard on the z170 and the presence of a bios mod for it. Overclocking nuances: 1. The built-in video core is disabled during overclocking. It doesn't matter for the gaming station. 2. AVX is actually turned off (in Lynx it gives out about 54 gigaflops). Little loss. Software for AVX is still negligible. And when the time comes for AVX, you can always switch to the K-version

Pros
  • I am writing about i5-6400 Awesome pro. Chases without problems and shamanism up to 4.6 GHz (OK, up to 4.59 GHz). In overclocking, it is on par with the i7 (non-K) of the previous generation, which, for a price of 14 thousand, I think is very good. For example, in Cinebench R15 scores 760 points in the CPU test (with DDR3 at 2022MHz).
Cons
  • In fact, no. Only the price. I would like it lower.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good product at a good price, I recommend to try it.

Without overclocking, the percentage is simply a miracle of technology, I have not seen such energy efficiency yet, in idle time the frequency of the cores drops to 800 MHz, there is no thermal imaging at all, even stop the cooler (the temperature in the room is about 25-28 degrees), with a usual load of 35 gr. somewhere no more than 40, with resource-intensive tasks already under 40-45 but no more (games, etc., excluding synthetics and long-term warm-up). By the way, I have never seen the…

Pros
  • Energy efficiency, performance
Cons
  • thermal interface, price

If you want to save money, then the best option is this percent and a cheap motherboard on the z chipset. Before such a purchase, it is better to google for the presence of cracked BIOS firmware, then buy the appropriate mother. In the air, it takes a height of 4 GHz, the craftsmen overclocked it even higher. I took an average bag under it, quite enough Assembly came out within 15k I do not advise owners of younger stones to ate, wait for caby-lake. Thank you for your attention.

Pros
  • Price, performance, bus boost, the last percentage supporting the "seven". Under overclocking, it is no worse than the line with the index K
Cons
  • A slight increase in one core compared to the i5-2500. I came across, frankly terrible, a stone with high voltage. So, in general, especially not

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good purchase.

A cull from the i7, with less cache, but with great cores. Index K for shkolota - he does not need overclocking, like most CPUs. It doesn't hurt to tune the memory timings - it will give a 1% increase in performance, unpacking the cores in Lasso 9.0 is also sometimes useful, or fine-tuning in the Intel Extreme Tuning Utility so that all 4 cores work at a frequency of 3.6, although you don't have to bother. Added screenshots from games on the embed (not the maximum quality, but when playable)

Pros
  • Really cold (45-50 degrees is almost always tense), very productive with two DDR4 sticks, has pretty good integrated HD 530 graphics, which allows you to play many games without a video card, including tanks, not at the highest settings of course, but still, with an acceptable FPS of 30-40 frames with a good picture. This CPU produces 68-80 FPS with the top-end GTX 1060 6 Gb SuperJetStream in the 15-minute Donut test without overclocking the video card (overclocking adds max 5 more frames) My monitor supports 75 hertz in Full HD, it’s relevant to me. The picture on the IPS matrix becomes clearer and richer, although the load on the vidyuhi increases at the same time, as well as on the CPU itself a little. Now it is not inferior in games to either the R5 1500 or the i7 7600, and even the R5 1600 or the i5 8600K is rarely bypassed (in any case, these games are unoptimized crap, and the only real reason for dropping to 50 frames, which, like games to that personally, I'm not interested at all)
Cons
  • It was quite expensive a year ago, half a year before the Ryzens, and, in fact, the best CPU for games, by and large it remains so to this day, because. assemblies on Ryzens or Kofileiks are decently more expensive, but for the same price everything is worse there.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best product I have ever reviewed, I recommend it to everyone!

Good processor, productive and cold. Stands on h110 without the possibility of overclocking, complete with 1050ti and 16GB ddr4. Quite affordable and powerful. In the mood, I decided to scalp, and as I understood it was not in vain. Thermal paste for 2 years of work has become dry and just fell off. It is certainly cold and so, but I do not regret that I replaced it with liquid metal. I installed a gammax 300 cooler, I don't see the point in being more powerful. In tests with Aida, it was not…

Pros
  • At the time of purchase, everything suited, now it's a little expensive
Cons
  • Thermal interface

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best price for such a product, I will buy more!

I bought this small one :)) I didn’t consider 6400 at all, since the former fan of amd and the habit of taking at least 3.0 ghz remained in my blood, it’s more pleasant to live in the future. 6600 K the mother under it bites in price + the processor itself, stopped at 6500 the most optimal. Of course, the processor is not cheap and, let's say, there was no particular need to buy it, since the Phenom 1075 t, which had not completely lost its performance, was put on a long rest, and under 6500…

Pros
  • Powerful, overclockable, cold
Cons
  • Price

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Everything in the purchase suits, a very necessary product.

I'm not an overclocker) The percentage was bought for reasons of price \ characteristics \ overclocking potential, if it suddenly stops. At the time of purchase, it cost about 20-24K (December 2022) Installed on ROG MAXIMUS VIII ranger with z170 chipset with DDR4 RAM and overclocked gtx 970 In stock in games, it suits at the moment, if it's not comfortable, you can overclock and change the card to gtx 1070. I expect it to be enough for a couple of years. The system turned out to be…

Pros
  • In stock peppy Good overclocking potential Price \ characteristics are probably the best at that time For December 2022 the freshest
Cons
  • There hasn't been a case yet. Now everything has a global minus due to the exchange rate)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I really like the product, it fully meets my expectations.

I switched to Skylake from the "epoch of dinosaurs" Socket 775. The difference is huge, everything flies. For games, there is enough work, it's good that I didn't buy the i7 6700, it would be a stupid overpayment. I assembled the following i5-6500, Asus H110-Plus, 8gb DDR4 2133mhz, video card old geforce 630 1gb 128 bus. cooler pwm cooler master. In games, the peak temperature is 51 degrees. Low power consumption. I have a 500-watt power supply (Chinese, without a certificate) for now with this

Pros
  • Fast, cold.
Cons
  • For me they are not

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Just super, it's beautifully made, I'm very happy with it.

Already rolled a review here, now I've been using it for 15 months, I play, I stream, the percentage is always overclocked. Stable at 4800, I can’t say for sure the temperature, but everything is in order)). Mother - asus z170 sabertooth. Deep cool gammaxx 400 cooler, stock thermal paste. I am very satisfied, but you can’t make a significant upgrade without changing the mother, I hate Intel for this))

Pros
  • Frequency.
Cons
  • When there weren't even cabileys, then the percentage of your money is spent, and now when the 8600k costs 2k more, the price turns out to be not adequate.

A strong middle peasant, it makes no sense to take less for games, and i7 cost horse money. This one is the golden mean, IMHO, but still the price is overpriced one and a half times. On the other hand, there is no alternative (I don’t even consider AMD, although at the dawn of P4 they were doing Intel). I did not check the overclocking, but if the factory one was up to 4GHz, it would be somehow warmer.

Pros
  • + average CPU, suitable for gaming, etc. + low heat dissipation + factory overclocking (boost-mode) up to 3.6 GHz
Cons
  • - price! it is too high for this segment - I would like to see factory overclocking to 4GHz

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I am satisfied, the purchase is quite successful.

6400 is a classic. Youtubers advertise "you can't overclock on windows 10 in 2022, Intel was blocked," while other normal ones show how to overclock a percentage of a price in the region of 11k to a level of 15-16k. But 6600k can be put on a boxed cooler and even overclocked a bit. 6400 is not about that at all. Be mentally prepared to spend 2-3 thousand on cooling. Without it, there is no point in this processor. This processor pulls out only on overclocking. He does not have solder, after 5-7

Pros
  • is chasing price (but I snatched a boxed version from a dealer that was closing)
Cons
  • 1. solder NO 2. I came across a not entirely successful copy, and a very high voltage, it took me to install an air tower 3. From 2 follows a high heat pack in the region of 200+ watts (personally for me)