- Price-performance, the possibility of overclocking is not K version. i5 6400 skylake review
- I'm not critical, but still. During acceleration: The temperature sensor on each of the cores does not work. Not all M / P are suitable for overclocking. Embedded video is disabled AVX instructions slow down (a rare thing used for specific tasks) Also, the power-saving functions on the processor do not work. Measurements of electricity consumption. energy at the input to the system unit (Stock: idle 50w, CPU load 70w; Overclocked 4.59ghz: idle 74w, CPU load 104w), even without these functions the result is excellent, considering that overclocking is 70%! from the face value, and this is 4 cores at 4.59ghz (for comparison, my old PC, where there is a single-core stump4 2.6ghz, the system unit consumes 120w in idle time)
- works and doesn't get hot
- did not find
- Very cold (40 degrees in games with a boxed cooler), the performance is enough for any games in conjunction with a fairly powerful video card. When overclocking the bus to 4.4 GHz with a not-so-top-of-the-line cooler, the Cryorig H5 only heats up to 50 degrees in the stress test!
- The graphics core is weaker than that of Broadwell and much weaker than even the most garbage AMD processors. For those who buy a motherboard now, bus overclocking is no longer possible.
- 1. 14 nm 2. The maximum temperature is 100C, up to this temperature it works without throttling without problems. 3. Good overclocking potential. 4. Durable despite the thinness of the substrate. 5. Very good heat dissipation performance in stock
- 1. Again, an incomprehensible substance instead of thermal paste 2. Thin substrate and the crystal itself is very small 3. PRICE!
- I am writing about i5-6400 Awesome pro. Chases without problems and shamanism up to 4.6 GHz (OK, up to 4.59 GHz). In overclocking, it is on par with the i7 (non-K) of the previous generation, which, for a price of 14 thousand, I think is very good. For example, in Cinebench R15 scores 760 points in the CPU test (with DDR3 at 2022MHz).
- In fact, no. Only the price. I would like it lower.
- Energy efficiency, performance
- thermal interface, price
- Price, performance, bus boost, the last percentage supporting the "seven". Under overclocking, it is no worse than the line with the index K
- A slight increase in one core compared to the i5-2500. I came across, frankly terrible, a stone with high voltage. So, in general, especially not
- Really cold (45-50 degrees is almost always tense), very productive with two DDR4 sticks, has pretty good integrated HD 530 graphics, which allows you to play many games without a video card, including tanks, not at the highest settings of course, but still, with an acceptable FPS of 30-40 frames with a good picture. This CPU produces 68-80 FPS with the top-end GTX 1060 6 Gb SuperJetStream in the 15-minute Donut test without overclocking the video card (overclocking adds max 5 more frames) My monitor supports 75 hertz in Full HD, it’s relevant to me. The picture on the IPS matrix becomes clearer and richer, although the load on the vidyuhi increases at the same time, as well as on the CPU itself a little. Now it is not inferior in games to either the R5 1500 or the i7 7600, and even the R5 1600 or the i5 8600K is rarely bypassed (in any case, these games are unoptimized crap, and the only real reason for dropping to 50 frames, which, like games to that personally, I'm not interested at all)
- It was quite expensive a year ago, half a year before the Ryzens, and, in fact, the best CPU for games, by and large it remains so to this day, because. assemblies on Ryzens or Kofileiks are decently more expensive, but for the same price everything is worse there.
- At the time of purchase, everything suited, now it's a little expensive
- Thermal interface
- Powerful, overclockable, cold
- Price
- In stock peppy Good overclocking potential Price \ characteristics are probably the best at that time For December 2022 the freshest
- There hasn't been a case yet. Now everything has a global minus due to the exchange rate)
- Fast, cold.
- For me they are not
- Frequency.
- When there weren't even cabileys, then the percentage of your money is spent, and now when the 8600k costs 2k more, the price turns out to be not adequate.
- + average CPU, suitable for gaming, etc. + low heat dissipation + factory overclocking (boost-mode) up to 3.6 GHz
- - price! it is too high for this segment - I would like to see factory overclocking to 4GHz
- is chasing price (but I snatched a boxed version from a dealer that was closing)
- 1. solder NO 2. I came across a not entirely successful copy, and a very high voltage, it took me to install an air tower 3. From 2 follows a high heat pack in the region of 200+ watts (personally for me)