Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 81
  • 5
    47
  • 4
    18
  • 3
    10
  • 2
    3
  • 1
    3

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best purchase in my life, I will definitely buy it again.

I bought tires Michelin Laude Cross all-season (although they write that summer) in the amount of 226.652022 in the spring of 2022, at $ 173 per wheel, I operate on a Honda CR-V (2022 onwards, AWD, engine 2.4, AT, American version), last winter 2022-2022. I went to Dunlop Grandtrek SJ6, good tires, but then frosts came, ice came to Ukraine and I decided not to put Dunlop Grandtrek SJ6 for the winter, I took a chance, I sold it with a mileage of 7000 km. for $400, now I definitely don’t see the…

Pros
  • Impact resistant but not rigid
Cons
  • Price

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Nothing special, there are positives and negatives.

Well, it's time for a review. three years of tire life. mileage about 50000km. tires are soft and quiet. sidewall is weak. cut on three wheels. and one had to be changed at all. put on other cameras. comfortable in operation. around the city it is enough to pump 2 points. but on the track not less than 2.5. or walking at speed will be. The tread height is small. as if specially saved. that is, with my run, it was already erased before the wear markers. once just stupidly pierced with a 15 bolt.

Pros
  • soft. quiet. comfortable
Cons
  • worn out faster than expected. protector small. the sidewall is weak. the price is high. in our region costs 190 dollars

I bought tires last year, skated the season. 235\55\r18 on lexus rx II. At a speed of about 80-90 km / h, the sharp edge of the "brick" (a support left by the road workers, where road signs are inserted (but there was no sign)), flew into the sidewall of the wheel. As a result: a hernia on the sidewall of the wheel and, after a couple of months, the rack began to flow into which the blow fell. Perhaps another tire would have burst, but not this one. Apart from this, the first season was…

Pros
  • 1) They eat up small bumps in the road well. 2) They drive confidently through puddles, they don’t flood the car through the windshield. 3) "Tsepko" hold on to the road.
Cons
  • 1) Noise / rumble at speeds over 60 km / h. 2) Due to the softness, the car starts to react a little worse (with a delay, or something) to the steering wheel and gas.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

It's not quite what I expected, overall it's ok.

I read a lot of reviews, in the end I bought the Michelin brand . Next time I won’t buy it: an incomprehensible tremor on the steering wheel - balancing, wheel alignment, pressure is normal . I rearranged the front wheels, everything was fine. There are problems with handling on this rubber, on dry summer pavement - the "zero" is not felt well . It does not brake smoothly, as we would like, but at first a slight slowdown is felt, then it gets rooted to the spot. I did not notice any problems…

Pros
  • Soft, rows well in non-clay mud, clings to stones
Cons
  • Smeared "zero" on the steering wheel, 255/65 r16 in reality turned out to be smaller than the winter 245/55 r16 from Nokian, heavy

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing Ive ever used, a great item for everyone!

Craving a toad. I bought a set for the Niva. Not a bit sorry. Great summer tires. Skated the summer. Wear-resistant, not afraid of puddles, holds wet turns like a glove, rulitsya excellent, silent. I really liked the reinforced sidewalls. I'm not afraid to jump on curbs and pits. But in the mud like a "cow", but this is a highway and it is forgivable for her. Sometimes the pebbles get stuck in the tread. Winter is coming, and it’s reluctant to change shoes into Kama Flame. I want to ride this…

Pros
  • Silence, strength, reinforced sidewalls, lack of aquaplaning (at reasonable speeds), wear resistance, minimal imbalance.
Cons
  • For five months, I did not find any flaws.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

It's not a bad product, nothing extraordinary.

2 seasons in operation on this rubber, (before that there was Hanko optimo 416) Yes, the car has become much softer to pass joints and small irregularities and pits. But : - Significantly increased consumption; -Auto accelerates more slowly and harder; - the car brakes normally on this rubber and nothing portends trouble during everyday use, until it comes to emergency braking, especially when it is +20 and above on the street, at the last moment the rubber starts to float . it’s not a very…

Pros
  • Soft, comfortable, swallows all the small irregularities.
Cons
  • increased gas mileage, unexpectedly fails during emergency braking,

265/70 R16 for Mitsubishi L200. Mileage - about 100,000 km. year-round operation. Even wear of all wheels, but the middle of the protectorate is a little more (the rest is 2-3 mm.). The pressure was kept from 2.0 to 2.2 on an empty car. Probably a bit too much, but the roll and handling, as already described earlier, is better with increased pressure. Along the edges of 5-6 mm. The geometry is not broken, hernias and other defects are not found. The previous set, installed at the factory…

Pros
  • Workmanship to everything already described. Combination of on-road and off-road capabilities. Very decent fuel economy.
Cons
  • Didn't find it.

Excellent tires for owners of crossovers and SUVs who spend 95% on asphalt, but who love outdoor activities (mountains, fishing, etc.) with the ability to move off the road. Before that, there were ordinary Latitudes, they were not always suitable for these purposes, slippery in the mud. They never let me down, very stable tires, of course, these are not off-road tires, but I kneaded dirt on them more than once. We live in the south, so I installed them in February of this year, we were in…

Pros
  • rolls well hydroplaning resistance patency (relative to normal summer) wear resistance
Cons
  • Small stones are always in the tread.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A good quality product, I rate this purchase perfectly.

Rubber for their tasks is excellent. In fact, for those who drive about 70% on hard surfaces, 30% on light off-road. They perform especially well on a gravel road, they drove a Ford Maverick on 18 wheels on such tires from Ekb to Severobaikalsk, on asphalt all the way 140 km. H., and on a gravel road + - 500 km one way with a cruising speed of about 70 90 km. H tires hawala all the pits, bumps, stones, potholes in both directions. After this trip, I bought myself a RAV4. very often you have to…

Pros
  • Soft, really universal (track 160+, gravel road 90 is not scary at all, it holds just super), cross-country ability, hard sidewall, made in french.
Cons
  • Noisy (compared to a highway, but generally quiet compared to tires of a similar class), expensive, balanced a little worse than an ordinary highway, an ordinary latitude tuor (tread costs).

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is good, there are only a few minor flaws.

Rubber dimension 235/60 R18. Car - Volvo XC90. Prior to that, there was Conti cross contact for 3 seasons. Conti is harsh, according to reviews I chose this Michelin. Production - France. First impression: The car is running very well. Holds the road very well. Smooth rebuilding at speed - not bad enough. With a standard pressure of 2.2, road bumps are almost invisible. There is no noise up to 110-120, then it is difficult to understand - rubber or aerodynamics. On Conti, the sound of the…

Pros
  • Really quiet. Soft, comfortable.
Cons
  • He doesn’t like active taxiing very much, but it sometimes takes place in our conditions .

Size 255/65R16. The size is "special", very sensitive to ruts in the asphalt. Otezdil three years in winter and summer, it's about 60000km. You can drive in winter, but it is not recommended. Ruts endured only in the first month. The Pirelli Scorpion STT was much worse in ruts, the BridgeStone 694 was slightly better. In terms of wear resistance, it turned out to be at the level of the bridge, if not worse. In terms of cross-country ability, it is the worst of the three listed. In general…

Pros
  • Price. Brand. The drawing is funny.
Cons
  • Controllability. Patency. Wear resistance. Behavior to the track.

Mr. But . Noisy, the sides are soft - the car shakes, controllability is reduced because of this. The impression is that all four shock absorbers of the car have become softer a couple of times, it brakes, it pumps, you turn it pumps, it stops, it pumps in resonance, smoothly fading. I tried to make more pressure, the car turns into a tank in terms of acoustic comfort, and the handling does not improve much. Probably it could be endured, I bought it already. 32tr set, ride and suffer. But not…

Pros
  • tire pattern is interesting)
Cons
  • reliability, comfort, safety

195/65 15 front-wheel drive, handling at height, acceleration 150 confidently, noisy on dry asphalt, every hole is felt, braking 5+ is rooted to the spot, climbs out of the mud everywhere despite the low clearance of the car (15 cm) very often has to be pumped up, reacts strongly for the slightest change in pressure, on wet asphalt it feels like it is better than on dry, 20,000 mileage on all roads, from federal highways to mountain gravel roads. You can take if the suspension is soft

Pros
  • Excellent on primer, dirt and wet asphalt
Cons
  • Noisy, harsh, punctures, clogged tread, does not look outwardly

But: Here, many have unsubscribed that it is quiet. I'm scared to think what people compared it to, because my tires (size 215 \ 65 \ 16) buzz, as if the wheel bearings are rolling the last kilometers. When I changed shoes with winter GoodYear ultra grip ice +, which I also chose based on reviews (and, by the way, she was very pleased, and not only me), I thought that it was buzzing because of the low temperature for summer tires (+5 . +15) , and with the advent of heat, it will become…

Pros
  • good in all modes I chose it based on reviews, I liked the reinforced sidewall. Holds the road well in both dry and wet weather, did not affect the economy Very wear-resistant and strong, traveled the season (10,000 km) on roads, dirt, gravel - not a single puncture, cut, hernia. You can't even see the wear and tear like new.
Cons
  • noisy for me 73 dB is the maximum allowed noise in the EU, this tire has 72 dB, and I compared it with 68 dB (the difference is more than 2 times!) so if you didn’t have ultra quiet rubber, then don’t be upset, just like the rest.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not the best quality, but overall not bad.

This rubber wouldn't be bad if it wasn't for its self-cleaning issues. Its pros: Used this tire for two years. Good grip, low aquaplaning, not noisy. Very good balance (I had tires made in France) Strong sidewalls - on a wheel flattened to the disk, I drove almost 2 km to the tire shop, and at least henna to the wheel. Cons below: The protector is very poorly self-cleaning. This is the only rubber on which I received 2 punctures during the first summer season, of which: the first was a…

235/60 R18 on Freelander 2 Long chose, compared; satisfied with the result. I rarely leave asphalt. But on average off-road, there were no questions. Rubber keeps excellent speed and puddles. It makes noise, but not much, it keeps the road well, it slows down - no questions asked. Feels better than stock (Continental Cross Contact), which is more tailored for the highway. Normally holds in early winter, if you suddenly do not have time to change shoes in time or "so-so winter"

Pros
  • Price-quality ratio Versatility

Its pros: Excellent, quiet tires, it will fit perfectly for frivolous off-road. Great looking at 255 wide. Cons: Small pebbles get stuck in the tread, then quickly fly out when picking up speed and hit the arches, but this is the inevitability of the design. Mudguards are required.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great product, best quality.

Rubber operated on the RX300 on pneuma, set exactly a year ago. Total rollover for all seasons, including -38 and +40. I live in the Urals, in a small town. The roads are cleaned and sprinkled with sand/siftings, we don't have reagents, but due to the low traffic intensity, snow rolls everywhere for 4-5 months. in a year. I work in construction - daily primers sprinkled with stones and gravel, dirt - as much as you want, I'm really satisfied with the rubber. TOTAL: A truly versatile tire for…

Pros
  • All year round tire. Mud, country roads made of stones, asphalt 160 km / h - the flight is normal.
Cons
  • For universal rubber - no

They took for the official Mitsubishi L-200 instead of the standard Bridgestone Dueler H / T (it was worn out by mileage, cars run 70,000 km a year). The size is the same 245/70 R16. The rubber turned out to be an order of magnitude better than the regular one, it rows exclusively in the sand, it was tested in a sand pit, there are no complaints in the mud and roadsides, it doesn’t clog, it has no equal in the rain, it goes at 140 km / h like on rails. On dry land up to 170 km / h I did not…

Pros
  • Hold on the road in rain/mud/dry weather is very good. Quite an unusual appearance (who cares). In general, soft, pleasant, although they were taken on a pickup truck.
Cons
  • Consumption has increased by a liter and a half, but this is not surprising due to its tread, still not quite highway. Still sometimes pebbles get stuck, at speed they fly into cars from behind. Not critical.

Bought for Mitsubishi Pajero 2022 onwards, 265/70/16. Before buying, I did not study anything about tires, I trusted the seller and the brand. Expected more, but coped with its direct functions. I often went fishing, never got stuck, everything is expected in the city, but on the highway it is noisy, as if you are driving on studded tires. It was also sold as an all-season, but it is dangerous to drive it in winter. Skated 70.000 km in 3 years, threw it away this year. While buying Velcro for…

Pros
  • Durability, manageability
Cons
  • A bit noisy, price