Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 47
  • 5
    34
  • 4
    2
  • 3
    6
  • 2
    2
  • 1
    3

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality exceeds all expectations, I recommend to buy.

Excellent convenience! Even at high pressures, the XL sidewall and 97 load index make short work of bumps. The noise is there, to be sure, but it's not deafening and won't keep you up at night. Even on rough, ancient asphalt, the salon's sound is muffled. The capacity to control is outstanding. When cornering, it's a huge improvement over a standard hankook. It's nearly impossible to capture the moment when Hankook loses traction and the car begins to throw. Michelin tires consistently drift in

Pros
  • Levels of noise and softness. Controllability.
Cons
  • Currently, no

Revainrating 3 out of 5

There are some variations, but tolerable on the whole.

The rubber is the best in all situations, but if you bought it, put it on, skated with it, tossed it away, and then got a new one for the next season. Got advantages: When something is new, everything is on fire. I have been using tires for three driving seasons, w219 245/45/18, and three of my wheels have nearly four times as much tread as the fourth (the wheel has given out). Cons of it: The issues start when you put it on for the second season after storage (in a very warm warehouse), didn't

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great quality, happy with it one hundred percent!

has certain advantages: Easy to use, and quiet. The asphalt is both dry and wet with excellent traction. Soft. Cons: In order to prevent punctures and hernias, constant high pressure (not less than 2.6 atmospheres) is required.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am delighted, the product is really worthy.

Not for silent movements are tires. Even their relative lack of potash is forgiven in my eyes. Those who enjoy moving quickly will appreciate tires since they are excellent for starting, cornering, and coasting (you can still drive around the Central Ring Road without cameras).

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality exceeds all expectations, I recommend to buy.

In my personal garage, I keep two fx jaguars. One of them has meshlin sport 4 and the other just got conti sport contact 5R. Just like two serious rivals. At the 15,000-mile asphalt T-junction, the Conti slips to the outside of the curve more strongly the faster the car is going. Meshlin is still at his regular hangout, and his routine hasn't changed a bit, but! Gaining this effect requires significantly increasing your speed. Even though the noise level in Conti is higher, the soundproofing…

Pros
  • One, it's more affordable than similar products in the UHP market. Second, you can hear very little on any of our surfaces, and the comfort is top-notch for a material that bills itself as a sports surface. Where an amateur's anarchy ends and a professional's is required. 245/45 R19 is my shoe size.
Cons
  • Six thousand miles. Not a word.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well made the product is, just magical!

The free tire care and fuel cancel out the high price, and the gap to well-known competitors is no longer so large, making this tire, in my opinion, the most intriguing thing available in this size on the market. Despite the tire's thin and fragile appearance (both inside and out), Michelin has long been known for its reliability and performance. If the tire is part of the pilot series, it will also have an excellent grip, as well as durability and comfort. We'll see how they hold up over time,

Pros
  • Softer and quieter than Bridgestones or Dunlops, with excellent grip and handling for sporty driving. The fuel card actually saves money because of the free tire service promise.
Cons
  • Tradewear index of 320 is typical for tires in this class, thus fast abrasion is to be expected; nonetheless, either grip or longevity is present. It's far too soon to make any sort of predictions.

I am pleased with the rubber, a good-balanced tire, and the reasonably priced pricing. Mileage per season of the Audi A4 allroad R18 245/45 is 15 tkm. The roads in Hong Kong, Hong Kong, and the Hong Kong areas are average, with some pits and potholes. However, the wheels performed admirably, hernias did not develop, and the balance was not upset, in part because of the 245/45 profile, which is a benefit for Michelin. I'll note that Pirelli had one hernia in the summer before, and on the winter…

Pros
  • Strong, absorb shock adequately, and no hernias have been found Both dry and wet pavement may be handled well. Resistance to hydroplaning is at a respectable level. calm and gentle doesn't pay much attention to the track, but it likely depends on the dimension
Cons
  • I didn't seem to notice the 15 tons.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Expectations were not met, average quality.

The tire turned out to be quite average, and it deserves a score of 4 out of 5. Good, but not much more than that. It does, in fact, slow down, but it does not whistle when it spins, and it does not float particularly well in the water; all of this, however, occurs without a spark. When I made the transition from Hankook tires to Michelin latitude Sport 3 tires on my Cayenne, I couldn't believe how much different the car felt. I didn't feel almost anything when I got on the PS4 on the X3 F25…

Pros
  • Given that this is a Michelin product, one could think that everything is crystal obvious; yet, NO
Cons
  • descending: Endurance, pricing, mediocre performance

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I am satisfied with the product, I recommend it to everyone.

The rubber has a lot of tackiness. Those for whom this is the most important consideration can buy with peace of mind knowing that the vehicle exhibits predictable behavior and that braking and acceleration are easy to comprehend. On the other hand, I did not anticipate that a summer tire would be that loud on my car, which has double windows and strong sound insulation, including the wheel arches. Before then, there was Hankook in addition to the more affordable Kumho, and both of these brands

Pros
  • Tough and reasonably long-lasting in its condition
Cons
  • noisy

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best deals, glad I bought this.

I get around in a BMW 5 E60. Before the potenza 001 225/5516 bridge, there were the NEXEN zr 16s, which were excellent tires. a little bumpy, over 180 on the bends it was a little unsure, now the bear is 245/40 zr 18, and this is just empty air. You'll have a secure hold at any speed. This is the perfect car for the speed demon in your life! Comfort is an added benefit at low speeds. has certain advantages: Superb control; the hold is spot on! especially after potenza 001, rubbery softness. The

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Do not hesitate to buy, the quality is amazing for the price.

I bought one of the first tires when they initially went on sale in 2022. Operation: a weekly application of 235/45R17 to VW Passat 170 forces. We only provide the XL version (reinforced, denser, and thicker sidewalls), which indicates a high-speed tire with an index (Y) up to 300 km/h and ZR rather than merely R. A tire with a wear index of 420 has a very excellent chance of lasting four seasons. The Michelin features slightly stiffer sidewalls than the ContiPremiumContact 5, making them far…

Pros
  • An extremely intriguing tire. Very quiet and excellent handling. One cannot feel the track. superb acceleration and braking without sliding. They just got out, so we haven't yet been able to ride in the rain. Later, I'll include a review.
Cons
  • not yet revealed

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Lame product and terrible quality.

The Michelin has excellent initial traction, but the Yokohama catches and stops more sooner and more comfortably under braking. The Yokohama is responsive and easy to understand in the corners. On a 55 profile, the rigidity is adequate but not outstanding. I was warned in the store about getting Yokohama tires, since they are awful and should be thrown away. It was discovered that this particular Michelin tire is not only too soft and slows poorly, but is also unstable when driving in a ring on

Pros
  • A look at the overpriced and overhyped Michelin Pilot Sport4 tires on a V55 Camry 3.5. There will be talk of whether or not it makes sense to install Michelin tires on a civilian vehicle, as well as whether or not these tires will enhance the stability, responsiveness, and comfort of your vehicle. Previously, I lacked the knowledge to respond to this inquiry with certainty. I feel qualified to examine these tires at this time because I know why people buy tires and how a vehicle's behavior might change depending on its tires even when driving in the identical conditions. Knowledge is complemented by time behind the wheel of a variety of sports cars and tire combinations, including a 380-horsepower Jaguar F Type on Bridgestones, a 340-horsepower Audi A7 on Bridgestones, and a 317-horsepower Lexus RC with Dunlops and rear-wheel drive. When the factory tires on my personal Camry 3.5 started to wear out, I thought that upgrading to more expensive tires might help the car's handling and traction on asphalt without requiring any adjustments to the factory wheel parameters. The Michelin "Pilot Sport 4" brand name was announced loudly in one TV show. That's what I figured after I looked up the list of vehicles that have it installed and considered buying one. The viewpoints of those I will not bother with are varied. Because of this new knowledge, I can tell you with absolute certainty which vehicle or set of tires would suit you best. The shop boasted that it had road tests showing that their tire was the best available. They assured me I would be satisfied, and I do not doubt them. When I tried the 215/55/17 factory size, I was so disappointed that I had to write a bad review.
Cons
  • After 5 months of ownership, I put the tire through its paces in temperatures ranging from +5 to +34. The tire's only real benefit is the peace and quiet it provides. I frequently enter corners and rings at speeds of 60–70 km/h, loudly whistling the whole time. In his seven years of driving Camrys, Yokohama had never made such a whistle. Three brand new Carmis, all with brand new Yokohama rubber. Two V55s with a 3.5-liter V8 and one V50 with a 2.5-liter motor. The Michelin's small side cord also contributes to the 55 profile's great corner rubber play. Putting "Pilot Sport" in the mix made my car feel like it was made of jelly. Many people who read this would argue that the Camry doesn't need to be softer than it already is. I agree wholeheartedly that the suspension is mushy, however the handling degraded dramatically when I switched to Michelin tires rather than the original equipment Yokohamas. Discomfort is caused by this. I also noticed that the directional stability indicator started flashing a lot more frequently after the whistle started. Exiting tight corners caused the body to make two or three imperceptible "pendulum" motions.

Citroen C5, 245/45/18 in size. Primacy 4, PilotSport 4, and ContiPremiumContact 6 were the options. He didn't even think of the kontiki, and the pilot's sidewall is thicker and more rigid than Primacy's. Primacy seeks increased comfort; the pilot seeks improved handling. It reached 170 mph on a dry road (I'll attempt more), flying like it's on rails. No roll, sharp turns pass without the tiniest hint of drift, and the rearrangement is plain and understandable (within reason). I have not yet…

Pros
  • Perfect handling of dry goods, in my perspective. decent rolling On minor irregularities, be quiet elastic (not soft nor hard)
Cons
  • have not yet disclosed

Price and quality don't match up, therefore this won't work for somebody who requires an aggressive ride. If you give the gas pedal a light squeeze on dry pavement while driving a Mercedes with 250 liters of displacement, the vehicle will slip. Standard rubber does not have any redeeming qualities to offer. On the rear wheels, I purchased from bezishodnosti because there was no other option available from other manufacturers.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Not a good product, sorry to have spent money on it.

Spain, 245/45/18, BMW X1. Perhaps it depends on the country of manufacture, however for the price these tires are underwhelming. Yes, you don't think about anything while it's dry, but you can still drive on bald tires in dry conditions. What matters is how they react in a crisis! In general, I was driving cautiously in the rain; my speed was under 100 km/h, it was not raining, but it was pouring just at the entrance to the turn, it started to slow down, but not there it was, the car went…

Pros
  • On a dry surface, the handling is excellent. craftsmanship and balance.
Cons
  • Transverse aquaplaning is not only dangerous but also weak! how it is described in international tests.

I think the pricing is reasonable for what I got, a well-balanced tire. 15 seasonal tkm for an Audi A4 allroad with R18 245/45 tires. Sufficiently strong sidewall, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, and Hong Kong regions, the roads there are so-so, pits and potholes, good strikes, the wheels functioned with a bang, no hernias were displaced, and the balance was not disrupted, in part because of the 245/45 profile, but as an added bonus in favor of Michelin. I'll add that one more hernia was discovered over…

Pros
  • Strong, sturdy, and no hernias have been found in this group. The handling is excellent on both dry and wet pavement. Moderate resistance to hydroplaning Calm and gentle Doesn't seem to care much about the sound, however it could change with the perspective.
Cons
  • I didn't even feel the 15 tons that were on me.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I really like the product, it fully meets my expectations.

Michelin tires are the ones I've always wanted to try but never got the chance to because, naturally, they're the best in the business. Let's see how it holds up in the fall, because right now I have no idea. Listed below are some advantages: Of course, with a size like that, sports discourse is out of the question, but still: 205/55 * 16. This rubber was quite effective after premier contact5. Straight line accuracy, pinpoint maneuverability, and a severe demeanor? or so it felt; perhaps…

215/45 R17, purchased in early February, as soon as it appeared on our sale. Based on feedback from one of the well-known UK sites (they have spring there much earlier), as well as a positive experience using PilotSport3. I put it in early April and immediately 1000 km trip, and on the street 0.+1. Noise at the same time wildly. In May it became warmer - the noise disappeared almost completely, showers began - it made it possible to drive on dry land. And most importantly - comfort! On the same

Pros
  • - the track is not felt - does not squeal in corners and at the start - on the Ring Road full of water the track crosses twice - SOFT
Cons
  • Possible rapid wear, but for 8000 km has not yet revealed ate info: tires covered 10,000 km, front-wheel drive, car weight 1600 kg, most of the mileage - highways at a speed of 130 km / h, starts from traffic lights are fast. At the moment, the residual tread depth of the front tires is 6mm, the rear tires are 7mm. I didn’t measure with new ones, but presumably 7-8mm.

Skoda octavia a7, I have been operating for more than a year, mileage is about 10 km, St. Petersburg. I will say this, if you need tires to just ride around the city without gas to the floor, then it’s better to take something quieter, noisy enough for the roads of the northern capital, sometimes completely, given that the car is completely noisy, including arches. Winter Velcro gooder in this regard wins very, very much. If you start pushing the gas pedal, then I recommend 100% rubber, the…

Pros
  • - Handling - Durability
Cons
  • - Noisy for the city