Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 34
  • 5
    16
  • 4
    3
  • 3
    6
  • 2
    6
  • 1
    3

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great product, best quality.

I took 205/55/16 for Toyota Avensis. I recommend it to everyone, although the mileage is not great, but I hope there will be no problems! Prior to that, there was a Turanza bridge, heaven and earth, nexen is more pleasant! And the price is only 12400. The sidewall is soft, but I try to drive carefully, our roads are such that no one is insured here. A friend broke his new contact 6 when hitting a curb (the quality is noticeably worse than contact 5), it seems that the manufacturer thinks that…

Pros
  • Pretty quiet! Very pleasant in terms of comfort and ride. They hold super, they brake perfectly!
Cons
  • It seemed that the size is smaller than stated! I'm afraid for the sidewall. (And not in vain I was afraid, I caught a side puncture)

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A practical product, nothing to complain about.

I put two on the front, because, to. I caught a pit and lost my alignment, when I noticed that 2 front wheels were gobbled up. Auto - polo sedan. When I received it, I was embarrassed that the rubber is very soft and the cord bends easily by hand. I put it, I left for 3 months before winter - softly, I liked it, I expected the worst. For a quiet ride around the city, that's it. Zagarod or gravel - in question, because. thin cord.

Pros
  • The car began to go more smoothly, the price is good.
Cons
  • Soft side line, not for sharp turns and maneuvers. Visually it seems that the wheels are lowered when it is standing.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Mediocre product, probably won't use.

Before that, I looked for zero Pirelli Cinturato P4 tires, then briefly drove Cordiant, Kormoran and Amtel - and all this on one car - Sandero. Pirelli Cinturato P4 gave the feeling of driving "like on rails". And this is not hyperbole: The car clearly, to the millimeter, was on a given course without any effort on the steering wheel. The first time I got behind the car on the Cinturato P4, it seemed as if a power steering was installed on the car (although it is already there) - it was so easy

Pros
  • 1) It seems to be really economical. When I moved to it, it seemed that the car coasts easier. And the average consumption of gasoline fell by 0.1-0.2 l / 100 km. I do not exclude that all this is within the framework of error and subjective perception, but it is unlikely. 2) Good resistance to hydroplaning. This is due to the fact that the tread has large and deep (until the tire is worn out) grooves. Never lost control in a puddle. There was no case that in a downpour one had to yield to someone due to uncertain grip on the asphalt. During heavy rain always move in the fastest lane (90-110 km/h).
Cons
  • 1) Manageability. 2) Noise. Didn't notice any difference compared to Cordiant Standard, Amtel Planet. Even at a certain speed, they sometimes resonate with tractor noise, like the Kormoran K801, although less often over time. I remember how much quieter the Pirelli Cinturato P4s were than the Cordiant Standard.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Upset and disappointed, the product is very bad!

Has pros: The price is not very noisy, the manufacturer is South Korea, not bad handling both on dry pavement and on wet Different cons: On the road with a rut, you always have to taxi, pebbles are constantly clogged into the tread and knock on the asphalt, a VERY soft sidewall, a little unevenness and a hernia!

Revainrating 3 out of 5

It has some flaws but the product is usable.

Took on Lancer X in size 205/60/16 The first two years - excellent tires. Didn't know the problem. What is the city, what is the highway, south-sea-serpentines - without any problems. Relatively quiet and comfortable tires. In the third year, vibration began to appear. Hodovka normal, balancing did not help. In total, after 4 years and 32 thousand km we have: - 2-3 more millimeters on the tread (before the indicators) - all in cracks, especially inside the lamellas and channels - egg-shaped, i.

Pros
  • - quiet and comfortable - price - country of production (which led to after the price) - good performance in tests - normal performance indicators, both dry and rainy.
Cons
  • - no durability - rubber quality - all cracked and cracked - the very quality of tires - in the third year they went "egg" - bagel appearance

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Bad quality, not worth the spent money.

I chose for a very long time, before that it was from the Kama-217 factory, which passed 7 years 60 thousand and most likely went herniated due to age, but the tread would still be enough for a couple of seasons. Throughout the operation of questions to her did not arise at all and there were no problems, oddly enough. But still I wanted something softer, more comfortable and for a change something foreign. On the advice of the seller, I took Nexen, the type is soft and made in the South…

Pros
  • Softness when passing small bumps Pretty quiet, not noisy inside High quality elastic material
Cons
  • Unpleasant handling Valkost Sluggish acceleration Unreliable off-road driving Tread - compared to tires of the same size from other manufacturers, these seem very narrow

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good and quality product, but there are flaws.

Good handling. Rut with water passes confidently. Auto Rio3, no festivities 120-140, no taxiing either. Noise is within the normal range. Soft, thin sidewall, as on all budget slopes. I got it without a prefix plus. Korea November 22. There are three drainage grooves, the tread pattern is the same as on HD +. Confuses one moment. Tires are asymmetric non-directional, installation on the disk by marks, outer and inner side. With this installation, it turns out that on the one hand the tread…

Pros
  • Controllability.
Cons
  • Currently undiscovered.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best price for such a product, I will buy more!

The rubber was on the purchased car, at the time of receiving the car I was upset, I thought full yyyy, because I used to prefer only famous brands. So, surprisingly, the tires turned out to be excellent, moderately soft, the cabin is quiet and comfortable. The handling of the car is excellent, the car does not roam at speed, it behaves great on the track, there has never been aquaplaning, the rubber keeps side drift. Very pleasantly surprised.

Pros
  • QUIET, do not believe the nonsense, according to its noise, soft, does not notice the track, hydroplaning is good, there is no lateral drift.
Cons
  • did not find

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Dissatisfied with this product, bad to use.

The tires were on a new car from the factory (Skoda superb 2022). There is a country house, which is 5 km away from the highway on a gravel road. Every summer 2-4 punctures are stable, in different wheels. Such softness for the sake of comfort is not needed. 3 times I caught aquaplaning on the ring road (St. Petersburg), thank God on straight sections, and without consequences. As a result, the sidewall burst, I don’t know if there was a puncture or, perhaps, a bump on the inside of the rear…

Pros
  • Comfort, not noisy, soft
Cons
  • It pricks at times, too soft, too thin sidewall. Tore the sidewall, drove 17-18 thousand km. Rode 3 seasons.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

An ideal product for any type of consumer.

In general, I like to choose from non-promoted brands, whether it be furniture, household appliances, tires or something else. I have been eyeing Nexen for a long time, but somehow I never got to know each other - Michelin, Continental, Good Year cars got to me, but they didn’t have time to wear out before selling . And now the hour has struck! 205/55 16 on WV Passat. Pressure 2.4 kgf/cm2. A set of 4 cost 11,000. in April 2022, which is much cheaper than Continental, which for me is the…

Pros
  • Good price for good tires.
Cons
  • I did not notice any shortcomings.