Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
nexen n "blue hd plus 215/65 r16 98h summer logo

Nexen N "Blue HD Plus 215/65 R16 98H summer Review

31

·

Average

Revainrating 3.5 out of 5  
Rating 
3.7
Automotive, 🚗 Exterior Car Accessories, 🛠️ Spare Tire Carriers, 🚗 Exterior Car Accessories

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(9)
img 1 attached to Nexen N "Blue HD Plus 215/65 R16 98H summer
img 2 attached to Nexen N "Blue HD Plus 215/65 R16 98H summer
img 3 attached to Nexen N "Blue HD Plus 215/65 R16 98H summer
img 4 attached to Nexen N "Blue HD Plus 215/65 R16 98H summer

Description of Nexen N "Blue HD Plus 215/65 R16 98H summer

South Korean tire giant Nexen Tire, which has recently focused on improving the environmental performance of its products, has introduced a new model of an environmentally friendly summer tire to the European market, designed for use on small and medium-sized passenger cars.

Reviews

Global ratings 31
  • 5
    14
  • 4
    3
  • 3
    5
  • 2
    7
  • 1
    2

Type of review

Despite the fact that this automobile is not the only one in the family and by no means the first, I managed to break three wheels due to the many issues that are associated with this particular type of rubber. And each of the three times the sidewall was unsuccessful, The very first time on the asphalt, there was a ridiculously enormous side cut from the pit along the rim of the asphalt that was missing one. When the wife crossed the tram tracks for the second time, the sidewall of her shoe…

Pros
  • Excellent maneuverability, resistance to hydroplaning and noise, as well as wear and tear, and a reasonable price.
Cons
  • GIANT, but with a huge disadvantage: a sidewall that isn't very strong.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I didnt expect the quality to be so high.

On a Toyota Corolla, which I borrowed from a 14-year-old boy, was Yokohama, which made tractor-like noises. Nexen was recommended by the tire fitter (the boss has it). I accepted it and did not regret it; I traveled 150 t. km. five times to the sea for six years, stopping in Crimea, Abkhazia, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Azov, and Georgia. With a self-tapping screw in the wheel, I left Batumi. Now, even though the tread is still 3mm in the centre (the side ones have all been removed), I started…

Pros
  • soft and not obtrusive
Cons
  • No

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Good quality product, I rate this purchase excellent.

I took 8.5j wheels (front-wheel drive) on the front p15 205/50, 9.5j wheels 215/60 back (drum brakes). sat down perfectly, brakes instantly, behaves just as well on a wet road, at a speed of 150 km / h there is silence in the cabin.

Pros
  • quiet, great grip

Overall a good tire and a fair price. Maybe I'll pick up the next set. Some pros: Almost inaudible on the highway, even at high speed. Excellent road holding on dry and wet asphalt. Aquaplaning was not observed. Mileage is about 50 t. Km and tread wear is about 65 percent. Cons: The only thing I did not like was the handling in sharp turns at speed, in the mountains, along serpentine. The feeling is as if the car is floating, the steering is bad. When driving smoothly it's great. But maybe I…

Good handling. Rut can be overcome with the use of water. No festivals from 120 to 140, and no taxiing either in Auto Rio3. The level of noise is within acceptable parameters. As with many budget slopes, the sidewalls are soft and thin. I was successful without adding the prefix "plus." Korea November 22. There are three drainage grooves, and the tread pattern is identical to that of the HD+ version. Confuses one second. Tires are non-directional and asymmetrical, and their installation on the…

Pros
  • Controllability.
Cons
  • At this time, it has not been discovered.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Wonderful quality, one hundred percent satisfied!

Toyota Avensis, size 205/55/16. I hope there aren't any issues, but the mileage isn't excellent, so I still recommend it. There was a Turanza bridge between the heavens and the earth before that. And for only 12400 dollars, too! Our roads are so bad that no one is insured here, so I drive carefully despite the soft sidewall. The manufacturer must believe that consumers are willing to buy new tires every year because my friend's brand-new set of Contact 6s were destroyed when they hit a curb…

Pros
  • All silence! The ride and comfort were both excellent. They're sturdy and have great stopping power.
Cons
  • It looked like a lesser size than advertised! The sidewall gives me the willies. (And my worries weren't unfounded; I did end up with a puncture on the side.)

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not a bad product, but you can find better.

using a 205/60/16 Lancer X tire Tires were first rate for the first two years. Not aware of what the issue was. Without a hitch, I can name the city, the highway, and the south-sea serpentines. Tires that are both quiet and easy on the feet. By the third year, people could feel the vibrations. Hodovka average, balancing didn't make a difference. After 4 years and 32,000 kilometers, we have achieved: All in cracks, especially inside the lamellae and channels; egg-shaped; i.e., unusable rubber; a

Pros
  • We liked everything about it, from the price to how peaceful and cozy it was to whatever nation made it (after the price). - high academic achievement - consistent performance in both dry and wet conditions.
Cons
  • - unable to last Tires went "egg" (or "bagel") in look after the third year due to poor rubber quality, which manifested as widespread cracking.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good value for money, I recommend it.

On this rubber, I did not go where I just did not go. Believe me when I say that there has not been a single puncture in the past four years of operation. She is an oak, to be sure, loud, and always jumping on bumps. However, this solution is preferable than the alternative of taking expensive tires to a tire shop every time there is a bolt on the road.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

I'm not completely satisfied with the product.

Before that, I searched for zero Pirelli Cinturato P4 tires and after that, I test-drove Cordiant, Kormoran, and Amtel for a short amount of time—all on the same vehicle, Sandero. The sensation of driving "like on rails" was provided by the Pirelli Cinturato P4 tires. And I'm not exaggerating when I say this: Without the driver making any adjustments to the steering wheel, the vehicle followed the predetermined path down to the millimeter. When I got behind the wheel of the Cinturato P4 for the

Pros
  • 1) It seems to be a very cost-effective option. After I relocated to that location, I noticed that the car seemed to coast with greater ease. Also, the amount of gasoline used per 100 kilometers driven decreased by 0.1 to 0.2 liters on average. Although I cannot completely rule out the possibility that all of this is the result of error or a person's unique perspective, it is quite unlikely. 2) An effective countermeasure against hydroplaning. This is because the tread has broad grooves that are somewhat deep (at least up until the point where the tire is completely worn out). You never let yourself get out of control in the mud. There was not a single instance in which someone was required to move over for another driver because their grip on the road was questionable during a downpour. Whenever there is severe rain, you should always move in the lane that is moving the fastest (90-110 km/h).
Cons
  • 1) Manageability. 2) Noise. In comparison to Cordiant Standard and Amtel Planet, I didn't detect any significant differences. Even when traveling at a set pace, such as the Kormoran K801, they occasionally vibrate with the sound of a tractor, but this occurs less frequently over time. When I think back to it, I'm struck by how much less audible the Cordiant Standard was in comparison to the Pirelli Cinturato P4s.

I had been considering it for a very long time; before to that, it was made by the Kama-217 factory, had accumulated 7 years and 60 thousand miles, and most certainly developed a herniation from age, but the tread would still be adequate for a few seasons. Oddly enough, she was never questioned at any point during the operation, and there were no issues. However, I still want something softer, cozier, and foreign for a change. I took Nexen, a soft and Southern-made brand, as the merchant had…

Pros
  • softness when navigating minor peaks Quite calm and quiet inside superior elastic material
Cons
  • unpleasant treatment Valkost slow accelerating driving off-road incompetently Tread - These tires appear to be unusually narrow when compared to tires of the same size from other manufacturers.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best price for such a product, I will buy more!

When I first got the car I'd bought, I was upset because I'd grown accustomed to buying only well-known brands. So, unexpectedly, the tires turned out to be great; they're somewhat plush, the car's interior is serene, and the ride itself is smooth and relaxing. There has never been an instance of aquaplaning, and the rubber has successfully prevented any side drift while maintaining superb handling. I was pleasantly shocked.

Pros
  • Calm, gentle, unobservant of the road ahead, capable of good hydroplaning and zero lateral drift; in other words, don't believe the rubbish its sounds would have you believe.
Cons
  • failed to locate

In general, whether it's furniture, home appliances, tires, or anything else, I like to select non-promoted brands. I've had my eye on Nexen for a while, but we've just never really connected. Michelin, Continental, and Good Year cars did reach me, but they weren't given enough time to wear down before being sold. And now the time has come! WV Passat, 205/55-16. 2.4 kgf/cm2 of pressure. In April 2022, a set of four cost 11,000, which is significantly less expensive than Continental, which for…

Pros
  • Good tires at a good price.
Cons
  • I didn't see anything wrong.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Not satisfactory, upset with the product.

A brand-new Skoda excellent 2022 was driven on such tires when they were delivered from the factory. On a gravel road, there is a country house that is located five kilometers apart from the main road. Each summer, there are consistently two to four punctures in a variety of wheels. There is no requirement for such suppleness in order to ensure comfort. I was caught aquaplaning three times on the ring road in St. Petersburg, but thankfully on areas of the road that were straight and there were…

Pros
  • Comfort, a lack of noise, and gentleness
Cons
  • It occasionally scratches because the sidewall is too soft and too thin. Tore the sidewall, and drove 17,000–18,000 kilometers. rode for a total of three seasons.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product suited me, I will recommend it to my friends.

I put two on the front since I thought it would look better. I hit a pothole, which caused my alignment to shift, and then I discovered that two of my front wheels were missing. Auto - polo sedan. When I got it, I was mortified to find that the rubber is incredibly pliable, and the cable can be bent with a simple movement of the hand. I placed it, I went away for three months prior to winter, and although I liked it very much, I was prepared for the worst. That's all you need for a peaceful…

Pros
  • The car's performance started to improve, and the price is reasonable.
Cons
  • The soft side line is not intended for use in making sharp turns or maneuvers. When it is in the standing position, it gives the appearance that the wheels are positioned lower.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Mediocre goods, most likely I will not use.

I drove about 15 thousand, the tires are really quiet, soft, I didn’t notice that they wore out very much. The board is very thin - it is very difficult to get out of the rut in the asphalt. It feels like the rubber wanders separately from the disc. You can drive around the city, don’t take it to the highway - you’ll suffer. I'll do it, I won't take it again.

Pros
  • Price
Cons
  • Very thin bead

There is something to compare, because. before that, Breeches (yapi, in stock), Nokian (2022), Kumkhi Eksta (Korean) were in the same size. In comparison with them, these tires, made in 2022, win in their merits, and above all in the absence of the effect of a "helicopter" at high speed, the absence of weak sidewalls, which Nokian clearly sinned (he broke through 2 wheels up to 1 year of measured driving). They have a good tread - they do not slip on asphalt and gravel, and the ABS does not…

Pros
  • made in Korea, worthy results of autotests in Europe (including prizes), low price, soft and not noisy, hold the car well during aquaplaning
Cons
  • designed for good roads and slightly rolly compared to previous tires

Revainrating 3 out of 5

There are disadvantages, but the product is usable.

The tire is good, especially for the price. It's worth its money, but of course it cannot be compared with the Continental, in terms of comfort and safety, with Dunlop, in terms of durability. Compared to Kumho, a little worse, and the difference in money is minimal. I won't take it again. Ford Focus car, tires 205/55 R16 Got pros: First of all, I liked the price, the low noise level, and the fuel consumption has changed down. At high speed, it is almost inaudible, and confidently keeps the…