Nokian Tires Nordman 8 205/55 R16 94T winter Review

I would like to share information on the operation of Nokian Nordman 8 winter tires, I repurchased the tires in the fall, rolled them on and drove all winter happily, the handling suits me completely, but in less than one season the tires cracked and look like they are 7 years old, I am very upset by the quality and price of this product . They are not yet a year old as they were produced.

I had assumed the tires would be old, yet they are only 21 years old overall. The cost is really reasonable. For 5950, I took 205x55x16.

Prior to that, there were Nokian Tires Nordman 4, which were released in 2022 and are still in working order. However, some spikes flew out, and because it has been 9 years, I believe it is time to eat. I haven't yet changed my shoes, but I have no doubts that nothing will go wrong.

After hitting the void, it promptly exploded. The automobiles following behind them all disappear down this hole. Only one year of warranty coverage is included in the purchase price. Going forward, I won't bother Nokian.

It burst when it hit the hole. What does the cars coming from behind also fall into this hole and nothing. Extended warranty only one year, not covered by warranty. In the future I will not contact Nokian.

I think I managed to buy the wheels in time! I bought it for 5ke, which has served faithfully for almost 5 years. To replace one, which was repaired a couple of times, I took 2 pieces back. Equipped for winter!

Mediocre rubber, at the level of the formula, if the quality control was higher for the formula, I would take it, since the formula has a large percentage of defects

Rigid, tougher than hakapelita, on dry and wet pavement, the braking distance is longer than hakapelita. The noise is the same. The fit of the spikes is good.

The 14-inch Nokian hakkapeliitta 8 rubber was the best on full ice (particularly asphalt), but it is no longer available. They looked for it, spent too much for it, and finally acquired it. Since Nokian Tires Nordman 8 (an exact clone of the premium hakkapeliitta 8) debuted in contests last year, it has performed as well as the original. There have been many worthy types of rubber used by the community (vk. Com/beDRIFTcup) over the years. The food chain begins and ends with this one. Everything

Good value for money. Some pros: Strong and stable. Holds the road well. For the entire first winter, it never failed. Spikes in place. Let's see how it behaves further. Has some cons: No. Except noise. Well, what do you want from studded winter tires.

Recommend to buy With its pros: Moderately noisy, good handling on roads with various surfaces and corners Cons: Expensive (2670 per item). For some reason, there are no markings "92T" and "XL" on the tires, previously they were present on the Nordman-5.

I purchased a set of four 185/65R14 tires from the final remaining stock of a genuine khaki 8 (nenordman) at the beginning of September for $4140. I compared it to Nordman 8 in the store and could tell right away that it was different without even looking closely. The spikes were shorter on Nordman 8, the sidewall and working surface were more flexible in Nordman 8, and the rubber (the actual material) felt different. Yes, I have all the wheels, and they're all at least a year old and from…

There has been a significant amount of snowfall this winter; nevertheless, if they are still clearing snow in Hong Kong, then there is none somewhere else in the region. On the other hand, I did not experience any difficulty moving about on this rubber. Getting out of a rut is not difficult at all.

Various advantages: I spent the first winter in Hong Kong on them, and after around 5000 runs, I found that they were comparable to the yokohama ice guard 55. It is so quiet that the people inside the cabin are unable to hear it at all. Now I ride like I'm sitting on a couch; it's just a buzz. Holds the road admirably; on the approach to Sheregesh, I made a few tight corners at an unusually high speed, but the rubber handled it with the utmost dignity. Departure from the garage complex up the…

Some pros: During the first season, I skated. Spikes in place. Maintains a firm grip on the road. As an installer, I am always traveling to new locations. region Below are some downsides: They have ceased production, and there is no indication that they are still available in St. Petersburg. The following variant is somewhat pricey for a kesa and a half.

Below are some advantages: They are quite reliable when traveling. All of the spikes have survived their first season with little damage. With these drawbacks: At speeds greater than 70 kilometers per hour, it is extremely noisy. Before they were Michelin, they could be quieter at times, but their prices were much higher. This could cause you to become preoccupied.

The promise of silent rubber and the depiction of floating spikes convinced me to give in. The expectations were not borne out. 225/60/18 suv size I read a lot of advertising and anticipated a lower level. For the dependability of the spikes, I can add + after the season is over. The pieces are all in place. This gives me pleasure. Indeed, the German forerunners "spit out their teeth" during the inaugural season. All the spikes are in place for the second season. an asterisk was added.

I tested the rubber in difficult real-world conditions when the Siberian winter hit, and the results were as follows: ice and rolled snow by 5, dry snow by 4.5, a bit less confidence but still good; I don't like asphalt, but it won't be in my hamlet until April. The tires are good; they rescued me from snowdrifts so deep on the Mazda 6 that the men in the 4WD looked askance at me; and they maintain the track with a lot of assurance, possibly due to size. One of its flaws is that it wanders on…

Quite an odd tire. It brakes effectively. Due to the quantity of spikes, acceleration is only effective on clean ice. It was so loud that I assumed it would roll, but it didn't. side slip holds horribly. On this rubber, even the slightest relief from an uncleaned road causes the car to shift, requiring frequent catching. That is why I believe this rubber to be hazardous. I don't suggest that anyone get a front-wheel drive.

purchased 185/65/15. I must add right away that we chose our tires based on our budget and quality/price considerations, as do the majority of drivers. They read the reviews, but they didn't pay much heed because no matter what "review" you open, there will always be people who don't like "rubber," no matter who made it. They drew attention to the tire's seemingly thin walls while purchasing it, despite thickness measurements showing an average of 7-8 mm, similar to the Hakkapelit 8 that is no…