Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 172
  • 5
    130
  • 4
    33
  • 3
    7
  • 2
    2
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for money, one of the best offers.

Nikon D5100 is my first digital SLR, which I have been choosing among Nikon cameras for a long time. The goal was to purchase a budget SLR camera with low weight and size, without unnecessary bells and whistles, which allows you to take high-quality photos. All Nikon devices meet the last requirement, the rest of the parameters are a matter of taste and finances. At first, I wanted to take the Nikon D3100, then the D3200, but I read a lot of comparative English-language reviews (the D3200 is…

Pros
  • Excellent thoughtful ergonomics. I especially like the swivel screen, which can be closed when shooting through the viewfinder, which protects it from scratches. Intuitive menu. Fast readiness for work at inclusion. The battery lasts for a day.
Cons
  • There is no provision for attaching the lens cap to the camera or lens body (a small detail that you can fix yourself).

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not all that bad, but there are minuses.

We went on vacation with relatives, they have a d5100, I have a d40, and so - under the same conditions on a whale, and even on a 35mm 1,8 fix, my pictures are sharper, richer, correctly exposed. In general, amateur photographers absolutely do not need 16 MP, they do not add any quality. And, what disappointed me, modern technologies did not improve the image quality at all, quite the contrary. Added only video shooting. So if you need a high-quality photo - take the d90, the price is the same.

Pros
  • convenient, intuitive camera, I figured it out in 5 minutes after d40 good fix video large swivel screen
Cons
  • good shots at high iso - a myth ! in dark areas, the noise is very noticeable at 800 iso, unless, of course, viewed in full screen, and not on the avatar whale 18-55 is absolutely useless, soap in all pictures at any aperture, sharpness only with a 35mm fix (price for 16 MP) image quality requires post-processing, almost all are underexposed with different types of metering NEF can only be processed in the latest version of Capture NX pictures weigh a lot, and, accordingly, are processed for a long time

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A very high-quality product, I take it not for the first time.

Now the industry of amateur DSLRs is such that devices of the same level: nikon, canon, sony, pentax for an AMATEUR will be almost identical. It is unlikely that you will see a big difference in quality, especially in jpeg. Canon - more ascetic, more reportage, as it were; the best video, so if you are primarily into video shooting, then I advise canons. Sony has the most innovations, but the most raw are newcomers to the mirror sphere, who, however, are actively mastering it. Pentax…

Pros
  • 1) One of the best matrices and processor in the amateur segment. Made in sleepy :) So in fairly calm conditions, the 7000 shots, where this matrix and processor are also, and the 5100 shots will be identical. 2) Ergonomics, IMHO, on top, the team worked out the design and layout of the buttons perfectly. 3) Price-quality. Even despite the flood in Thailand (flooded Nikon, Sony, Canon factories .). Moreover, it is temporary, after NG will subside. 4) A rich arsenal of functionality, but well-organized - I personally figured it out without instructions in just 30 minutes, although this is my first DSLR (but it’s important to know the photo materiel well, it will be difficult from full 0). Now, in general, the trend of raising the level of amateur devices is higher and higher. It is with them that testing of innovations begins, because this is the largest segment of the photo market. 5) Rotary screen and its quality. Even though this is now the norm. That doesn't detract from the fact ;) 6) Reliability of the apparatus as a whole. Nikon respects not only himself, but also his users. It is felt. All devices in the amateur band are reliable enough for relevant requests. 7) Kitovsky lens. Not all brands give them the proper quality. Nikon does it. For starters - great working optics.
Cons
  • 1) The absence of a screwdriver and additional buttons (there is only one on the 5100) is difficult to call a disadvantage for this segment. They are not yet put on amateur devices. A screwdriver is needed for "AF" lenses produced since the 80s, which were made without a built-in motor. For the last 5 years they have been produced very little, completely duplicating the "AF-S" standard. A screwdriver is also noisy and rather slow :) In general, with rare exceptions, such lenses are not used, especially by amateurs. And additional keys are needed for quick access when the work is on fire and the conditions are quite extreme. Again, this is for enthusiasts and professionals. 2) Plastic case, this is also the norm for this price category. And contrary to some statements, it feels like nothing if you use the device adequately. 3) Viewfinder. That's what I would like more and brighter. God bless him, with guidance points, 11 of them are enough for me personally. However, even here this is the norm for almost all devices of this line. And do not worry, this shortcoming is not critical. The viewfinder is really important, IMHO, when precise manual focusing is important. And this is semi-professional and professional specificity. And you get used to it so quickly. 4) I want a stronger battery. But this is typical for such devices. However, I still want more! At the very least, buy 2 pieces. Look like that's it :)

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Quite good, but I expected more from it.

Good afternoon, I bought the D5100 a couple of months ago in Amazon. There was a need to change the lens, I decided to try Nikkor 18-105 kit. And that's the problem, from the viewfinder of the camera, when zooming, THE WIND BLOWS DIRECTLY IN THE EYE ! I can't believe this is a design feature. When contacting the repair center DS, which was in Hong Kong, they told me to hand over the camera, we will send it to Hong Kong and return it in 2 ! month. I was in the same Amazon Hong Kong store, they…

Pros
  • Ergonomic, functional.
Cons
  • Read carefully the appeal to the official representative in Hong Kong. And check the equipment in the store.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best product, from those that I have viewed, I advise everyone!

I bought the camera Nikon D5100 KIT 18-55 bought 2.5 years ago. From the first day, she pleases with her capabilities, the quality of photos. The kit lens is very cheap and gives beginners the opportunity to learn how to shoot beautiful photos in various genres. With their DSLR with a whale lens, they went on savage trips to China, the Philippines, Mexico, Sri Lanka, Hong Kong and New York. More than happy with the quality of the photos. Six months ago I bought a Nikkor 70-300 telephoto lens -

Pros
  • inexpensive, high-quality matrix, wide opportunities for creativity
Cons
  • no cons for the price

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I like the product very much, fully consistent with my expectations.

An excellent camera that is suitable not only for acquaintance with digital-SLR photography. But to get high-quality photos, you need to be able to use it. In daylight, excellent photos come out even in automatic mode. In dark conditions, it would be convenient to use the "live view", but everything spoils the autofocus backlight that does not work in this mode.

Pros
  • - excellent photos with proper use - swivel screen - life view (but without autofocus illumination)
Cons
  • - autofocus backlight does not work in life view mode . in a darkened room, the mode becomes useless - the lens cover is not fixed in any way - I did not find an opportunity to disable the output of data on the screen when photographing through the viewfinder - I have to close it - weak negative adjustment of the viewfinder

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Just super, the product is made wonderfully, very satisfied.

I shot with this camera for 2 years, I decided to write a review =) The potential of the camera is revealed on good lenses, including cheap fixes: 35 or 50 mm, the photos are excellent. Although at 18-55 you can get a good shot! photo examples: https://fotki. . Ru/next/users/masha-rumyantsewa2022/album/467956/view/1092835?page=0 https://fotki. . Ru/next/users/masha-rumyantsewa2022/album/467956/view/1092845?page=0 https://fotki. . Ru/next/users/masha-rumyantsewa2022/album/467953/view/1092811……

Pros
  • 1. Small. For a woman's hand, that's it, but my husband complained that it was not very convenient to hold. 2. Rotary screen! Yes! At 7000 it is very lacking :( 3. Quite working ISO 800 (surprisingly, things are worse at 7000 with ISO). 4. Good battery! Long enough. 5. Simple control - a beginner will be able to figure it out. 6. Strong body. Once I fell - but even after that there were no difficulties! 7. Affordable price (now the truth is very expensive).
Cons
  • 1. No screwdriver. Accordingly, it is not possible to use lenses without autofocus. 2. There is no way to correct the focus of the lens - if there is a back or front focus - it is already more difficult. 3. No second screen.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good value for money, I recommend.

I will make a reservation in advance that I have many years of experience shooting with SLR cameras, from film to digital FF. So this camera immediately went into the category of "friend of Photoshop" due to the strange color rendering of the "skinton" (skin color). Of course, all this is corrected by "presets" configured and created in Capture NX2, but why such a hassle :(. This is an amateur segment camera and everything should be simple and immediately here. You can shoot objects but faces…

Pros
  • The advantages include a large matrix with high sensitivity. Compactness. Build quality . Greater functionality. All sorts of chips in the form of preset effects. Full HD video shooting. Rotary display .
Cons
  • Color rendition . With the settings sewn into the device, deathly pale faces are obtained, as if powdered. On a calibrated monitor, the difference in color reproduction compared to competitors' cameras is significant. In-camera JPEG at 3+ no more. Poor viewfinder, it does not have frames (sight) as in old models, from here a littered horizon, etc. High price (for an amateur camera segment).

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best purchase in my life, I will definitely buy it again.

If the nikon d7000 had a swivel screen, I would take it as an ideal inexpensive camera for amateurs and pros. And so - nikon d5100 is quite an excellent device, convenient, high-quality and takes great pictures. If you had a canon 10-50d or 350d-1100d or any cropped nikon up to d90, then it’s better to take the d7000 - you will be more happy. In the store, he focused much better and generally sat in his hands like a glove, solid, durable, fast and beautiful unit with a large bright viewfinder…

Pros
  • I had a canon 40d, I compare with it. In terms of noise, the leader is 100% - 5100, in terms of color rendering - everything is relative, 40d turns yellow, 5100 is blue, you need to take this into account when making settings, in the shop it is corrected at once. In terms of detail, the leader is again 5100. Nikon also has a very nice screen. Pixel-by-pixel preview of the captured photo. The video is pretty cool. Screen rotation is extremely useful. It focuses much more accurately and faster, the percentage of photos in focus is much higher than that of 40d - I consider this a very important factor. Focuses via LiveView. Photos open much faster in the computer and download faster. Noise suppressors and all sorts of D-Lighting rule with might and main. Whale 18-55 VR - beyond praise - sharp, with small distortions, quite pleasant and fast, light, durable and does not play anywhere, does not leave.
Cons
  • Very weak battery. I have enough for a couple of days of active use. 40d in this sense, I took a vacation for two weeks - I never charged it, I shot a lot every day. It is also harder to control, 40d is more comfortable to hold for my big hand, and all pressing is somehow more pleasant and solid. Still, 5100 is not reinforced concrete, like 40d, somewhere there is a bit of backlash. When pulled out of the wardrobe trunk, the card compartment always opens. No exposure bar in LiveView. The video has not yet been able to adjust so that it does not turn out so wildly noisy in the twilight - the device automatically uses extremely high ISO. The viewfinder appeared darker and smaller. Often there are errors when scrolling through photos, sometimes they don't "spin". There is no battery pack for this machine. I found a broken pixel in the center of the matrix - it does not interfere, but the fact is unpleasant, check when buying. I will add after a month. And yet, the ineptitude is frustrating. I liked the width of the tokina 11-16 the most, and autofocus does not work on the 5100.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Everything in the purchase suits, a very necessary product.

It is worth starting with the fact that this is the first SLR. Before choosing, I probably watched reviews and read articles for 3-4 months) My eyes immediately fell on Nikon, Canon faded into the background . although many said that Canon is the "God" of all cameras: D But I made sure that this is not at all the case;) The camera fits comfortably in the hand, for me personally the location of the buttons is convenient, excellent photos even at 18-55) Swivel screen, this is very important for…

Pros
  • Color rendering Photo quality Ergonomics Swivel screen Not a bad 18-55 lens
Cons
  • Haven't figured it out yet =)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the level, I am satisfied with everything.

I’ve been using it recently, but I’ve already appreciated the strengths, and you can and should fight against the shortcomings of the auto mode - that’s why it’s a DSLR, in order to fully open up only in capable hands - which I will strive for! As I already wrote in the discussions, the advantages: 1. matrix from the "semi-professional" D7000: the light sensitivity is simply excellent, at ISO 800 the picture is almost perfect, at 3200 (!) it starts to make noise, but still corrected by…

Pros
  • - Photosensitive matrix from D7000 - Photo quality - Flash - Price quality - HDR and D-Lighting - Many more - too many to list
Cons
  • - Auto settings - governing bodies - no "masterpiece" button ;)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I definitely recommend buying, I didn't notice any disadvantages.

I wanted to make a conscious and correct choice when buying a CZK, to find the optimal combination of price / quality, without overpaying for what I don’t need, but taking it to the maximum, so that I wouldn’t be disappointed in my choice. For a long time I studied on the Internet the features of digital photography, reviews, reviews, comparisons of cameras and other information from the structure of the matrix and lenses with their optical properties, to RAW processing in photo editors. All…

Pros
  • The quality of photographs, color reproduction and image detail, speed, ergonomics Nikon - at its best. The price justifies itself by 200%.
Cons
  • Just one programmable button, I put ISO on it, I shoot in RAW, so in principle, one button is enough. Aperture and exposure are also adjusted by turning the control dial while pressing / releasing the "exposure compensation" button, and nothing else needs to be changed during the shooting process, so the absence of several programmable buttons is not critical for me. It takes a long time to catch focus in LiveView mode, which, again, is not very important to me, since I shoot mainly through the viewfinder.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I³'m satisfied with the product, it³'s well made and the price is also satisfying.

I liked the fotik, only a screwdriver is really missing, and the d90 is already outdated, and the d7000 costs space. The HDR function is worthless, it is better to take 3 shots yourself, since there is bracketing and it will not be difficult. For creativity, it will definitely require additional lenses, and for a family, especially after a soap dish - super. If you want to earn money, then buy a more serious fotik. I personally do not have enough external flash, I think to buy it. Photos…

Pros
  • 1. A good whale lens, though it quickly gets bored, I really want a fix. 2. Rotary screen. When transporting, you close the screen inside and it is safe. Very high quality, awesome viewing angle. 3. Not very noisy matrix. 4. Ability to control the flash manually. 5. You can connect Soviet lenses through an adapter, mech. 6. Good battery. 7. You can take a photo directly from the browser from your computer without additional. software. 8. IR remote control sensor on both sides. 9. With a skillful approach, the pictures are super, I printed 20 * 30 - excellent, but if I still shoot on a fix, I think there would be space.
Cons
  • 1. No screwdriver. Before buying, I thought, what for it is needed, overpay for it. Almost immediately I felt the need for additional lenses, macro, halibut, body, shirik fix. Very expensive. And with a screwdriver, it’s 2 times cheaper, but second-hand, just a penny. So a screwdriver will save you a lot of money later. 2. It is not friendly with non-processor lenses at all, it works only in the "M" mode. 3. A flash sticks out, the Soviet fur cannot be screwed on (checked!), unless through the ring. 4. No native extra battery pack (vertical handle). 5. There is no "make a photo masterpiece" button. 6. Sometimes does not fall into the white balance.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Just super, the product is made wonderfully, very satisfied.

As an amateur DSLR the best choice. Three good lenses for it (wide, normal and tele) and you are ready for any scenes. Yes, and with whale 18-55 is also excellent, for starters. The swivel screen saves when you need to shoot from an uncomfortable angle (from the ground for example). I won’t say anything about shooting a video, I think it’s superfluous in a DSLR. On the machine, in poor lighting, the ISO is very high, you need to follow or limit it in the menu. ISO 1600 is definitely working…

Pros
  • Good sensor (wide range, low noise) Build quality Good quality swivel screen
Cons
  • Pentamirror The front wheel and another functional button are missing, as a result - menu climbing Not very fast Live view Wrong BB when there is little light No reticle in viewfinder

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Overall good, but I expected more, there are disadvantages.

There was an experience of using models d3000, 3100, 3200, d90, d300. If you do not take more expensive models, then this camera is almost no different from its predecessors. If you just shoot anything or just in the same, constant conditions as in a studio, then it’s not bad, but depending on what you shoot. In the default settings with colors, there is a problem, I had to adjust it manually to the result that suits me. Overall, not bad, but not good either. Many hybrids now shoot better, but…

Pros
  • Many possibilities, enough megapixels, if you get used to it, it's convenient, price, compact, lightweight. The screen lies less than on previous models.
Cons
  • The same as the D3200 model, only more expensive and with slightly higher resolution. There are many features that you will never use, but you have to pay for them. Shooting with live view is almost impossible, the built-in microphone for video records everything, including a lot of noise. The battery is sooo weak, but this is for my needs in shooting without video, and if you shoot with a lot of live view, it will sit down in an hour. Ergonomics for an amateur. The screen is lying.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Not a bad buy, well worth the money.

Attention! In order not to be disappointed in the device, be sure to check the focus when buying! Of the three tested devices in different stores, only one turned out to have an accurate lens focus. For those who do not want to search and print test charts, I would recommend taking a picture of a small object in the store, for example, phone buttons with an open aperture. Take a few shots at the angle of the center button, then view them enlarged. You will immediately see whether the sharpness…

Pros
  • A lot has been written about the merits, so I will not repeat myself. I bought this device because of the availability of hdr and d-lighting functions, because I photograph landscapes a lot. Canon has these features only in expensive models. I was pleased with the presence of image processing functions and specials in the device. effects. For photography lovers who do not want to sit and process photos in lighroom and photoshop, the functions are useful. I like Nikon's color rendition, although this is subjective.
Cons
  • Just one programmable button. I would like two. Difficult menu for beginners.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like everything, the price and quality are acceptable.

In general, the disadvantages / advantages are controversial. I bought this unit yesterday, I sit in it all my free time - a lot of settings, a lot of effects . A good option for those who need good photos. Even in auto mode, the photos are worthy (much better than on a soap dish). first photos: http://fotki. . Ru/users/rumiantzeva2022/album/329553/

Pros
  • - Low price. - Pleasant to the touch - Fits comfortably in the palm of your hand - Swivel screen - the ability to use a wireless remote control - Not heavy - Takes pictures quickly, focuses
Cons
  • - Weak battery - Replacement battery is hard to find and costs 1000-1500 - Lenses are more expensive than Canon - Slightly illogical menu (perhaps for me) - Weak battery cover

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Everything is fine, there are only minor drawbacks.

I bought it by accident, before that I looked after Nikon 3100 or Pentax K-R for money, (Kenons were not considered, due to the use of the 1100 model by friends, and the personal testing of the 550 model. somehow it didn’t impress and didn’t hook) A lot has already been written about all the advantages of Nikon 5100 , I want to talk about the shortcomings. There is no screwdriver, which means that AF lenses will have to be twisted by hand. AF-S are expensive. Setting the viewfinder to minus is…

Pros
  • High ISO HDR Bracketing noise reduction Matrix D7000 Active D-Lighting IR port on both sides Focus illumination swivel monitor. Ability to edit pictures directly in the camera.
Cons
  • High price no screwdriver Lacks diopter adjustment of the viewfinder to minus The wheel is involved rather weakly, navipad --- not at all !! for menu navigation only. Just one programmable button.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good product, I advise you to try it.

Due to the fact that I travel quite often - over time, the capabilities of the "soap box" became not enough, I planned to buy a good SLR. I chose among such options as Nikon D3100, D5100 and Canon D1100, D600 - as a result, the D5100 was chosen by the ratio of characteristics and price. This device was bought before a trip to the UAE at the beginning of 2022, the shooting during the trip was carried out in a fairly active mode - the camera has proven itself only from the best side. At the…

Pros
  • 1. High quality photography due to the matrix from a more advanced counterpart D7000. 2. Quite compact and light (compared to more expensive SLR cameras) - in my opinion, the best option for traveling. 3. Rotatable display - allows you to take interesting pictures from different angles. 4. IR port on the front and rear panels - convenient to use with the remote control when the camera is on a tripod. 5. Sufficiently capacious battery - on average enough for 400 shots, but an additional one was purchased for travel.
Cons
  • 1. Video mode leaves much to be desired - poor focus on the subject, autofocus sound recording. 2. Live View mode (shooting through the screen) - it is not convenient to use for photography due to the slow shutter speed. 3. After the purchase, one dead pixel was found on the photomatrix - but it is not noticeable in the photographs.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Some kind of defective product, I definitely won't buy it anymore.

I decided to buy a "budget" camera more expensive, for a trip to the sea with a child (1.5). The photo is good, but the video is just disgusting. Focus auto is very loud!!! You watch the video and hear how the camera focuses, every two or three seconds it buzzes, because the child cannot sit still. The device was purchased solely for the sake of good HD video shooting of a child. In motion, it focuses poorly, only when the object stops is it normal. The camera is not recommended for young…

Pros
  • good photos
Cons
  • HORRIBLE VIDEO