📷 Nikon AF FX NIKKOR 50mm F/1.4D DSLR Lens with Auto Focus for Nikon DSLR Cameras" - "Enhanced Nikon AF FX NIKKOR 50mm F/1.4D DSLR Lens with Auto Focus, Perfect for Nikon DSLR Cameras Review

Its pros: Aperture, sharpness, so the picture it gives out is simply gorgeous for me! Cons below: The advantages of this glass more than cover its disadvantages.

Has some pros: Fairy tale picture! Sharpness is great! Focus speed is fast! Not a lens - but a miracle! I photograph everything - portraits, landscapes, Cons: The hood could not stand the impact on the stones :) I slipped on the river :)

Its pros: Compact Light Blurs the background! Not the highest clarity/sharpness at 1.4 Focuses 3 times faster 50/1.4G With its cons: Chromatitis up to 2-2.8 Softit up to 1.7-2.2 Not the most accurate af on 1.4 There is a slight backlash.

Somewhere, starting from f2.8, there is a sharp degradation of the image, after 2.8 a smooth increase in quality, up to 5.6, It folds - unfolds, plus the lens protects. With its pros: Small, mirrorless, through an adapter), at 50 1.4 after 2 years of use it is like new, does not creak, Cons: At 1.4-1.8 it is very soft, HA for bright objects, even in the center of the frame: Info/i7/555a8c5ca16f757d03d20fb47f485f12/4-56-809/24298346/50_1_4 1.4G wide open is much sharper.

An inexpensive native fix with aperture 1.4, further than 5 meters the picture can no longer be distinguished from the zoom, therefore, when purchasing such glass, you need to understand what it is taken for, shooting at apertures 1.4 - 3.5 I don’t want to shoot from the camera))) A few portraits in conjunction with the D7000:

Has some pros excellent glass. Ideal for portraits. Perfectly draws corners. Bokeh, which is UNcharacteristic for Nikon, is very pleasant. Cons below: lack of a fast motor, although this is not critical for a portrait

I considered the current, not new, but not ancient G-version for a long time, but I ultimately decided against it since I didn't like how slow it was, and Krasitsky (also known as DVDM) raised some questions by comparing the 1.8D, 1.4G, and 1.4D variants. I was also very interested in the sharpness that the new 50mm Sigma and the 45mm Tamron stabilizer could provide. But, the weight and the dimensions. If you give up on them, I have a 24-70 2.8G lens that is not quite as sharp as razor blades…

Some pros: Huge f / 1.4 aperture, beautiful and voluminous pattern, very sharp. Has cons: Unfortunately, I did not find any technical shortcomings :). Well, is it a drawback when you have to walk once again to move away from or get closer to the object being filmed?

After reading a sufficient number of positive testimonials on this glass, I decided to go ahead and purchase it. I use Nikon D800. Disappointment at viewing the initial photographs; the sharpness needs to be "milked" like a cow in the graphic editors; there is no contrast; the field is covered in a pale pattern all throughout. Much less light is required for a nighttime photo, but once again, there is no crispness. I previously owned a Nikkor 50 1.8d, and I can attest to the fact that this…

The portrait turned out wonderfully! Because of the quality of the lens, you may take pictures of people, nature, and even just indoors without having to use a flash. Exhibits, animals, and museums are just some of the things that may be captured with this lens that are impossible to capture with a flash. Check out the album titled "Test Nikon D90 + Nikkor 50mm AF f/1.4D" for additional information. It contains sample photos taken with both cameras. Some pros: 1) Aperture. When set to f/1.4…

In general, when buying a fix, you need to know why you are taking it :) Very good glass for quite normal money. At the same club, the photographer is very praised. Should be in the arsenal of any amateur photographer. Has some pros Huge luminosity. A must have for portrait photography. You can shoot indoors without a flash. Beautiful bokeh, if desired, you can achieve a very low depth of field. Has cons: There is no motor. If your DSLR does not have a screwdriver, then do not rely on…

immediately after the purchase in 2022, I was completely delighted, but now I have tempered my ardor and sold it for 4 years Nevertheless, I used it for all 4 years as the main one, though I shoot mostly portraits. I advise you as an inexpensive fast lens for beginners, you can practice on it and understand what you really need. Pros below: Budget fast aperture, focal length for crop is quite suitable for facial portraits. Not a bad picture Cons: Although there were no special expectations…

The portrait is excellent! The quality of the lens allows you to shoot both portraits, nature and just indoors without a flash. Exhibitions, museums, animals - everything that cannot be shot with a flash will allow you to shoot this lens! For more details, see I have an album "Test Nikon D90 + Nikkor 50mm AF f / 1.4D" there are test photos. Some pros: 1) Aperture. At f/1.4, it is soft in the distance, but pleasant, and sharp up close. 2) From f / 2.0 is already sharp! 3) Metal bayonet 4)…

I have been wanting to comment for a long time. The difference after the transition from "Kita" is really noticeable. Photography has become more artistic, sometimes looking at the pictures you think is this possible?)) Maybe this feeling will pass with time, and good things will become a habit . But now photography has taken on a deeper meaning for me. Pros: Aperture, sharpness, image quality. This is my first glass after the whale glass, so the picture it gives out is simply gorgeous for

This lens is very good for its price, it's just a bestseller, and the Chinese assembly, I express my deep respect to the Japanese, did not worsen its quality at all ! Plus, for those who bought a full frame and while there is no dough for a normal zoom, you can light up this baby and enjoy amateur shooting in full frame ! With its pros. It is not expensive for the glass from which it is made, all the cheaper glasses from Nikon and Canon are also made of plastic. Has cons: He is not…

I use on Nikon D7000. AF is fast enough but slower than the AF-S version I had a BF on mine, it’s good that the device has a fine focus adjustment. I set it to -20, like the hits became more accurate. Soft drawing, even if you clamp the aperture to 8, it's still soft. Its pros: On the crop is an excellent portraiture. Aperture, 1.4 Light Its cons: does not have its own AF motor, AF only works with cameras that have a "screwdriver" chromatitis there are copies with BF soft at all…

For modern digital cameras (I have a D80), the aperture ring is completely useless - you can’t use it, the aperture is set through the camera. When buying, it is advisable to choose - all copies are different - I looked at 3, in the end I took the best one, although also with a little back focus. The outer lens is not recessed very much, so it is advisable to use a lens hood when shooting in sunny weather.

I just recently bought an old Japanese one. showed excellent results in tests. for my money, I consider it the best lens . for whom aperture 1.8 is not enough. before that I shot at 85mm afs 1.8, the fifty dollars has a faster focus, sharpness is where it was focused . of course, it will soap the edges, this is understandable with such an aperture . who is dissatisfied, close the hole)

I saw enough laudatory reviews for this glass, I bought it - I bought it. I use Nikon D800. Disappointment from the first photos, sharpness just has to be milked like a cow in graphic editors, there is no contrast, a pale pattern all over the field. For a night photo, even less, but again there is no sharpness. I had a Nikkor 50 1.8d - it’s really better and the nuts on the bokeh didn’t bother me, sharper, cheaper. I adapted 50 1.4D for ID photos, but it showed itself not in the best way there…

I bought a new lens from the editorial office of a printed publication for 6500. Apparently they knew how to choose lenses, because there is no front and back focus. If you take pictures by the light of a flashlight at night at F 1,4 on the target, right in the center of the frame, there is a strip where chromatic aberrations occur. During the day they are not there, the image is greatly spoiled. You can fix it in the editor, but it's not nice. It collects dust well, and there is no lens hood…