Nikon NIKKOR Fixed Focus Cameras Review

Great lens, used with d610 Has pros: - Sharpness! After Nikon 50 1.8 G / Tamron 24-70 - Great for shoulder portraits where 50mm is already distorted. Got cons: - There is no stub, it still gives distortion, so I want 135 mm + macro (this one does not allow you to get very close due to MDF) - The inscription "Nikon" on the cover was quickly erased

Why is it so light? So much plastic horror, well, it’s not for nothing that all the pros sit on it, and give you more matrix on the crop.

A very good portrait for its price (500 bucks), there are no complaints about the drawing, everything is beautiful and sharp, af is not as tenacious as I expected, although this may be the trouble of my specimen.

I bought in Hong Kong for 18980 an excellent replacement for my 85 / 1,8d did not regret a bit about the investment in the new 85 / 1,8G Ru/camera/ there are examples of photos of mine where the girl is in the forest Some pros: 1) Aperture 1.8 is 95% Drawing (good contrast, sharpness, bokeh) 3) Constructive (normal lens hood, manual autofocus fine-tuning, appearance if it matters to anyone) 4) Confident fast focusing (and in poor lighting conditions) Cons below: the disadvantages are…

Considering the price, Attached some photos with different F values Some pros: A lens that is very sharp at an open aperture (over the entire field of the frame! ) Guys, if you have a camera with poor AF or you yourself still don’t technically understand how to consistently get into focus at F1.8, then this is only your trouble, BOKE at F1.8 You just don’t feel the weight of the lens (very nice) I've been shooting on it for many years and there were no problems (5 for reliability) Has cons…

In general, if you need a good portrait lens, I will attach a few photos taken on the nikon D800 The first one was shot with 2 different lenses, against the background of blinds specially in the same conditions, nikor on the left, sigma art on the right) Nikor' notice the complete lack of detail on the white curtain and the awful chromaticity that makes the model's hair look purple! The third is an example of "volumetric and artistic" bokeh :)

The picture significantly surpassed my favorite 50 1.8 1.8G (left) and 50 1.8D (right): (Stills from video 720p, D7000, 30 fps, shutter speed 1/30, f/1.8, ISO 100, manual focus and WB) http://ib3 Ru/b/2022/08/14/d5/d5b6c5b9edbf0ef20d01576379cec400 Keep4 Jpg http://ib3 Ru/b/2022/08/14/75/757a315041546362907630e73c1672f9 Keep4 Jpg I will add that a couple of months later I bought a G-fifty 1.4 and I can say that 85 fifty dollars loses, although it costs one and a half times cheaper.

85 / 1.4 would be better, I look at the price tag on it, from the moment of purchase, http://s020 Ru/i721/1302/5e/a666146c871 Jpg http://s017 Ru/i418/1302/b2/a4682752a6f7 Jpg http://s017 Ru/i443/1302/44/b52bc01d7 Jpg

\ 2 and 85 \ 1.8D, having bought 85 \ 1.8G I did not regret at all, \ 1.4 85 \ 1.8G is the best work of Nikon in recent times in terms of ratio, price \ quality \ working hole \ pattern, etc. but I can show a couple of photos: http://farm9 Com/8181/8015464791_4fd6dbd357_ Jpg http://farm9 Com/8455/7991797267_950f16476d_

voluminous (in my opinion) is very working, in the portrait "only the face" all skin imperfections are visible, why even more sharpness? Do not believe the reviews where "4 out of 5 in marriage, shooting in the open. " Moreover, in the same review it is written that if you hold down to F2,2, then everything falls into place and the photo starts to turn out! First you need to learn how to shoot in the open, use all types of carcass focusing, understanding what depth of field is, shutter lag time

Different pros: Sharp at all apertures, contrasting at open apertures, light, fairly accurate AF, smooth bokeh. Different cons: AF is not fast enough, the lens is rather weak in backlight, cheap body materials against the backdrop of a price of about 20,000.

An excellent lens for my money, I think this is one of Nikon's masterpieces, only 85mm f / 1.4G is better (85mm f / 1.8D is not so simple here), but this is a completely different story at a price of 3 (3!) times more expensive for people who do not tolerate compromise! What else can I say . a classic portrait painter. Some pros: Aperture, the picture is pleasant (but without any peculiarities), fully working f1.8, sharp (anyone, for me +), focuses accurately, constructive (nothing dangles…

An excellent lens, however, like the whole series of new G-series 35mm, 50mm fixes. Compatible with all Nikon DSLRs thanks to built-in focus motor. As for focusing speed, there is not much difference with Nikon D7000 from 1.8D ! So everything is quiet, fast and accurate! Pros below: Excellent color reproduction with a very plastic oily bokeh pattern, light circles of the correct shape)), sharp at 1.8, although it is better to shoot at 2-2.2, light and comfortable compared to 1.8D, solid…

Bottom line: Good portrait glass for further deep post-processing in Photoshop. Ideal for a reportage portrait (little time) and commercial (immediately need a high-quality result). In fact, it can be used as a regular lens. Even on the crop! Along with fifty dollars . For the soul - I shoot with Helios, for work - with Nikon. Its pros: Light, light, sharp, fast enough. Very high quality detailed picture. The price is small (I took it before the crisis for 20-odd). Some cons: Chromatitis…

I had experience using 85mm 1.8D, after which I tested (and bought) 85mm 1.8G. D-shka at 1.8 finally soap :( I had to tighten it up to 2.2-2.5, only there the sharpness began . but D - autofocus is undeniably faster. And 1.8G is sharp right from 1.8, very cool! =) Different pros: relatively inexpensive, light, compact, SHARP at 1.8 !, well, fast aperture (of course). And also, in comparison with the D series (also 1.8), they successfully reduced chromatism, well done. :) Cons below: bokeh by

Just love the lens. Allows you not to waste extra time when processing portraits for dancing with a tambourine, to get a pleasant complexion. Gives a color reproduction that I really like. The color saturation is high, it does not require enhancement in the editor. The lens is worth its money, in terms of price / quality ratio - amazing glass! Has pros: 1. Excellent, for an inexpensive lens, color reproduction. Good skintones. When processing in Lightroom 5.0, the maximum that has to be done -

I recommend to buy, just a magical portrait from the point of view of an amateur. Different pros: An excellent portrait lens, including on a crop (it turns out a "long" portrait lens, EGF = 127.5 mm) Sharp even at maximum aperture (f1.8) Excellent bokeh, blurs the background just into colored spots High-quality autofocus, I'm quite satisfied with the speed Excellent build quality Excellent aperture, suitable for night portraits Complete set (two caps, lens hood, case) Got cons: For an amateur…

But we must pay tribute to the lens, all these problems are visible only with a strong approximation, if you don’t crop and zoom in too much, everything looks very cool. Got pros: Excellent portraiture. Good aerial bokeh at 1.8. The recoil is normal. Focus on a selective point is quite accurate. Lightweight and small. Cons below: Would be an ideal purchase if not for the chromatic. on an open aperture. If on the central objects of the 1st plan (where the focus is) it is practically absent, then

There were many opticians, both expensive and not very expensive. For myself, I realized that the price very often does not justify itself. From 85mm 1.8g and 1.4g I would have to choose, then I would choose 1.8. I didn’t even hold the D version in my hands, I won’t say anything. I would choose in favor of the price in the first place, because I didn’t notice a huge difference from 1.4G, for which I have to overpay 40-50 thousand, it’s better to get more lenses for this money. Very sharp with…

I have been using this glass for 2 years paired with d600. Light - yes. It can shoot at open up to f / 1.8, but soap can hardly be avoided. Out of 5 shots on such a hole, 3-4 are in marriage. I believe that the working one starts at f / 2.2. But to be sure, I press it to f/2.5. Due to the good plastic body, the lens turned out to be very light. How to anyone, but for me it's rather +. The built-in motor drives AF fast enough. But this is subjective. I read that many are not satisfied with the…