Pentax DA 35mm f/2.4 AL Lens for Digital SLR Cameras Review

Candid insights into the product.I took it with Pentax K3 the picture is just class! I took a star 55mm for a couple of days, I didn’t like it! I put on my 35mm, I'

The impression is very good, they can say that 70% of the successful shots that went into business from this glass! And the number of these successful shots is only growing :) I will buy another one :)

I combine with the k10 with autofocus on an open hole, there is zero sense from it - it never got into focus, Pleasant bokeh for me, although the 77 and is quite satisfied

That's it, the whale is resting. How to set and forget.)) I recommend! But the price could be a little less, for the absolute ideal) . It doesn't get more universal. Got pros: Easy, quick focus, sharp enough throughout the frame, good colors, angle of view, resolution, size and build quality . excellent glasses . Got cons: There is little distortion. well, plastic, I don’t really consider this a disadvantage, especially if it is rarely removed.

Blurring, in my opinion, is harsh (this is very subjective, of course, therefore not in shortcomings). And in bright light (sun) it becomes quite pleasant. Often I carry only it, almost always enough. A plastic mount with a low weight - I think, rather, a virtue. With its pros. Light; luminosity; convenient focal; fast and accurate autofocus. Has some cons A little bit cheaper with the same quality - it would be ideal. But it is, nitpick.

For the landscape, not very - the color reproduction is not so juicy and I would like it to be wider Good for cityscapes from rooftops - good sharpness does the trick. At 2.4, some sluggish and hard at the same time, in a word, the picture is too straightforward, not artistic - therefore it is not beautiful enough for flowers Fully pays for itself at a price, but as it usually happens all the time, you want either wider or narrower His element is medium distance. Up close, harsh. In the…

Decent lens for little money. Sharpness at 2.4 was even better than at 40/2.8 Lim! I bought a lim six months before 35. If I had known in advance, I would have bought 35/2.4 and 50/1.8 for the price of one 40 lima. I repeat once again - the sharpness is simply amazing, I got a good copy. Practically does not chromate, the same lima has a lot of HA (purple halo) in contrasting places. You will not find such a decent glass for such money on any system. Very light due to the absence of metal…

This fix cost me 8200. I already ordered a hood for it in advance (by the way, it is foldable, rubber, funny in general), and after I took a few test photos, the whale retired. Photos are sharp and juicy with nice bokeh. It's also great for video. In general, for its cost, this is an excellent staffer with cool optics, which is able to produce clear and lively photos)

I combine with the k10d camera. A good lens, although there are some troubles. So, with autofocus on an open hole, there is zero sense from it - it never got into focus, and it smears very much. There are no problems with manual focus, so I use it. Might be worth tweaking it. Pleasant bokeh for me, although the 77lim is much more interesting. Now he stands as a staff member, and is quite satisfied

I didn’t have enough money for lim because of the New Year’s Eve toad, I wanted a fortieth pancake to pair with k5. But now I don't regret it. Completely satisfies me as an amateur as a staff member. Now I will buy with similar focal lengths if I stick to Pentax. So far so good) Of course, for example, 43 draws differently, but. :) In general, who does not want to throw money away on a whale, I safely recommend a carcass for everyday use.

Good lens for your money. In poor lighting conditions, 2.4 is not always working (autofocus smears). If the light is better and especially natural, then it is quite possible to shoot at 2.4. At 2.8 everything is fine. Beautiful bokeh. Very versatile! Fifty dollars 1.4 is now only for shallow depth of field. I use with K-r. The quality of the picture, the colors are very pleasing. Especially after nikon D90. Could be a little cheaper too.

It seems that the toy is not so expensive, but the optics are very good. For beginners, the lack of zoom is very annoying, the optics - they and the whale are behind the eye, the aperture ratio is better, perhaps - the percentage of good shots in low light will be greater. Take a whale instead, if not for some type of reporting, and don't be afraid to move more with the fix. 35mm on the crop is a 38 degree horizontal field of view. And I really liked it on film, but this is already…

In good light, this lens is excellent for close-up and medium-range photography. With this Pentax 21987 DA 35mm f/2.4 AL lens I've taken some excellent shots for Pentax DSLRs with my Pentax K30, K5 and K100D. I am amazed at the sharpness of this lens on close subjects. It's difficult to get a sharp image with this lens in dark conditions, but if you work hard enough you'll be rewarded with very good low-light images. My K5 and K30 take the best low light shots with this lens. Of course, this is

I've read a lot of reviews on many websites about this lens but the two that sold me were Photozone, an excellent review there as well as on DPReview. When I saw this on the $177 Revain I grabbed it. The description said there would be cosmetic damage to the box, which made me a little wary, but Revain has a really great returns policy, so I wasn't overly concerned. Well the lens was in perfect condition and I was surprised at how well made it was and although I only took a dozen photos with…

Free shipping was fast as usual, thanks to Revain.com! I'm just telling you why I chose this lens. I was at a kids party about two weeks ago, I took my Kx with a 18-55mm kit lens. I set the ISO to 1600 (sometimes 3200) automatically. I didn't use flash at all. In most cases the light in the room was enough for a decent photo. However, the children were moving a lot and fast, the shutter speed just wasn't enough to capture these actions, so a fast lens is clearly needed in this situation. I have