Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 123
  • 5
    73
  • 4
    22
  • 3
    18
  • 2
    3
  • 1
    7

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The price/quality ratio is great, I will buy again.

Very worthy tires, with the only drawback - it is worth moving off ice or snow onto clean asphalt - it howls like an airplane. Other than that, I don't regret buying it one bit. Has pros: Rowing like a hundred. On rolled snow, in powder, in snow porridge, it carries very confidently. On the ice, not so confident, but this is not a combat spike. With its cons: On clean asphalt, it hums like an airplane. Even louder than a spiked amtel.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The product can be used, I expected a little more.

In terms of operational properties, it is better than Nordman, but worse than Hakki. In addition, I note * curves * promotions from the manufacturer, with problems on the site when registering goods With its pros: Price. The tires sat well on the wheels during installation. Good permeability. Relatively new model. Got cons: Already during the period of gentle break-in, on the wheels of the drive axle, pieces of rubber fly off around the spike. High noise level when driving on clean asphalt…

For vehicles in which the sound of the tires doesn't annoy you (((on a Gelika with an AMG silencer, you won't hear a flying plane due to the silencer))), I recommend this product. Since I was already aware of the rubber squeak, I didn't factor it into my calculations. I plan on doing the same thing to the S-class next year (though the tables will be turned thanks to the brilliant Shumka). PY. SY. Take it; you won't lose it if you're deaf, don't care about noise (like I do), or have a car with…

Pros
  • A G-500 (Gelik) automobile must be worn. Size 265/60/R18 You can use rubber on anything from snow to ice to oatmeal to dry asphalt. Very malleable, doesn't get stuck in a rut, and takes corners like a champ. The second car has Nokian Hakka 8 tires, so I'm not writing without basis; there is a direct comparison to make with the Winter Ice Zero tires I purchased on the suggestion of my friends. Because the rubber is so pliable when cold, Gelik is able to crawl effortlessly over meter-deep snow, over compressed snow and ice, and at a speed that is even more manageable than in the summer. Despite my aggressive driving style (a shoe to the floor at a crossroads), the spikes have held up nicely on both ice and asphalt.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best I have ever used, great product for anyone!

it holds the road perfectly, the spikes make noise on asphalt, but on ice and rolled snow you feel that the spikes cling very well, not a single spike has been lost during the winter, does not like porridge, overtake more carefully, good luck to everyone on the roads.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm very happy with the product, it's very satisfying.

So let's write a review of this rubber now. I drove it for three seasons, covering 12 thousand kilometers on average each year. No spike was lost or broken off for the entire three years; I only used it sparingly to commute from home to work and back, occasionally to the nearby city, and of course to the shopping center. I suggest this tire. Well, in regards to the noise, I'd say that an AvtoVAZ 2 gear makes considerably greater noise than this rubber on bare asphalt.

Pros
  • • Rows effectively in the snow (unkept yards are her thing). • Agrees to wait turns (unless, of course, being unpleasant) Good stud quality
Cons
  • • Noise (but it was clear)

205\55\16 I got it for my brand-new Focus3. I took great care when selecting tires for my home in Hong Kong. Planned excursions in and around the metro area. All the reviews of nearly every type of rubber were read by me. I didn't drive into snowdrifts and didn't need shovels to get out of deep snow, so that's why I went with it. The floatation of the side skid is minor. Excellent traction on the ice prevented me from colliding with other vehicles on multiple occasions when I had to apply…

Pros
  • Having the quality of Hong Kong, etc.
Cons
  • Noisy. Dismantling from the side.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great product, a pleasure to use.

I bought some winter tires because the vendor recommended them. I took it and have no regrets; it's in great condition and I haven't had a single skid in the past three years, even when driving rather quickly. I felt no shame in getting where I needed to go, even if the road wasn't cleaned. Only one of the four wheels' spikes came loose over the course of three years, but I did put roughly 20,000 miles on them. Okay, so this is the consensus option.

Pros
  • 1) Controllability Secondly, it is resistant to wear. 3 Perseverance.
Cons
  • pavement noises like an airplane taking off. However, you won't be able to hear it at all when it's rolling snow or ice.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The item is of good quality, there is only one minor defect.

The name fully justifies itself, you don’t notice ice, confident acceleration and braking. At the beginning of operation there was a strong noise, after a few months. he has shrunk. I took it before the 2022 season, for 7 thousand 215/60/17, for such a price a great option. I give it a 4 because of the noise. For two years, 3 spikes flew out of the kit.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I really like the product, it fully meets my expectations.

In my opinion, Pirelli is not a reliable supplier of winter tires. Now, Italy isn't exactly known for its icy winters. By some twist of fate last winter, I was issued a business vehicle equipped with winter pirelli tires, and I quickly came to see my past thoughts as nothing more than hollow stereotypes. My personal vehicle is already outfitted with this rubber, and I went to the tire store on nokian hakkapelita 4 rather than summer tires (which many people do because summer tires are more…

Pros
  • The path "holds", so to speak. Having no fear about driving in the snow. drawn to the spike's peculiar form. You can save money compared to name-brand ogues.
Cons
  • In a word, yes. That shouldn't be an issue with winter tires.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

It's possible that I just got lucky, but I'm really impressed. There is not a single complaint. Pits, after getting caught multiple times, sat on their bellies, and tore up the earth. They row like they mean it and they do it well. The car will continue to speed up as long as there is sufficient space between it and the obstacle. On the snow with a depth of about 15 to 20 centimeters traveling between 100 and 120 kilometers per hour went like a rocket. One of them should be in the left-hand…

Pros
  • Volvo XC60 vehicle. They were facing their fourth winter. And they are the first tires that have been driven almost 70,000 miles in Hong Kong without showing any signs of wear. At all. Stud loss is limited to a maximum of three per wheel with 235/65/17 tires. Despite the fact that I am proficient in driving, I commute by automobile.
Cons
  • In my opinion, there are no areas for improvement. Write in a loud manner, there is not much. It's possible that I've become accustomed to the noise, but at first it felt somewhat distracting. Or maybe rolled over.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

BMW e39 car. For 3 years of operation everything is perfect. Lost 3 spikes, and then when the rubber was used as a spare tire in the summer on the rock. Braking at the level, on ice rides like on rails. Next season only the same tires.

Price per cylinder at 6700, 205/60/16. warranty extension for one full year and complimentary tire mounting and balancing. What else does? I am extremely glad. Rolls nicely and stays in control quite well on icy surfaces and in porridge! Outstandingly dogged and victorious tooth! Below are some downsides: Even on the pavement, the noise level is bearable. on snow and ice, sound is not audible.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Not a bad product, quite normal quality.

Has pros: Feels well on asphalt and is an excellent choice for driving on snowy and slippery roads. Long-lasting and robust in nature. Different cons: Very noisy. Do not take my advice if you are looking for an affordable vehicle with poor sound insulation in the cabin. When traveling on asphalt at a speed of 120 kilometers per hour, the rumble in the cabin will be very intense. On a Toyota Prado equipped with a good Shumkov, you won't be able to hear the rubber, but inside of a Mazda3, which…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

It was a reasonable purchase, I will order more.

Has some pros: It takes the bend without a hitch, the braking distance is just right, and it doesn't lose traction on the road. Got cons: It was noisy on the trade wind b6, almost as if all of the bearings were buzzing, but after two trade kilometers, it became less noisy or the crew gained accustomed to it.