Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 123
  • 5
    52
  • 4
    28
  • 3
    17
  • 2
    13
  • 1
    13

Type of review

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Satisfactory product quality, good price.

What there is to be stated. This is the third watch that I have purchased from Samsung (Frontier3 > Galaxy Watch 46mm > Galaxy Watch 4 Classic), and although I was prepared for some degree of dissatisfaction, it is still present. 1. Since the clock is not dry yet, the programming for it needs to be completed as soon as possible. There are frequent interruptions to the connection with the phone known as jaggies. 2. The loss of autonomy is, of course, disappointing, especially in light of my…

Pros
  • Excellent layout and screen, to boot
Cons
  • However, in this case, just like everywhere else, the autonomy is really low, and in general, this is the first watch on WearOS; but, due to the fact that the strap is wet, it is revolting.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is completely satisfied, performs its functions.

I got this to replace my Watch3, whose battery had entirely expired after only three years of use. There were no issues with the program stuffing, despite the many nasty evaluations that were published. It would appear that WearOS has been completed, as a result, everything was immediately connected, activated (using the phone - Samsung S21 Ultra), all notifications are received, the connection does not break, etc. The control is virtually identical to that of Tizen, and there is once again no…

Pros
  • In spite of the concerns, WearOS operates without any problems, and the battery life can last for several days. The bezel around the glass provides additional security for the sturdy case.
Cons
  • Horrible strap. When it comes to lying, biometric sensors are the worst. The "bald" bezel appears even more unattractive than it did on the Watch3.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Overall good, but I expected more, there are disadvantages.

Here again, Samsung has done the hardware as one would anticipate but has, as one would also expect, messed up the software. There are a variety of less expensive choices available if all you want is a stylish smart watch. There are several options available to you if you require a smart watch for athletic purposes, and some of these watches do not have the drawbacks described above. The advantages of it include the following: Excellent display; it is sufficiently bright to be readable even on…

To summarize, I have a device that works, with an assembly that is of good quality, but the software is of low quality, and as a result, I am unable to use it to its full potential. The battery won't even last for 24 hours at this rate. Do you desire a watch and a Samsung at the same time? I'd be interested in buying one, but I think I'll hold off for another three years in the hopes that further optimization would make the product more useful or that denser batteries will become available…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best thing for the money, glad I did it.

This is the third watch of this kind that I've had; my previous ones were made by Sony and Garmin. I did not have enough for Garmin to work with notifications, the ability to answer with voice from the watch, install many necessary applications, and some other functions, some of which were even on the old Sony watches, so I purchased these instead (but there was no heart rate monitor). Samsung has taken over for Garmin as the go-to brand for business and casual attire. I tried on 46mm, but…

Pros
  • The quality of the materials, the craftsmanship, the appearance, the movement and function of the bezel, and the display are all exceptional in their own right.
Cons
  • Duration of use from a single charge, as well as charging time. Even in contrast with the old clock on this system (Wear OS), there are some minor software flaws; however, it is abundantly evident that this is a new system for Samsung, and it is still in the process of being perfected.

When compared to approximately the same time as the Samsung and Apple Watches. In general, Samsung is an excellent brand, with a steel case, an expertly designed exterior, and a rotatable bezel (one of the reasons why I took the classic). One disadvantage of using steel is that it will quickly become covered with scratches. On the other hand, the material is more resilient than aluminum when subjected to micro-shocks and contacts. The watch is without a doubt in the lead when it comes to taking

Pros
  • materials, screen, management of measurement, and overall design
Cons
  • The thickness, the design of the straps, and the lack of a variety of services

Revainrating 2 out of 5

A bad product, not worth the money.

After using the first Galaxy Watch for a while, I decided to upgrade to the newest model. There are actually a lot more programs for wearos, but there aren't any essential partners for Whatsapp or Telegram (although there seems to be a viber available, but I haven't tested it). The watch is immediately less convenient than when using Taizen. This is due to the absence of certain convenient widgets (tiles for wearos), such as a calendar sheet for a month. Look for an alternative in the market…

Pros
  • More comfortable to hold than the earlier iteration (there is matte plastic on the wall) Samsung pay works (also worked on Taizen) How has the functionality of the headset been (!) so far? (Tizen also worked well for the first year, then it became stupid and in 2/3 cases did not turn on the microphone with the speaker) The watch eventually established a wireless connection with the phone (but I was unable to do so on Taizen).
Cons
  • It is not possible for the user to benefit from using wearos (in its current iteration) in comparison to using tizen because there was very little software, there was very little, but something else. The preloaded calendar has become even less reliable. There are fewer widgets and tiles that are useful. The life time is not the worst (2 days with a drop in time after the first full charge), but it is significantly worse than the original model of the watch. The most infuriating aspect is that it is incompatible with chargers made by third parties, and it is even incompatible with the terrible charger that came with the original Galaxy Watch. In comparison to earlier iterations, each and every alteration that was made to the strap was a step in the wrong direction. When it comes to application installation, the Play market is inferior to Samsung's Galaxy Store (which, however, was dumb on my Taizen and after switching to the 5th version, it stopped displaying key applications) They did not remove the unnecessary animation or delay that was there before showing the information that was associated with the notification. 1-2 seconds should elapse between the display of a notification's push title and the notification's body text. Smart watches marinate the user, whereas Honor and Mi bands display information immediately.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Performs its functions, nothing unusual.

As I've been using a Gear S3 Frontier for the past four years, I absolutely adore everything about it, although I do wish it had more features, sensors, and a longer battery life. I did not achieve any of my goals, and some of them even became more difficult. All of the drawbacks are software-related; perhaps they will find a solution at some point in the future, but for the time being, it makes very little sense to migrate from borders or other models of a similar nature. Got pros…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good product, more pros than cons.

Its pros: Appearance. A bunch of applications. Everything is optimized and fast. Cons below: The battery is terrible. I have enough for a maximum of two days. If used often then one day.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is really good, I'm glad I bought it.

There are a significant number of poles. fewer than one in each! After making the switch from Gear S2, the difference in the amount of time it takes to complete a task is very noticeable: 3 days versus 1.5 days. I have high hopes that the developers of the next firmware will be able to extend the battery life by at least 5%.

Pros
  • Great watch with a ton of different features.
Cons
  • The short lifespan of the battery is the only reason for the one-star reduction.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best deals, glad I bought this.

Has some pros New operating system, support for Google services. New sensors. 1mm more than its predecessor) Increased memory, new percent and battery. Cons below: Not such a brutal appearance compared to watch 3 45mm. Silicone strap, leather was better.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing Ive ever used, a great item for everyone!

Their 30890 (I gave so much in aliexpress) are definitely worth it! Excellent BOILERS!) Pros below: Super watch. A bunch of displays. Functions are just a sea. Easily connected to xiaomi 11 ultra. Everything works great Cons below: Battery. For 1 day. And this is expected. Everything else is fire.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Quite good, but I expected more from it.

Battery for one day (46 mm Galaxy Watch was kept for 40 hours). A very serious scam with the measurement of blood pressure: after a monthly calibration, the numbers are shown only within the limits that were during this very calibration. That is, if during the calibration you had "dancing" numbers around ~ 105/70, it will show the whole month. And if suddenly the blood pressure rises to ~140/90, the clock will show ~106/72. For persons with blood pressure fluctuations of more than 20 mmHRT, not

Pros
  • Design. Size (previously were 46 mm)
Cons
  • Measurement of blood pressure. Battery. } price.

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Terrible purchase, only wasted money.

I bought a watch with one purpose, to be able to pay for it. As a result, I received a meaningless fitness bracelet in terms of functionality equal to 1/8 of its declared value. And you can’t even return it, because. goods are not returnable. The site says that the MIR and my bank cards are added, but nowhere does it say that they are not added to the clock. And that a watch and a phone are generally different services. It looks like a deliberate deception and swindle.

Pros
  • I bought a watch with one purpose, to be able to pay for it, and as a result I got a meaningless fitness bracelet for a lot of money.
Cons
  • The promised work with MIR cards is missing

Revainrating 1 out of 5

The quality is worse than I have ever seen, a complete disappointment

Do not believe them, I ordered Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 classic 46mm silver rostes, indicated everywhere, but they sent it not for 2022 (certify), but for the Arab Emirates, they deceived. The return is now a whole story, a boorish attitude towards customers, will be careful, the courier did not let the packaging be opened so that he could break through. Return the money or the watch that I ordered, NAMELY ROSTEST.

Pros
  • Good
Cons
  • Not what I ordered.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like everything, the price and quality are acceptable.

For some reason, after ating the firmware, I can not add cards that are already in the phone. I had to get a new one on my phone. I got used to the clock so much that without them something is clearly missing, although at first it seemed that the gadget was useless. Has some pros 1. Reading messages from the screen - no need to take out your phone to decide whether to reply now or later. 2. Call notifications with the ability to reject. 3. Customizable interface - you choose the widgets you…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product did not disappoint, the quality pleases.

I bought it cheaper, and therefore received it for the Guatemalan market. Surprise is missing, like a working Samsung Pay. I solved the problem using Android Pay (thanks to the play market). There are no other problems. Battery? As expected, it keeps with active use confidently for a day. If you save, then more. But the watch is for active use, so I don’t see the point in thinking in terms of economy.

Pros
  • 1. Basel. This is simply the best solution. 2. Appearance. It only spoils the strap, but the issue is solvable.
Cons
  • The strap just become in terms of appearance.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

I thought it would be better, but overall not bad.

Hello, I bought this watch a month ago. What I will write now is a real review of the purchase, and not a sales one like many, which say that this is the best watch. The watch is beautiful, orgonomically look on the hand. But I’m not very satisfied with the battery, it lasts for 18 hours and this is the maximum, that is, you won’t be able to sleep in them. It will be necessary to put them on charge at night, which means that the sleep tracking function automatically disappears. I have a samsung

Pros
  • Looks beautiful
Cons
  • Autonomy and bezel

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Good quality product, I rate this purchase excellent.

Review rewritten on 20-11-2022. After 2 months, the feeling of operation is rather positive, but some points are frustrating. The interface on Tizen was more interesting. The autonomy of 2 days suits me, but at the same time, if you actively train in them, then they live ~ 1d10h, and that's it. I am pleased with the accuracy of the tonometer, pedometer and generally debugging activity. Bioimpedance does not differ much from Xiaomi floor scales, although I have met someone who does not work…

Pros
  • 1. Design, strict concise, look and sit on the hand well. 2. The screen is bright, well readable in the sun if necessary. 3. High quality microphone and speaker. 4. A huge number of sensors, an accurate heart rate monitor, in my case, an accurate measurement of blood pressure and bioimpedance, which even surprised me. Accurate workout and location tracking. 5. Ergonomics and UI, in the broad sense of the word, there are interesting features, wide customization, thanks in many respects to One UI. Interface responsiveness. 6. The presence of a bezel greatly facilitates the management and interaction with the watch. 7. The possibility of replacing the strap. 8. The presence of a remote connection to the phone is a huge plus. 9. Flexible notification settings. 10. The watch in many ways has truly smart functions, in some moments it adapts to the user. For example, you can synchronize the activation of sleep mode with your phone, but the do not disturb mode will work according to a separate scenario and vice versa. If you don’t want to, you can turn off the mode synchronization with your smartphone. Usage scenario: Always On Display disabled, Auto-brightness disabled (brightness about 35%, see screenshots), wake-up by tap and turn of the ring disabled, reaction only to raising a hand, workout recognition on, Wi-Fi auto connection on, heart rate measurement on every 10 minutes, sleep oxygen saturation measurement on, snoring detection on, sounds on, vibration long and long, GPS on, NFC and Samsung Pay off. Turn on the screen when notifications are off, Notifications come only when the phone is not in use. From the 2 days of training, every day was walking with GPS tracking for about 60 minutes a day and 30 minutes of cycling.
Cons
  • 1. A disgusting complete strap, sticks into your hand, even if it is not tightened, for example, when you sleep in your watch. His hand sweats underneath. By the way, under the clock, too, the hand sweats, it's unpleasant. 2. No e-sim, it would be very handy, especially when it comes to remote connection to a smartphone. 3. Wear os - yes, the system is smart, the interface is responsive, and so on, but Tizen worked more stable, was run in, and autonomy was much better, work from a single charge . this is a separate issue. And there are lags and glitches, it especially infuriates when the interface stops responding to the bezel, but as soon as you turn off and on the screen, everything starts working. 4. Autonomy, battery, call it what you want. In my use case, after the last ate (10/28/21) it got better, but still not enough. The operating time from one and a half days, up to 2 days and 5 hours, still falls short of the previous records on Tizen, this is a fail. 5. There is a question about the accuracy of the pulse oximeter. Saturation often does not exceed 98%, although I do not smoke, do not get sick, etc. And medical devices at the doctor's appointment consistently show 99-100%. And drawdowns up to 85%, well, this is ridiculous, I should be suffocating with such indicators. Conclusion one, the sensor is inaccurate. 6. Long charge. The watch takes about 2 hours to charge, when charging, they sometimes turn on the screen (GLUCK), and the charging time increases, although it should be 1 hour 40 minutes. 7. Strong heating, the temperature was very unpleasant when ating, I also observe a high temperature when charging, I don’t think it’s good, it seems to me that they should be charged in the off state. 8. The bezel in my case turned out to be unreliable and became loose after a month of use, after 2 months of use there were questions about positioning, I will carry it in for repair. 9. There are no logs of any of the sHealth indicators on the watch, for some reason you have to look at everything on the phone, it's disgustingly inconvenient. 10. There is not enough more flexible button customization, I do not use payments and it would be more convenient for me to reassign a long button hold.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great quality, happy with it one hundred percent!

They look very stylish on the hand! They are pleasant in every way. As a lover of all sorts of smart devices, I study these watches and their capabilities in parts, savoring so to speak. And for this, there really are all the possibilities. I will soon get to the settings for measuring pressure and ECG. Pros below: This is a high-tech toy and in order to use it with maximum benefit, you need to really try and use your brains to set everything up and determine exactly the applications that you…