I am completely satisfied with my Michelin. Rubber 225/45 R17, car Volvo S60 170 hp I swing before 2.5 2.4 (because low profile). I don’t know who’s there after 90 km / h. the car is poorly controlled, I drive on the highway at an average of 140 km / h. sometimes I accelerate and faster, no problems were noticed. It also performs well in the city. On a sharp start, it does not slip, braking is on the level. Water drains well too. In a word, on this rubber you feel your car well. I can ume that on a higher profile, with low tire pressure, the car drives worse, which is why some of the negative reviews. But, I must admit, I was surprised when I read them. Michelin rubber itself is quite soft, more precisely elastic, like a good eraser. Therefore, the adhesion to the coating is excellent. When buying this rubber, I immediately noticed a shallow tread and pleasant "sticky" properties. By one look, we can say that it is an excellent rubber for asphalt. No noise, no resistance. Hence the weak off-road performance. But here everyone decides for himself how much he needs this criterion. I live in Hong Kong, I drive around the city, to my country house, sometimes to nature. I'm not bothered by her weak off-road qualities. On my car, I wouldn’t get into the mud anyway, but driving to the desired place on a dry primer is a pleasure. By the way, the road to the dacha along the Rogachevsky Highway, who traveled in the course of how winding and unpleasant the road is, the tires did not fail. From the foregoing, I conclude that I am completely satisfied with the rubber, it costs my money, I will advise my friends. The only thing left to find out is how many seasons it will last. And remember - the basis of traffic safety is in reasonable driving behavior, and not in good tires.