Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 134
  • 5
    110
  • 4
    18
  • 3
    5
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Do not hesitate to buy, the quality is amazing for the price.

There are strong doubts that this processor is being used to its full potential by game creators, despite its inclusion in the requirements of several recent titles. It was one of the more affordable choices even after the price increased by about 2 times from its pre-economic-crisis level. Will this CPU be adequate for the next three to five years? Quite, because of its overclocking capabilities and outstanding adaptability, it is the greatest choice currently available.

Pros
  • The substrate and the stone are firmly fastened, and the processor has been running reliably for about 1.5 years, so its quality is already apparent. Under maximum load, the stone heats up, but not to a million degrees but within 30-50. At 5 GHz, from 30 to 65, but this is usually due to air, because CBO is required here; I do not recommend subjecting the processor to such stress, as doing so destroys both the crystal substrate and the crystal itself.
Cons
  • Unfortunately, the expected performance of 8 cores has not been demonstrated. Only a few systems are 8 core, yet many games only support the use of 2 to 4 core processors. Very little in the way of software updates or game additions to keep things interesting. - When picking a CPU, you need think a thousand times about whether it's worth it, because 8 cores are great, but 8 cores fully loaded are even greater, because the specific heat capacity is huge and the return on the wasted energy is very sparse. The processor's and many applications' and games' reliance on users sitting about doing nothing is a major negative.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

On a GIGABYTE GA-970A-DS3P FX (ver. 2.1) motherboard, I have a system. I use a tower radiator from Ice Hammer with four 8 mm tubes, model number IH-4400B. I bought the FX 8350 to speed up the system. When working in the Pinnacle video editor on a Phenom II X4 965, the loading of each of the 4 cores was approximately 90%, and the temperature reached 48–51 degrees, according to installation and testing using the same application. All 8 cores on the FX 8350 were loaded between 40 and 50 percent…

Pros
  • a fantastic replacement for the retiring AM3+ platform. 8 core processor with a 125W heat sink maximum. fails to heat up.
Cons
  • Not

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the level, I am satisfied with everything.

Prior to that, there were only 2-core CPUs at most, but after installing this beast, I understood the true meaning of power! The Zalman CNPS9900 MAX Blue cools quickly; its resting temperature is 15-20C. With a load of more than 40C and an overclock of 4.1 GHz, it never happened. Any game can be pulled smoothly. By the way, as a fan of World of Warcraft, I suggest that you lower this proportion since tanks will soon transition to multi-core.

Pros
  • performance, overclocking potential, and multithreading
Cons
  • honestly missed it!

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A good quality product, I rate this purchase perfectly.

I upgraded from the overclocked phenom 965 3.6GHz (4.1GHz) and I'm happy with it (It looks much like my stock Phoenix, only there are more cores, so you can do a lot of stuff at once)! The record in air seems to be that it can be overclocked to 5GHZ, but you have to drive it. The brakes are read even in the system, despite the fact that dispersing is not possible. The future is with multithreading!

Pros
  • Price vs. quality: AMD pleases as usual! read the remaining specifications.
Cons
  • Yes, it is lacking in some streaming applications (like dated games from the 1990s), such as a collection of gothic games.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is good, there are only a few minor flaws.

"Corn" means eight cores, yet even in the year 2022, that's plenty. Due to being stuck with an AM3 and 32 GB of DDR3, which, at today's RAM costs, would have to be changed anyhow if I wanted to move to Ryzen, I am compelled to make this purchase. But the speed is sufficient now so I can finish up my work. In the context of video games, the answer is yes; nowadays, near-perfect single-threaded speed is all that's needed. The GTX 1060 6GB is about equivalent to this CPU, but not greater than…

Pros
  • Quite reasonable, despite the claims of Intel's zealots. Great potential for overclocking with a motherboard that has a solid power delivery system and standard mosfets.
Cons
  • Temperatures remain high. There can be no short-cuts when it comes to properly planning and executing cooling.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Good product for me, no problems at all.

A superb stone all around. An Athlon 64 X2 5200+ was used before to that; when it was replaced with an FX 4300, everything crashed. Extremely cold (the 400 with a faulty sole Gammaxx200 cooler keeps it quiet even without a fan). Up to 4500 can be overclocked without any trouble, and 5000 with an increase in pressure. The architecture is a drawback. Modules. Two modules with two cores each and one (!) FPU combine to generate four cores.

Pros
  • Fast, Cold, and BE (unlocked multiplier!)
Cons
  • Modules rather than cores

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

FX-6300 I have not yet seen anything to suggest that he would not have been able to complete his assignments, which may have included games. Many people overclock it, and turning off the function that automatically overclocks it is something that is strongly advised. However, I am still confused as to why this is happening. The processor's default speed is 3500 megahertz, and it has a multiplier of approximately 17.5 and a core voltage of approximately 12022. You may verify for yourself that…

Pros
  • Price, performance, and overclocking that occurs automatically when under load
Cons
  • I gave it a lot of thinking, but ultimately, no.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I am not disappointed, the quality is satisfying.

This fx8300 replaced it in September 2022 and started making money right away. Installing a gigabit ga-990ha-ud3 board required updating the BIOS to version f13, which is compatible with this percentage. During stress tests and games, the same cooling system was used: a box with heat pipes salvaged from a phenom 955. It was renamed kpt-8 and installed. The AIDA64 software reports temperatures ranging from 30 degrees Celsius at idle to 50 degrees Celsius during a stress test, but it is suspected

Pros
  • This newer processor is superior to its predecessor, the x4 955 phenom, in the following ways: 8 streams instead of the typical 4 higher clock frequencies 3.3 GHz and self-acceleration up to 4.2 in the turbo core, against 3.2 GHz and 3.84 (stable operation during overclocking, a blue screen crashed at 4 GHz, nominal voltage 1.4V) for a phenomenon, without self-acceleration ; lower power consumption and heating 95 W vs. 125, power consumption at rest and undetected compared to 125 W; and finally, support for new instructions like fma3,4, hardware support - the increase was perceived, albeit not noticeably so.
Cons
  • The phenom even outperforms it in terms of performance per core, thus the single-core performance is really bad. Also, it's not ideal that just 4 real number coprocessors are available for 8 cores, one for each pair of integer cores. Although this is already picky, you may "forgive" it because it only costs $6000. Errors were left in the precipitate after the initial crisis was launched and its warhead was added, and this happens on both xp and wine 7. Other CPUs, including the socket 939-based athlone 64 3500+ and the socket AM3-based athlone x2 250 and hair dryer x4 955, did not exhibit this behavior. enjoy most games, Crisis 2 begins with a spectacular explosion; if he doesn't enjoy the original game's opening cinematic, that's not a good sign. As a result, I must reduce my rating from 5 to 4.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A wonderful product, its nice to use.

There is no support for fx83xx on the manufacturer's website, but you may use the fx-8310 in place of the phenom II x4 965BE on a ga-990-fxa-d3 motherboard to save money without sacrificing performance. The mom and son both booted up with the memory speed set to 1033 MHz, despite the BIOS's default setting of 1600 MHz. The frequency in Aida fluctuates between 3400 and 3700 MHz during the stress test, and between 2400 and 4300 MHz on an annual basis. a range from 1.1 V to 0.8 V in voltage. Turbo

Pros
  • The advantages of the entire fx-83xx series
Cons
  • failed to locate

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A wonderful product, it's nice to use.

Even though I only tested the FX-6300, Amazon went ahead and published a review of both the FX-4300 and the FX-6300. This computer's processor was the main factor in my decision to purchase it. After reading the instructions and watching some overclocking demonstrations, I came to the conclusion that this is a great stone for a computer with a lot of potential for overclocking and, unlike older models, is not too hot or pricey. Unlike Hyperstumps, it is still relevant in the present day. It's…

Pros
  • Turbo-Boost (for those who do not want to take a steam bath with overclocking on their own), low price (especially on the used market nowadays), excellent potential for overclocking these days, does any Hyperstump and i3, can sometimes be cheaper than the overclocked i5-4590.
Cons
  • When overclocked, it performs poorly compared to the i7, i9, Xeon E3-E5, and Ryzen 5-7 in the 1600 MHz and higher range.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm very happy, it really is worth buying.

utilizing a spending limit of 6000. I spent a lot of time considering what proportion of a computer to buy with a motherboard for my wife's computer, what would she have at the level (but not cooler than mine), etc. And after a lot of research, including assessments of tests and samples from friends and from salons, I came to the conclusion that % was the best. MSI 970 motherboard with an AMD FX-4350 processor (which is actually the fastest one that is mass-produced). Everything got a lot…

Pros
  • Quick, low-cost, and not particularly warm
Cons
  • I was hoping for it to be a bit chillier, but it uses up a lot of electricity.

I use this processor to process videos, and I couldn't be more dissatisfied. I use Adobe Premiere Pro to encode h264 fullHD 3 hour movies, and during that time I can play Skyrim without any hiccups. 4.4 GHz is an overclocked speed. Increasing the factor by an idiotic amount. For cooling, percentage-wise, performance 12 never got hotter than 59% (assuming the current average temperature is 30 degrees). I didn't pay much attention in the winter, but I'm willing to bet the stone is a touch…

Pros
  • Strong, low-cost, and on the hunt.
Cons
  • It's overpriced (4600 r) for what you get.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I do not cease to rejoice at the purchase, a very good deal!

You left a favorable first impression on me! The ability to multitask is excellent; you can open a number of items at once, and there is no lag in performance. When it is not in use, it is incredibly energy efficient and very quiet because the cooler is operating at its lowest speed. When it comes to games that are depending on the processor, everything runs beautifully smooth and the frames per second are consistent. Before that, he served in the intelligence community. If you compare Intel…

Pros
  • Extremely potent in relation to its cost (the FX-8350)! Competent energy conservation technology; it consumes less power while under light load than the first generation i5, as well as the second generation (i5 750 and i5 2400). It never got hotter than 56 degrees, even when it was under full load (linx), thanks to the Zalman CNPS9900NT cooler. The temperature in the room was 20 degrees. Whoever shoots first on the battlefield is the one who flies!
Cons
  • Do not be concerned, mother Hawala, even though your load is greater than 60 percent. Nevertheless, inside the thermal envelope.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great quality, happy with it one hundred percent!

Even with the Silent profile selected in the BIOS, the regular fan is quite noisy for me; hence, when I was in custom mode, I set it to only gain fan overclocking when the temperature was more than 50 degrees Celsius. There is complete silence, and all that can be heard is a buzz. The temperature of the processor rose by 4 degrees Celsius, but this is irrelevant because silence is more important than anything else. I went into the BIOS and set the turbo mode to 4.5GHz for the experiment; it…

Pros
  • At this price, you get prots with eight cores. It has now been immediately clear that doing so will open a large number of bookmarks in the browser.
Cons
  • Noisy fan. However, in the biographies, you have the ability to change the speed.

I intended to try Intel, but there wasn't enough money, so I spit on my attempts to learn about Intel and got AMD FX-8350 ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Corsair Vengeance CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 instead. The Pioneer BDR-S07XLT and the spindle of two-layer blanks may both use 4 x 4 GB modules. The PSU, an Antec NeoPower 650 Blue, and the Cooler Master V8 cooler, both purchased in 2022, are still in use. Everything functions well and doesn't even get warm.

Pros
  • a more reasonable cost for the motherboard and the processor together Very quick in real life (not in games) The temperature doesn't rise much (I don't go above 44).
Cons
  • With the correct iron, they are not as strong.

Compatibility tested with Gigabyte 7770 R2, OCZ Vortex 4+ 2TB SSD, ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0, Kingston HyperX 2x4GB 1866MHz DDR4, Thermaltake Toughpower 600W power supply. Video/audio encoding and graphical editing are the primary goals. Five plus plus for the way it's handled. - minimum 40-45 dB @ 5700-6100 rpm from a spinner on a 3.5 GHz CPU under 90%-100% load with 8 cores.

Pros
  • Price\Performance\TPD-125wt\Multithreading\There are 8 working processor cores and 16 megabytes of memory.
Cons
  • If someone complains that it's too hot, tell them to pony up for a better air conditioner, and everyone can live happily ever after.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing for the money, I'm glad I chose this option.

The review was mysteriously moved to the fx-9370 after being sent in an extremely peculiar manner (it was written to fx8350). Initially, the review was stored in a general library of reviews on processors using this core. Although the evaluation is intended to apply, in practice, to all processors in this family, the exception is the fact that fx 4- 6 processors generate less heat than fx 8 nuclear ones. I feel the need to point out right off the bat that this stone requires a solid…

Pros
  • First things first, let's talk about the power and potential, shall we? It is able to handle the workload of several threads quite well. After reading many reviews and other such materials, I've observed that some people argue that it is not as good as the second version of the i3 processor (complete nonsense, don't you think?). However, it became interesting for me to compare in practice (luckily, a friend has a machine based on Intel i7 of the third generation). As a result, when processing video of the same video file, this gem performed around 4% better without the need for overclocking. Regarding the way I perform in games, I do not have any criticisms to offer. There will be no friezes, freezes during lengthy downloads, or any of the other issues that certain customers enjoy writing about in the comments section of the websites of certain retailers. In addition to this, it can readily chase frequencies up to 4.5 GHz without experiencing a substantial rise in temperature. However, the cost should be your first concern. It cost me 6,000 dollars, but an Intel solution with comparable performance would have cost at least 8,000 dollars.
Cons
  • In days gone by, AMD integrated visual chips directly into its processors. They have now made the decision to install heaters in them. Put that boxed cooler out of your mind! A minimum of Zelman Optima is required for it (unless, of course, you plan to utilize it for the purpose for which it was designed and not sit in office applications).

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good one.

Prots were used as playthings, and he handles them. I use it along with the Radeon 7990 and 32 GB of Nvidia GTS 450 RAM for physics. Battlefield 3 has a full server for 64 players, a vast area, and an FPS that, when measured with fraps, is roughly 120 and essentially never drops. Similarly, in all games. If i7 does not outperform, then he will perform at his level, but i7 is 30% more expensive than the 6 version it is compared to at $30,000.

Pros
  • Quick. The same performance as an i7, but less expensive (I compare based on gaming FPS, not testing).
Cons
  • Not at all.

I will state right away that FX is a stylish processor for a fairly demanding user, capable of delighting any school-age bender (and not only). This processor was designed specifically for overclockers. It isn't extremely efficient while it's in stock. The am3 + socket and mothers for them, as well as the processor itself, have one very significant issue: these cores are not connected to the memory controller. They must therefore be driven independently. Not all mothers use a multiplier to…

Pros
  • Cost and overclocking potential.
Cons
  • In today's world, the overclocking-solved low frequency of the memory controller, CPU-NB, and northbridge in the drain is still relevant.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing for the money, Im glad I chose this option.

In addition to this, its power surpasses that of a significant number of today's processors. Got pros: The AMD 6350 is essentially a six-core processor. The processor in question has three separate cores. OH is structured in such a way that there are three separate core pairings. When operating in the real world, it is more beneficial to have fewer cores, but each one should have as much power as possible. When it comes to games that are not even close to being optimized, the second core…