Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 134
  • 5
    110
  • 4
    18
  • 3
    5
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Normal quality, you can use it.

A system unit Zalman Z11 Plus, an ASUS M5A97 R2.0, and a cooling unit Zalman cnps14x were present. In theory, they functioned in idle. I'm now ecstatic about the i5-4670K. To the i5, AMD FX-8350 suffers significant losses. Of fact, getting a lot of a nuclear processor for such a price is in theory not awful at all, given some specified objectives and a budget constraint. Well, I would advise adding and purchasing an i5.

Pros
  • Simple to pursue (literally in two clicks), the cost is 8 cores, of course, real.
Cons
  • On the 990FX, you need excellent cooling and a top-tier mother because overclocking the system creates a system that is similar to an oven that is heated to between 50 and 100 degrees. PCI-E 3.0 is typically not supported by mothers.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

If compared objectively, it was 9590 similar to a v8 engine with a turbine and the same v6 engine without a turbine. I disabled turbo boost for the same reason I didn't overclock since the motherboard won't allow it in terms of power. However, there are significant advantages: Does not heat up quickly or efficiently (when used with cooler master v8 ver.2). You cannot even turn it off after having it on, sitting, or playing. The computer no longer overheats, you can use fewer fans and turn off…

Pros
  • It works with all of my hardware. 6 cores (Unlike 9590) Does not damage motherboards or RAM. doesn't even get warm
Cons
  • power declines (sometimes lags) This one is much weaker where the 9590 flew. Now that it is winter, the room is frigid.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent product, the best quality.

The majority of online reviews claim that AMD Vishera is not a gaming processor and that it consumes 30% of Intel's FPS in some AMD games. In actuality, there is a drain at a resolution of 1280x800. When we compare gaming performance amongst processors using Full HD resolution and the highest full-screen anti-aliasing setting, the differences are minimal (1-6%). AMD is prepared to offer higher performance for less money than Intel. I'm confident there won't be any single-threaded programs in…

Pros
  • a good value, top-notch performance, compatibility with AM3+ boards, and gaming
Cons
  • The packaged cooler is rather loud and somewhat underpowered. Some motherboards need bios firmware in order for AMD FX-8350 to start.

I also purchased an Asrock Extreme 990FX motherboard, two 8GB DDR3 cards, and a Silver Arrow ib-e tower in addition to the FX-9590 graphics card. The frequency of the processor ranges from roughly 1000 to 1300 megahertz while it is not being used. The frequency provided for the load is 4700 MHz. When the engine is not running, the temperature is between 36 and 39. This is an air-cooled component, however it gave out 65 degrees Celsius when under load (with 10 degrees in reserve before resetting

Pros
  • Not to mention that it comes at a hefty price tag, yet this processor is outstanding in terms of multithreading, performance in games and programs, and editors. If the temperature drops at a typical rate, there is no reason to be concerned about anything.
Cons
  • - Very hot, but only while operating under load. - Not as quick in single-threaded apps (where the top Intel CPUs should rightfully lead the way) - Consumes a great deal of energy while under stress in addition to producing heat (although I didn't really notice the latter).

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The product did not cause delight, but you can use it.

Many mention the cheaper pricing. Naive. That's where I became engrossed. Don't you believe that a cheap motherboard offers nothing to catch? or neglected to bring the cooler? The cooler won't function in this case for the mower. How about a healthy body to serve as a reminder? Furthermore, it will be quite expensive given the present rate of exchange for the. Consequently, can take the same Intel? Although it will cost a little more, it will be more comfortable to play and has the option for…

Pros
  • Examining FX 8320 It's feasible to overclock. Works well while processing and transcoding videos or when using multi-threaded programs like Winrar. Who however needs it? excluding units. Well then, stream on.
Cons
  • AMD's critical temperature is still lower than Intel's, so it doesn't get very hot. Power on a different core is significantly less than it. You shouldn't use it as a toy, but if you aren't going to use high-end video cards, it is perfectly adequate and won't show any signs of wear even when overclocked. Although the schooltrons' favorite potato pulls typically, Intel will be preferred there. And certainly, there won't be any additional upgrades because the new Zen line will be on a separate socket. Regarding the obsolete process technology and energy usage, I won't say anything.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

bought an FX-8350 for $199 at the end of December. connected to a Radeon 7950. Asus Sabertooth R1.0 motherboard, 2x4 Gb 1600 Mhz memory, packaged cooler, and 850+ Cougar power supply. works perfectly when overclocked to 4600 Mhz. It registers 57 degrees under load and 42 degrees at rest. I never looked back; the performance is great, there are no lags, and the settings for Battlefield 3 Ultra 1080p are consistently at 60+ FPS. In terms of the higher speaker regarding WOT, at maximum speed…

Pros
  • plus overclocking plus cost-quality plus speed
Cons
  • - Consumption of energy

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A really necessary purchase, glad I found this product.

Intel Pentium II, AMD K7, Intel Pentium 4, i5, i7, and FX8320 have all been used in the past to make stones. All reports claim that Intel is incomparably superior, however after testing the i5 and i7, I can state that this is a fraud because Intel has rigged the tests to favor it. AMD actually has a faster visual speed. I don't run into any issues. Take AMD, but AVOID the slow and foolish Intels.

Pros
  • The best value for the money
Cons
  • a loud box fan

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing for the money, Im glad I chose this option.

Of course, I'm no saint of a gamer, but I have seen that some toys might cause the CPU to overheat. At the same time, the sensor reads 206 degrees Celsius. I believe it to be a malfunction, as it will melt at this temperature and cause a short. When even the PC was destroyed, the safeguards kicked in. I then switched out the paste, but things haven't improved much. But this is the worst of his pains! Moreover, nobody has raised any other concerns. A lightning-fast CPU, in terms of speed.

Pros
  • Cost-effective and nimble.
Cons
  • Like a stove, it can reach extremely high temperatures.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

As a replacement, I went with the Phenom II x4-955 Black Edition, which lasted for five to six years in the system unit and was perfect for me in every way (it held a highly popular percentage of the market). And the "old man" FX-8350 proved to be a difficult nut to crack, lagging behind all recent games in HD and Full HD when combined with an ASUS GTX950-2GD OC (and eventually an ASUS RX 570 4GB OC) and 16GB DDR3 Kingston HyperX Fury (overclocked to 1920 MHz). However, by the year 2022, his…

Pros
  • 1) Extremely powerful for the time period 2) a moderately low heating (the use of a low-cost dropsy) 3) still "dragged" all of the most recent games, even when they were in HD. 4) the capability of installing it on an older motherboard (I'm using it with an ASUS M5A88-M) without having to switch out the socket.
Cons
  • I was blind and missed those. I was already at a high enough frequency when I got the car, so at first I just drove it for the purpose of my interest in sports.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good product at a good price, I advise you to try it.

I set together a machine with an AMD FX-8350 processor and an ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 motherboard specifically for testing purposes (overclocking, etc.). With my third PC, which has an Intel Core i7-3770K processor, I started making comparisons. I began testing with games (Crisis 3, Mafia 2, GTA IV, and whatever else was available) and software (Sony Vegas Pro 11, 3D Max 12, 3DMark 11, and a few more I won't list) and found no discernible performance difference between AMD and Intel, but…

Pros
  • Results, cost
Cons
  • 1) The entire packaged cooler must be replaced immediately. 2. Heat transfer.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Good product for me, no problems at all.

In summary, if you want a CPU with great performance at a reasonable price, buy it. He's awesome! Take a nice cooler, either a good air or water cooler priced at $3,000, if you're going to play. In theory, a boxed cooler works perfectly; the key is to dust it out every three months so that it is prepared for the "turbine":D In many ways, I enjoy the competition—or opposition—to encourage rivals and prevent a monopoly on Intel alone. Unquestionably, Intel also produces excellent products. But…

Pros
  • Price. It costs a lot less than its Intel-family brothers. Performance. It performs admirably in benchmark tests and is amenable to overclocking. cooler. At low speeds, the cooler in the box is completely silent, much like a laptop. I am also delighted with the workmanship and copper tubing. Overclocking You are able to safely overclock to 4.5–4.7 with proper water cooling. See, I only gave it a couple of minutes.
Cons
  • cooler. Unfortunately, the same cooler transforms into a turbine at high speeds, i.e. in games and demanding applications. It became blocked with dust after six months, and the computer abruptly shut down (clearly as a result of overheating). This indicates that the cooler would be worthwhile replacing, of course. I believe you should spend all of your money on a solid dropsy in this situation, thus I advise against taking the BOX version and instead urge you to buy something substantial. Warm. I believe that this query is related to the topic of coolers. Normal 32–34 with a typical cooler running at idle. In video games, it will occasionally increase to 72 with 6500 thousand cooler spins (at this point, it appears that a turbine is present in the space). Once more, a good cooler resolves the problem.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I really like the product, it fully meets my expectations.

I have read the responses. I recently came to the realization that not for no reason will I be purchasing it. The people who are responsible for Intel and AMD are being held responsible. Could it be that your hands are slightly crooked? that it is not possible to put the processor in its regular state; alternatively, is it possible to put it on toothpaste or glue? Or, it's possible that the radiator's fan wasn't running, since he's making a racket and then yelling in a loud voice, "AMD…

Pros
  • I don't know the answer to that question just yet, but I will take it.
Cons
  • In all likelihood, and similarly to other AMD processors, not at all.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm very happy, it really is worth buying.

Even though I play games for 6-12 hours straight (gytya 4 and 5, dying light, dark soul3, assassins all parts, days standalone, arma3, dcs world, bf3 and 4, tanks, and many other modern ones and at that on high or ultras), my fx 6300 from September 2022 under one thermal paste (never changed - breaks) does not get hotter than 54 ° C in loads on a tower with 3 tubes. Despite FB's relatively low strength (r 270x), it can still beat almost any other hand. memory speeds of 1866 GHz or higher, with…

Pros
  • value, hilarity, turbocharge, and several cores
Cons
  • Programmers who sold over to the spooks

Revainrating 4 out of 5

It was a reasonable purchase, will order more.

A powerful workstation model. The boost in productivity is primarily seen in applications like CAD and GIS that involve a lot of "stupid" computational mathematics. AMD advises water cooling, and the Thermalright Archont cooler is unable to handle this, functioning normally only with the side wall removed. We'll see, I ordered a water bottle.

Pros
  • Review of the AMD-FX 9590, which offers a significant performance improvement over the FX 8350!
Cons
  • Compatible with motherboard units (but only those running the most recent beta Bios), needs specific cooling. Pricey (for now)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I didnt expect the quality to be so high.

Different pros: Price - for the price, this is the best processor. Productive - in all new products with a video card r9 280x produces more than 60 fps! With its cons: Heating - in order not to cut down the computer due to heating, I had to buy a cooler for 2022; (

Suitable for ultra-light streaming and editing in Movavi 20 or 17 premieres. I haven't tried Sony Vegas. An excellent processor for the money, but I would take a ryzen 3 2200g, it costs more, but there are more prospects with it. however, he seems to be worse in the streams. With its pros: Not bad chases on the ULTRA BUDGET mother ga-78lmt-s2 (I didn’t buy it myself, don’t scold me) up to 4 - 4.2 GHz, but at these frequencies it sometimes fails. cooled with a gammamax 200t, the maximum rate was

The computer is used for video editing. The maximum download when rendering video 1920x1080 was 80%, Pinnacle studio 16. When converting, with the converter settings 8 streams and 8 simultaneously processed files, the download was 100%, two and a half hours of video footage 720x576 in .MOV format was surpassed in .AVI in 6 minutes . Decent result!

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I did not regret the purchase, everything is fine.

Its pros: overclocking to 4.1 cheap compared to peers without overclocking it does not heat up very much Has some cons: there is no kit . not even a box, they just give it to the palms and that's it . is it somehow . strange? uncomfortable? well, rather the latter.