Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 46
  • 5
    37
  • 4
    8
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

An ideal product for any type of consumer.

Previously, I didn’t use AMD products, I took it exclusively for streaming to the 2nd PC together with a capture card, the result is amazing, it chews FHD 60 Fps effortlessly, it doesn’t heat up and doesn’t even strain half, a masterpiece Although, judging by the results of the benchmarks, it does not reveal its full potential, this is most likely the fault of a cheap board based on simple logic (A320), I saved money, but in the future, if necessary, I will transplant

Pros
  • - multithreading - price
Cons
  • - gaming performance is lower compared to i5 8400

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A valuable purchase, some advantages!

We are talking about the R7 1700 (without X). Prots is completely satisfied. Holds virtual machines well (without glitches and friezes), in other tasks it also shows itself normally. Outside of tests, 100% load is rarely seen. The stock cooler is quiet (under load, the noise only slightly increases), for lovers of effects it has an RGB color. Before that, I sat on c2d E8400. The increase is certainly noticeable (well, still). Thought about taking the I5-8600, but ended up with AMD because of…

Pros
  • Price (took for 16670) Performance (8 cores, 16 threads) Heat dissipation (on the stock cooler I did not see above 57 degrees)
Cons
  • Until I noticed

Regarding games, in my opinion, the lower average fps is balanced by much more stable minimum fps: where Intel dances up and down, AMD is more even, without jumps and microfreezes. In literally everything else, the 7700k has no chance, both in terms of pure performance and the cost of a processor + motherboard + cooler kit. R7 Ryzen is designed as two CCXs - in simple terms, the processor behaves like two quad-cores with eight threads each. These two complexes are connected by Infinity Fabric…

Pros
  • 8c16t, Excellent multi-threaded performance on par with the i7-6900k (RUB 75,000) Price/performance ratio, Single socket for all Zen-based processors, active support promised for at least 4 years, On a stock cooler (which is RGB!1), it will almost certainly overclock to 3.7 GHz, with good luck up to 4-4.1 GHz and temperatures up to 70 degrees. Excellent voltage drop potential: less than 1 volt at stock frequencies. Infinity Fabric is tightly tied to the frequency of the RAM: the higher the frequency of the RAM - the processor works faster. Subjectively smoother FPS in games, there are practically no microfreezes and the minimum FPS is much higher compared to the mainstream kaby lake. AMD FineWine™.
Cons
  • At the moment, there is a problem with running RAM with a frequency of more than 2666 MHz: on most boards it refuses to fast at the declared parameters, or you have to manually search for working timings and frequencies by trial and error. 3000 MHz does not pull, only 2933. It is expected that it will be fixed in the near future. Yes, in games ~5-8% less fps compared to 7700k, Ryzen IPC is about 8-10% lower than Kaby Lake. CCX. If the cores need to communicate between two CCXs, there is a large delay, and, as a result, a performance drop of up to 25% compared to a single CCX. see comment. The price in 2022 is an economic crime.

I switched from 3770K (without overclocking) to 1700 (without overclocking), in synerender the difference is very significant. According to the test, 2.2 times. In a real scene, 3 times, with grass 1.5 times only, for some reason, part of the grass on one core counts . But still a mega thing! At the same time, we bought a 7700 for the office, in the bench the render is 1.6 times weaker, I did not check it on the real stage.

Pros
  • Ideal for rendering, sat on the i7 for a long time! But Intel has 8 cores very expensive . According to reviews, it is easy to chase, the multiplier is unlocked
Cons
  • I think it would be nice to overclock, there are one-line tasks, though there are few of them on which I will notice the difference.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing for the money, Im glad I chose this option.

In terms of price / performance ratio, the processor has no equal (except perhaps the R5 1600). I was very pleased with the bundled cooler, I did not expect such speed from it. Vishera also came with boxed coolers, but this is heaven and earth - the new Wraith is not only efficient, but also does not make noise, which was the sin of the old coolers. A nice bonus is the RGB backlight, which is synchronized with the motherboard and, in general, a nice appearance of the cooling system. Not…

Pros
  • 1) Performance; 2) Price; 3) Low heat generation; 4) Complete set; 5) Solder between heat distributing cover and die
Cons
  • 1) Overclocking restrictions; 2) Unlike Intel, there is no omnivorous memory (it will work, but by default it will start at 2133 MHz, and the performance of this CPU significantly depends on the speed of the memory); 3) Follows from the first point, but still, dry performance per core is lower than that of a competitor. Yes, with the same frequency, the difference is leveled, but no one will deliberately reduce the frequencies of the 7700 or 8700 to 3.7-3.9 GHz.

According to reviews, many write that it’s slower in games than i7, by 20 percent. For me, it’s not critical, fps will be 100 or 120. I play, I render video, everything works quickly. Took for 14900 OEM + cooler for 1440 zalman CNPS9X Optima. Tried to overclock: stable at 1.35v 4GHz. I left 3.6 GHz 1.25v permanently (this is -0.1v from the default values ​​\u200b\u200bon the ASUS B350 prime plus). without overclocking, the temperature is 50-55 in the load. When overclocked, it reached 70-73 in

Pros
  • ryzen 7 1800x fast processor, enough for all tasks.
Cons
  • Not revealed yet

Back in 2022, I bought an i5-2500K and was so amazed by its power that I thought I would not return to AMD (I switched to it from Phenom II x2 unlocked to x4). i5-2500K was great for everyone and overclocking to 5 GHz, and solder under the lid and cold . Compared to the FX, it was a fairy tale . I still consider the FX the worst processor in history, and I have been communicating with computers for 25 years . But after the sandy bridge, Intel got stuck. Hong Konganent +3% to the previous…

Pros
  • + The main advantage is the price + Price per core + 8 cores + Low TDP + Low consumption (not to be confused with TDP . TDP and consumption are different things, otherwise 90% think that this is the same thing) + Solder under the cover + Cheap motherboards with no overclocking restrictions
Cons
  • - Low overclocking frequency 3.8-3.9 is mainly taken. - Low performance per core / MHz), and coupled with low overclocking in a single thread, Ryzen looks sad. - Infiniti factories (the common bus of operation is only on one bus), so Ryzen needs RAM with 3200+ MHz and only two-rank (if you take 2 bars), if you take 4, then you need to take single-rank ones.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best price for such a product, I will buy more!

overall it's a great processor at a good price in an Intel-dominated world. It has no competition in terms of performance, especially in terms of mixed workload and even gaming. Has some pros: - Multi-threaded performance on par with i7-6900K ($1049.99) - Single-threaded performance on par with Broadwell-E - For 38% of the price of a direct competitor - Better value for money compared to the 6C/12T i7 6800k which is much more expensive but noticeably lagging behind in performance…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for the money, definitely recommended!

overclocked my 1700 to a frequency of 3800 MHz at a voltage of 1.35v. The boxed cooler copes with the load perfectly, the temperature under load does not exceed 60 degrees in a spacious case. Processor performance is very dependent on the frequency of the RAM, ideally find compatible brackets with a frequency of 3200 MHz. I advise you to purchase. Different pros: In all applications that can work in multithreading, it confidently outperforms i7 (twice as fast). Cons below: Demanding on RAM. At…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the highest level, be sure to try it.

I bought my 1700 BOX for 1920220, which turned out to be cheaper than 7700K but a little more expensive than a simple 7700 (which, moreover, cannot chase). The regular cooler is good and quiet enough, therefore, taking an OEM is just a crime) As a result, I assembled a mother system for 16gig memory (2666) for 33tr, which I think is just smartos in our difficult time. In general, I was very pleased with the process, especially after my 4790

Pros
  • Good performance for the future

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing Ive ever used, a great item for everyone!

Excellent processor, 8 cores, 16 threads. A task for the future. Overclocked without problems to 3700 GHz, someone will say, well, it's about nothing at all. Well, yes, nothing. but on a boxed cooler, but with a voltage drop to 12022, at a maximum temperature in loads of 72-75 degrees - this is not bad. With memory overclocked to 3200, the total performance increase is around 30%. And to arrange an oven from a computer with an expensive cooling system for the sake of 4000 GHz and a 5-10%…

Pros
  • Low price for an 8-core processor that, when overclocked, catches up with the top 1800X. Possibility of overclocking and voltage reduction. Good box cooler. Good performance.
Cons
  • There is none of them

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best I ever used, recommend it to everybody.

I've owned it for several years. Colleagues in Zbrush (3d sculpting software) noted problems associated with interaction with some applications (sculptris), supposedly freezes and behaves even worse than intel. I took it with the transition from amd fx-reports to this one, so there will be no comments on the problem, there are rumors, but you hang on there. It behaves very nicely on CPU renders, the total potential power is prohibitive. With that said, whatever I write here, 1700 will plow the…

Pros
  • Total power, was better than Intel i7 for 24k at the start of sales, now and even more so Good heat dissipation, pulled the Witcher 3 ultra on a branded cooler
Cons
  • In the keyshot (3d render), the branded cooler could not withstand the 100% load of the cores, the processor began to throttle. Decided to buy a normal cooler. in a single core, it will lose to the solution from Intel. on rumors, not every software is optimized (below)

Revainrating 3 out of 5

It has some flaws but the product is usable.

Amd fx rev 2.0. I'm a fan of amd, but I didn't like the percentage. It's better to take any old i7 from your hands for a dorma (starting from 2600k). 16 threads will work as they should when the percentage is not relevant, in five years. Buy only for AMD fans, or wait until it drops in price to 10-15. You should not even switch from Evie and Sandy Bridge, there will be almost no increase in games, and somewhere it will even be worse. If saliva has already gone through Hong Kong, take the r7…

Pros
  • Editing, rendering, synthetics. King of benchmarks, in synthetics between i7 6800k and 6900k. Unlike the older model, the 1800x costs much less, but is no different. Solder under the lid.
Cons
  • Weak for games, at the level of old i7 and modern i5, almost does not chase. Expensive 25k for non-gaming percent, dear mothers from (8-20 oblique) and very weak, for comparison, look at mothers on socket 2022 v3. Raw platform, I don’t think it will be finished soon, so far it doesn’t work well with win 10, problems with high-frequency RAM.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Well done, but I wont buy any more.

The processor is exclusively for work tasks. And there it is, taking into account its price, it is simply not achievable for Intel. However, if you are building a gaming system and want high-end hardware, then the 1800X is not the best choice. You might as well buy the 1600X or the 7700K and both will cost you less. And do not listen to those who scream about optimization for 8 cores and DX12. When only 3.9% of users have more than 4 cores, no one will even stir to optimize games for multi-core

Pros
  • Price Performance
Cons
  • Low overclocking potential, but these are trifles, performance is enough

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A good quality product, I rate this purchase perfectly.

I bought the 1800s in KU for 26k so as not to mess with overclocking and other dances. To him ASUS B350M-A and 32GB Samsung 2400. In work (Adobe CS6 mostly) no complaints. Everything is stable, I don’t know what they complain about problems. Possibly due to overclocking. Well, games like Skyrim run with a bang. There is so much power reserve that you can not close programs at all, you just turn off what you no longer use, then unfold and continue working. No more need to close antivirus…

Pros
  • 1. Price for 8 cores 2. Cold (be quiet! for 1.9k). 3. What else do you need from the processor?
Cons
  • Nothing to write. For such money, it still has no analogues.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best I ever used, recommend it to everybody.

Motherboard - ASUS x370 Prime RAM - HyperX 2400Mhz SSD - Samsung 750EVO 120gb Chassis cooling - Thermalright - TY 140 x1, X-Silent 120 x2. With a slight overclock to 3.4 GHz with a DeepCool Gammax S40 cooler and Arctic Cooling MX-4 thermal paste, the temperatures are as follows: - simple - 28-32 degrees - load - 48 pounds - heavy stress test CPU+FPU+Cache+AVX (LynX, Aida, etc.) temperature not higher than 57 degrees. And all this on an inexpensive cooler for 1500! Performance in…

Pros
  • Performance in multi-core mode Temperature The smoothness of the picture in games - there are no friezes or stutters, unlike the I5. It provides the minimum FPS at the Intel level, so you won’t notice much of a difference.
Cons
  • In games and some applications from Adobe, where there is no scalability for more than 2-4 threads (cores), it loses to the i7 6700 / 7700 and is compared with the i5 7600. The platform is still raw - BIOS ates come often.

It's funny, for some reason all the negative reviews are written in such a hysterically illiterate style that one gets the impression that they were written by schoolchildren who only saw this processor in reviews :-) By the way, never get fooled by synthetic tests and "reviews" 7 "A". Literally a week ago I finished assembling a server for a department of 25 people (all PCs are weak, the RDP server was raised on this). Estimate the scale: 25 users every day work with documents (M $ Office…

Pros
  • We are talking about the AMD Ryzen 7 1800X, I will not name the motherboard so as not to advertise, 64 GB of memory, 5x4 TB disks in the array, I am writing in March 2022. - optimization not only for games, but also for technical tasks - this is a mega plus, for powerful, but inexpensive servers, just a song (see comment); - transcendent computing power (see comment), really amazing; - 16 cores; - capacious cache; - PRICE (1/3 of similar Intel); - very low heat dissipation, does not require powerful cooling; - new technologies and goodies (pulls DDR4, ECC, I generally keep quiet about processor extensions); - I just don’t know the task that could load it at least 70%; - even reviewers praise and do not pour mud, which is strange.
Cons
  • - with motherboards from ASUS, judging by the reviews, there are problems with the BIOS. For some reason, they always have problems with new AMD; - Windows 10 has not yet released a patch for its normal support (there are glitches). But who in their right mind uses Windows 10? (joke) :-) - it is not entirely clear who needs such power at home (I mean that it is more suitable for servers).

My PC is always quiet. At work. When playing. When idle. No temperature fluctuations. Power with a margin for many years. Windows is not buggy. Bios ated immediately to the latest, and there are no problems. I don't know why people buy a 7700k system with a 60Hz monitor? The phrase that Ryzen is not a gaming processor? Well, yes, probably such people need a gaming processor, gaming motherboard, gaming RAM, hard, power supply in the end. In general, I am delighted with the red product. He is the

Pros
  • Happy owner of Ryzen 7 1700 Pros: 1) Hell of a multitasker Launch tank client? the second client of tanks? And play at the same time in GTA 5 is quite comfortable? Easily! (no, I don’t do that, but I know that Hong Kong is able to run many games / applications / virtual machines at once - checked) 2) Easy overclocking from under Windows (Amd Ryzen Master) up to 3.6 WITHOUT raising the voltage on the boxed cooler. Even a blonde will do. 3) In the simple heart of my PC it is colder than that of the former! (33C) in games up to 60 in a blown case, it is difficult to warm it up. - at stock frequencies 4) severely dominates the i7-5960x in both single-thread and multi-thread in CPU-Z 5) no drawdowns / freezes in the games were noticed
Cons
  • I could not influence the price policy of a competitor as quickly as we would like.