Pros
- Price-quality ratio Sharpness up to 200mm indestructibility
Cons
- Huge retractable trunk - ladies are shy
Pros
- Image stabilization. Pretty normal picture.
Cons
- Dark, no marks showing focusing distance. After 200-250 it starts to soap terribly. In general, I don’t know what to do with it and how to remake the limiter, but I recommend not to set the zoom above 250 mm in any case - it lathers, at least crack, at least close the aperture, it’s still less, but it lathers. They could have done 70-250, but it would have been normal for all FRs.
Pros
- - Price quality - Stabilizer - 58mm filters (same as 50f/1.4) - fairly high linearization - blocker "falling out" when carrying - relatively light
Cons
- - Play front - drop in quality at the long end (200-300) - dust slips at 300mm (zoom) - slightly "fades" the pictures - darkish - the front optics rotates when zooming, which complicates the work with polarizing (and other circulating) filters - no focus correction in auto focus mode (example as in sigma)
Pros
- Photo quality, focusing speed, detail, stabilizer.
Cons
- In cloudy weather, it lathers a little after 200mm. The zoom ring rotates counterclockwise - inconvenient.
Pros
- Colors, picture clarity up to 200mm, stabilizer, ultrasonic. Two stabilization modes. The zoom lock will prevent the trunk from accidentally moving out while being carried. Very beautiful landscapes can catch, and including portraits from afar.
Cons
- Soap after 200mm, poor image quality at dusk and at night (even with a tripod). Trunk - dust collection. The lens drains the battery well.
Pros
- Price, stub and focal length.
Cons
- Haven't found it yet.
Pros
- Price, stabilizer, sharpness.
Cons
- Noisy autofocus, focusing speed. In dark rooms (quite dark) it can be unsteady to focus. Sometimes it dulls by 300mm (although I did not notice such problems in the tracking focus during sports shooting).
Pros
- Good universal telephoto focal lengths. Fast focusing, ultrasonic does its job, but with a small flu, of course. In dark and dimly lit rooms or in the evening, the focus begins to dull a little, not critical, given the stub, the shutter speed increases to half a second and everything is normal in general. Double stabilizer is a definite plus for this glass, without it it would be game Very good things are drawn by this daring fellow with sufficient practice and shooting skills on such fr
Cons
- at the glass for a speck? They are not, and not the segment at all to pull out. If you want a more serious toy - white elks to help, there you can complain and be dissatisfied, for such a sum. The only thing is, check the lens on your camera for backs and fronts, many on the forums complained that some of the glasses out of the box had a shot down af, this is important to consider so that later there is no trouble with delivering it to the service.
Pros
- Cutting Gives a good picture and colors The stabilizer does its job
Cons
- In the range of 200-300 - lathers Inconvenient switching to manual focus (although rarely necessary) Rotating front lens (which pops out noticeably) Slow and not always sure focus
Pros
- Its most important advantages are the price (almost every amateur photographer who has grown up to a SLR can afford it). As well as weight and compactness - if you have enough spacious pockets in your jacket, then you can easily put it there as a changer, if you suddenly need to make a small exit without a wardrobe trunk. Further advantages are not so obvious, but nonetheless. The design is quite comfortable and well made, despite the fact that everything is made of plastic. The stub works well. It gives a picture at short focal lengths (somewhere up to 150+ mm) that is quite sharp, but harsh, so it will not work as a portrait lens. It has a very pleasant, non-irritating bokeh.
Cons
- The main drawback is, perhaps, a vacuum cleaner. Due to the strongly retractable front part, it works like a pump and, with sharp zoom turns, sucks in the dust, which eventually ends up in the camera on the matrix. Therefore, the zoom twist sharply and unnecessarily is not worth it. Another disadvantage is the swivel front lens, which makes it difficult to use some types of filters, such as polarizing ones. "Soaps" at a focus of more than 200 mm. So if you are interested in these focal lengths, it makes sense to look at other options that are more expensive. It also gives a vignetting effect at high focus, darkening the image in the corners. But sometimes, depending on the plot, it happens even to the topic. Apparently not a very strong construction inside, especially the stub - most likely afraid of any falls and bumps. About six months after the purchase, I had to take it to the warranty service due to the fact that the stabilizer lens had come off or peeled off, although I handled it quite carefully. But a year and a half after the repair, everything is working properly.
Pros
- The price for such focal lengths is very interesting. Pretty sharp glass, the stabilizer is fundamentally not much inferior to 70-200L 2.8 IS II. Very light compared to the same 70-200L 2.8 IS II. The presence of a latch trunk. Focal lengths are working on the entire range.
Cons
- Most of all, I don’t like the rotating and retractable front lens when focusing: it’s almost impossible to shoot with a polarizer. The trunk extends under its own weight, if the latch is not latched. The design itself creates a feeling of fragility, especially in comparison with the L series. A potential vacuum cleaner, so I use it very carefully. No hood included.
Pros
- - Workmanship, strength and reliability (I fell and survived everything, escaping with a scratch on the case. It did not affect the optics in any way - Powerful 2-mode stabilizer (regular and for shooting in wiring) - Working range - Excellent sharpness in the range of 70-200mm, sharpness acceptable for amateur photography in the range of 200-300mm - Up to 200 mm, a very pleasant, juicy picture - Smooth pleasant movement of the zoom ring. If you take after amateur glasses of the initial price category, you can feel the real THING in your hands - Fast and accurate focusing - EF mount - Small and cheap 58mm filters
Cons
- - Energy-intensive stabilizer. In Live View and video mode, the battery is eating at a terrible pace. The rest is rather features that you need to be aware of: the front lens rotates when focusing, the trunk extends to a decent length and can drag dust inside, the stabilizer is noisy for video shooting, in the 300 mm position the sharpness is only for publishing on the Internet and printing 10x15. As many have already said, if the lens is not focused at infinity, then in order to roll up the exit pipe, you must first switch to manual mode and tighten the ring. On autofocus, the focus ring cannot be turned by hand.
Pros
- Price sharpness Picture as a whole
Cons
- Aftofocus
Pros
- Price, focal length, a 300 stub is necessary and works well if the hands do not shake much. It blurs the background quite interestingly both with macro and with magnification. I use with Canon 550 and EX580 / . Who is looking at a telephoto and is confident in his hands, take it without a stabilizer. cheaper for a beginner as I recommend. buy a lens hood right away.
Cons
- You can shoot them only during the day or with a flash (the camera puff is not quite weak) if in the twilight I recommend switching to manual focus, you will be less upset when you view the footage. This is probably the only negative that you need to switch to manual mode.
Pros
- Excellent value for money for what you can get. Focal lengths of 70-300mm on the crop turn into 112-480, which is more than enough for handheld shooting. Excellent working stabilizer. Fairly fast autofocus, though not usm. Sufficiently sharp in the entire range of the FR (after adjustment).
Cons
- No hood included and no red stripe. The front lens rotates when focusing. If you install the native lens hood the other way around (to the transport position), then it closes the focus ring. It is more convenient to use a rubber folding hood.
Pros
- An excellent stabilizer, focusing speed pleases, in the range of 70-220 it is very sharp, reproduces colors well, gives beautiful bokeh, especially in backlight. Well-thought-out design, the presence of a trunk lock.
Cons
- I bought it for 15,000, I am very pleased, but now it is in some places and over 20 thousand fills up. Still, it's too expensive. In the 220-300 range, the picture is not always clear, especially in poor lighting conditions - this is the main drawback, there are no other serious ones.
Pros
- Stabilizer, fast focusing, workmanship.
Cons
- There is no hood included, and without a hood it is impossible to shoot.
