📷 Canon EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 STM Lens, Black - Sharp and Versatile for Exceptional Images Review

In general, a cool lens, that' permanent, it would be insanely cool, without sarcasm, see this, so we take Some pros: Only about video features: This is the best universal width for the ef-m system) No, seriously, this is an excellent width, despite the aperture Sharp on open holes, but put on the foot and a little higher, finally the blade) Stabilization works great, BUT you need to let it “get up” before you start shooting, like a second and a half By the way, despite the fact that the "dark"

experience of using 6 days - on the 7th issued a refund. I hope I came across a single instance with a similar design feature of the assembly, because the very quality of the shooting completely suited me. But I don't like the prospect of dust getting inside the lens. Now I will know what other places to look carefully when buying Canon lenses Different pros: I was pleasantly surprised by the sharpness and detail - sometimes even better than that of the whale ef-m 18-55 With its cons. a gap of…

The packaging was opened and the lens was obviously used and completely dirty. I would never have bought it if I knew it was used and showed signs of wear. Especially considering it's cheaper than a new unopened one on other sites. Super disappointed and will be back

I bought this lens for my M5 to extend the range of my wide angle shots. I take a lot of close-ups and need a larger field of view. This lens works great, but don't let the "no fisheye" reviews fool you. There is a slight distortion at the edge of the 11mm setting. However, this lens gives excellent results.

I LOVE this lens! I use this lens for landscape and nature photography. This is the sharpest lens I've ever owned. I didn't notice any strong color fringes or distortions. It's great to have a wide-angle lens that can focus at such short distances. The 11-22mm focal length is very versatile. I took it with me on a photo trip and used only 2 lenses for 3 days: this and a 55-200mm and I have 6 lenses in my bag that I just didn't need. This lens isn't weatherproof, but it's definitely an upgrade…

This lens is new to me but I like it. It's very sharp and the color is good. I like the 11 better than the 22, so if you're deciding between this and a 22mm prime, keep that in mind. In other words, for a wide angle, I'd place it just above the Rokinon 12mm. And it's good to have some zoom, say 14 or 15. But to compare the 22mm of this lens to the 22mm prime, I would use the prime that I have. And of course, the 22MP Prime is faster and better suited to soft backgrounds. All in all this is…

Incredibly sharp with almost no optical issues. This really makes the EOS M3 a great combination for the serious landscape photographer who doesn't want to (or can't) lug around extra gear. To me, taking a 5d mkiii and a 16-35mm for a 5 day hike is unrealistic, but you hardly notice the weight of this camera and lens combo. This lens has limitations, most notably the minimum aperture. This severely limits the use of the lens outdoors or in very bright indoor lighting. This lens also gets pretty

When I first bought the EOS M3 for Xiaoqin, I decided on primes. First, the EFM 22/2 is very sharp, tiny and light, and the lack of zoom actually makes the camera easier to use. This is an excellent lens. However, in Japan one often finds oneself in cramped quarters where the ability to frame a picture by moving one's feet is very limited. This requires a wide-angle lens. I would have preferred a fixed 15mm lens, but all fixed wide-angle lenses for the EOS M system are manually focusable and…

The lens is quite controversial, its sharpness is comparable to 18-55, in some places it even seems to me that in poor lighting, the staffer wins. The lens, like the entire line for eos m, is made of high quality plastic, so it is lightweight. The assembly, like the rest of the lenses, is on top. The fact that when you turn it on you need to bring the lens into a "combat position" is very unpleasant, precious seconds are wasted, for me it is a very controversial decision to make the lens…

Long-awaited compact wide-angle lens for Canon's mirrorless. In terms of viewing angle, the picture is similar to the full frame and wide-angle 17-40mm L. But the dimensions are several times smaller. Nice metal notch focus ring. Doesn't drag the camera. I can’t evaluate the work of the stabilizer yet, but I think it will give a stop and a half exposure in the evening (although the best stabilizer at this time of day is a tripod). If you bought an EOS M, buy this lens too, you will not be…

I saw a presentation on the "net" and accidentally an offer on ebay for sale in Japan, I ordered my Canon eosm to the available two accessory lenses. the Japanese at first asked why I needed it, but then he sent it all the same. And I can say that I feel happy for many reasons. And the camera itself is the height of perfection - style, quality, size, functionality, amenities are different, but you can just admire it for hours. So lenses, including 11-22, are made for a person. In general, it…

Bought to replace the regular 22mm. Because I shoot landscapes, then 22 mm is not enough. Of the shortcomings, perhaps, first of all, I will highlight the fact that there is no automatic sharpening to infinity when turned on - you have to do it manually every time. From 22 it was easier - turned it on and shoot right away. I will also say that automatic focusing led to the fact that many shots were unusable - sharpness was almost absent on the left side of the picture closer to the edge…