Crystalline Precision Captured: Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Lens Unveiled Review

Impartial observations from a user.A very good lens for traveling, walking, and a little more sharpness, then there would be no price for it.

I am satisfied Different pros: A very handy travel lens - it's much easier to travel with as it's very light, can be used instead of a camera plug and take pictures when needed. Got cons: he, of course, will not allow you to make a good portrait, but he will not let you down when you need to shoot architecture

the wide-angle effect is quite weak, so it' everything is ok, but professionals are unlikely to read comments about such lenses)

Got pros: Essential item for indoor video shooting thanks for the speed and compactness :) Some cons: I would really like to have a stub, but due to its uniqueness, it is still an important element in the chain of budget cropped lenses

Since this glass was made for cameras with a cropped matrix, corpse, I purchased it to complement the 50mm 1,4 and to replace (if I may so boldly put it) the whale 18-135 I had previously purchased. But what I enjoyed best about this camera was how small it was; I could easily fit it into my purse. Reviewing a lens isn't complete without showing off some shots taken with it in action, so I'm happy to provide a link to a folder containing a photo taken through the "eye" of this glass: I did a…

worked with the 18-55 package of lenses. When you set a specific focal length, tilt the camera down with the lens (clothing are on the floor in the backdrop), and repeatedly push the sharpness button on a Canon 20D or 500 camera, the original version without a stub was present. I detest trunks, 4L 50 nice lens at 1.4 70-200 mm f/2.8 L IS USM Macro, 4L is nice My preferred lens, the f/2.8 STM I have been hunting for a good, light lens with the proper focal length for a while, and I've finally…

Has some pros Fast, compact, silent compared to the Canon 50mm f/1.8 II, although the lenses are different in principle. Relatively cheap. Gives nice bokeh. Got cons: For the sake of compactness, it is not very convenient to turn the focusing ring in manual mode, but not critical.

Pros: everything is fine, a cool lens, a bit noisy, and when I put it on the carcass it went tight, keep in mind (compared to the whale one, it’s like clockwork) Has some cons instead of bubble wrap there was paper, it was well packed, but it could not be saved from delivery by rukozhopami.

With its pros. I took for the video to replace 40mm, since nothing fit into the frame Different cons: For video with 40mm there is no difference. For a photo less sharp

High-quality equipment in general, inspires, I want to take my camera with me everywhere. The whale has now completely become unnecessary, the yongnuo 35mm f 2.0 and this lens are enough for me. I took a used copy - it cost half the price, which I am quite satisfied with. Got pros: I will note that it is a pleasure to shoot in the evening, in low light - a really fast lens, sharp at maximum aperture. Fairly wide angle. A very compact lens, after it you just don’t want to cling to others) Cons…

Bought for travel in addition to fifty kopecks for a 200D camera, which itself is tiny (for a DSLR). Total - two fixes and the camera fits into a waist bag) It turns out about 40 mm and 80 mm, perhaps very versatile focal lengths . And if fifty dollars is the gold standard and everyone has it, then 24 mm surprised me in terms of versatility. A very comfortable focal length for any task (even for macro, if you strain).

I waited a long time for this glass to appear on sale in Hong Kong, but due to the situation on the market, the prices turned out to be very high, as a result I ordered it on e-bay from Japan. I shoot with a 650D and have a number of relatively budget lenses, including a 40mm f2.8 STM with a similar design that was my favorite. Now I have two favorite lenses. The rest of the large and heavy glasses do not particularly want to carry around with you all the time, and these two are a great team.

The wife is interested in photography. At first I forced me to exchange the Canon EF 200mm f4L for the Canon EF-S 18-135 IS STM . I have long wanted to have a "pancake" in my luggage, for my 6th "Canon" the "magpie" was irrelevant due to the initial heavy weight of the camera, but for a non-full-frame "hundredth" "pancake" fits perfectly. So what do we have? Compact size, light weight (reminiscent of a "zoom camera"). Silent focus. An almost perfect lens for street and travel photography. As…

I was very happy with the announcement of this model and, as the opportunity presented itself, I bought it. I really wanted to have a compact and lightweight lens for light walks and trips to visit. But the lens is very upset. Apparently due to a simplified optical design and cheap glasses, it produces a very uninteresting, flat and generally not sharp picture (everything is in order with focus), like a compact camera. In general, miracles do not happen. The price is very surprising, this lens…

Honestly, this is my only lens. Initially, I was going to buy a camera focused on shooting landscapes and architecture. I was advised to take a fotik carcass and a lens according to my needs. Before that, I used a digital camera. Didn't like enlarged photos. Jackal. I have always loved panoramic photography. And I proceed from the principle that it is better to approach the subject. When choosing a lens to buy, there is a lot of criticism for each lens, as well as for this one. But the size…

An ideal reporter for cropped cameras, for shooting banquets, corporate events, half-length, full-length portraits. In shortcomings, they write vignetting, chromaticity, barrel - what do you expect from the width, besides, it is corrected elementarily in editors. But it’s really convenient on the crop - you don’t wipe the walls like with the same 40 2,8, sharp with excellent autofocus - misses are no more than 5% at f 2.8, thanks to the wide grip it does not require adjustment. It is also…

24 mm on crop in my practice I use often. I purchased to replace a zoom lens with a focal length of 12-24, which failed on the eve of the New Year holidays. I purchased the lens along with the SL-52 hood. Official delivery from Malaysia with a guarantee for 2 years. There is a minimum front focus up to 0.5: we tested 3 copies. The presence of a small distortion is corrected in the editors, weak XA in the contrasting areas are visible when magnified, but they are also corrected in the editor…

Initially, it was taken as a household reportage for premises (apartment, kindergarten, office, etc.). Fortunately, the price and size allow. My friend and I went to take a picture with him in nature, check him out as a portrait painter, although, obviously, he is not for that. It's also not as bad as it could be. If the model is not strongly moved to the edge, it is quite decent. Autofocus seems to be OK; were greased, but I don't know which of the two of us is to blame for this. More than…

About the "front / back focus". In general, I would not say that I personally have perfect autofocus on 100d on any lens. I understand that the comparison may seem incorrect, however, this lens focuses no better and no worse than, for example, a whale lens. There are also misses. During the day, I didn’t notice any problems with it at all - it focuses perfectly. No, there really are moments when autofocus is wrong, but their minimum is exactly the same as on other glasses. Well, I repeat, this…

A little discussion. Do you carry a DSLR with you every day? Not for work, but for yourself? I once caught myself thinking that I don’t want to carry my favorite canon 35mm f / 2 with me everywhere. The reason is that it is large, like many different other lenses (whales, etc.). Together with 70d, it turns out a serious size and weight of a DSLR, under which you need to take a photo bag, etc. For every day, I wanted compactness and lightness so that the camera could be put in a backpack /…