Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
canon ef-s 55-250mm f4-5.6 is stm lens review & best deals for canon slr cameras logo

Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM Lens Review & Best Deals for Canon SLR Cameras Review

20

·

Very good

Revainrating 5 out of 5  
Rating 
4.9
👓 Lenses

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(3)
img 1 attached to Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM Lens Review & Best Deals for Canon SLR Cameras
img 2 attached to Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM Lens Review & Best Deals for Canon SLR Cameras
img 3 attached to Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM Lens Review & Best Deals for Canon SLR Cameras

Photos by authors

(4)
img 4 attached to Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM Lens Review & Best Deals for Canon SLR Cameras
img 5 attached to Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM Lens Review & Best Deals for Canon SLR Cameras
img 6 attached to Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM Lens Review & Best Deals for Canon SLR Cameras
img 7 attached to Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM Lens Review & Best Deals for Canon SLR Cameras

Description of Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM Lens Review & Best Deals for Canon SLR Cameras

Product Characteristics

The Compact and lightweight Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM Lens for Canon SLR Cameras is a high magnification EF-S telephoto zoom lens that offers exceptional image quality and versatility. With its built-in Image Stabilization, it provides up to 3.5 equivalent stops of shake correction, ensuring sharp and blur-free images. This lens is based on the CIPA standards and has been extensively tested using the EOS 7D at a focal length of 250 millimeters (equivalent to 400 millimeters in 35 millimeter terms).

Similar Products

If you're looking for a telephoto zoom lens with excellent image stabilization, the Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM Lens is a top choice. However, if you prefer a wider zoom range, you might consider the Canon EF-S 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 IS STM Lens. It provides a versatile focal length range and also features Image Stabilization to capture sharp images.

Problems Solved

The Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM Lens solves the problem of camera shake and motion blur when capturing distant subjects. With its powerful Image Stabilization, it allows photographers to achieve clear and crisp shots even at longer focal lengths. Whether you're shooting wildlife, sports, or distant landscapes, this lens ensures that your images are sharp and detailed.

Important Parameters

One of the key features of the Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM Lens is its one UD (Ultra-low Dispersion) lens element. This element effectively reduces chromatic aberration throughout the zoom range, resulting in excellent image quality with high resolution and contrast. Additionally, the lens is designed to be compact and lightweight, making it easy to carry and handle during extended shooting sessions.

Here are some areas where the Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM Lens can be used:

  • Wildlife photography
  • Sports photography
  • Landscape photography
  • Portrait photography

    • High magnification, compact and lightweight EF-S telephoto zoom lens with Image Stabilization for up to 3.5 equivalent stops of shake correction. Based on CIPA (Camera & Imaging Products Association) standards. Testing performed using EOS 7D at focal length of 250 millimeter (400 millimeter in 35 millimeter equivalence). One UD lens element reduces chromatic aberration throughout the zoom range, for excellent image quality with high resolution and contrast. New six-group zoom system provides a compact design while achieving a maximum magnification of 0.29x at the telephoto end. Minimum focusing distance: 2.79 feet; 0.85 meter (full zoom range). Kit Inlcudes lens, lens cap E-58II, lens dust cap E, instruction book, warranty card.

    Hide

    Reviews

    Global ratings 20
    • 5
      17
    • 4
      3
    • 3
      0
    • 2
      0
    • 1
      0

    Type of review

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    The best thing Ive ever used, a great item for everyone!

    I shoot on 200D Everything about this lens is good. To tears, I want a little more aperture. But if he had a constant F / 4, it would be L-ka. 250mm on the crop is power. For such a price, there is no way to achieve such an approximation on the FF. The lens gives opportunities. To say that this is a wonderful device is to say nothing. This is my favorite lens, I love it more than my life. (only at the time of publication I noticed that the photos are too compressed, of course, everything is…

    Pros
    • -excellent sharpness at all focal lengths -stabilizer! extremely important for televisions - autofocus is great - excellent range of focal lengths -price quality - dimensions and weight -due to the fact that this is a crop, the long end, in fact, is 400mm of focal length
    Cons
    • -I would like f / 4 aperture at the long end - a little scary for the trunk, if it’s even a little drizzling outside, it’s better not to tempt fate

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    One of the best offers, glad I bought it.

    I am an amateur photographer, my first and last Canon 1100d camera has been for 5 years now. Recently, I began to understand that I was not satisfied with the quality of my pictures, I was going to buy a new carcass. But on the forums I was convinced that changing the lens would bring more benefits. When I received this lens, I tested it at home, compared it with the whale 18-55 and yongnuo 50mm f1,8 and did not see any difference in photo quality, I was upset) Today, finally, I found models…

    Pros
    • Good approximation, background blur, frame sharpness.
    Cons
    • Until I noticed. But I haven't fully figured out the focus yet. In LV mode, it focuses for a long time, but for sure, although misses, of course, happen (like everyone else, I think). And through the viewfinder, I didn’t understand at all how it focuses)

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good purchase.

    because I don' at the beginning, but such soaps after 200 4 Stopped at 55-250 a little better than the old versions of 55-250 planes, animals - that' a quiet autofocus, you don't feel it at all, it' tested it yet, points, price-quality. (Though the price is a bit high)

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    Beyond praise! The product definitely deserves your attention.

    I did not regret that I took the second lens after the whale one! Works in tandem with Canon 800 With its pros: The lens is more suitable for those who are fond of shooting wildlife, spotting, correspondents, thousand, ) the frame is sharp, though it can miss the focus. 2 if you buy a lens hood (ET-63), then people from the street will look at you (they look at such a colossus). 3 4 that's why he and STM) Cons below: 1 At the end (250mm), not often, but it happens that it is mistaken in…

    Revainrating 4 out of 5

    I like the product, the quality did not disappoint.

    A workhorse for a telephoto, but my mistake was to take 55-250, it’s not enough for a distance, it’s too close close, I should have taken 70-300. Some pros: Stabilizer, although at maximum focus it does not save AUTOFOCUS! THE FASTEST SILENT is really the best I've seen Light enough for a TV Has some cons Sharpness, For some reason, the sharpness was not enough for me, I tested it at 5.6 aperture Dark, darker than the same 50 mm f1.8 STM fix at the same aperture, although I turned off all…

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    I am one hundred percent satisfied with the purchase, I recommend this product to everyone.

    Those who make money from photography will certainly choose "L" at full frame. For everyone else who needs a high-quality inexpensive telephoto, I recommend it. Pros below: Relatively sharp at all focal lengths, at all apertures and across the entire field of the frame. The drawing is as if soft and plastic, or something, but not soapy! STM - instant and absolutely silent focusing. Compact and light for a telephoto, which, thanks to a normal stabilizer, is not a disadvantage, but rather becomes

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    I didn't expect the quality to be so high.

    Compared with whale Canon 18-55, 55-250 turned out to be darker. Much darker. Somewhere on the 2nd step! Absolutely the same conditions. Yellow. Not tragic, but noticeable. Especially in comparison with the whale. In Photoshop-e, the balance for outputting to Canon 18-55 had to be shifted to cyan by + 12%. Sharpness is exactly the same. 55-250 turned out to be a little more contrasting. Loves the world. Sharpens instantly. It feels like he does it faster than you have time to press the shutter

    Pros
    • Silently and quickly focuses. Compact. working stabilizer.
    Cons
    • Dark.

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    I am delighted, the product is really worthy.

    I use it in conjunction with a budget canon 1100d carcass. The park has a kit 18-55, pancake 40mm f2,8. This one was purchased for outdoor photography. Perfect for reportage photography. Built-in stub - excellent thing! The quality of the photo in comparison with the kit is no comment at all, with a pancake - sharper photos, with a more beautiful blur on an open aperture. Definitely happy with the purchase! Favorite outdoor lens!

    Pros
    • STM is definitely a big plus! Focusing, firstly, is really almost silent (you can’t hear it at all on the street, only in a quiet room), and secondly, it’s unrealistically fast. The quality of the shots is excellent, aperture 4.0 is enough to take portraits with beautiful blur. Moreover, the focal length of 55-250 allows you to make these portraits natural, when a person does not even know that he is being photographed!
    Cons
    • If you need a lens for shooting children in an apartment, this lens is not for you)) And I didn’t notice any shortcomings!

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    Feel free to buy, for such a price, the quality is simply amazing.

    A very small and light telephoto that never discourages the desire to carry it with you. Before that, there was another telephoto lens from the 70-300 class, and so that one was a healthy and heavy monster, which you quickly got tired of carrying with you. In terms of the totality of its advantages, to be honest, I don’t see any alternative to this lens, it’s a great workhorse and in general it makes no sense to look for any other lens of a similar range of focal lengths for crop. I noticed…

    Pros
    • 1) Surprisingly good sharpness throughout the zoom range. 2) The weight and dimensions are so small that it's hard to believe that this is a telephoto. 3) Good bokeh. 4) There is a stabilizer, a necessary thing for telephoto lenses. 5) The price-quality ratio is beyond praise.
    Cons
    • 1) Not suitable for ff camera. 2) A retractable trunk, there is no dust and moisture protection, but it’s ridiculous to talk about this for an amateur class of lenses, in general there is nothing to seriously complain about.

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    I am very happy with this purchase, I will advise everyone!

    I am very satisfied with the purchase - the picture quality is generally excellent, the price is reasonable. Pictures can be viewed here. http://fotki. . Ru/users/tsv-star/album/422958/ http://fotki. . Ru/users/tsv-star/album/396693/ in cats from this photo and beyond http://fotki. . Ru/next/users/tsv-star/album/373870/view/718185?page=1

    Pros
    • Instant and clear focusing, juicy colors, many pictures are obtained as if three-dimensional. The build quality is excellent, nothing rattles, no backlash. Good quality of sharpness, sharpness is not crystal clear, but for a telephoto the picture is very good. Haha didn't notice. When shooting a video, the operation of the lens is not audible, not focusing, not changing the focal length.
    Cons
    • It blushes a little, maybe only my copy, however, the flaw is not terrible, it is easily corrected in Photoshop. Ventilation is present at the focal length of 250 and nearby, you can ignore it or edit it in the DPP that comes with the canon mirrors or fix it with Photoshop.

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    I am very happy with this purchase, I will advise everyone!

    No wonder in one bourgeois video review the chrome strip on the lens was made red and said: That's better! Indeed, that's better! Works tirelessly lenses on the carcass of the Canon 650D Test photos here: https://fotki. . Ru/users/valtsure/album/164780/ P. S. About 7 aperture blades - in one of the reviews it was said that there are more of them compared to the previous version, this is not so, all generations 55-250 initially had 7 blades (so believe the reviews after this)))

    Pros
    • Sharp for the price, even on the long end. STM - fast, even instantaneous, quiet, no buzzing, precise, almost no misses. Color rendition immediately at the level, without photoshop. The softness of the pictures. 7 aperture blades - softer bokeh. Finally, there is something to blur the background, which is called "trash")), there was a hint of volume and artistry as on fast lenses of the middle range of focal lengths. The front lens does not rotate - you can hang a polarizer, although it is practically not needed on a telephoto, except to shoot floating birds on the water without glare. Lightweight, compact
    Cons
    • Not an EF mount, sorry . if a transition to FF happens, it will be a pity to part with it. You can’t break the aperture so that it doesn’t depend on focal lengths and has always been 4)) He doesn’t like it when it’s dark, but that’s why he is a state employee to be dark glass. Is it a plastic mount - so what? This does not affect the quality of the images, nor does it affect the "usability". The minimum focusing distance would be smaller .

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    Excellent quality, absolutely not expected for such a price.

    I chose a zoom lens for a long time. It began with a search for used options, because I don't use it often. I wanted 70-300 at the beginning, but such soaps after 200mm. I thought about 70-200 4L. Big and no IS. Stopped at 55-250. After seeing the reviews, I liked the version with STM. The quality is inferior of course to L-cams, but the best option for price and quality. According to reviews, a little better than the old versions of 55-250. For shooting nature, planes, animals - that's it. If…

    Pros
    • Very quiet autofocus. Decent glass performance. Light. Relatively small. The front lens does not rotate when zoomed. Good stabilizer.
    Cons
    • Plastic bayonet.

    Revainrating 4 out of 5

    Not a bad product, quite normal quality.

    I bought it as a second lens for cases when the 24mm fix does not work: where it is impossible to get close to the subject. So far I can’t really work with manual focus at long distances. Focuses well on auto. No manual setting. It is only possible to focus normally at a small focal length. Well, in principle, I was warned not to buy a zoom lens, but still, sometimes a zoom is objectively necessary. In general, this is not a problem. It works on automatic. At night, by the way, it's hard to…

    Pros
    • The weight
    Cons
    • manual focus

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    Excellent product, the best quality.

    I purchased Canon EOS M as a telephoto for mirrorless, I use it through a special adapter (I bought it separately on eBay for 2500r). pleasantly surprised by the excellent compatibility of everything together and the excellent work of the lens - it focuses instantly and very accurately! Now I ordered a lens hood and a filter - a polarizer, after all, the telephoto trumpets this. But the pictures are amazing, I'm happy!

    Pros
    • optical characteristics - sharpness at the long end is super, bokeh is super, minimum distortion, instant autofocus, picture quality, picture, light, no backlash, sits tightly on the camera
    Cons
    • there is no lens hood in the kit (500-1100 on eBay), no cover, not very beautiful, probably due to the fact that it is plastic, in short, not a pro product

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    Full compliance with the manufacturers assurances, high quality.

    For example - a couple of handheld night shots, on a device with a crop1.6 matrix, the same object with and without full zoom: (links to the photo were not missed). Handheld video shooting of moving subjects is now easier than ever before - autofocus instantly and silently works out manual zooming, and a stabilizer compensates for slight shaking. For comparison, watch a video with a comparative focus test of two lenses "70-300 usm" & "55-250 stm": youtube. Com/watch?v=pmrvBcXYcwU - it's…

    Pros
    • Lightweight, silent, fast focusing. The stabilizer in all modes is fine. Distortion is minimal over the entire operating range.
    Cons
    • Plastic mount, not for frequent changes of optics - with high-speed replacements, it will loosen up after a hundred or two times. But at such a price, this is not significant, and if you do not rush, then the thread will not work in two years. Protection against water and dust is not like the "L"-class.

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    Everything about the product satisfied me, the price is perfect.

    I read about stm and decided to sell sigma and take canon 55-250 stm. I was surprised that my old camera is able to shoot sooooo even well)) No misses, sharp, high-quality zoom. Ordered from China. came quickly. Very satisfied. For trips to nature, attending concerts, taking pictures of birds is easy. Video without problems, focuses and there is no noise. Take replacements for old glass. you will not regret.

    Pros
    • PRICE QUALITY . Lightweight, simple and quite pleasant lens. The quality, in my opinion, is excellent (after sigma 18-250), there are practically no misses. quiet and fast focusing. the trunk does not fall out, tightly assembled, but at the same time not tight. easy to handle. A good analogue of expensive glass. The stabilizer works great.
    Cons
    • not revealed yet.

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    Just super, the product is made wonderfully, very satisfied.

    At first I was planning to buy a Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6L IS USM, but when I watched the video of the 55-250 f/4-5.6 IS STM versus the deluxe Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L IS USM, doubts about the appropriateness of such costs. You can see for yourself by watching this video. http://www. Youtube. Com/watch?v=RUPKbS8NbBQ In general, sometimes it makes sense to save money without losing quality. A cheap lens that is not inferior to a luxury one.

    Pros
    • Build quality (despite the plastic), focus is fast and accurate, does not smear, as it was written in one review (check the settings or others), silent STM engine, photos are sharp at all focal lengths, excellent bokeh, no complaints about XA, optics is not inferior to luxury lenses. You can see examples of photos in test shots taken by me: http://fotki. . Ru/users/avikdoc/album/406527/
    Cons
    • The plastic case and bayonet cannot be called shortcomings, because. they are of excellent quality.

    Revainrating 4 out of 5

    It was a reasonable purchase, I will order more.

    For 4 years of use on two different carcasses (600D and 7DM2) I shot a huge number of various shootings on it: sports, concerts, interviews, meetings, genre shots, nature, city. As an amateur lens, it is probably out of competition at all, but I used it for work in reportage shooting, and there it is, of course, frankly slow and aperture for reporting is simply nothing. A must have for those who want a good TV set on an amateur basis, but for something more serious, it’s still past. The price…

    Pros
    • Focal lengths (especially on crop), if you like to shoot sports, such as football, then this will save you from huge and heavy lenses (at an amateur level, of course). The weight Nice background blur Not noisy motor
    Cons
    • Of course, this is amateur glass, but still there is no protection, the body is completely made of plastic, be extremely careful Aperture, whatever one may say, but I want lighter glass The outgoing trunk, well, this is an aesthetic moment, but of course it looks sooo so-so from the side Focusing speed, sports are very difficult to shoot on it