Engine foam decoking LAVR Complex, 400 ml, Ln2510 Review

The use is super simple, they started the car after Lavra easily, washed the engine with a flush, changed the oil filter of the candle. I got another mash-oil, I stopped eating and went better, I didn’t measure the compression

There is definitely an effect. It should be done more often and combined with other preventive chemistry. Got pros: Black poisonous exhaust smoke that has been creeping along the street for a long time. As a result, oil consumption has been greatly reduced. On a five-cylinder pipe engine with 249 forces, before the execution, the oil ate 1.5 liters per 10 thousand km. Now it's been 7k and the level hasn't changed. Some cons: This is the first attempt to decoke the engine for 190 thousand km. As

The result is more than satisfactory. I would even say it delights with simplicity, short exposure time and excellent response of the machine to this preventive cleaning with the product. The engine instantly reacts to decoking, during operation the effect only intensifies - the remnants of softened coke burn out. The compression increases, the engine runs like clockwork, there are no jerks or problems with the plant. I recommend this tool! "

He copes with his task perfectly. But on heavily running engines, you need to either do it several times, or something more powerful. And so the result is, it's a fact. Much less oil consumption.

I judged the work of the remedy by candles. It was difficult to clean the deposit on the skirt of the candle without a tool even with a metal brush. After several minutes of the candle being in the well of the cylinder filled with foam, the carbon deposits from her skirt were simply wiped off with a rag. I hoped that it would reach the injectors (GDI), and clean the intake valves, but it felt like this did not happen. It definitely didn’t get worse, but the engine didn’t become new either…

The simplest endoscope did not allow assessing the condition of the valves, but I doubt that it is better there than on the pistons. Foam settles quickly. Soot on the pistons partially tears, partially remained. After processing, I pumped out a lot of liquid - the composition practically did not pass through the rings, despite the fact that the mileage of the motor / rings is more than 300 thousand - there is hardly any gap. Compared to the effect of "dee-da" - money down the drain. But only in

didn't believe. already purchased gaskets for the valve cover, cylinder head and valve stem seals for five thousand. but the men did not advise in every possible way to remove the head for the time being. mileage 113000, logan 2022. guzzled oil, drop dead soot on one candle, but most of all infuriated detonation on hot days. It was time for an oil change and I decided to give it a try. I did everything according to the instructions, lowered the temperature of the engine to 50, it's good that…

This balloon was enough to pour 3-4 times into each candle. Much better than plain (liquid) laurel. I will explain. When the time has come to decoke at the end. remove the remaining liquid, then there was nothing in the cylinders! And after the foam, I removed 30-40g of black manure from each cylinder. I think so the effect is somehow more. Time will show. It is convenient to use the balloon. The main thing is on a cooled engine, otherwise the foam quickly sits down. I'll definitely get the…

Its pros: Nice strong tool! The foam lasts a long time and works better than Valera. At Valera, the foam quickly settles and the cleaning effect is not the same. Laurel is stronger and better. Some cons: The tube is just a mockery, like a pig's tail. The output was this, the electrode is protected from welding and the ends are on electrical tape.

This is certainly not a panacea, moreover, in order for the engine to work really well, you need to use several means. But even when using only this excellent decaking, you feel the result immediately. There were problems with the plant in cold weather, oil - the impression that he does not drive on gasoline, but on oil with such an expense. I cleaned it with this decarbonizer, chose it based on reviews - thanks for helping. Means of fire: simple and effective. Well, once I found it, I also…

Carried out a raskosovka for preventive purposes. There are no tools to test how effective it was, but after a lot of smoke, in the first few kilometers, it became clear that the cleaning was not in vain. Moreover, fuel consumption gradually began to decrease, I forgot to think about oil in general. On TO asked to check the compression - like a new one. Very pleased with the result. I try to use all prophylactic agents for auto systems at LAVR.

Its pros: Cleans really well. Posted a video on my channel about it. But one bottle is clearly not enough. Has cons: Still too expensive. Not a comfortable tube, all bent, what the hell can you straighten. I had to tie a hard wire to it.

It decokes perfectly and quickly, and most importantly, the convenient formula , foam , , the tube is really, as many write, not very comfortable, it needs to be straightened. With its pros: Decokes perfectly, and even better than Gzox, and that says a lot, I like it. Has cons: The price, the price of the balloon is very high, this is a minus.

as a car mechanic told me, before using the foam, the compression of the internal combustion engine was 3.5 after it rose to 7. My mileage is 202,500 km. , And maybe more if they twisted after driving a car from Japan (Toyota FunCargo 2022 onwards). We decided to repeat the decarbonization procedure with the same tool after 5,000 km before the next oil change, let's see what happens, maybe the engine will serve more.