Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
go industries s70764set mud flap logo

Go Industries S70764SET Mud Flap Review

5

Β·

Poor

Revainrating 2.5 out of 5Β Β 
RatingΒ 
2.6
πŸš— Mud Flaps & Splash Guards

View on AmazonView on Π―M

Media

(2)
img 1 attached to Go Industries S70764SET Mud Flap
img 2 attached to Go Industries S70764SET Mud Flap

Description of Go Industries S70764SET Mud Flap

Country of Origin : United States. Package Weight: 7.371 kilograms. Package Dimensions: 5.08 L x 64.77 H x 52.578 W (centimeters). Part number: S70764SET.

Reviews

Global ratings 5
  • 5
    2
  • 4
    0
  • 3
    0
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    3

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Disappointed: Exterior Accessory

What said in the description is not what I received. The stiffening ribs and wooden hangers mentioned were included, but weren't.

Pros
  • New
Cons
  • Repair

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Looks great - fenders and fenders

Fits perfectly. didn't trust the supplied plastic clips; went to the hardware store and bought stainless steel. The drivers behind are happy with my purchase.

Pros
  • Satisfied so far
Cons
  • Crumpled packaging

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Item not as advertised

I ordered a diamond plate and only received a stainless steel flat piece. drilling required. No template and poor installation instructions

Pros
  • Confidence
Cons
  • Zero

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Not as in the photo

fender where not the one in the photo. I was expecting a diamond finish on both fenders as shown in the photos provided by Revain when you clicked on the article. I am so disappointed.

Pros
  • price
Cons
  • negative is present

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent quality, strong, stylish and thick fenders

They look great on my Ram 3500 and it was exactly what I expected. The only improvement I can think of is the hardware assembly as I used my own screws. With a chrome plate it would be useful to have a shoulder screw to prevent over tightening and damaging the chrome, but overall it looks good and should last.

Pros
  • Consistent test results
Cons
  • Could have chosen a newer model