Pros
- rides well in puddles, did not notice aquaplaning, and this is probably all the advantages.
Cons
- everything else is flaws
Pros
- The tread pattern looks nice.
Cons
- Pseudosport. In the rain, it slows down and turns into corners so-so. Very soft side. Did not travel a season, as he caught a hernia.
Pros
- My car is front-wheel drive, the size of the rollers is 225/45. I compare with ContiSportContact 5 in the same size. I liked the Ventus more) it behaves a little better on an asphalt road. The feeling that you are turning on rails is more pronounced, the rutting is felt less, the rubber is more tenacious. In the wet at first glance, both tires are good! In terms of wear resistance, Ventus is clearly a priority.
Cons
- Noisy!. From 80 to 120 there is a rumble in the car. By the way, it seemed that in the first season the noise level was less, and in the spring after changing shoes it is very noisy. Maybe it seemed so after winter less noisy tires. By the way, Conti has less noise, but it also did not differ in a comfortable level. Hankook has almost no sidewall and does not forgive mistakes . Conti can forgive, but only small roughnesses. Ventus and Conti do not like any slush, they skid, we know :) Consumption after Conti increased slightly, my computer shows 0.1-0.2 l / 100km more.
Pros
- Holds the road well. good hydroplaning resistance. Quiet.
Cons
- you constantly need to taxi - all the bumps in the road are felt, especially rutting. Noticeable wear
Pros
- Price, appearance, quietness
Cons
- Difficult to find on the open market
Pros
- noiselessness, directional stability, hydroplaning resistance
Cons
- No
Pros
- Quiet, comfortable, clear steering zero, balanced perfectly, not very critical to the track, keeps the road great in the rain.
Cons
- Too heavy (but this is a retribution for strength (reinforced sidewalls)
Pros
- wear resistance Not noisy Soft Cheap (in 2022 5700- 225/60/18) Very few holes Didn't cause any problems
Cons
- I can't name any obvious flaws. It can be bad with a track, but it depends on so many factors. Looks narrow, could have been wider.
Pros
- Good dry road holding, good wet road holding. Reasonable price. Braking is quite informative. From the pits is not covered with cones.
Cons
- A little quieter. And a little more sidewalls covering the disk. Feels the wheel. More actually and get to the bottom of nothing.
Pros
- when I took it - it was one of the cheapest offers, wear resistance
Cons
- very soft court, hydroplaning, quite noisy
Pros
- Low noise Comfort Holds the road confidently
Cons
- Not seen
Pros
- Relatively quiet, good handling, predictable behavior at low and medium speeds. Medium tire. 3 out of 5
Cons
- Poorly swallows joints and bumps, feels the rut and coarse-grained asphalt, Medium tire. 3 out of 5
Pros
- Quiet, taxiing, does not feel the colley
Cons
- The rubber bead does not protect the disc
Pros
- Price Driving in the rain
Cons
- Stalls at the start from a place No flanging
Pros
- Little noise after running in. Good handling.
Cons
- It all wore off very quickly.
Pros
- price, soft, reviews that it does not protect the disk on my size from the edge of the tire to the disk 12-15mm, it is impossible to scratch the disk, it keeps normally in the rain.
Cons
- terrible noise after 90km, hissing howl is difficult to describe, good bmw noise they slide relative to the center, and the inner part of the wheel and the outer one slide unevenly, you run into a bump, a hole and again wild vibrations from 80 km / h, you have to remove the tire and put it on the disk for a very long time, but it was never possible to do this ideally, the tire fitting shops were good and different, in different cities of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, not a single tire shop could put them in, everyone concluded that the rubber was guano. the tire slides relative to the center by 2-3 mm, and each time in different ways. I tried to put the same size on other disks from x1, the situation is the same, by the way, my disks are perfectly even! Another minus, it whistles in corners (pirels and bridgestone did not whistle better), brakes noticeably worse than bridgestone potenza s001, abs works, steering became blurry reaction to sharp maneuvers blurry compared to bridgestone potenza s001, but this minus is covered by the plus that the pebbles are cracked rails and other passing became much more comfortable. addition 09/13/2022: period of use is about 2 months, mileage is 7000 km, there were no collisions with stones, rails, pits, so that a hernia came out, rails and pits are driven at a speed of about 20 km / h, or even slower, the clearance will not allow you to drive faster, a hernia crawled out on Hong Kong city roads , there are no holes at all on the route!. A hernia on the front wheel came out, there are no marks on the disk that speak of a strong blow or any kind of blow at all (perhaps a crack in the cord received on the Hong Kong roads gradually spread - 2022 km ago, unless of course there was one). On the Pirel they flew into the pit at 120 km / h, no hernias slightly bit the rubber disc. during emergency braking, a very long braking distance whistles compared to bridgestone potenza s001
Pros
- - Quiet - Soft - Relatively reasonable price - Good handling
Cons
- - Extremely fragile sidewalls! It is very easy to catch a hernia.
