Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 28
  • 5
    14
  • 4
    3
  • 3
    2
  • 2
    2
  • 1
    7

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A very high-quality product, I take it not for the first time.

Extremely determined, even the asphalt can't stop the summer Michelin Primacy 4 from slipping. After two full seasons of driving (in a BMW 3 GT), it has been reduced by one-half. However, it is not of vital importance. The best tires for the winter have not been met, and they are worth the money.

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Disgusting, I don't recommend it to anyone!

michelin x-ice north 4 is tires for 5000km, then the spikes sway and there is no sense from them. That michelin x-ice north 3 was because the spikes broke, that michelin x-ice north 4 was . Here was a michelin x-ice north 2, just super rubber, the only negative is the weak sidewall, and everything suited me that way. They stood on my logan, I just ped on the right. I remember the snow fell well, and as always, no one cleaned it, so all the cars trudge, and I drive confidently 60 km, then I…

Pros
  • the first 5000 km was super rubber.
Cons
  • the spikes are just not what they are, there are a lot of them, but they are small, and even with not much snow they stop working. But the most important thing is that their normal work ends after 5000-7000 km. Also, the cord could be made stiffer.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the level, I am satisfied with everything.

An excellent option for winter tires for the middle lane. They do not sag during a thaw, they are quite rigid and steerable, they behave predictably on ice. For operation in severe frosts, they are less suitable than previous models of the line - the choice was clearly made in the direction of a tougher compound and handling, and not in the direction of low-temperature characteristics and all-terrain capability.

Pros
  • Excellent behavior on dry and wet pavement, both in winter and in the off-season. Moderately quiet, they steer perfectly on the pavement (the sidewalls are quite rigid even on the 65 profile, the thrust wheel does not break in corners), it does not sag at positive temperatures. Switching from summer tires (a Michelin PS4 to a 55 profile with an even higher load index and a very stiff sidewall) doesn't feel like you've moved from a car to a bog like it did on the XIN2. On ice, the grip is not as "anchor" as that of the 8 Hakkapelita, but the predictability of control is much better - skidding as the lateral load increases does not happen suddenly, but the car starts to be slightly dragged, and this happens long before the breakdown into a skid. On ice, it seems that the tires are not spiked, but coarse sandpaper, which makes the position of the car and the margin of the hold feel great.
Cons
  • Compared to the XIN2, due to the stiffer sidewalls, they “flatten” worse and row worse on soil or a yard littered with snow. Traditionally for the entire line of XIN - so-so directional stability in conditions of "track after a heavy snowfall", you constantly have to taxi, but on rolled snow it slows down better than XIN2. There are big doubts how this rubber will behave in -40, the rubber composition is quite hard.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Wonderful quality, one hundred percent satisfied!

I just put it in yesterday. Naturally, I wanted to try it in different conditions. I chose the road home in such a way that I came across rolled snow, shagreen leather, asphalt and sometimes deep snow. I rode them for a total of 300 kilometers and, I must say, a normal holder was everywhere. I'll see, of course, how they will behave further, but at the moment 5+

Pros
  • Quiet, well kept on almost any road.
Cons
  • Until I noticed