Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED IF AF-S DX VR Zoom Lens with Vibration Reduction, New in Bulk Packaging (White Box) Review

A good lens for a beginner, but in the future it is better to switch to something faster as a staff lens, you still need to look for such a light and compact telephoto. Pros: Lightweight and compact telephoto (! ), stabilizer, nice picture, price. With its cons: Dark (requires a lot of light for a good result), with a hood, the "trunk" leaves when tilted.

Has pros: Light, sharp, working stable, it’s not a pity to break it and the dimensions are almost like those of a whale. With its cons: The assembly is not so hot: the zoom rotates easily, it is generally flimsy and the lens hood does not sit hard (China)

Despite its nondescript appearance, this is a very good amateur glass, be careful not to touch the focus ring, as you can easily lose focus, He earns 100%

Many of the shortcomings are due to its price and it’s not worth it to be indignant at all, an excellent lens for those who do not shoot constantly dynamic reports) Has some pros: -Really sharp! - normal stabilization - pretty compact -Wide FR change ring Got cons: -Very slow autofocus -dark (well, for such a price and so good) -plastic mount (again, the price) - sometimes there are problems with autofocus (at 200 mm it drives the lens close and gets stuck there, and makes a grinding…

Discussing the item below.I purchased this lens for my Nikon D3100 camera in addition to the Nikkor 35 ( lacks sharpness, dark, glass for beginners.

even when it's cloudy, it gives a good, bokeh (but how else with such a FR), but there is more contrast at 200mm, there is more fat in the picture, that’ which is not bad, a normal telephoto lens, quite inexpensive, and for pros, of course, with leisurely shooting. Has pros: 1 we have a pretty good thing when shooting during the day, why, 320220 and 200mm, 5 Has cons: 1 Maybe I came across such an instance, it helps when there is little light, F4 at 55mm is much worse than the same 55mm at 18

Pros below: Portraits are also successful, but for them, it seems to me, it’s better to take special “portrait” fixes. Has some cons: / 10-1 / 40, which, of course, can “blur” Well, or you can increase the ISO, but here the quality of the image will suffer.

Different pros: Excellent glass, especially for such $ it’s a sin not to buy :) the picture draws clearly, the lines are soft, beautiful blurring of the background in portrait photos, Some cons: A bit dark, so it’s only suitable indoors with a good flash, by and large a lens for the street

Different pros: don’t know that many are picky here, or maybe I got such a copy - although China is also), compact, With its cons: A little dark, but it's not scary - everything is easily drawn out in Photoshope.

Pros: it is an excellent addition to the regular 18-55 \ 18-70 fast enough autofocus, rarely misses (Only if at dusk) It does not darken, Different cons: but if you use it with Macro rings, then you can quite achieve the desired result.

page=0 page=0 Has pros: 1 grams is not at all large for such a "big lens" Zoom - The zoom is 3.6x magnification, times is enough for those who do not want to "zoom with their feet. " 3 Wave Motor) Nikon D40x, Nikon D60, Nikon D3000, Nikon D3100, Nikon D5000, 4 FF models like Nikon D700, D3, D3x, D3x, etc. ) it will give very strong vignetting pictures that can' Internal focusing - when focusing, only the internal parts in the lens block move, 6 It' VR (vibration reduce) Vibration reduction

I shot them, and decided to return to the old AF-D 70-210 / 4-5.6, I don’t consider zoom telephotos with f / 2.8, because they are heavy and expensive, http://vit-1 Com/tag/nikkor%2055-200%2F4-5.6 Got pros: 1) Excellent value for money! 2) Buying this lens is an easy way to try out other focal lengths after your kit lens, great complement to the 18-55! Buy another 35/1.8 Lightweight and relatively compact (only the version without a stabilizer is lighter and more compact), for crop cameras…

Great addition to the whale 18-55 not for professionals, but for me, an amateur, it has all the necessary qualities! Lightweight, affordable (not a pity), excellent image quality (by 55 mm compared to the 18-55 whale), but for periodic shooting of your vacation, going out into nature, In comparing photos in the same conditions with Nikon 18-200 - this lens is in no way inferior to its focal lengths! Yes, and a set of lenses 18-55 + 55-200 is half the price of 18-200 Htm And another good…

I personally would take it better, for its versatility, although after looking at the pictures from 18-200 they are inferior to it in sharpness, and due to the fact that it is not fixed, you don’ Ru/users/den-binori/view/610498/? page=7 page=7 page=7 page=7 page=7 page=7

Here are photos taken by my husband and I using a Nikkor 55-200 f/4-5.6 VR lens: all my lenses were Nikkor 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 VR and Nikkor 55-200 f/4-5.6 she returned to 18-55 f/2.8, but I still reach for the Nikkor 55-200 f/4-5.6 and d300 such as the Sigma 70-200 f / 2.8 macro HSM or Tokina AT-X PRO 50-135 f / 2.8 leave the Nikkor 55-200 f / 4-5.6 VR for the second camera - as a lens for vacation trips and other situations when I don’t want to take more expensive and heavy optics or I’ f/4-5.6

It has been said more than once that the lens should be taken by those who want to free themselves from the whale "18-55" initially I grabbed this lens because I wanted to shoot what was far away (the standard desire of a beginner), but then it became clear that the lens copes with all the tasks with a bang! The quality of the photos is very good (now I don’t want to dress the whale, I’m looking for something to replace it) I note that the focus sometimes still misses (on the D5100 camera), but

to 11f at all focal lengths, lying, There are tables in them, and from them you can very well see what to expect, really believe the tables, but it’ Let it be 500-1000 which, with a low aperture ratio, 55-300 is twice as expensive, 70-300 of course, in picture quality (55-300 draws better bokeh, but it’s not so sharp at all focal lengths and all aperture values). 70-300 is definitely good and autofocus is faster, At 8f, Of course, you need to make friends with it, get used to it, on the long en

I took it to the whale one 18-55 The stabilizer really helps and copes even at 200 Here are a few pictures taken on the Nikon D3000 with this lens: /5378263708/

The lens is ideal for those who want to try their hand at various genres of photography such as portrait, macro, very beautiful bokeh, rich colors, Portrait taken at 55-200: page=0

I shot portraits with a half-length, tried this lens and realized that focal length 50 is not enough for facial portraits, even on a crop! And this is what you need! Here's the confirmation! - page=0 I recommend it to everyone who does not have money falling from the sky, but wants to get decent pictures! For this price just a buzz!