Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 65
  • 5
    31
  • 4
    12
  • 3
    12
  • 2
    6
  • 1
    4

Type of review

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Unsatisfactory quality, I won't buy it anymore.

35 thousand passed and that's it . The inner side of all 4 tires at once went with numerous small hernias, a strong vibration began. The tread lost its geometry, uneven wear of the outer side of the tires began (alignment was always normal). The tire is of course quiet, elastic, with a good grip, it handles well on the water, but it does not last long. The composition of the rubber is quite soft, it burns quickly, loses its properties also quickly. Over 35 thousand km wear - 70%. Driving style…

Pros
  • Elasticity. Good grip.
Cons
  • Low resource.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is okay, it's not a waste of money!

Pros: It does not roll in ruts, it goes through cracks more softly, it does not slip during a quick start from a place. At optimal speeds on a wet surface, there was no tendency to drift. Got cons: We'll see after the holidays. Hong Kong - the Hong Kong coast and back . Paid and partisan trails.

I preferred to buy tires in Finland, I felt the difference. Now I ventured to buy a 2022-made one and did not regret it at all. In a word, well done, they learned how to do it with excellent quality, for which money you can’t buy wheels in the EU. Well done, online stores that are able to provide an affordable price are not greedy and work for turnover. And judging by the delivery volume, which was just full, it means that the guys are doing well with sales. And those who stupidly names prices,

Pros
  • for 3000, the tires are simply excellent, quiet, with fairly moderate sidewall stiffness. Balanced perfectly, minimum weights, maximum 35 gr. Wet asphalt, perfect road holding. Rebuilds without a hitch.
Cons
  • value for money, no cons

I ride size 215/50R17. In general, there are no comments on the rubber. A lot of cargo when balancing is not required. As stated in the manufacturer's advertisement, the tires are quiet and hold the road perfectly, I would like to separately note the acoustic comfort and softness of the passage of all kinds of bumps, the noise level is beyond praise and subjectively quieter than the previous KUMHO solus. The reaction to rutting was not noticed, it’s just that for some, judging by the reviews…

Pros
  • Tough, quiet and soft.
Cons
  • didn't notice

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The purchase brought only positive emotions.

Auto - Volvo XC70 2nd generation. Tires 215/65/16, before that were Nokian Hakka. Experience of use - 1 month. The tire is rigid, this is especially noticeable when passing joints on bridges and overpasses at high speed. But the feeling is not much compared to Nokian Hakka. When driving in city mode, there are no negative emotions. The tire is noisy due to rigidity. The car has very good sound insulation + I drive with loud music, so in city mode, tire noise is not heard. But at high speeds…

Pros
  • Handling, rolling resistance
Cons
  • Harsh, noisy

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for the money, definitely recommended!

I have been driving for more than a year, on the day of purchase I fell into a pit on a station wagon with a full trunk of loaded suitcases, as a result, a small hernia on the rear wheel, while cars with punctured wheels were parked on the side of the road (gape - himself to blame). Not noisy, excellent road holding, efficiency, increased resource, with high mileage - what you need. Great option - highly recommended!

Pros
  • Durability, durability, driving performance, ideal for their price (took that summer)
Cons
  • it’s better not to meddle in mud and wet grass - a consequence of rigidity (I don’t consider it a minus)

I approach the choice of tires responsibly, previously I had a native from the Yokohama A460 salon, I wanted to take the same one, but after visiting a couple of stores I didn’t find it, they said it was rare . I had to look for an alternative, the sellers recommended a new product from the same manufacturer, in fact I doubted it, since few reviews, but the sellers assured me that it was an excellent model and quality - in the end I took it and for a little more than 2.5 months I have been…

Pros
  • Handling on wet pavement, quiet.
Cons
  • I haven't found it yet, I've been using the tire for 2.5 months, I'm happy as an elephant.

Size 205/60 r16, pressure 1.8 front and 1.6 rear. Compared to the Michelin Primacy HP 225/45 r17 (2.0, 1.8), they handle a little worse, roll a little more in corners, but not significant. They accelerate and brake more efficiently, perhaps less pressure plays a role. Large irregularities are softer than Michelin, remember again about the difference in pressure, but at the same time, small irregularities are transmitted to the cabin much more clearly. Very noisy both during simple rolling and…

Pros
  • They handle well, brake and accelerate well.
Cons
  • Rigid. Plastic protector.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well the product is made, just magically!

Has some pros: They keep the road well. I've been driving in the rain and haven't noticed any hydroplaning. Acceptable price. Teranul already withstood the sidewall on the curb. With its cons: Passengers say it's a bit noisy. I don't know, maybe because it's new. My opinion is within the normal range.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Thought it would be better, but overall not bad.

in general, not very impressed, on 3. Tires lasted exactly one year, mileage about 50,000 km. when they put it on for the second season, they noticed that it had worn out quite a lot already, it wouldn’t be enough for the season. Plus, it just started to crumble - pieces of rubber just flew out, pulled out, very tender, although the 200 did not go, as a result, a large piece flew out and the cord was exposed, which almost immediately tore. Yes, and noisy as it seemed to me, The only thing…

Pros
  • No bumps appeared
Cons
  • Rubber "crumbles" and wears out quickly enough, quite noisy

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Poor quality, not suitable for use.

Introductory: Car 1600 kg, rear-wheel drive, driving mainly in St. Petersburg, that is, on asphalt, with the possibility of high speeds on the ring road, WHSD and some regional directions. Before these tires, there was and is a positive experience with winter Yokohama, which is why I chose it for the summer. Balanced very well, about 20 grams per wheel. I left for almost two seasons, until the end of the second summer there was not enough rubber, so I rolled the summer on Michelin Energy. Very…

Pros
  • Lightweight, quiet, good grip on asphalt.
Cons
  • Short-lived, suddenly died of hernias.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Dissatisfied with this product, bad to use.

Seduced by the global brand, cost, reviews on Yamarket and tests in 2022 automotive magazines. After driving in the rain began to raise questions, I found tests of these tires on the Internet in foreign automotive publications, where they failed wet tests . Some pros: Cost 225 50 17 If you feel the car, then in the rain you will drive very carefully and save gasoline. Behavior on dry pavement, wear resistance is better than nokian hakka blue, well balanced (one wheel sat on the rim without…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well the product is made, just magically!

Don't know. why in the reviews many are unhappy with the design, the tires look old-school and serious, I like it. Of the main advantages of the AE-50, I note good handling, the steering wheel turns normally, not too easy and not too tight, just right. what is needed. On a wet road, everything is fine, on a dry one too, high speeds are kept with a bang! Good tires for trails and paved roads. But they are not very suitable for swamps and mud, consider them as high-quality city tires for everyday

Pros
  • controllability.
Cons
  • some people don't like the design.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The purchase brought only positive emotions.

I am a calm driver and usually my tires last a long time. Sometimes rubber is more comfortable, but it suits me, so 4. Despite the pressure, usually 2.8 bar, everything is quite normal. This one also seems to be doing well. I have no comments on it, I hope, then it will not appear either. Got pros: Inexpensive, decent tires. Not noisy, soft enough. The Skoda Kodiaq goes on it clearly, like on rails. Tolley machine such, felts rubber, but it does not matter to me. Some cons: Is it wear and tear,

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Just super, it's beautifully made, I'm very happy with it.

Good afternoon, dear users of the review. I want to tell you a little about the Yokohama BluEarth-A AE-50 tires on my car, they were installed in dimensions 195/60 R15 on a Mitsubishi Lancer IX Wagon, the tires went on my car for 3 seasons with an average annual mileage of about 25,000 -30,00 kilometers, with enough fast and active driving style. There were times when I flew into large pits, but the tires surprisingly withstood the blow. Fairly quiet and comfortable both at low speeds and at…

Pros
  • Comfortable. Not noisy. Excellent grip
Cons
  • No.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the level, I am satisfied with everything.

I can’t say anything about the resource, since I’m using the first season, I can add a review when I have a lot of operating experience. In general, the purchase is satisfied I am ating my review after 2 full seasons. Behind 4 long trips, 1 of them to Karelia with a length of 3800 km. In Karelia, I drove about 400 km on broken and dirt roads, the handling is excellent, the strength is on the level. On the highway 210km / h holds confidently. In serpentine turns, it also behaves predictably and

Pros
  • - Durable. Bought in size 225/45/R17 already managed to get into some hard holes. Despite the low profile, the pits did not cause any problems. - Quiet. In principle, I don’t hear noise from rubber in a D class car. - Handling with the front multi-link suspension is great. In turns enters well, in a rut feels good. In the rain in 0 weather on the track, too, did not cause any problems. I personally didn't notice any hydroplaning. - All bumps, bumps in the pit work out well. But here the design of the suspension has a greater influence, probably.
Cons
  • Bought in March 2022. In 2 stores I specified the production date and in both the tires were 2022. I had to come to terms with the old production date, but in general I didn’t see a very big problem in this and decided that there was not much point in chasing a fresh date.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The product did not cause delight, but you can use it.

The tires came new with the car. Compare with Bridgestone Turanza T001 - I also got a new one with the previous car. Dimension 205/55 R16, yokagama production - 2022, bridgestone - Poland. In Yokohama, last season I drove only 7,500 km, already minus 2 mm from the wheel, now the remainder is 6 mm. Bridgetown for 3 years was not erased to the middle and the runs were 30-40% more. In terms of noise, it is less comfortable than the bridge, for me the rumble of the yoki is unpleasant, although the…

Pros
  • Comfortable, soft
Cons
  • Hydroplaning, wet braking, wadding reactions

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Everything is fine, there are only minor drawbacks.

I want to express my gratitude to the representative of YOKOHAMA in Nizhny! I applied under warranty, the wheel was not subject to repair. It was not possible to immediately pick up a new one, but the company went to a meeting and the representative personally brought the tire from Nizhny to Hong Kong. If YOKOHAMA treats all its customers this way, then I will take both winter and summer tires from you and recommend them to friends. THANK YOU VERY MUCH!

Pros
  • Good tyres. In wet weather excellent road holding. Noise is normal. On the primer work out all the bumps well.
Cons
  • Didn't reveal. I've been using it for 5 months. So far there are no questions.