Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 65
  • 5
    31
  • 4
    12
  • 3
    12
  • 2
    6
  • 1
    4

Type of review

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Disgusting quality, impossible to use.

Initial: Lancer X 2l. Use August-November, March-July, total - the period of ownership - a year. Before buying, I naively thought that if Japan means you don’t have to worry about quality. As a result, this model of this manufacturer is the worst I have ever had. The car does not hold the road in sharp turns, literally dives into the rut, and also unexpectedly and sharply emerges. When passing serious transverse cracks (hello to Hong Kong and his "good" roads), the car slightly throws up and…

Pros
  • These were not found
Cons
  • Handling, softness, reliability.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing for the money, I'm glad I chose this option.

The BluEarth AE-50 is an excellent summer road tire with excellent performance in all wet conditions over tarmac, at temperatures as low as +5. I hope that it will roll back more than 70 thousand km. like a native Korean Hankook K406, which has not worn out to the limiters and the next official MOT can be passed with an interference fit. It turned out well, during the week to ride on three different tires, in the same puddles and feel the difference. Never mind the design, the AE-50 is a great…

Pros
  • Low rolling resistance, the car started to accelerate downhill in neutral, where it dropped off and accelerated more actively at speeds above 90. Excellent road holding at high speed, definitely no worse than the Mishelin Xi 2 winter Velcro. AE-50 tires are very quiet (no whistling, no noise on wet pavement, quite quiet on worn pavement). The track in the asphalt is not felt at all. The pressure is 2.2, as always, and the sunbeds have become somehow softer to move, and the joints on the bridges. I compare with the old Hankook K406 185\65\15. But the steering wheel is spinning a little tighter. For how great the tires hold turns, and even on wet pavement! Aqua gliding was not felt when flying through a puddle in the same way as on the Xi 2. I remember that on the new Hankook, the car drove in such puddles and the steering effort disappeared. Linear, on wet pavement, the car stops very well with the AE-50. With the K406, the ABS would hit the pedal, and the car would rush further (Hankook is not bad when it's above +30 and you can fry eggs on the pavement). As well as with Xi 2, braking on smooth bumps in manually laid asphalt pleases. With the K406, it felt like a washboard, not a drag. :\
Cons
  • You should not meddle in the mud and wet grass on this rubber, it is not for mud. And on asphalt with sand you need to be more careful. The design is not aggressive and looks more like a cool wheel from a truck.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not a bad product, but I expected a little more.

I bought this rubber three seasons ago, marketers promised absolute noiselessness, the price tag also hinted at this. In fact, it turned out that this is a fairly ordinary rubber, the noise is like everyone else's, but it has simply worn out shamelessly. For three summer seasons, I drove about 25tyk, the rest of the tread is 2.8mm, I change it for the 4th season, you can’t ride on such a remainder. My driving style is calm, city 40-60, highway rarely 120.

Pros
  • famous brand
Cons
  • For a fairly small run erased to zero.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

I cant say that I was completely satisfied with the product.

Was very surprised at this level of noise from rubber. I took off in the summer of 2022 decently erased kumho ku31, put THIS and there was no limit to my surprise. Well, I think the new ones will get used. The reviews are pretty good. In vain thought. The rut is not the level of noise, it's just awful. It does not drag into the rut, but directly throws it. The rubber does not let loose. And only at a temperature of about 20 degrees, which was almost non-existent this summer, rubber turned into…

Pros
  • Price. Appearance
Cons
  • Ooooo noisy. There is no manageability. Rigid.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like everything, the price and the quality are both ok.

I operate on a Chevrolet Cruze for dry asphalt, it is quite well controlled both in skidding and braking, on wet everything becomes reversed in entering a turn at 60-70 km, 90 g axle separation from asphalt with a slip of about 60 cm, I didn’t like it very much! ! Rubber soft Kotska swallows comfortable. Some pros: On dry pavement, nothing even enters into a turn with a skid well, in a straight line at 160-170 km it’s very quiet, it doesn’t make any noise (Whoever says it’s making noise, check…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best purchase in my life, I will definitely buy it again.

225/55 R18, X-trail T31, After the regular Dunlop, it is much quieter in the cabin (considering the soundproofing of the car). I traveled from Hong Kong to Hong Kong and back, the Caucasus, the Ural mountains, the Hong Kong region, everything is fine! :). On serpentines it just super holds, no rutting, not as hard as the bridge and Dunlop similar, quieter. Wear over the summer is not visible, everything is fine. The only thing about the reinforcement or the pit was a little hooked, tore, but it

Pros
  • Quiet soft wear-resistant, keeps the road confidently, that on the highway, that on the Hong Kong serpentines, any weather, any speed!
Cons
  • Price, but what to do, Michelin breeches and others are even more expensive.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

Well, in order) I drive a VW Golf 122 hp ~ 250 Nm of torque. Size 225/45/R17 On dry and wet pavement, that sharp start, that braking is just PERFECT! I drive a lot, tires for 3 seasons drove 50k +, and then erased in the middle of the indicator did not hold the road badly, certainly on wet pavement without sudden movements. For 3 seasons there was one penetration, but if it got into that hole, not a single tire would survive. But since I drive a lot, of course I got into big pits and…

Pros
  • Grip tower on any surface wear resistance
Cons
  • Has risen in price) So I would buy it again) Some friends said it was noisy. But, in my opinion, it's perfectly acceptable.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I am satisfied, the purchase is quite successful.

A week ago, I changed shoes for such a Yokohama model for the summer. This will be the 3rd season of its operation. Dimension 215/65/R17 on an all-wheel drive Tiguan, produced on the 26th week of 2022. Drove on it for more than 35 thousand km. Very pleased with the silence and softness of this rubber, satisfactory drainage. Rubber is not racing, rolls enough, helpless off-road. Strong disadvantage: low resource. It feels like it will last for a maximum of 40 thousand. In principle, given its…

Pros
  • Silence and softness
Cons
  • Resource

Winter studding Yokohama Iceguard ig35 is not the first tire from Yokohama that I put on my car. Before that, I knew that if you need inexpensive, but it’s good that it happens infrequently, then you need to buy this particular company. And so it happened this time. I put a studded tire for the first time, because before that I lived in the Hong Kong Territory with mild winters, having moved to the northern region for work, I realized that studs were needed here. The first winter was very…

Pros
  • Excellent, satisfied
Cons
  • No

I changed my shoes to this rubber on March 19, on the street at the moment 3 . 5. Feels noisy, possibly due to low temperatures. I will ate my review when it warms up to at least 15 degrees. There are no complaints about driving performance, even in a deep rut the car is kept perfectly. Size 215\55\16. I am supplementing my review: it is the end of May, the rubber becomes quiet only at temperatures above 20, until this moment there is a persistent rumble in the cabin. Coupling properties are…

Pros
  • In a rut does not throw, swallows any puddle.
Cons
  • Noisy. Production 2022.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

There are disadvantages, but the product is usable.

Well, now the details. The tires were on the car when I bought it. The car is the top Tiguan of 2022. Honestly, I expected to see something like the Continental in a car, but not Yoku. Before that, there was a much more budgetary crossover, but there was Conti CrossContact (it seemed to be called that) at the 18th "radius". And then 18 radius and, accordingly, Yoka. That is, if you do not need a lower profile, then you can ride this one. I changed the rubber almost immediately, because it was…

Pros
  • The biggest advantage is that I did not buy this rubber, it was installed on the car, and I don’t feel sorry for it.
Cons
  • Everyone didn't like it. I did not find any merits from the word rubber at all.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I was surprised by the quality for this price.

I have been driving Yokohama BluEarth-A AE50 for a long time, this year will be the fourth season, the tires are still in excellent condition. I really like that the rubber is quite tenacious, it is easy to keep a track on it, even on a wet road. I often travel by car between the nearest cities, on the highway I usually drive steadily at about 120 km / h, while I feel safe, the car goes smoothly and is very quiet at the same time! Before that, I had tires from another company, compared to them,

Pros
  • +++
Cons
  • -

Got pros: I took tires Yokohama BluEarth-A AE50 in dimension 215/50 R17 in the summer of 2022. to replace the worn out Bridgestone Potenza S001. After the noisy, hard and expensive (but holding and not killed in the pits) S001, I was looking for an average price / quality / handling ratio. Departure for AE50 a couple of months and about 7 thousand km. - not a supersport, but they hold normally, wear is minimal, noise is low, softness is good, not very rolly in corners and predictable with activ

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Expectations were not met, average quality.

Used on Nissan Teana 2.5L. Result according to subjective impressions: The price justifies itself. Don't expect premium performance from these tires. Braking dry 4, braking. wet 4, acceleration the same . Demolition in a turn 4, rutting 4, run-out 4, heading 3.5, noise 3.5, minor asphalt defects-3.5, potholes or policemen 4.5, appearance 3, aquaplan 4, it's too early to talk about wear resistance. I will compare it with 2 tires skated on this particular car. 1. If you compare it with the…

Pros
  • Price. Braking, accelerating, course characteristics.
Cons
  • Noisy. Unattractive in appearance.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

It's not a bad product, nothing extraordinary.

in general, I bought it in the spring of 2022, as I left the service where it was delivered to me, I realized that I was a victim of marketers, because the wildest noise from them in the cabin even at low speeds, although on the Yokohama website it is written that one of the quietest in its class due to some kind of spherical edges on the side of the tread, LIE! On May 8, I got on the highway in heavy snow and the ice was moving at 80 km per hour like on winter tires, it pleased me, I set the…

Pros
  • there are almost none, except for wear resistance, and good stopping power when braking on dry pavement, well kept in the first snow
Cons
  • very noisy roll look like that's it

I got this model by accident, because I did not know what to choose. "Laudatory" reviews in the current price segment are fair, since it is unlikely that people drive something better for this money. In the rain, this is generally some kind of absurdity, 60 km / h, Karl, driving along the highway - the rubber seems to be driving on ice. And if you fly into a puddle, then this is some kind of attraction for testing nerves and points. Before that, there was experience with t1r, which is for me…

Pros
  • Price, wear resistance to pits, no hernias after impacts
Cons
  • Tires are bad, very bad. During the rain, it is dumb to drive even 60 km / h, noisy. Upon inspection after a couple of seasons, I found torn pieces of the corners of the tire sipes. In dry weather, riding it is also dumb at high speeds. Wild hydroplaning.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not my best purchase, you could have found something else.

I understand that I write early, but I will leave my impressions. And so drove about 1000 km. I thought the bearings on the hubs died, but no, after 2 hours they found out the rubber is buzzing. It buzzes hard! And the hum of 90% will not disappear after rolling. Rubber production 2022. The masters from the service said that if Malaysia or Japan it would be much better, but there would be a hum. In all other respects the tires are good.

Pros
  • Controllability
Cons
  • Noisiness