I placed an order with the vendor Market-Shina on January 14th, and it was delivered to me on January 24th. It turns out that the tires were 48 weeks old and 22 years old. In order for the vendor to be recommended,

This is my second set. The first skated 7 years. After this rubber, I don't want to wear another one. Rubber came in one batch. I recommend the seller

To be honest, for the price, these tires are pretty nice. Maintains its balance despite taking hits and is quite silent. One of the drawbacks is that it has a poor hold on the water, much like any other non-directional rubber.

It seemed to me that she kept a low profile. Run up to 500 kilometers (km) without becoming overly fanatical. They make it simple to maneuver the vehicle on them. The passage of time will reveal how worn the bottom actually is. As long as everyone likes it. . A cut was made on the side of one of the tires on the track. I placed an additional order.

I contrast it with the Toyota Prius XF2. Tires of a medium size. The traction on the road is good, even better than Toyota's. The ability to accelerate and brake without making any extra movements. It has superior traction and rideability in light mud. However, the Toyota was more comfortable over bumps. I received a new one. Excellent tires.

Matter of chance. puncture caught after 300 km. Then, I got into a hole with a sharp edge, drove after 20 km and bang, for 800 km. Replaced under warranty "samurai". For which many thanks. Different pros: Holds well in wet weather. At speeds above 110 km, the behavior is very predictable. The samurai guarantee really works. Tires were replaced under warranty. Some cons: the sidewall is soft on roads with large pits, you need to be very careful

While the grip is satisfied with the rubber, I would not say that it makes a lot of noise before that, the kumho were much more noisy, the seller is also pleased with the fresh rubber of this year

I will ate my review during use. Tempered in December 2022, the seller of Market Tire. Ru sent fresh tires for the 45th week of 2022 and also put four bags for storing tires, for which I thank you!

Pros below: Good handling (if not impudent). They perform well on wet roads. Got into the pits - bent the discs, but the rubber was not damaged Some cons: 2 (! ) seasons, about 30 t. Km. pensioner (! ) ride - and they are almost slick, had to be changed . Noisy.

I decided to change my old tires, chose for a long time, read reviews and comments from the owners, many recommend these tires. Decided to buy one for myself. In general, the tires are not noisy, the handling is excellent, compared to my previous ones, they hold the road well. The price tag is also adequate, let's see how long they last

I'll add my 5 cents too. . Why exactly this rubber? Yes, because the last four seasons skated on the same brand. And NO problems from the word "absolutely". Excellent directional stability, perfectly holds the road and brakes in the rain, QUIET! Average price tag. I took 195/55/R15 for 3900. I recommend!

Pleasant enough rubber, about enough sensitive to the coating. on good asphalt, there are no questions at all, but it’s worth driving onto rough old asphalt and the comfort from the trip is somewhat reduced.

Unsuitable for RF. A complete disaster, on his native rubber, Kumo skated for 6 years without force majeure, and then two tires were torn in three months, one for ejection, the second for expensive repairs.

Has pros: Very quiet, predictable Soft, comfortable. A strong sidewall, it is not afraid of holes, and there are so many of them in Hong Kong that it’s hard for you to even imagine. Got cons: I do not see any shortcomings, in comparison with Nokian and other brands

I put it on a 2022 Nissan Almera, sat perfectly on the disk and in the wheel arch, I thought it would rub, hurt (rr 205/65 R15), but surprisingly everything is fine!

Very quiet and soft tires, while not rolling, the car is a Honda Accord 8, before that in the summer I drove a Dunlop dz102, compared to it you don’t hear it at all, small joints are not felt. On the very first day after the purchase, we were driving on a gravel road, the car seemed to pop up already at 30-40 km / h. Stable on the track, the reaction to the steering wheel also seems to be unchanged, everything is fine. I doubted buying because of the soft side, but I don’t get sick with curbs…

Car kia cerato 4 20 g. Compare with pirelli p7 I drove them for the first 1000 km, mostly on bad roads. Hernias and cuts are not observed. Feels all holes. Pretty soft. On rough pavement it is noisy, on smooth pavement it is generally quiet. It manages well, but during the break-in, the roll was felt, probably due to the soft sides, now I'm used to it, everything is fine. Wear is not yet clear. Personally, my opinion is that for 20 thousand, rubber is the norm, especially in our time! I…

After repeated hits in the bumps on the road, the discs got more than the rubber. For the sake of reducing risks, I had to break through the rubber / bend the disk to look for profile 65 already

I've been eyeing this tire for a long time and read a bunch of reviews. A few years ago, on another machine, I rolled rubber from this manufacturer, I liked it. I put a sedan on the Polo, size 195 \ 60 \ R15, instead of Kama. Impressions (personally mine, subjective, experience of 30 years_ I do not pretend to be an expert) are good compared to the previous one - quieter, softer. On the paid section Hong Kong - St. Petersburg, it accelerated almost to the maximum, it keeps the road perfectly…

Pros below: Quality - price. It flies along the highway for 140 holes, swallows bumps. Excellent on dry roads. On wet - only within the city. At 60-70 km / h, calmly, confidently. Puddles pass well - do not float. With its cons: No way through mud and wet grass. But this is not rubber for an all-terrain vehicle.