Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 53
  • 5
    35
  • 4
    9
  • 3
    5
  • 2
    2
  • 1
    2

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am delighted, the product is really worthy.

Place the duster on the 16th position and 215/70. The absence of aquaplaning was the first thing that stood out to me; puddles were quickly dissipated by the rubber. In urban environments, the handling is satisfactory, and it does not get bogged down in ruts. The reviews included stones becoming lodged and the sounds of these stones hitting the arches; while this may be painful to read, it should not be taken as an indication of the quality of the product as a whole. There is no discomfort…

Pros
  • After learning about road tires, I forgot what it means to aquaplane. I went to a temperature of -5, and the trip was uneventful. Normal flying conditions: Hong Kong to Hong Kong in the middle of March: precipitation, ice on the roadway in spots, and slush; speeds of 90–140 km/h.
Cons
  • Not found; nevertheless, I plan to write a review in the near future.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

I thought it would be better, but overall not bad.

Got pros: One of the benefits that immediately comes to mind is how low the level of noise is; it is almost nonexistent. To my knowledge, there are no additional potential benefits. Some cons: It seemed to lack firmness. The tread design is geared more toward being used on the highway. The fact that the tread depth was only 6-7 millimeters was definitely the biggest drawback for me. The production year is 2022.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

Superior than g012, and significantly superior to stock 091 in all respects. After G012 is taken off the market, there will be no other option. In spite of what many people believe, the tread does not send loose pebbles flying, nor does it become clogged with them. Produced during the year 2022. Even when the disk was being optimized, quite a few weights were hung when balancing the load. Similar to how elastic snow is, the composition of the rubber is incredibly elastic. I believe that…

Pros
  • Excellent tires! I decided to put it on the Forester rather than the G012. The performance of the 015 is superior to that of the 012 in every regard, especially while driving through muck. 012-I blurred faster. Water drainage seemed better. It seems that the 015th is lighter than the 012, which contains "a lot of rubber" in comparison. The length of time for this use is one summer. Took her from MSC across the all of Abkhazia. I drove along the rocky slopes until I reached the tunnel in front of the checkpoint in the Kodori Gorge. After that, I went to the alpine meadows of the Auadkhara spring, and then I drove to the Gegsky waterfall. That not a single wheel was damaged, with both roofs and breaks being absent, is just Super! I checked the balance as soon as I got there, and it hadn't changed at all. It features superior rubber protection on the sidewalls and tread area of the tread. On the rugged mountain roads, this most likely prevented any damage to my vehicle. The braking performance is outstanding in both wet and dry conditions. They don't make noise while they're in tight spaces. The road is in fantastic shape! Because of the tread pattern, it was easy to avoid any damage despite the sudden sleet. Because there was no ice present, even the wet snow did not cause any slippages. The summer wheels of the neighbors were not turning properly.
Cons
  • After a journey, a significant amount of wear and tear is visible to the naked eye. a limited selection of sizes. There is no such thing as a standard 225/60/17. I had to adjust the profile to 65 because it worked out well for me there.

Attention! Tires are never allowed off the beaten path! Before this, the Geolender AT G012 had shown signs of wear ever since it was brand new. Rubber was in a league of its own. In addition to this, it performs very well on the highway, and it is not a foolish idea to drive it through the mud. Only have a good opinion of it after traveling close to 100,000 kilometers with it. It consumes an additional 1.5 liters of fuel, it handles well, and it typically keeps rutting on asphalt. It performs…

Pros
  • Maintains a good grip on the paved road; noise level is average.
Cons
  • Patency.

Before that, I went to Yokohama Geolandar A/T-S G012 265 / 65R17 for a few years, and I just couldn't get enough of those tires: they were quiet, stable, and wear-resistant. Because of this, I made the decision to get the Yoko, which can be worn in any season, so that I would not have to keep switching between summer and winter clothes. I took it. Upon my own shoulders. I assumed that after some time I would become accustomed to the noise. It wasn't present in this location. Put off summer…

Pros
  • Because of one significant disadvantage (which will be discussed further on), all of this tire's benefits for me are immediately nullified.
Cons
  • Wildly noisy! When I first put it on, I did not immediately notice that it was producing a noise. I was confused. I was under the impression that the bridges or the razdatka hummed. He requested a friend to go out and listen to the bridges in order to determine which one was buzzing. On the other hand, there wasn't a lot of noise coming from the street. After then, it took me a while to put together the fact that the noise started as soon as I put on the new tires. It's annoying, just like the rumble of an airplane when you're inside the vehicle.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

I was seeking for an affordable alternative to the standard Bridgestone Dunlop tires, which I had driven for four years, primarily within the city, accrued more than one hundred thousand miles on, and been content with. I have driven one of them for five months, and during that time I have experienced autumn and winter in St. Petersburg, during which time there is snowfall, and I have found that there are no issues; the vehicle rows in the snow, it is not frightening on ice, and there are no…

Pros
  • Price
Cons
  • Haven't revealed yet.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Exactly as promised by the manufacturer, high quality.

Because of the nature of the activities that they participate in, they frequently have to drive on dirt roads. To put it plainly, the performance of normal highway tires on the priming was not very good. When it was finally time to switch tires, we settled on Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 R16 215/60 as the brand to test out. The rubber was quite appealing to me. Excellent performance on any imaginable surface. A mixture of dry and moist. In my experience, the Geolandar A/T G015 tires provide an…

Pros
  • When it comes to stopping, asphalt is exactly the same as road tires. - The level of noise is about right - It is not significantly louder than the nearby highway - Acceptable conduct while moving very quickly - A cheaper price for A/T rubber - Sidewalls that are more fortified - Excellent handling on unpaved roads. - Resistance against wear and tear - Variable sizes available - Soft rubber
Cons
  • increased use of fuel in vehicles.

The tires are mounted on a Nissan Xtrevel T30 and were driven through Teriberka and Crimea in the summer of 2022. Although they are a little hefty for my car, I did not experience any discomfort while driving with them. There has been a moderate increase in consumption. Tires are adaptable to a wide variety of uses, making them ideal for people who fish, bike long distances, and participate in other types of energetic pursuits. The road is kept in good shape regardless of the weather, with the…

Pros
  • 10 t km drove - ceased making noise
Cons
  • for 18 t km did not locate

The beginning of the G015 fall-winter-spring journey. Due to the fact that I wear a size 285/70, there was a pressing requirement to expand the clearance. In spite of its remarkable softness and remarkable lack of noise, the rubber is highly pricey and very heavy due to its bulk. I can't really complain about the grip because I drive most of the time like my grandfather, and during the winter months, I run along roads that have been treated with a chemical for 90% of the route. In spite of…

Pros
  • An exceptional tire that is suitable for usage throughout the year on a hefty four-wheel drive vehicle. Does not experience excessive wear and tear in the summer, and it does not perform poorly on the roads or in the snow during the winter. It looks fantastic mounted to the car. Even though it's an odd thing to hear, I really enjoy the sound of her rolling around on the pavement.
Cons
  • Take some stones and start throwing them! But you can't go against nature.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm amazed! It was definitely worth the money!

I placed on a Ssangyong Kyron 4 * 4 xdi20; previously, it had been a Nokia nordman suv2. 235-75; before them, a standard guano nexen rodian 235-75 was in place for a while. I started off with winter tires (225-75), and then I moved to summer tires (also 225-75). The variety of rubber for 225-75 is far wider than that of 235-75. Commentary after two to three months of driving (both in the city and to and from Karelia). They make a lot more noise on asphalt than they do on the highway because…

Pros
  • A well-balanced vehicle with a supple ride that is, in the opinion of the driver, softer and smoother than the Nokia Nordman SUV2.
Cons
  • Not yet, maybe I'll come up with anything later. Haven't discovered it yet.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Nice price, good quality.

Normally balanced between 25 and 35 grams. 1. Rubber is a flexible material that can easily absorb impact while traveling through rough terrain. However, this may result in the opposite consequence, which is rapid wear because of the extreme softness. It is obvious that nobody can comment on the wear right now because the tires are from 2022, but there are conditions that can lead to higher wear. 2. There is a considerable amount of noise, but I believe that, in general, for AT rubber, the…

Pros
  • Soft
Cons
  • Noise

Revainrating 2 out of 5

The quality is at zero, very sting of the money spent.

I would like to schedule a meeting with you as soon as possible to discuss rubber manufactured in 2022. Why do I feel the need to clarify this, but there are just a lot of reviews that claim tires made in Thailand are of a higher and more consistent quality, despite the fact that firm authorities refute this. Wheels of a different make and model than the standard Dunlop were purchased in order to fit the second generation of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport. New tires that were purchased. It would…

Pros
  • Affordable for most people. It is resistant to wear. Not noisy
Cons
  • Producing products of high quality. Very brittle and not very comfy to sit in.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The perfect product for any user!

Before that, there were goodrichs, but they were old. After letting them lie in the garage for a while, I pulled them from my hands and replaced them with new ones. Here they are, how they howled: the KO model. Perhaps CO2 is quieter when it is brand new, but their price is increased by fifty percent. After leaving 50 km, they assisted a couple of times, but it was feasible to walk on foot and verify that they are able to. Because of this, I made the decision not to be miserable. Yoka is…

Pros
  • I'm putting it on for the second time. It has an 80-thousand-kilometer tread life, it's like a fantastic all-season tire, it rides nicely in the snow, the track is quiet, and the price is reasonable: 225/70 16 x 6
Cons
  • In the mud, similar to how winter tires perform on snow, this is slightly preferable to driving on the road. However, there is not nearly as much of this filth in real life. Bought chains in preparation for the event.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is good, there are only a few minor flaws.

I decided to purchase it for an SUV so that I could travel the 500 kilometers to the off-road and then drive on the off-road once I got there. When you get over 110, there is a tiny increase in noise, but this is to be expected and correlates to the aims. Additionally, consumption is higher on a per-liter basis. There is no fountain in the muck, but the shackles are unharmed once more, as was to be expected. Even though it can be used in any conditions, it is recommended that you avoid using it

Pros
  • Value for money
Cons
  • Noisy

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality exceeds all expectations, I recommend to buy.

Kyron diesel 2.0, chip. The standard Nexen 235/75 r16 was the tire that I used to replace it for the entire year. Bought tires measuring 238/85 r16 LT. After consistent, strenuous activity for the past six months, I'm still not used to it. The download of version 1.9. In the winter, when I travel on a rear-wheel drive, I'm content with the fact that the sole safety feature in the car is antilock brakes (ABS), which perform admirably both in dry and wet conditions. Over 25,000 kilometers driven…

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Expectations were not met, average quality.

Rubber is odd. She is comparable to an AT, however her layout resembles that of a highway more than an AT. As a consequence of this, it is very soft on the pavement (I like to compare it to the Hankuk Dinapro; in contrast, they are merely track ingots), but they do not have a tread when they are used on the ground. On the pavement, during rearrangements, it began to be flung as if I had two full-size spare wheels on the roof, a garage fire extinguisher on wheels, and a spread out tent in which

Pros
  • Lovely Fragrant when it's first opened
Cons
  • Incomprehensible. Additional information can be found in the comments.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not the best quality, but generally not bad.

It was a patriot, and the dimensions were 235 by 85 by 16. Prior to it, there were the comparatively nefarious Cooper STTs. For the entirety of time, the Cooper was penetrated in any dirt; frequently, I didn't even connect it in front; this created the idea that I didn't really require MT; thus, I also considered AT; yet, the decision was made to go with this. To begin, this is not rubber but a horrible vacuum cleaner; the "rubber" collects all of the stones from the road. I was concerned that…

Pros
  • A variety of sizes are available. Price paid at the time of acquisition Conduct on a gravel or asphalt roadway Made to my specifications in Thailand.
Cons
  • Conduct in the muck and on the sour tread Current pricing Extremely fragile sidewalls, particularly on high profiles

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best I have ever used, great product for anyone!

I took my Volvo Geolandar G015 with me, and the performance of the tires was as anticipated. I drove all around the city and out into the country on trodden roads, and it showed itself to be great everywhere I went. It is soft, but not overly so, and it rapidly adjusts to any qualities the road may have. On the other hand, it does not produce any noise on its own. The tires that I had before were made by a different manufacturer, and they produced such a hum that it caused my head to suffer…

Pros
  • fuel usage, quiet, regulated
Cons
  • No

Revainrating 1 out of 5

The product is not good, I will not buy any more.

Previously had the G12 model before it. The situation is substantially worse in this one. Despite the fact that the pattern isn't nearly like asphalt, the cross-country ability is nil! It needs to be washed immediately and does not clean itself! The very first rubber, which was used to create punctures using flour. It pokes holes in everything that can be poked! Even branches. On a single wheel, there are already SIX patches ((I believe the explanation for this is simple; the model was…

Pros
  • The only benefit is how affordable it is.
Cons
  • Traction, resistance to puncture, and equilibrium

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

Mileage on this rubber is already about 100 t. Km. From the first sensations after installation - very quiet rubber, pits and bumps pass very gently. Compared to the Yokohama Geolandar H / T S (before it), it is more rolled. The tread pattern is almost the same as H/T S, but this rubber does more than H/T S. Turns and serpentine holds perfectly, everything is predictable in the rain, there is no aquaplaning up to 80 km / h (while the new one is up to 100 km / h), further at your own peril and…

Pros
  • Quiet (I don’t understand people who write about her, noisy, etc. ) she’s damn really quiet. Soft. Holds turns well
Cons
  • -Increased fuel consumption compared to H/T.