Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
📸 powerful and versatile canon eos 70d digital slr camera - body only logo

📸 Powerful and Versatile Canon EOS 70D Digital SLR Camera - Body Only Review

42

·

Very good

Revainrating 4.5 out of 5  
Rating 
4.3
📷 Digital Cameras

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(4)
img 1 attached to 📸 Powerful and Versatile Canon EOS 70D Digital SLR Camera - Body Only
img 2 attached to 📸 Powerful and Versatile Canon EOS 70D Digital SLR Camera - Body Only
img 3 attached to 📸 Powerful and Versatile Canon EOS 70D Digital SLR Camera - Body Only
img 4 attached to 📸 Powerful and Versatile Canon EOS 70D Digital SLR Camera - Body Only

Details

Model NameCanon EOS 70D
BrandCanon
Form FactorSLR
Skill LevelNovice
ColorBlack

Description of 📸 Powerful and Versatile Canon EOS 70D Digital SLR Camera - Body Only

Discover the Power of the Canon EOS 70D Digital SLR Camera

When it comes to capturing stunning visuals and taking your photography to the next level, the Canon EOS 70D Digital SLR Camera is a true game-changer. With its impressive 20.2 MP APS-C CMOS sensor and DIGIC 5+ processor, this camera delivers exceptional image quality and clarity that will leave you in awe.

One of the standout features of the Canon EOS 70D is its advanced 19-point cross-type AF system, which ensures precise and fast autofocus, even in challenging shooting conditions. Whether you're capturing fast-moving subjects or focusing...

Reviews

Global ratings 42
  • 5
    26
  • 4
    9
  • 3
    3
  • 2
    3
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 3 out of 5

A normal product, but they wanted more for the money.

After more than three years of consistent use, it suddenly became unresponsive (showing the message Err) and would not turn on at all. The casing warmed up to forty dishes, which did not surprise me in the least; but, for a gadget of this class (and brand), even taking twenty thousand will require returning to a tried-and-true manufacturer.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best price for such a product, I will buy more!

Some advantages include the versatility of both photo and video capture, high-quality assembly, speed, wi-fi, tracking auto focus, great Live View, pairing with STM lenses, super-quiet operation, and fast focus speed, among other advantages. The price at the beginning of sales, as well as the price of a battery grip, are both disadvantages of the product. Wi-Fi, alas, does not support video transmissions of any kind.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A high-quality product, the price corresponds to the quality.

Switched to 70 I shoot mostly concerts and various events, for example, with your hands up or (to be honest) At ISO 10,000 In continuous shooting, for example, The carcass itself lies comfortably in the hand, a locking button is made on the rotating mode selection ring, know how anyone, but I was pleased, on the thousandth, I accidentally touched and knocked down the regime. :)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Im amazed! It was definitely worth the money!

Different pros: The versatility of photo and video, high-quality assembly, speed, wi-fi, tracking auto focus, excellent Live View, paired with STM lenses, super silence and focus speed, etc. Different cons: The price at the initial stage of sales and the price of a battery grip :) Unfortunately, wi-fi does not support video.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Average product, you can do better.

I have been using it for over 3 as usual, it hung (by writing Err) and did not turn on anymore! The case warmed up to 40 dish", I would not be surprised, but a device of this class (and brand) even take 20,000 will have to go back to a proven brand.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Valuable purchase, nothing but pluses!

The camera that came out after the Canon 600D was just heaven and earth. The photos practically did not lose quality when they were cropped, which is what I mean by RAW, and I appreciated the in-camera HDR feature. Please follow this link to view an image captured with Jupiter 37A optics: &p=1 It's been two months now, and the camera is pleased! I have no problems because I enjoy EVERYTHING! I was able to track down an ancient Soviet Helios 97M glass and calibrate it to determine what the 70…

Pros
  • I liked EVERYTHING ! When tracking focus, the viewfinder on the USSR optics is just enormous in comparison to the viewfinder on the 600D. It is a delight to concentrate on the USSR optics, but on the 600D you can only focus using LiveView, which is fantastic for video.
Cons
  • Using ISO settings up to 800

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Product satisfying the quality of the product, good price.

years I could not stagger, like the a / f in 650d. 700d is better, but I decided to take 70d, hoping that it is more reliable, a month later, Here is the proof of my words: v=F-A_I_0A1NY I can also post broken pixels, but this can be seen with a good resolution, but I still have a satellite and very expensive Internet!

Pros
  • the presence of a video mode with intraframe compression
Cons
  • twice as expensive as 700

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

An example of a video that can be obtained using this camera is (if you are interested, most of the videos uploaded to the channel were shot using this particular model) Now there is a new Canon 80D model on the market, I have been using the camera for a little less than a year, be aware of all the limitations of this camera, then you can get quite a good (excellent with straight hands) result.

Pros
  • Decent price Ease of use Possibility of obtaining adequate pictures Ability to record adequate video clips
Cons
  • If you approach the purchase wisely, being aware of all the limitations of this model in advance, then no shortcomings (in the context of unjustified expectations) were found.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

As such, there are no disadvantages, it is convenient to use.

The device has a good harmonious color reproduction, an excellent swivel screen in 3 planes, measures the exposure quite accurately, but I got a picture no worse from the younger model Canon 700 or 6 but it seems that the 70D is a 700D, but with a slower shutter speed of 1/8000 Perhaps, for those who shoot video, the advantages are obvious in view of the fact that this device uses a new matrix with dual pixel-phase detectors, and not 700D or 70 You can see pictures taken with this camera here:

Pros
  • Pleasant color reproduction in most cases, accurate exposure metering, swivel screen in 3 planes
Cons
  • White balance errors, the advantages of the device over the younger model are not obvious

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is good, there are only a few minor flaws.

History of use among DSLRs: Nikon D90, Canon 1Ds mark II, Canon 70 (2022 with 12.3 megapixels) and the Canon 70D (2022 with 20.2 megapixels) during video recording), support for SDXC cards, wi-fi, remote control via smartphone / I use 2 lenses, constantly changing, I expected more clarity from a 20.9 m2 (2022 with 16.2 Mp)

Pros
  • - Remote shooting via smartphone (EOS Remote).
Cons
  • - ISO is high, As the plaster began to flake off at the bottom corner of the screen.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Wonderful quality, one hundred percent satisfied!

A device that, in general, has been built with care and does not make any marketing concessions in regard to the filling. There is everything that one would require in order to participate in a leisure there. Yet, you shouldn't anticipate a huge improvement in the overall quality of the picture. The advancements, in comparison to the first DSLRs, will mostly have an influence on the user-friendliness, utility, and performance of the cameras, as well as the video quality, which will of course be

Pros
  • Originally recorded on the 600D. The primary reason, in my opinion, why one should select it: 1. A viewfinder that is significantly larger in comparison to the one found on the 600D. (not bright: it has a brightness that is fairly comparable to that of the 600-ku; by the way, Nikon has viewfinders that are lighter). Nevertheless, you won't be able to do this with any other DSLR camera than the 600D or one that's designed for novices. If we are totally straightforward with one another, we must acknowledge that the numbers of coverage percentages and increases that are offered by manufacturers do not indicate anything. It will appear as though you are staring through a keyhole when you have completed 70 matches in the level 600. And without delay, he contrasted it with the number 6D. And for this reason, if you require a LARGE viewfinder, you go there; you can see EVERYTHING in it, and the viewfinder seems to be 1.5 times larger. However, we must acknowledge that the 70-ke already enables manual aiming with a shallow depth of field. This is a significant advancement. 2. Functionality - virtually anything and everything relating to shooting that you could ever want for. 3. The speed of the fire. Although the buffer is big, you will still need a fast SD card in order to record extended series in RAV. 5. Enhanced battery capacity in comparison to its predecessor. If you don't use the main screen very much, you won't have to charge the device as regularly if you do so. When aiming for adequate food for oneself for two to three weeks. 6. The use of STM lenses for video recording has become substantially more practicable thanks to improvements in tracking and autofocus capabilities, as well as capabilities that are silent, smooth, and accurate. 7. Effective operation of the touch screen is possible. Taking shots of macro subjects is much simplified by the touch focus feature. 8. You can access the internet wirelessly by configuring the EOS-Remote. despite the fact that you predict it will have further capabilities, it only has the current set. 9. An exposure measuring system that is both accurate and reliable. 10. Despite a slight increase in the device's overall weight, the carcass of the device has been redesigned to fit the hand of an average male better. This was accomplished by increasing the size of the device's grip. 11. A dexterous controller for SD cards that is incorporated inside the device itself. In this particular instance, taking a picture is made a great deal quicker by using a wire to connect the carcass to the camera. despite the fact that I utilized a card reader in practically all of my transactions. 12. In a same manner, the focus of the lenses in this series is capable of being finely adjusted; however, you cannot rely on the jambs manufactured by Sigma or alignment services for this adjustment. Even if the amount of noise in the matrix has only been reduced marginally (by a step), this is an advancement despite the fact that it is just minor. On previous sensors with 18 megapixels, black started to take on a purple tint at ISO 6400, and by the time the image was captured at ISO 12800, it was a total and utter failure. In this instance, ISO 6400 has developed into a setting that is almost usable, color reproduction is not adversely affected by noise, and details are kept almost totally; 12800 is an acceptable sensitivity setting (we are talking about RAW).
Cons
  • 1. The mirror and the matrix have both been taken over by dust, which has taken up permanent residence there. In the past, all of the DSLRs in my collection were entry-level models, and I only infrequently came across a feature of that nature on any of them. I have a sneaking suspicion that the large mirror, which is positioned in such a way that it is set so that it is in close proximity to the mount cutoff, is the root of the issue. As a direct consequence of this, the huge mirror always picks up junk whenever the lens is switched. It is more compact and deeper on models that are younger. It was necessary for me to become familiar with a pear in order to maintain my personal standards of hygiene. In addition, in order to confirm that the matrix has been cleared after changing the lens, shutting off the camera and then turning it back on again will not be an unnecessary step. 2. Issues for those who own Tamron lenses that are powered by a mechanical drive, such as the 17-50 f/2. 8. There are problems with the autofocus while liveview and video are being used. If you focus the camera manually, there should be no issue. After one to two seconds, the carcass is no longer in contact with the lens after it starts moving back and forth in a crawling motion on the machine. This happens after the machine has been running for one to two seconds. To remedy the issue, simply power off the device and then turn it back on. 3. There is substantial discontent among users due to the lack of a white balance button (WB). Canon was under the assumption that this particular feature was utilized only a small percentage of the time for some unknown reason. The fact that it is NOT on the list of functions that can be altered so that they are associated with other buttons is by far the most crucial aspect of this! In addition, in order to access it, you will need to ensure that the primary screen is now open. 4. Compatibility with the external flashes created by third-party brands; prior to the initial upgrade, the Nissin Di622 that was manufactured did not function in any mode. There is no other option besides the built-in slave class. 5. The image noise is noticably higher than that of the direct competitor Nikon D7100, and the dynamic range is also lower than what is provided by the Nikon D7100. Both of these shortcomings are present in the Canon EOS 80D. It is not possible to recognize the full extent of the gain in picture quality until one upgrades to a camera that has a resolution of more than 18 megapixels.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good product, good quality, not bad.

In general, the camera has met my expectations, and I enjoy using it. Excellent picture quality, robust RAW processing capabilities, quick shooting speeds, and a straightforward user interface. But it's annoying when there are a bunch of little things that can't be accounted for and a few failures here and there. These are some advantages: Shot on a Canon 550D over the course of four years. After him, the Seventieth appears to be a model that is remarkably distinct from the previous ones. - It…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

After the 1100d and the 600d, I've upgraded to a third DSLR. Choose between 60d and 7d. The numbers 60d and 600d are essentially interchangeable. The 7 is a terrific camera, but it is a bit antiquated (there are no newfangled stuff), and while it lies more solidly in the hand than the 70d, the joysticks on the 70d seem to be more user-friendly. The answer to that question is that I now have 70d instead of 600d. 1 - Built-in lens adjustment! It has a straightforward configuration and can store…

Pros
  • The fact that this is a truly semi-professional camera should be the first thing brought to your attention. All of the functions that were defined are present and are operating correctly. In comparison to the 60d, the matrix and focusing system have been modified. It is functionally similar to the top crop, the 7d (the difference in the viewfinder field of view being 98% rather than 100%, and the rate of shooting is 7 frames per second rather than 8). The existence of a variety of trendy chips, including as WiFi and a touch screen, helps to compensate for the slightly worse rate of fire and viewfinder that the weapon possesses.
Cons
  • The only item that may be considered a nuisance is the lack of a hot button for white balance, as well as the inability to designate that button.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best price for such a product, I will buy more!

Integration of the 650D's development with that of the 60D's. All of the benefits that early cameras offered are still available, but the image quality and user-friendliness have been significantly enhanced. One who does not work in the photography industry would benefit much from purchasing this camera. In general, for everyone who is aware of what a single-lens reflex camera is. When it comes to photography, I believe that crop cameras have reached their maximum potential at this point…

Pros
  • - Ergonomics of older versions. - A high rate of firing in comparison to other cameras in its category. - Great autofocus (by points, by zones, manual point selection, manual adjustment). Quick. Very quick. - The highest level of convenience when shooting video and the highest quality pictures. a viewfinder that is both expansive and informative. - Interactive touchscreen.
Cons
  • - Provide your own battery grip. - The wifi signal isn't particularly clear

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am very happy with this purchase, I will advise everyone!

It is a combination of amateur and professional cameras that has proven to be quite successful. Before making a purchase, I inquired about any damaged pixels that might be there. They were not located, which is a fortunate turn of events. In comparison to the price of the camera, which was over 55,000 dollars, the cost of the check seemed quite insignificant. In addition, you don't go out and buy purchases of this magnitude very frequently. I used to be surprised when I found out that Canon…

Pros
  • Extremely simple to operate; Very well put together. There is absolutely no audible noise produced when buttons are pressed or scroll wheels are turned. Nice touch; Battery with a large capacity (1800 mAh). The identical situation exists, for instance, in the 5D mark III; Simple switching between the photograph and the video mode; incredibly quick to focus Availability of protection from the elements; Because of the placement of the sizable battery in the grip of the camera, holding the camera in one's hand is a highly convenient experience; A readout of the electronic level is displayed in the viewfinder. To avoid doing so, it is quite helpful to not overwhelm the photographs.
Cons
  • The "CA" mode, in its current state, continued to be of no utility (filmed on the 600D). The configurations are not being saved.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Not satisfactory, upset with the product.

Be careful when buying this camera! I tested two 70D cameras with EF 50mm f/1.8 II and EF 50mm f/1.8 STM lenses, and in both cases there was a defect in AF performance when aiming through the viewfinder (AV mode, f/1.8, one shot, spot). The number of sensors (AF on the center point or 19-point automatic) and the distance to the object (from 2 to 250m) did not affect the final result in any way: in ALL cases it was WORSE than in LIVE VIEW mode with the same settings. As it turned out, the…

Pros
  • Live View, swivel screen
Cons
  • All the rest

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is really good, I'm glad I purchased it.

In general, I am satisfied with the camera, I like it! Good picture, good Rav processing capabilities, good shooting speed, user-friendly interface. But all sorts of unaccounted for little things and small failures are sometimes annoying. Pros below: Filmed 4 years on Canon 550D. After him, the Seventieth, of course, seems to be a strikingly different model. - It has become bigger, the grip has become better due to a more comfortable handle, finally it is convenient for me to hold the camera…

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Some kind of defective product, I definitely won't buy it anymore.

All the positive aspects are killed by autofocus, or rather, the almost complete absence of a working phase autofocus for fast lenses. At the moment, I'm trying to solve the problem through the service, and, perhaps, I will supplement the review. Pros below: 1) Excellent focus in Live View, in video. 2) Good ergonomics and autonomy. 3) Nice color reproduction 4) Rotatable touch screen Its cons: 1) Very unstable operation of the main (TTL) autofocus with all tested lenses (Kit Canon 18-135 IS