📸 Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens with Speedlite EL-100: Ultimate Photography Bundle Review

Extremely content. Superb value for the money. Were. It was January. Right now I have no idea. substituted 12022 You should invest in some sort of protective glass, even if it's only a cheap UV filter. Filter thread diameter is 43 mm.

To complain about the flaws at this pricing is absurd. This was the second major discovery I made after the whale, and it cost me my first fifty dollars. This is the best choice if you are a beginner or if you want to take professional-looking photos without having to pay the equivalent of two full-time incomes. However, if you are a more experienced user, this lens may not be ideal. After a year in business, I realize I need more robust and quicker machinery. The 1100d body was used to capture

I had to get used to the focus ring (it only works if the shutter button is not pressed all the way). I use it as a permanent lens on the Canon 77D, more than satisfied for most tasks. Pros: - Luminous. - Blurs the background very nicely. - Light. - Focuses silently and rarely misses focus. - Metal bayonet. - The focus ring moves smoothly. - Sharp! The picture is really very good with it, given its price, it's just a godsend. Cons: There is no lens hood included, I had to order from Ali (around

When shooting subjects, it is helpful, and the resulting photos are of a high quality. There is not enough depth of field here. For everything else, I was unable to make any adjustments; nine times out of ten, I find that I require zoom and stabilizer. It seems impossible to me that someone could simply walk around a city in a YouTube video and click everything that is around them. Below are some advantages: He does very good portraits of people for the price of ten thousand. I decided to do…

Good lens. When the aperture is set somewhere in the middle of its range, the resulting picture is relatively sharp and has pleasing bokeh. Despite the fact that I mentioned the soapiness of the edges in the critique of the book's flaws, it is not overly forceful. If you are a beginner who already has a whale and are looking for something additional that is affordable, I strongly advise you to purchase one. With its positives being: Solid construction. Does not play, plastic is nice to the…

Instead of this one, I would recommend taking the 40/2.8 STM because it is more suited for crop photography. Because of its relatively compact size, the Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Lens is an excellent choice for taking group portraits as well as serving as a general purpose lens. This type of the 50 mm f/1.8 STM is appropriate for use with entire frames and might even be used for half-length portraits. In general, I took it home with me, tested it, and then returned it to the store a week later…

I'm a wild beginner to photography and a rusty teapot. I used a Canon 650d as a soapbox for four years before I started photographing sports. I discovered that using a kit lens did not allow me to take photos at dusk that were of decent quality. I made the decision that I required a fixed width after reading a little online. Considering the crop, 50mm is not particularly wide, but as a cheap repair with a nice aperture and positive reviews, it looked like a good choice for an experiment. The…

The best portrait lens for the money, and I use it almost exclusively. It has a wonderful creamy bokeh, a good aperture, and good autofocus, which is a great deal for the price. Various advantages: Cost 7000 Filmed with a high aperture at night in a park with lanterns at an ISO 400 setting; if your hands do not shake, you can attain a shutter speed of 200. Good autofocus, however there are better Compact cameras out there. With these drawbacks: Because the horse licked the focus ring, cleaning…

This glass is still giving me pleasure. Despite having a full park's worth of L-glasses. Only there wasn't a fifty dollars because the focal length wasn't right for me. unexpectedly purchased, "let it be in the bag." Why is joy? since I didn't have any expectations of him! And it ended up being a pretty good lens—much better than I had anticipated. Colors that are cool and not saturated are an intriguing aspect. This may be a drawback to some, but I actually like it. Forget about comparing with

Elephandic joy. Before that, the non-radioactive Takumar worked as a portrait painter; he was, without a question, the greatest in drawing, but he grew weary of working with a manual focus. Based on the specs and the results of the tests (not a huge improvement over prior models for the price), I settled on 1.8. When I tried focusing at two different stores, I found that it was either rock solid at the back or wobbly in the front. Some online sources state that back focus is caused by…

this lens was purchased two weeks ago. I used to use an outdated model (Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II), but eventually upgraded to the Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM. The camera and lens dropped from a tripod at a height of 1.8 m while they were in use. The lens was upgraded, so I had to use the outdated 50mm 1.8. The camera is still alive. Of course, it was already unpleasant, but the new USM was making the toad choke, and the cost increased. I purchased USM for $13,000; the current price of $25,000 is…

In comparison to the branded 50/1.4, it performs better in terms of build quality, sharpness, and autofocus (AF), but it has a worse overall aesthetic. Look elsewhere if you value sketching highly but wish to make the jump from manual to AF. Better to spend your money on something more modern than a 50/1,8 II against STM - a sew on soap. Perhaps a different kind of enlightenment causes those who create "plaster-fiction" to draw more gently. 40stm vs. 50stm - strangely, both offer about the same

Incredible clarity, wide enough aperture for natural light indoor photography, lightning-fast autofocus (milliseconds on the 7d II), and only a 10% mistake rate. Although this may not be a major issue for video, the electronic, highly smooth manual focus makes it theoretically hard to fast get into focus. The vignetting and HA that occur up to f/ 4 can be eliminated with a single click in ACR. It's a steal at the price they're offering! The 50mm Canon 1.4 that I used was an older model, so its…

It is already more expensive to think of saving up and taking something that is more intriguing than this, so you can only take it if you somehow manage to buy up to 7000. If you do manage to do so, then you can. Has pros: It is small and inexpensive, and it is an excellent choice for a beginner photographer who truly wants to build a bokeh like those that are made by real photohunters for delicate shots: When filming on crop, sceneries become unrecognizable and distorted: () And satisfying…

In all honesty, this lens is completely unprofessional. Use it on vacations to snap images of your loved ones, your kids, and the sights along the way. excellent for video production. However, I would not suggest it for serious business photography. Because of the blurriness and the shaky autofocus. Maintaining an aperture of 2.5 to 2.8 will allow you to work with it. Then autofocus's sharpness and precision will be satisfactory.

A non-alternative option for your money! The price of everything better is much, much higher. The only area where the old 50mm 1,8 from Canon will edge over its rivals is in autofocus quickness. It merges stm for other indicators. The Canon EF 50mm F 1.4 didn't particularly excite me. The picture "fatness" of the Sigma 50mm F 1.4 EX DG is superb (on par with the Canon 1.2 L), however the autofocus is unstable (either rear or front, and both can be on the same lens, depending on the focusing…

I got it as part of a bundle for my 6D, and I shot it with apertures ranging from 1.8 to 2.8 most of the time. In terms of the level of detail, the picture appeared to be very standard at 20 megapixels. However, when I switched the camera to an EOS R, I discovered that this glass already has a somewhat low resolution, making it unable to fully utilize the camera's capacity of 30 megapixels. The rationale for the selling was as stated above. After two years of service, the lens maintained its…

Today I decided to get a Certify. In point of fact, the second copy. The first one is situated somewhat in the rear. I have a harvest here. 60d. There is a significant gap between a whale and 18-55. Yes. Excellent for those who are just starting out. It cannot be denied. There is not a single complaint. When set to 4.0 in live view, which represents the closest approximation of focus possible, the sharpness is nearly as sharp as a razor. Didn't anticipate such a move from him. Bokeh is…

The Canon 650D is used in conjunction with. A great portrait lens for beginners, especially with a crop sensor camera. Good, dry depiction. It darkens the picture a little; however, it can be easily disabled with a single mouse click. After being fooled by back focus, I started relying on manual focus, particularly in dim conditions when LiveView proved useful. I'll see if they'll fix it under warranty.

I believe that it was money well spent. Simply make an informed decision when you're making a purchase, and pay attention to both the front and rear emphasis. According to the reviews, this lens flawlessly resolves a full-frame matrix with 50 megapixels and produces an image that is of the highest quality. Since the previous version of the lens was also capable of correctly resolving 20 megapixels when used on a full frame camera, it is safe to assume that owners of cropped cameras, which only…