I just got this lens for $8990 not too long ago. There were 2 in the shop. The first one that they presented provided sharp focus in the back. And the second one turned out to be just right; there is an adjustment available on the 6D, but you won't find yourself using it. Hits with pinpoint accuracy from all ranges and with the face open. In the past, I owned an older model of this lens that had a mount made of plastic. The contrast is as great as heaven and earth! If the accidental hitting of…

I debated between this lens and yongnuo for a while, but many people informed me that there wasn't much of a difference. I firmly believed in this Yongnuo and purchased it, only to discover that it is a very poor lens that, even when focused on the center, only seldom achieves sharpness. It constantly creeps at dusk but is unable to locate the thing. It already soaps a great deal at aperture 2.0. In general, I sold the Chinese and purchased this lens. There is no end to the excitement, and…

Photographers with friends and newbies! If in doubt, I advise buying this lens. Any technique has several weaknesses that can be easily identified if you so choose. But. The output image this unit produces at such outrageous pricing. Excuse me. When I read reviews, I see that many times, individuals don't know what they're writing about—that it doesn't work at 1, 8, that they select almost from 10 copies. Learn the material, comrades. Understand what depth sharpness, focus length, etc. All…

The lens is placed in a bag that is then coated in a thin layer of bubble wrap and shipped in a box. Expanded creative options quickly available after the whale lens. Even in a room with a light bulb, it was gloomy when I had a whale for 7k (with a stub, 18-55). To fix the situation, I had to remove the approximation or unscrew the iso. Although I enjoyed the lens, not everything is in focus when I focus (this appears to be a trait of lenses with static FS). What I concentrated on is good…

After using a variety of glasses, I was able to determine whether or not I preferred shooting with glass. Naturally, he was the one who had the preceding fifty dollars in his possession. I am certain that I am able to state that Canon has once again manufactured an ideal lens in terms of the ratio of price to quality! The presence of a metal mount made me happy since, according to the sensations I get when holding it in my hand, it lies much more pleasurably in my palm. But these are all…

I used the Canon EF-S 2022D to take the picture. When you take into account the crop factor, the lens is fantastic for photographing portraits. However, if there is sufficient room, it could also work for the filming of other scenes. In a confined space, functioning as a macro) will be possible. Because there is a lot of background noise, it is not suited for capturing videos. However, in my opinion, the only type of camera that is appropriate for video is a video camera because video is…

Without a question, this is a superb update to the classic 50/1,8ii formula. A metal attachment has been added at long last. There is no jerking or dangling, and the lens is knocked down securely; furthermore, the plastic seems of higher quality than it did in the previous model. There will be fewer nuts in the bokeh))) Optically, it's the same as the old 50 / 1,8, but they added two petals to the diaphragm. It's the same exact photo. 1.8 dead on in the middle of FF's focus. As soon as you…

Although half a meter is not the most common focusing distance on a crop sensor, I have no doubt that this lens is second only to the whale in terms of sales volume. Naturally, after trying something more serious (I tried shooting at 24-70 f/4 and 35 mm equivalent), you understand how slow autofocus is, that sometimes there would be more sharpness, and less focal length, but, friends, let's be honest - half a 1.8 is a marketing lure to prick for the first time, planting on a line of lenses. We…

Canon's original version of their $50 cheap camera had a metal mount, but to appease buyers, they switched to a plastic one. They were indistinguishable from one another optically and mechanically; however, they made a creaking sound when focusing and frequently missed their mark because of backlashes. Yet, the plastic lens won out as the "popular" option, allowing users to capture clear images with pleasing blur (on the off chance that the lens didn't malfunction) for around a hundred dollars.

The crop has a shorter depth of field and, of course, a far more detailed picture at full aperture compared to a 40 f/2.8 STM. Live view also has a lengthy focusing time. When compared to an aperture of 85 f/1.8, let alone XA, its visibility is essentially nonexistent. There are situations where a 50mm crop is preferable to an 85mm one. For one thing, a shutter speed of 1/80 s is sufficient to avoid blurring, while a speed of 1/160 s is required for an 85mm lens. Both the 50mm and the 85mm have

The Canon 50D was fitted with this lens. This lens will be contrasted with the Nikon 50 1.8G, and I will do so objectively. (Nikon fifty dollars was on Nikon D90, also 9 points) so I liked the lens only because of the price, in everything else it loses to Nikon, Nikon has much better sharpness, and the picture is much more interesting and the bokeh twists, in addition, the Canon picture is simple, it just captures the sharpness, and does not draw it with lines (not I know how to write…

It will undoubtedly become a bestseller and the default lens on half of Canon cameras. The prior version was fantastic, but there were some issues that the demanding photographer might have had, particularly with oblique focus at infinity, front or back, after some lens shock with prolonged use. It's no longer so fantastically made of plastic. The image hasn't altered much, but the lens is now worthy of use by any photographer rather than being a cheap, flimsy compromise lens. I also used a…

For a very long time, the plastic of science fiction needed to be updated and improved, and I believe that Canon did a wonderful job with this aspect of the project. The autofocus drive and virtually nonexistent yaw are, of course, the two primary benefits. I would take the 50mm by 1.4 for myself, of course, but after trying several variants of this glass and a significant number of marriages as a result of the flawed operation of the ancient usm drive, it irritates me to the point where even…

This lens was my entry point into the world of photography. It functions flawlessly in a studio setting with controlled lighting. It's wonderful outside, too. When the shutter speed is greater than 1/125, blur occurs. If the hands are where they should be or if there is a tripod, it works nicely in the dark. I found it challenging to photograph family gatherings while he was around; I always ended up hiding in a corner to get everyone in the shot. Ideal for a novice, but additional width is…

An acceptable portrait lens that is nearly perfect, but not ubiquitous, on crop matrices you may encounter during your shooting. The focal length varies. I'd say this lens is fine if you just require a camera a few times a year. It has a silent motor, quick focusing, and produces bright, high-quality images. Any camera with a lens costing more than $30,000 ought to be set up to automatically shoot in such a way that even the thought of editing the pictures is eliminated before the shutter is…

In general, I enjoy the lens. In contrast to the whale, the photo is quite lovely; the individuals in it have a natural appearance, and there is no evidence of any distortion. It took Kitov a very long time to photograph, so you are going to need to get used to the new lens, particularly on the crop (since it increases, you are going to need to move further). I appreciate how bright it is. Whereas the whale pushed the ISO up to its highest limits, this fifty dollars' worth of coping mechanisms…

An improvement over the 1.8 II. Round barrels, noticeably sharper than its predecessor, but still lathering at the edges, functioning aperture, starting from 2.2, dusty hues (what you want from such lenses), but this is addressed in FS. Round barrels, noticeably sharper than its predecessor. After testing it and determining that it was worth the price, I decided to sell my 1.4 and purchase this one instead. For an edge that is both sharper and more consistent than my copy 1.4

With its pros: light, bright, just what I needed. well blurs the background. for portraits it's the best! Cons: the fixedness of the lens makes you run, but this is not even a minus)

what else to take from him! initial good optics, if someone takes pictures not on an open hole, then this is the best solution, with expensive optics on a clamped aperture it differs very slightly (you need to poke around with a magnifying glass to find differences in the picture) . Has some pros: At the moment, the most normal lens in the canon series for ~ 9000r Some cons: In 2022 it was possible to buy for 3500, now in 2022 it costs 9000 on average, this is sad (since for 3500 you could…

Yes, at 1.8 it does not produce the same quality as canon 50 / 1.4 or any sigma. Because the lenses are of different price ranges, but in its class, for its price, it is really handsome and deserves to be in the bags of all canon owners Examples: