Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
cordiant off road 215/65 r16 102q summer logo

Cordiant Off Road 215/65 R16 102Q summer Review

53

·

Very good

Revainrating 4.5 out of 5  
Rating 
4.5
Automotive, 🚘 Tires & Wheels, 🔧 Tires & Wheels Parts, 🚘 Tires & Wheels

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(6)
img 1 attached to Cordiant Off Road 215/65 R16 102Q summer
img 2 attached to Cordiant Off Road 215/65 R16 102Q summer
img 3 attached to Cordiant Off Road 215/65 R16 102Q summer
img 4 attached to Cordiant Off Road 215/65 R16 102Q summer

Description of Cordiant Off Road 215/65 R16 102Q summer

Cordiant Off Road - the upgraded tire behaves confidently in the most difficult operating conditions, guaranteeing the driver confidence behind the wheel: Unsurpassed overcoming of any obstacles and excellent handling in difficult road conditions: sand, clay, mud. The use of a new metal cord significantly increases the rigidity and tensile strength of the breaker belt and the reliability of tires. Breakdown protection. Tread Features/BenefitsClimbing any obstacles and getting out of deep ruts: Thanks to powerful side lugs. Excellent self-cleaning of the tread from mud, snow and gravel: Thanks to the unique flared groove system. Increased tire flotation in the most difficult operating conditions (sand, clay, gravel, swamp): Due to large multidirectional tread blocks. Applied technologies 3D Mod 3D computer simulation of the tire optimizes tread design, materials and properties of the tire. This design provides operational reliability, safety and economy of the Dual Nylon&Steel tire breaker of the combined tire design. Two layers of high-strength steel cord and a protective layer of spirally wound textile cord give the tire extra strength and reliability, puncture resistance, improved handling, shape stabilization, as well as increased operational reliability and safety.

Reviews

Global ratings 53
  • 5
    35
  • 4
    13
  • 3
    3
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best offers, glad I bought it.

They do a great job off-road, but if you prefer riding in cities, I would suggest finding something different because the ride gets unpleasant at speeds over 100.

Pros
  • Patience and cost
Cons
  • Handling on asphalt causes noise.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm amazed! It was definitely worth the money!

in contrast to their equivalent imported products. I am going to do it once more because. Because of how hard it is, it makes a great asphalt additive. Everyone who does not want to change their shoes before going to the country may consider getting some pokatushki instead. Got pros: NIVA vehicle Wear on the rear tire was 60% after three seasons (70t. Km), while the wear on the front tire was 80% when driving on asphalt. For such tires, I believe that is outstanding. In addition, the car spent

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

Chevrolet Niva 215*65*16 standby weekdays/weekends in the city; weekend/rural only. The cornfield no longer accelerates past 130 kilometers per hour when driving on the highway. Dragging it uphill through the mucky dark soil was no trouble at all. Only once did I get trapped on them, when I was flying from the Urals at night and hit a rut and got stuck on some bridges while running. The wheels were spinning in the air and did nothing to free me. Well-balanced, and its deceleration is just…

Pros
  • First, dragged all over Affordable, top-notch M/T tires with a low price tag. Shniva flatters them tremendously. Fourth, pliable; fifth, long-lasting; sixth, a refresher on pavement flaws Quick cleanup, number six
Cons
  • only the ones that are inherent to M/T rubber's structure - 1 noisy (although the dispenser is much louder). I wouldn't risk bringing a Cordiant Snow Cross of the same size in the winter because, although I haven't used it, 90% of winter evaluations are unfavorable. Third, you can't roll (with that tread). I am cautious when driving across deep puddles. (no ditches or drain furrows) 5. they excavate tunnels in the sand and stones.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Practical product, nothing to complain about.

I was seeking for cheap off-road tires on a cheap domestic SUV, and Korda won out. This size can be greater on Shniva since it is a native there (up to 215 without a lift for sure). Purchased at the conclusion of winter, spring opted to replace shoes rather than wait. First impressions in the snow after switching to Bridgestone winter tires without studding: the cabin's rumbling and vibration doubled. both on the tarmac and in the snow. After a week of use, I became accustomed to it and it no…

Pros
  • Off-road adventurers have a nice, affordable choice.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best offers, glad I bought it.

stance on 225/75/16 UAZ Hunter. In comparison to the Nivovsky variant, she is rather toothy at this size. The automobile was silent. It acts admirably up to 110 km/h, then starts to vibrate and make more noise. for 10,000 kilometers as new, with no wounds or hernias. I just changed my tires for the winter and was delighted to discover a large self-tapping screw in the tire. However, while unscrewing it, I discovered that the hole was not through. I often left really fine boots among ordinary…

Pros
  • In medium mud, there is no sign of slipping because of how effectively it rows. Very wide tread, good cleaning. without difficulty climbed a steep clay mountain in the rain. no poisoning ever. works great in the snow. Soft. For this amount of rubber, it stands fairly firmly on the track. No noises caught my attention. They were perfectly balanced, but I had to add a lot of stuff.
Cons
  • In this price range, none.

Put on Suzuki Jimny. After reading the reviews, I expected poor performance on asphalt and around the city and noise on the highway. In reality, noise is observed at a speed of about 80 km / h, but it does not cause discomfort, I drove 300 km at a time without problems. The wheels were balanced quite easily, minus - they were pumped up to 2.4 atm at the station, which is a lot, according to the passport, a maximum of 1.8 in front and 2.0 in the back. I did everything according to the plate, and

Pros
  • Durability, well behaved on the primer. Quite well managed in the city.
Cons
  • Noise like all MT.

I traveled from May to October, switched to them from a low profile, auto turboforester, after the transition I felt that the car did not accelerate and steer, but this was precisely due to the fact that it was 17 radius with a 50 profile, I got used to it in about 3 days, from the minuses - in those turns where I used to drive 80 km / h, now more than 60 does not work out - it blows out, gasoline consumption has increased by about 2 liters per hundred, otherwise it’s pluses, I stopped paying…

Pros
  • Price, indestructibility, perfect in the mud
Cons
  • heavy

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great product, a pleasure to use.

Pros: The car (Niva Chevy) with this rubber is a tank. I tested it in the mud, the car literally lay on its side, but got out with a bang. In the city (Hong Kong) rubber also behaves excellently. Has some cons: On bad roads, i. E. on roads with pits, due to the rigidity of the tread rubber, the hardness of the impact is noticeably felt when the wheels hit these very pits. As if with a sledgehammer they beat on the suspension.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The item is average, not sure if it's worth the money.

stand on the field 225/75/16 I bought a new one, since I don’t see the point in taking used off-road tires with wear, the whole buzz when it’s new with large treads) the dirt kneads well, it doesn’t make much noise on the asphalt, which I noticed after the kama, the flame-acceleration became worse, the consumption increased by 3-5l, and the pluses-clearance increased)) without skidding, but you can ride a kame flame in winter, only summer on cords! it's summer tires! do not fall for the tricks

Pros
  • price, permeability
Cons
  • they are heavy for the fields with stock razdatkoy and ch. in pairs, in the mud does not leave the rut

Dimension 225/75-16 actual dimensions tread width 17cm, edge to edge width 22.5cm, wheel height 73cm. To work off-road, you need to blow off. protector 17cm if blown off, then all 22.5cm work. For those who drive on primers, and not on mud in clay, it is washed out.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best thing for the money, glad I did it.

I put a chevrolet on my field in the amount of 205/70 15r, this size is enough for me, the tires are soft, not noisy up to 80 km, you can’t hear it at all, after 80 there’s not a big rumble, it doesn’t get louder up to 105, I didn’t drive faster, my wife said that I don’t hear anything just like on the Dunlop sj6 winter Velcro, there is no vibration or discomfort, the tires are excellent for the super cornfield! if you drive through a puddle on a windshield, a minuscule flies, everything goes…

Pros
  • Not noisy, brakes well both on dry and wet roads at positive temperatures, cross-country ability, price
Cons
  • For me they are not

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like everything, the price and quality are acceptable.

I live outside the city. The main problem is the clay rise, when it gets wet, the clay becomes just a lubricant. You can drive on this rubber, if not in an outright downpour. Got pros: In general, good mud and normal summer asphalt tires. In particular, it rows well in the mud (except for the swamp;), it is well balanced (and does not hit at a speed of 100-130), it once crushed a glass bottle without consequences, it behaves normally on wet asphalt and with puddles. Wear resistance is good. Got

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best thing I have ever used, highly recommended!

I took a UAZ 3303 for trips to the fields and destinations (the car is used for household chores and popzdok for mushrooms and fishing). It is hard to balance, so I did not do this, since the mileage on asphalt is 10% of the main drag. the main element of movement is purely dirt roads and directions through fields and forests (drown cars without ardent fanaticism). He copes with his duties with a bang. Sand, mud, snow, etc. makes no difference to her. It rows only on the way either on an empty…

Pros
  • What you need for off-road mediocre
Cons
  • cow on ice

I will never put stock road tires again. I will change either to the same ones, or to more "evil" ones - with better stability in side skid) Has pros: + 15 km/h comfortable off-road speed. The car (Renault Duster) has become twice as soft (including on asphalt) and a little higher. Cool appearance and drawing of a predatory cat). +50 patency on sand and clay. It does not slip on clay, does not lead away, clearly holds the road. On the sand, the holds are incomparably better. Riding 130 on…

I recommend it for driving in the mud of any quality, based on its price, and I don’t recommend it for driving on rocks. wheels, so that it is "universal" and high-speed, because when I go far from home I go for 120. Its pros: Perfectly goes on any mud, be it clay or a swamp. Quiet, excellent dry road holding, a little "crawl" on the damp, but at certain speeds. Does not "blur". Good value for money. Its cons: Weak cord, 30 kilometers over a large stone was enough for microhernias to crawl out…

Rubber liked! I do not consider it necessary to overpay for another 2 times more expensive. City 80%, off-road 20% (just off-road, not a primer). - Mileage more than 40,000 (6 seasons - 80% wear) delamination began (did not follow the pressure) - I do not consider this a disadvantage. - The rubber is thick - I unscrewed the screws and screws myself, more than once, immediately (or after a couple of weeks) repaired it with a repair kit, I don’t know how it was on others, but there were no…

Pros
  • Niva 1996 (I use it only in summer) Some advantages for such money, - rowing in the mud is great - normally holds the floor of the atmosphere on the sand and in the mud - never had problems on wet pavement, also in puddles - like on asphalt - at speed, because of the noise of the transfer case, you still can’t hear them (although the noise is on the car), it keeps 120 km / h normally on the highway - who says hard - it is soft (if the pressure is 1.8 - 1.9 - it swallows almost all the bumps) - Gasoline consumption has not increased - He gets out of the rut normally, though after 2 years he only learned.
Cons
  • This is MT - that's all from here: - chews on the front end (it is necessary to follow the similarity collapse) - heavy tires (heavy wheels are not recommended) - for some reason they complain at the tire fitting) - maybe there is something else, but not for me

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good product for me, I was satisfied with the price.

Against the background of other sounds of the field - it makes no noise louder than the handout howling at 100 km / h. Rowing confidently. Virtually no wear after 15,000 miles. The rubber is durable, to break through somewhere in the forest or on the stones - you still need to try

I took it to the Niva. Those who write that it is noisy, apparently have an ear for music like great musicians. In a field, by definition, it cannot be quiet. And those who take the field, then there is a need for such a car to get to point B. Good tires for the price. He rows no worse than the Maxis and Boris Fedoroch. Well, if you are already on it, then a high jack and a piece of wood under the wheel will help you . Rating 5 out of 5.

Pros
  • Price, good lugs, exit from ruts.
Cons
  • Well, the price just outweighs them.