I was led towards the cardiant by the desire for toothy rubber for fishing rides in an affordable price segment. Another reason is the reluctance to lift cars (Suzuki Grand Vitara 3d). At first I thought Hankuk AT, but smart people dissuaded me: it’s not very good on the pavement and it lathers through the mud at once. In general, if there is a desire to use a car without fanaticism, but in a fairly tough off-road mode, I advise everyone. For the city and the highway, of course, it is better…

Rubber is not for the city! Although many in the city ride it. I recommend Niva and Patrick. Fully justifies its drawing. Good luck to everyone on the road! Its pros: Price. I put it on the Patriot.225\75\16 Dirt and clay and sand everything goes with a bang! Root very well. Perfect for fishing and hunting trips. and not expensive and good. Has cons: Heavy and requires attention during installation. It just doesn’t drive on ice (there are NO spikes), but it’s normal without slipping.

I took the first set of 205/70 R15 for the first field, drove 20 thousand, after Vli 5 it seemed fantastic)) Then there was 235/75 R15 also on the Niva, but prepared, drove about 30 thousand km. I liked the rubber very much, but I took Goodrich 35e for the UAZ 3151, of course they are out of competition. Now the UAZ Patriot, for the third year on 275 / 70R16 /, the mileage on them is small, about 10 tons. Km. I like rubber, it climbs very well, if you etch up to 0.8, then you generally ride…

With all the minuses of rubber, there are probably more pluses IMHO. It is probably impossible to pierce a cordiant with something off-road. Has some pros: Rides like a tank in the mud. Snow for this rubber is a gift. The rocky slopes of the mountains are generally her element. In the summer, there was not a single hydroplaning when driving at speeds of more than 120 km / h on the highway. Cons: on the front axle - Niva, erased noticeably faster than on the rear. Factor of. In winter, the…

215 / 65r16 put on the field, went to Karelia and the Crimea, drove around the Hong Kong region - I'm satisfied. I didn’t go into extreme sports, but where I went, crossovers no longer go. If you do not drown more than 100 on the highway, the flow rate is 10 liters. Maximum speed 125 (with a full spare tire on the trunk). Alloy wheel assembly 24 kg vs. 18 stock stamped. I got here until the winter, I decided not to bother with the winter kit - it’s enough to go to the store once a week. The…

I feel like I should leave this review. Before buying, I read here . they pour mud on this rubber - horror, I took it out of harm and because of the low price. In the end, I'm delighted. All the worst expectations turned out to be superfluous. All my ratings are compared to the stock Pirelli AT, which everyone knows well . The tires are on the 3-door field. I drove 10 thousand on the stock, 5 thousand on this Cordiante. I drive off-road every day for 5 km, and then another 30 km on asphalt, and

Pros: Decent rubber, for fishing, cottage, nature, quite strong (roots, broken bottles, stones, nothing) Its cons: Who often drives off-road and saves less on roads for more expensive foreign tires (keeps track better, cleans better.)

Some pros: On asphalt 180 and normal) that's just such a rumble that it seems now we'll go for takeoff))) Some cons: Wrecked quickly. even on slightly rolled snow it turns into skates and it is impossible to stop the car))

A friend has one on the Patriot! He is there for fishing, hunting, a fan of riding, mixing mud, and so these tires are just perfect for such a batch. If I'm not mistaken, a friend has already skated them for three seasons, and is happy as a March cat))). Quite normal for its class tires, the price is justified. Max is pleased, I know this for sure, recently we only talked about tires, he said that he successfully bought himself a Cordiant.

Pros below: To everything already written, I will add only one important detail: when you ride it through puddles, the glass remains unsplattered ! Unlike the standard Shnivovsky Barguzin and other rubber with a small tread. Some cons: After two years of quiet driving up to 100 km a day, they began to slide a little on wet asphalt. The impression is that the topmost layer of rubber was of higher quality. Consider it a disadvantage at this price or not - decide for yourself.

My choice! Even despite some cons, it is worth the money. On the bitten front wheels I will buy a new pair of Cordics and that's it. I advise. Pros: good off-road qualities. Of course, not for trophy raids, but for fishing or hunting - that's it! almost no noise on the highway. At least not louder than winter. Nice protector. The price for MT rubber is just right. Holds up great on the track. Even at speeds above 120. Has cons: Very sensitive to breakage. It is balanced, but the loads are…

It is quite soft, and when they told me that there would be a rumble from it on the way, like from a KAMAZ, then there is absolutely nothing like that. Got pros: Price. Price and quality. On clay and mud, once after the rain, I turned on the four-wheel drive where construction equipment was loosening the road near the house. It behaves with dignity on the highway, there is no beating, the steering wheel does not go away, it does not chat. Brakes. But laying sharply into turns is a pity. It…

I bought a Pajero sport in the first body in the amount of 265 / 70r16 for operation mainly in the country and mainly on the ground. However, I drove 15,000 km on it on different roads - asphalt, gravel, sand . Goodrich at 245 / 70r16 stood before the cordiant. compared to it: 1. the cordiant is much softer (when I went to the village near Hong Kong for the first time on the cordiant - I thought they patched the road; the PITs of the Hong Kong, Hong Kong regions and the asphalt-gravel off-road