Pros
- Huge potential if they don't change the base again!
Cons
- price
Pros
- -cold -powerful - enough for a long time
Cons
- haven't noticed yet
Pros
- - Powerful [more powerful than even the next generation, 9900k doesn't seem to outperform much, 4% somewhere, but it costs 15 thousand more] - I didn't think of anything else.
Cons
- - Very high heat dissipation. It is indicated in the specifications that the power dissipation is 95 W, however, on my second computer I have an AMD FX 6300 with a similar power dissipation and the coolers for Intel and AMD are approximately the same, but the FX heats up to a maximum of 59 degrees. Intel heats up to 85 degrees. Later I found out that this was due to not very thoughtful air circulation in the case, however, even with the cover removed, max. temperature 75 degrees, still 15 degrees warmer than AMD! And they said that AMD is almost a stove, but for now it turns out to be the opposite, by the way, the TOP Ryzen, as I saw from the reviews, is also colder than the i7 8700k. So if you take it, then buy accordingly and the cooling is not bad, I have a DEEPCOOL GAMMAXX 300 R DP-MCH3-GMX300RD cooler and I don’t overclock if the temperature is like this, it’s better to buy something better, of course, although in principle it is enough kind of like, but after AMD, 75 degrees of temperature strains a little. I will not put one point minus in the overall assessment, because it is more likely that my expectations were not met (and those were compiled from the words of several "experts"), but again I expected that this CPU would be colder.
Pros
- review of 8700 without (k) nuclei frequency temperature
Cons
- No
Pros
- Review of 8700K 6 cores, good overclocking potential ;) All the advantages are painted in the tests.
Cons
- Thermal paste under the processor cover from here is not a pleasant temperature during overclocking. I see no reason to take a processor with the letter K and not drive it.
Pros
- - Six cores, twelve threads - Floating frequency: from 4.2 GHz idle to 4.7 GHz under load. Theoretically, it should work at a nominal frequency of 3.7, but the frequency is usually not lowered below 4.2 due to the features of Turbo Boost 2.0 technology - Advanced 14++nm process technology - Finally official support for DDR4-2666 SDRAM - Unlocked multiplier for 8700K - Very attractive price, $360 for a practically flagship
Cons
- - TDP 95 W - a blatant lie, at full load the consumption reaches 125 W, even higher in stress tests - Under the cover, there is not metallized thermal paste, like AMD has, but some kind of misunderstanding, due to which even with good cooling (Noctua NH-U14S), an unoverclocked processor heats up to 65 degrees under load, in idle - about 30. In stress In the LinX 0.7.0A test, the temperature of one of the cores rose to 88 (at +22 in the room), the data was recorded by Core Temp 12022. Poor thermal interface limits overclocking potential
Pros
- Review of 8700k + Runs up to 4.8 in motherboard auto mode (msi z370 gaming m5) + The temperature after the scalp, under a single-section dropsy at 4.5 GHz, keeps 45-50 degrees in the load +6 cores / 12 threads, upgrade for several years ahead
Cons
- -Starts only on z370 chipset -Default took 4.3GHz to 1.3v, it's sad that with such a voltage it drowns up to 75-85 degrees - Thermal paste under the cover (more in the comment)
Pros
- Coffee Lake - 14++ nm, 6 cores, 12 threads. Really a technical shift, not the usual 5% performance increase. I took a frequency of 5 GHz without question, but I don’t need more. On a Deepcool Captain 120 EX water bottle and a mini itx Tristellar SW case, depending on the selected mode of operation of the PC cooling system (silent, standart, turdbo, full speed) in idle 35-50 C, under load above 67 was not seen in any of the operating modes cooling systems.
Cons
- Due to competition with AMD and an earlier (almost a whole quarter) release, intel did not manage to release enough processors, which speculators did not fail to take advantage of. I did not have time to order for 27, an hour later in another store it was already 30, on the trail. the day the price tags were already 32, 35, 39, then when the price tag reached 41, I found it for 35,600 thousand. the old PC on 3770 has already left me.
Pros
- 6 cores; high performance per core; high fps in games
Cons
- hot as a blacksmith's oven; the price bites; at the slightest acceleration, the heat does not have time to "spread" to the lid and the percent throttles; requires a cooling system >250W TDP.
Pros
- 6 cores, 12 threads. Overclocking
Cons
- I don’t see it yet, I’ve only been racing for 2 days . Well, except that it’s incompatible with the Z270.
Pros
- - Stable 6 cores and 12 threads - Good overclocking potential - There were no problems with installation / configuration
Cons
- - Almost 0 sense in the power for games. - High price
Pros
- - Intel has finally moved, otherwise since 2022 they have been releasing the same percent
Cons
- - The performance is lower than that of competitors, the same Ryzen 7 1700 costs 2 times less, and gives out more in multi-threading. - Strong heating due to poor thermal interface. If Ryzen can be cooled with any cooler for 1000-1500, then for the I7-8700K you need a cooler for 3000-10000. - Necessity of the scalp. Without a scalp cap, you can't even expect to get a frequency above 4.7. The processor is very hot even in stock. - Exorbitantly high price. Competitors with the same performance are 2 times cheaper. -Stillborn chipset. the Z390 is already planned. - Not enough processors. Intel was in a hurry to release and did not provide enough processors.
Pros
- Nice quality box Limited Edition type only 50,000 copies (hard to believe in this) Not hot in stock Turbo boost works well Price (at the time of writing cheaper than 8700k) In 8086k, only selected chips are taken (judging by the tests, it looks like the truth)
Cons
- Minus - multi-threaded performance in real work applications compared to 6800k-6850k (not counting all sorts of benches)
Pros
- 1. Nimble (6/12 after all) 2. Large power reserve for the future 3. Good embedded core
Cons
- 1. High TDP 2. Thermal paste under the cover (although I don’t think it’s so critical for a processor without overclocking), as a last resort, it will be possible to scalp in the future
Pros
- Core i7-9700: Finally 8 full cores. Solder instead of paste, which has a good effect on temperature indicators.
Cons
- No.
Pros
- Productive, six sound, twelve stream
Cons
- Price, chipset, thermal interface
Pros
- The task was to create a lightweight graphics station for home use. I was looking for a compromise between power, system unit size and noise under load. As a basis, I took the I7-8700 with a 65 watt thermal package. Acceleration was not expected. The choice of Intel was due, among other things, to high performance in low-threaded applications. Compared with an old computer on a non-overclocked I7-3930K. The new machine turned out to be about one and a half times faster in all tasks. In some cases, the advantage was about 80% due to the use of AVX. All this while reducing energy consumption by 2-2.5 times. The result is a cool and almost silent machine in a mini ITX case with abundant wall perforations (no noise protection).
Cons
- For the application in question, the I7-8700 is currently optimal.
