Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 46
  • 5
    20
  • 4
    13
  • 3
    9
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    4

Type of review

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good value for money, I recommend.

Toyota Prado car. Size 275*65*R17. Bought a new set at the beginning of the season. Hong Konganent four-wheel drive, with locking center differential. Before that there were Hakki 7, never blocked anything. But for the sake of economy, I decided to try Velcro. I am writing from Siberia, the winter was cold, with drops at the beginning and snowy in the middle, so there was a lot of snow, there was also enough ice under the snow. The feel of the rubber is different. On the one hand, for brushed

Pros
  • - quiet - slows down well on ice (accelerates and holds the road noticeably worse). - any snow at all. - I looked up to -40 - it does not dull, it remains soft as it should. At the same time, the characteristics in such a frost do not change much (I compare it with Korean rubber). - democratic price in comparison with Nokian and Kontikami.
Cons
  • The main problem is related to ice. If braking can still be called acceptable, then acceleration and handling are below average. This is especially true for temperatures over -25, when snow is rolled down to the state of oak ice in the yards. The car is heavy, the rubber does not cope very well. But if you don't drive, you can drive.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

A completely ordinary product, nothing remarkable.

I went to this model on Nokian Hakkapeliitta R in size 225/60/17. Let's be honest Nokian holds turns much better. According to yokohame: a rather interesting pattern, a lot of sipes, wide tread slots give great grip with the coating. "Velcro" has its advantages and disadvantages, the beginning and end of winter, in persistent frosts it is gorgeous. In wet snow and snow porridge, you need to be careful.

Pros
  • 1. Quiet 2. Wear resistant 3. Price
Cons
  • 1. Turns, a very weak point of this rubber. 2. Ice and a little snow.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality exceeds all expectations, I recommend to buy.

Operation 4 winters on Land Rover Discovery (weight almost 3 tons). He sold the car and the tires went after him, like new (seemingly not much changed :)) In winter, on bare ice (without fanaticism of course), snow, porridge, wet asphalt keeps the road without problems. I travel a lot: city / highway, high speed. Tires never failed. Now I will also take Yokohama for a new car and I advise everyone. I bought it myself on the advice of friends, because. they always put this on BMW and Land Rover.

Pros
  • Price, handling and braking, low noise, wear resistance
Cons
  • Basically, they don't exist!

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A really necessary purchase, glad I found this product.

For the fifth winter I will use Tires Yokohama Geolandar I / T-S G073. I bought a used car for a long time, it was winter and the car owner left a complete set of winter and summer tires as a gift! Winter tires have been serving for a very long time, there are no complaints even about it. The owner praised this rubber, and I fully support him) Very high quality and reliable! Next winter, I will most likely buy a new one, and I will definitely take Yokohama!

Pros
  • Very high quality and reliable!
Cons
  • there is no such

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not the best quality, but generally not bad.

I put this rubber in the fall, probably a month before the snow, size 285/75 R16, car Nissan Patrol. On rubber, the imbalance is more than 100g per side on each wheel, but the wheels are at least straight. On dry pavement, the car goes well, quietly, it is controlled normally, there are demolitions of the front axle in corners. When wet, the ABS kicks in. On snow, ice, urban winter asphalt, it slows down very badly ! Very smooth deceleration, and then a slip into the skid and the operation of…

Pros
  • Price, quiet, soft
Cons
  • The car does not brake at all on these tires ! Or very smoothly. Ice, snow, urban winter asphalt - ABS is constantly working!

You just need to understand that this is Velcro and make adjustments to your driving style on ice, then there will be no problems. I rode it for 2 seasons on the CX-5, before that I went for 3 seasons on Toyota Avensis on yokohama ig35 also with Velcro, my wife also skated ig35 for three seasons, no complaints. Operation - city, moderate countryside, winter roads (3 trips from Hong Kong to Austria). After this rubber, I had a chance to ride bridgestone revo gz for a season, so I'll tell you…

Pros
  • Quiet, soft, predictable on rolled snow and ice
Cons
  • at temperatures above +10 too soft, starts to float

I bought it in the fall, changed my shoes at the first snow, then the snow melted and drove for almost 1.5 months at above zero temperatures. If the temperature is above +5, the rubber becomes like snot, constantly hammering the ABS, at the beginning of the movement it slips and squeals on dry pavement. It doesn't go well in the mud. Waited for winter, snow and frost. It turned out to be a nightmare in general, when turning on semi-rolled snow at a speed of 25 km / h, I flew onto the curb. You…

Pros
  • Quiet
Cons
  • A complete disadvantage

Revainrating 4 out of 5

No complaints, I recommend to buy.

The rubber is not bad, but we must not forget that you are riding Velcro. I operate at temperatures from +5 to -35 on the Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.0. Rating - solid 4.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The price/quality ratio is great, I will buy again.

I took UAZ Patriot in the amount of 265/75. Consumption has not increased despite the size and rather evil tread. In an icy hill, a slope - it’s scary to look at, I drove in without problems, although I couldn’t get there on evil muds in the winter. Rowing vigorously. It’s good in the city on packed ice, I didn’t notice a difference with the spike, it seems to slow down even better than the domestic spike, but it can take a little more in corners at speed. It's not critical for me, I don't…

Pros
  • quiet, soft, predictable behavior on ice, excellent rowing on slush, excellent price, wear resistance
Cons
  • Very soft. As it warmed above +10 - that's it, change your shoes. Not all season. The sidewall feels soft and weak, in general a suspiciously light tire, perhaps there is little cord or it is not steel. Although for 2 winters there are no cuts, no hernias, no burst flagella, but I regularly stop by the curbs and in the forest I drive along fallen trees along sharp branches. Questionable in general. It’s not easy to get out of a deep icy rut, it’s not spiked, and there are no pronounced side hooks.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best deals, glad I bought this.

I will try to describe in more detail the impressions of using this rubber. 1. I am writing about 235/65 R17 108Q, Tuareg car, permanent four-wheel drive. 2. As soon as I changed my Hakku 5 to this rubber, I immediately felt the difference, I had never used Velcro before, now I understand that it was in vain. 3. I tested this rubber for braking on ice lightly powdered with snow, braking is noticeably better than on Hakka. (I didn’t even think that Velcro was capable of this). Further wet…

Pros
  • Not noisy, soft, behaves well both on ice and on asphalt, there were no questions about porridge either.
Cons
  • during use (2 months) is not detected.

The second season on this rubber 225/60/R17 on X-Trail T31. In St. Petersburg this season there is almost no winter, the temperature constantly fluctuates around zero. Precipitation turns to ice. Ice on the roads for the second month. I ride around the city and suburbs within 100 km. Not enough sense of reliability in such weather conditions, unfortunately. With its pros: Soft Relatively quiet Holds well on dry and wet pavement Runs well in the snow Price Different cons: Does not hold on bare…

Skated a season on the Patriot. Size 285/75-16. Soft, goes well in deep snow. At a pressure of 0.5, it is quite realistic to bring the car to a more or less solid crust. On ice, it is quite adequate, although not studded. Thought it would be worse, but was pleasantly surprised. It floats in porridge or water, but there are two points. Firstly, for the weight of a patriot, it is wide and the ascent is quite natural. Secondly, after MT, any will float) In general, excellent tires, I recommend for

Pros
  • Versatility: adequate behavior on ice and snow
Cons
  • Floats in porridge

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Nice product, happy with my purchase and may buy again.

Here's what I understand about her. Auto Outlander, drove a 2022 Hakka SUV, without studs for 7 years. It was just the perfect rubber until it wore out to zero! Raked from everywhere, 100% controllability! I was going to take a new one, but I got on a Merc ML with a friend on it and realized that Nokian was doing something wrong. Rubber has become much more comfortable, but where is everything for which we need winter tires on our roads? Okay, stopped at Geolandar. Briefly: 1. Ice is just zero,

Pros
  • Snow porridge, wet asphalt, the ability to rake out. Transition between different driving situations.
Cons
  • Ice, wear resistance.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

All is well, liked the product, didn't buy it for nothing.

I don't know what they say about danger. I already have the second set of this rubber, the first with a range of 100 thousand km. Worn out to the state of summer, Just burned getting out of a snow drift on a rear-wheel drive with an empty pickup truck. If the "fool" does not include quite adequate behavior on the road. Speed ​​holds, different weather too. But I ride on such tires in the Urals from the south to the north from mid-October to mid-May.

Pros
  • The price is adequate, wear resistance is good, Universal

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Average quality of the product, especially for the money.

They gave me a replacement car LR Discovery 5 on Yokohama Geolandar I/T-S G073 tires for a week. My car has a non-studded Hakkapeliitta R2 SUV, which has been used for several seasons and is about 40-50% worn. On the replacement car, the tires are much fresher. the mileage of the car is only 16 thousand, but the impressions are not at all in favor of newer tires. Since I drive along the same route, I immediately noticed how much the quality of braking had fallen - where before I calmly braked…

Pros
  • fairly quiet tires, average price tag
Cons
  • braking on a snowy road is extremely weak, patency is also so-so

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A wonderful product, its nice to use.

Since driving safety is 80% dependent on the quality of rubber, I prefer not to save on this. Especially if I know for sure that the rubber will fully justify its cost. I'm on my second season with Geolandar I/T-S G073, it meets all my needs on the road.

Experience of using autumn-winter-spring 2022-2022, Hong Kong and country roads (200 km. in radius). Car Infiniti Fx 37, 4wd, 333 hp, high-revving engine. Tire size 265-45 R21. I thought for a VERY long time and chose what kind of rubber to put, spikes or not, compared the tread, etc., before that I drove a monodrive, all the tires were studded, the last one in particular was Nokian Hakkapeliitta 7. TOTAL: rubber very satisfied, never regretted this choice. Good luck on the roads.

Pros
  • Excellent rubber, at temperatures from 0 and above on dry and wet, as well as during rain, asphalt is practically not inferior to summer tires in summer. At a negative temperature, it behaves very predictably, it does not particularly harden, even at -30. Loose, freshly fallen snow, porridge is not a hindrance for aggressive driving, it keeps the road well, the braking distance is predictable and much less compared to the previous Yokohama Geolandar I / T G072 model (specially compared, personally, on the same cars with the same radius). Roll and drift in turns with medium (moderate) gas is practically absent. Noise - no noise at all compared to spikes. Icy ice and heavily packed snow - well, you can’t mess around here, even on spikes, but everything is smooth - adequate behavior.
Cons
  • Small speed index (160 km/h) Can't complain about the rest.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Just super, it's beautifully made, I'm very happy with it.

I have never seen a more predictable winter taxiing (1st generation Outlander). The demolition is so soft that you clearly understand the limit of the car's capabilities. Ford Focus on the Conti Vikingconact 5 nervously smokes aside from what these wheels allow you to do. Happy as an elephant. I will give my father (Outlander XL) and wife (Rav 4) exactly the same for their cars.

Pros
  • 1. Handling + braking. Everything is clear and predictable. 2. Price: 225/60/R17 cost 7000 wheel. 3. Low noise. 4. Low fuel consumption. 5. All potholes are soft enough. But at the same time it is so loud (like a drum) that it becomes scary for the wheels
Cons
  • 1. Very low speed index: 160 km/h. The quality of the wheels does not allow dragging at such a speed, I want to imbed. But you always have to remember a maximum speed. 2. He is afraid of a rut: in a high-speed one, he can start tossing back and forth, and he simply cannot get out of a deep winter one.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Medium quality, especially for that kind of money.

Strange model. It rows very well in the snow, the car climbs confidently (four-wheel drive), drove normally through porridge, did not notice the minuses. But on ice and icy asphalt it does not slow down at all and is not controlled like a sled. ABS works all the time. Not the first Velcro I have, but I have not seen such an effect. Finished the winter and will not put more. dangerous

Pros
  • Deep tread, rows very well in loose snow. Doesn't burrow.
Cons
  • Ice and icing. Doesn't hold at all. How to slow down on a sled

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Overall good, but I expected more, there are disadvantages.

. I won't say that I'm very disappointed, but Yakohama is not good in all respects. You can ride, but be careful, especially on ice. Demolitions, drifts constantly at first, now I'm used to it. 3 months in Yakohama. Departure winter, what can I say, everything is known in comparison. Yakohama is definitely worse, the most important thing is the predictability of handling, when it breaks into demolition, God only knows. Ride very carefully until you get used to it. In deep snow, a little better…

Pros
  • Price and . everything!
Cons
  • Relatively noisy, relatively harsh, poor handling (understeer, like a "cow" on ice). Unpredictable stall into a skid, skid is poorly controlled.