Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 37
  • 5
    23
  • 4
    3
  • 3
    6
  • 2
    3
  • 1
    2

Type of review

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not a bad product, nothing extraordinary.

Warranty Extender! Like a quest-profanity, it gained momentum. In the past, I could just call the right service in case the wheel ever broke. Also, service is free if the warranty card is shown. Now I have a long list of things to fill out and a link to the Nokian website. Unfortunately, the check did not pass their verification, hence the transaction is cancelled after scanning. And the "girl" on the phone told me that if the check doesn't clear, the guarantee is null and void. She exists…

Pros
  • It looks very similar to Green2 on the outside. excellent grip in both wet and dry conditions.
Cons
  • The primary precursor was this quick abrasion, as we would later observe. It ended up being pretty noisy. The prior sequence was merely noisy. This one is like riding a spike, in a way. Extremely frail lateral, possibly even more so than GREEN2's.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

Two wheels were balanced normally (10g + -), while the other two creaked as they were done. They were able to balance it under dancing with a tambourine and 80g of lead after removing the tire, checking it again (and finding it to be ideal), and removing the tire at what was known as Tire Fitting. In addition to everything else, the reduction in hours was announced without any prior warning. They applied a fix, and the amount of lead that was needed for balancing was reduced from +80 g to +60.

Pros
  • Quiet
Cons
  • Numerous weddings took place.

Dimension 195/65 R15. When traveling at a speed of 80 kilometers per hour, the rumble of a tire can become exceedingly wearisome. Let's keep our fingers crossed that the tire, after being rolled for around 500 kilometers, will get quieter. I thought the management was good, and it did a good job of keeping the road in place in both dry and wet conditions. Excellent braking. ate as of 05/17/21: the hum has stopped, and I've determined that the cause was the wheel bearings (I didn't think about…

Pros
  • Pedestrian maneuverability on both dry and wet pavement.
Cons
  • The tire has a tough exterior. The most significant drawback is the loud rumbling that is produced by the tire when traveling at a speed of 80 kilometers per hour. The hum has stopped, and I've determined that the cause was the wheel bearings (I didn't think about them immediately away because I replaced them 15,000 tons ago).

For the past fifteen years, ever when I switched to the fourth iteration of Hakki for the winter, I have used the Nokian for the summer. In the past, I'd switch to Yokohama in the winter and Michelin in the summer. Five to six seasons with Michelin, two to three with Yokohama. Like mine, I think Nokian Hakka Green 3 will last longer if the distances driven are shorter and the driver takes a more relaxed approach. The ride quality is excellent overall, and I would give it five stars if the…

Pros
  • Excellent traction in both wet and dry conditions. Water-filled ruts and deep puddles are no match for your high-velocity driving. To wit: 205/55-R16 is my size.
Cons
  • Indicator "8" was no longer visible after two weeks, and marker "6" was already poorly readable when I got it at the end of April 2022. As of today (19 September 2022) the set has traveled close to 20,000 kilometers; the front wheels (front-wheel drive) have worn down to approximately 3 millimeters of tread. They seemed to wear out excessively soon, even taking into account the possibility that the hot weather contributed to the accelerated wear. Typically, I would have two to five summers' worth of tires.

Almost all premium tires in this class and in 205 were 195/65/15. If you don't find fault with trifles, this one is unquestionably no worse than the tires I took for many years from the first five tests of automobile publications. The behavior in the puddles and on the damp grass will have to wait till the rainy season. At lesser speeds, the pits and joints move normally; I have not yet flown into them at speeds over 120. A perfect balance. Octava vehicles. 95 percent of paved roads are good or

Pros
  • The car drives smoothly and naturally, has great handling at high speeds, and does not rut. Its pricing is consistently the same.
Cons
  • A continuous noise does start to occur after the speed exceeds 80, but it is not alarming, and I believe it will stop once the tires have been lightly rolled and cleaned. There are no issues at all in the urban cycle.

Tires It's 21 years old, a brand-new model, and it comes with all the latest and greatest features. In truth, the rubber is subpar, wearing out very quickly. I've stepped on the Nokian rake quite a few times by now. I have a few white hairs on my bald head, but the power of the brand trumps common sense. Although rubber is expected to degrade over time, this level of degradation in the rubber compound makes it impossible to predict even 20–25 thousand miles of use. Even if you put it in a…

Pros
  • The condition of the road is excellent. Excellent symmetry.
Cons
  • The front tires on my mother's car have worn down to a 6 after 4,000 kilometers of her extremely cautious driving (I installed 205/55/16 tires). The rear tires have worn down to a nearly invisible figure eight pattern. You feel like you're riding on spikes because the tread design actively attracts road debris.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

As such, there are no disadvantages, it is convenient to use.

With its advantages, which include good driving performance, good grip on the road in wet weather, and resistance to breaking into axle boxes, despite the fact that it has only one drawback. Disposable, with enough material to last for one and a half seasons, or two if the front and back are replaced.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

The product disappointed, does not meet the promises.

I don't know who writes on this page that they enjoyed it since there wasn't much background noise, but that's not the case. When compared to the Hankook Optimo (of which I have used multiple kits over the course of the previous five years), the Nokian Hakka Green produces a discernibly higher level of noise. My winter tires with studs made less of a racket when I was traveling at a pace of 50 miles per hour (80 kilometers per hour). I deeply lamented my decision to make the buy. And even at…

Pros
  • Controllability.
Cons
  • Noisy. A little too severe. appearance of melancholy

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good purchase.

Seasonal departure, covering roughly 14,000 miles. 215x65xR16 in size. One front wheel and one rear wheel are seen in the shot in their post-season condition. Another 8 can be seen on the back, and 6 can be seen plainly on the front. Both in dry and wet conditions, the tires operate effectively. Soft and welcoming. I can mention the following with regards to fuel economy: The on-board computer of the car—which I have been driving for five years—showed the lowest consumption at the conclusion of

Pros
  • Soft and welcoming
Cons
  • I'm not sure. not yet located.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A good quality product, I rate this purchase perfectly.

I entered it on 04/16/22, and as of 05/26/22, 8000 km (Crimea + cottage) had gone; the number 6 is already "not very clearly visible" on the tread of the front-leaders. So, based on my predictions, she will end this season with a strong "4", 15000 will pass, and. She will replace the rear ones the following year in the hopes that wear will be a little slower there. It will take another 10-15 thousand to reach a "drop" if she is at least visibly "six," after which it will be unbearably painful…

Pros
  • Excellent tire.
Cons
  • but I believe the tread should only be used for two seasons.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A nice option for the money, one of the best deals.

Some pros: The steering wheel doesn't even quiver when we drive through puddles, which is a sign of very strong handling. Got cons: Noisy. When traveling on new asphalt, there is little to no audible disturbance; nevertheless, when traveling on older asphalt that is dotted with gravel, the level of noise is significantly increased.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm very happy, it really is worth buying.

In comparison, the ContiPremiumContact 5. 205/55R16 offers a different impression. Opel Zafira B. - They discussed the sounds in this section. She makes incredible time in the first kilometer. After thirty kilometers on the highway at a speed of more over one hundred twenty kilometers per hour, I could no longer hear the rumble of the tread. In all honesty, the tire is not noisy at all (not even noisier than CPC5). - Not loud at all. Road noise is greatly reduced on uneven pavement in…

Pros
  • Not noisy Not spoken and light, with no bouncy quality
Cons
  • It's too soon to tell.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality exceeds all expectations, I recommend to buy.

The last time the viatti was worn on the road was after hard braking, so I haven't tested it in the rain yet, but I hope I won't wear it. Below are some advantages: I haven't tried it in the oppressive heat yet because, in my opinion, it's such a nice rubber, but it takes time. After viatti, runs softly with soft tires that have good traction. Pros below: For 3200 fantastic tires, even with an additional warranty that I registered on the first day on the Nokian website, I didn't notice, I…

After ten years of driving, a large number of tires have been rolled back, including those manufactured by Nexen, Bridgestone, Dunlop, Cordiant, Continental, and Nokian, amongst others; hence, there is in theory something to compare them to. The initial responses have been uniformly good across the board. This summer I purchased two sets of tires for two separate automobiles, and in both instances I obtained excellent predictable braking and handling. Even during the rain, there were no…

Pros
  • Very quiet. Purchased to take the place of Green 2; it's a match made in heaven. Excellent traction both on dry and wet asphalt on the road. In the event of an emergency, the brakes perform exceptionally well (although have only been evaluated on dry pavement). Despite its softness, it retains its grip even as the temperature drops. Adequate price tag (it turned out that the most expensive brands were the least expensive overall) Very well balanced, despite the fact that there were some doubts regarding the 2022 production.
Cons
  • Soft (there are worries regarding the strength of the sidewall as well as the possibility of hernias), Dirt and soggy grass at the top of the hill are quite problematic.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Nothing unusual, a normal product.

2022 was the first year that he took his brand new Solaris out for a spin in a Toyo Proxes SF2 (a Japanese-made vehicle). The Shumovannaya machine, in addition to wheel arches. I got these for three thousand dollars a cylinder because they were advertised as having a low noise level. I'm in the process of reading the initial reviews, and I can already point out some issues. The locals understand that to mean that they produce an intolerable amount of noise.I'm not going to risk replacing the…

Pros
  • novelty
Cons
  • merely the initial feedback from residents regarding the level of noise (((

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Everything is fine, there are only minor drawbacks.

Bought a Nokian this year. From the good, I note that tenacious on any pavement - both wet and dry. Rulitsya clearly. The price is pleasant. Of the shortcomings - noisy, but on good asphalt they are practically inaudible. They often write that they have a weak sidewall, but I have not come across this. Not the best tires I've ever had. But in general - the norm.

Pros
  • holds well in any weather
Cons
  • wear out quickly, soft