Nikon AF-S FX NIKKOR 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED Vibration Reduction Zoom Lens: Ultimate Auto Focus Lens for Nikon DSLR Cameras Review

Finally, I became the proud owner of this lens (before that there was a whale 18-105, a Nikon D7000 camera) Sharp, lighter than whale 18-105 Operation more than 3 I almost forgot: Portraits on it are cool, the background washes as it should.

I took this lens because Nikon has no other alternatives, I decided to compare it with 70-300 and was very surprised that at 300 but no, I compared others, is actually 28-200

"5" put because in terms of its universalism, 24-70 (2.8) + 70-200 (2.8) WR, yes + something else of a higher cl - it is, of course, I' + nikkor 28-300 (4) If you don't photograph a black cat in a bag at night and in a dark room, if you don't photograph the of rabbits frame by frame, A year later, to 250 cry! expensive zooms are better, but . I never bought 70-200 (2.8) it is simply not needed, and I don’t earn money with photography - just for the soul.

Its pros: Everything that is stated! The first one was in a whale - a complete delight! Different cons: I had two. When the first sold, after a while I realized that I was missing him. I bought the same and the sharpness was lower.

The versatility is simply unmatched! Chic object Of course, such a station wagon is a must-have for everyday! BUT a 50mm aperture fix should always be in your pocket! Just in case a fireman! 28-300 + 35 or 50 or 85 mm fixed aperture 1.4 - 1.2 Perfect match! Another good flash rotary and you don't need anything else! Has pros: Brutality level 99 Good sharpness but does not reach 50mm 1.4D Good bokeh. At 28mm, a soft picture, pleasing to the eye (Not blurry like on Deshman lenses, but soft.)…

I use this zoom with Nikon D700 and "I'm happy as an elephant" - it's not always the same to carry a huge backpack with a set of optics . This zoom is totally worth the money. Pros: Versatile range of focal lengths, excellent sharpness - looking at the pictures it's hard to say that they were taken by superzoom. Got cons: For me they are not. A superzoom will always have a smaller aperture, but this zoom seems to me to be designed for full-frame DSLRs, which have little noise at high ISOs .

For me it is indispensable and universal. Has pros: It perfectly replaces a set of lenses 24-70 + 70-200, which you can carry around all day, just your back falls off (only 70-200 pulls one and a half kg. Excellent sharpness over the entire FR range. I am pleased with both color reproduction and focusing speed. Saved me from the need Constantly change lenses while shooting. Cons below: I could not stand shooting without a flash in a concert hall. Too dark. I had to use his more aperture…

People who write "dark" are surprised, I want to tell them - "When you buy, do you look at the characteristics? Or did you just find out at home that aperture 2.8 is not there." It is convenient for them to shoot at events when both close-up and general are needed. At the expense of darkness, it is well compensated by raising the ISO on modern cameras. With its pros. A good zoom lens, sharp enough, good bokeh, very versatile, it can be said to be indispensable when one camera and a lot of…

Bought for D3. At the long end, I couldn’t focus on the take-off plane - I had to go down to 200mm, then the focus caught on and then bring it closer to 300. When the hole decreases even to 4, the device writes an error. The picture is obtained, but the series cannot be seen as ears. The series is possible only on the maximum open hole. I took it to the store - two more behaved the same way. There are no problems with other lenses. The firmware in the device is fresh.

I chose between him and 18-200. I took it all the same as a universal reportage, I realized that I was in a hurry with the decision: F28 on the crop is still a bit too much, at the entrance the wedding ransom consists entirely of portraits :)) I had to hastily switch to the old 18-105, it’s good that I didn’t have time to sell it to this time :)) But on a walk there is no substitute for him, chic wedding portraits are obtained + (I repeat) perfectly "lathers" the background. P. S. There was an…

I took this lens because Nikon has no other alternatives, I decided to compare it with 70-300 and was very surprised that at 300 they had a different frame scale. I thought that I came across such a lens, but no, I compared others, the same story. I came to the conclusion that 28-300 is actually 28-200. Didn't expect this from Nikon. The strangest thing is that I read a lot of reviews and reviews and no one mentioned it.

I bought it at one time (October 2022) for the D700, as the main zoom "for all occasions" when traveling. But I did not expect that in the process of use it would become a staff member. I'll try to explain why. My copy has a very smooth "behavior" in terms of sharpness / color in almost the entire range of focal lengths and at all apertures. It draws low-contrast details quite softly, as if blurring them - small skin errors, for example, in portraits - where my 105/2 cuts with a razor and you

Tired of carrying a 15-18 kilogram backpack with optics on vacation, I bought it for passing and not serious tour trips. I screw it to the D700. I compare with 24-70 and AF-S 80-200 the impression is that you can get used to low aperture, especially since the stabilizer allows you to shoot at 1/60 and 200-250 mm, though with a good focus. The picture quality is more or less not bad, of course, there is no sharpness of 24-70 and AF-S 80-200, and for landscapes this is not a very good lens, but…

For trips, I went through a lot of telephotos, superzooms and bundles (standard + telephoto), but I had to abandon all of them. televisions with aperture ratio of 2.8 are usually heavy, and such as 55-200VR, 55-300VR have a "flimsy" design with a backlash of the trunk, a "dumb" stabilizer of the first series (the picture is already bouncing) and poor detail at the long end of distant objects (more than 200-300m, this also applies to 18-200VR). Bundles (standard + telephoto) are inconvenient…

I bought it new in the store, but before that I tested it with other lenses, in particular, they brought 24-70 2/8 used prices are about the same. I walked around the dark corners, took pictures, looked at the details, noises. When I started to compare, I did not find much difference. The angle is larger at 24-70 2/8, well, that's understandable, I set the ISO to automatic, aperture priority. Noise is slightly higher, but at ISO 200, the same. I bought it and have never regretted it. for a…

Finally, I became the proud owner of this lens (before that there was a whale 18-105, a Nikon D7000 camera). I took it from my hands for 23t. R. The realization of happiness came after the very first shots taken. Sharp, lighter than whale 18-105. Feeling of quality. I am a beginner photographer. For those who doubt, definitely take it. I add: Operation more than 3 years. on the body of a Nikon D7000. I rarely use it lately. I mostly use 16-85. The lens did not like it less. I'm not going…

. but for that kind of money it cannot be with a larger aperture. ;) In general - a very, very good travel lens. The best, IMHO, of universal zooms. You have to get used to the vagaries of auto focus - mainly because the focal lengths are large and deviations of 1 degree already change the focus point. Once you get used to it, fall in love! ;) Also, it's REALLY BIG! ;) Suddenly big, if this is your first DSLR (I'm talking about myself;) and you saw a TV set only from afar. Due to its size +…

To begin with, the main thing to understand is that this lens is positioned as a universal, travel zoom. For this purpose, it is better not to come up with. I did not compare it with analogues from other companies, but this lens is very convenient. I use it mainly in good light for shooting portraits on the street - there are wide and medium and narrow angles. Extremely convenient! I took on a trip around the Crimea - again - both nature with architecture by 28 mm, and bring mountains closer to

I consider this lens one of the best zooms in this price category (and maybe even give a head start to more expensive ones), the range is suitable for absolutely any situation: portrait, reportage, travel, etc. in addition, it is great for both full frame and crop and for cameras that do not have a built-in motor, such as the Nikon D40, which with this lens no longer looks like an initial DSLR, but as a worthy competitor to more mature and serious cameras. What they write about his weight I…

Was bought for the range of focal lengths. Convenient when traveling, walking, when you don’t really want to take extra optics with you or it’s not advisable to change it due to lack of time, dust or precipitation. Also handy when the situation calls for "pull-and-pull" tactics. Some will find it heavy and oversized. But it was made for large full-frame cameras, which themselves do not shine with lightness and compactness. So it won't pull too hard. Even with the weight and dimensions of this…