Pros
- Durability, manageability.
Cons
- Noisy tires.
Pros
- Soft. Compared to the Continental Yes, it can slow down and worse, but you don’t have to drive. At speeds up to 120 I did not notice a difference. Quiet, which is nice. The water is fine, because. a lot of lamellae, probably well otvoyadt. The tread depth is very good. The screw didn't even pierce through!
Cons
- Because soft, then the pebbles fall into the lamellas. car ticks)
Pros
- Reliability wear resistance Controllability
Cons
- Noisiness
Pros
- Controllability. Track, aquaplaning - there is no such thing at all, strong sidewalls, wear-resistant. For road tires, it has quite decent cross-country ability (of course, dirt on the hub is not for it).
Cons
- Made in Poland, poorly balanced, noisy, harsh,
Pros
- Liked everything. Despite the noise, which, in comparison with other pluses, simply loses its negative value. If the tires are in the regular size of your car (calculated), then you don’t feel the rut and rulitsya excellently in dry and wet. Durability is just a song. Again, a casting on the sidewall covering the edge of the bisque if you rub against the curb (the border is for Hong Kong :))
Cons
- it’s archaic that they stopped releasing them . . I don’t want to take the leftovers from warehouses (as a rule, there is a sunbed there - returns are poorly balanced either in terms of terms or in violation of storage conditions . )
Pros
- Feels the road well, does not lead, there is no feeling that you are floating like water. On a wet road, I got into a rut, I felt pretty confident.
Cons
- 1. This rubber has the ability to create an excessive rumble from 40 km / h. 2. Due to the wide tread, stones got stuck when driving on gravel. 3. Not for driving in mud and wet off-road.
Pros
- Quiet, soft, rides well on the knees, no aquaplaning
Cons
- Haven't revealed yet
Pros
- Rigid, not afraid of pits, curbs
Cons
- fast wear. Became very slippery in the rain for the second summer season
Pros
- strong, holds the road norms on any asphalt
Cons
- No
Pros
- 235/65 R18 Nissan Murano stood on a new car from the salon. Quite strong for domestic roads, endures . . no hernias . . Pretty decently protruding sidewalls often save the disc from minor damage when parking.
Cons
- Wear . . On the run of about 45 thousand km of a car with a winter / summer replacement, i. e. with a real mileage of less than 30 thousand, the outer edge has worn out, perhaps of course it's the disks, the factory offset is ET50, they were on ET45 disks. The wheels rotated front and back from season to season, in the end, absolutely everything looks the same. It just so happened that the annual mileage is small, so the tires are already up even for the 7th summer season, but they look very sad, the rubber is covered with microcracks, 2 mm is left to the border of the center wear indicators, there is simply no outer ring, as a matter of fact there are already cubes protector. Circular collapse was performed more than once, the deviations are minimal . . The roll, compared to the winter Nokian SUV, seems more tangible . . But it's hard to judge here, as if the profile is appropriate .
Pros
- Excellent road holding on any asphalt. The car drives very confidently. Unkillable, not afraid of curbs and pits. Resistant to the formation of hernias.
Cons
- Compared to Michelin, slightly less comfortable due to greater rigidity. As if the vibration load is greater. But less comfort for me is not a big drawback compared to greater control reliability.
Pros
- Fire! A gun! ! Super! ! I'm shocked! Rides like it's on rails at any speed (reasonable))
Cons
- I would not classify the stiffness as a minus, as it is a "sport". And if you want good handling, then comfort, after all, needs to be sacrificed a little. And she's not that tough either.
