Bridgestone Dueler H/P Sport 225/55 R18 98V summer Review

For 4 short northern summer seasons, punctures at least a dozen times. The tread is still good, but I want to change it for another one, because I'm tired of going to the tire shop. I gave money, probably enough for a new wheel. Car - Volkswagen Tiguan, tires were from the factory.

Has pros: Holds the road with a bang! In the corners does not blow away in four years, only one puncture. Has cons: It buzzes like a B-52. It doesn’t make noise, but it buzzes. The slightest dirt and like a cow on ice. Only for asphalt.

Got pros: Normal tire, good road holding at any speed. From 0 to 200 km / h I go constantly. Noise is normal noise. Strong, survived several blows - there are no hernias. Got cons: I have been demolished for about 25,000 km. That's the whole disadvantage.

The rubber is quite good, I won’t say anything critical, but I wouldn’t buy it 2 times because of the rigidity. I put 3 because of the low acoustic comfort, and strong rigidity. Has some pros: Pretty wear-resistant, 4 seasons, mileage 82t. I drive on indicators, the first puncture was 2 weeks ago - the tires are already bald. Strong - 1 time I ran into a curb tangentially, changed the tie rod end - nothing to the rubber, 2 times on the highway at night I got into a deep hole, even the registrar

All in all a well balanced product worth the money. Were a little quieter and softer, the prices would not be! The photo shows the tire tread after 6 seasons.

Stands nominally on Taureg. Yes, this is pure asphalt sport! On the track is a fairy tale, cars like on rails at any speed. Especially good in the mountains. Very reliable. I went to Tauregi with a different tire. Conti or Pirelli are softer, but not by much. But with the bridge you feel the road. On the first day I was surprised on the wet road behavior. Previously, there was a Conti (which was worn out after 30,000 km), here it is super wet. But I quickly got used to the bridge, if you do not

I got it as standard with vw tiguan. The driving style is VERY calm, the maximum speed on the ring is rarely 120, without slipping, braking, etc. . Pros below: I didn’t find it for myself, except that there were no punctures. Cons below: The car has a total mileage of 45 thousand km (this is winter and summer), and this rubber has already worn out, plus a hernia the size of a fist popped up. Unnecessarily tough, all the joints of the road are felt, like a sledgehammer they beat on all the…

My tires are 265/50/R19. What can I say about them. These tires are quite rigid, have a strong sidewall, and are practically not afraid of holes. Handling on dry pavement is not even bad, there are no complaints about braking either on dry or wet surfaces. By car, the total mileage is almost 60 thousand km, now the 3rd season for these tires, they are no longer enough for 4. If we take the mileage without winter tires, then these tires drove about 35 thousand i. e. they are enough for me for…

Satisfied. I think not the top tire, because. workmanship (burst rubber at the seams, corners a little worn or underfilled during pressing), but for the money, the best price / quality ratio.

In terms of price-quality ratio, this is the best that is now on the market for crossovers. Everyone who complains about harshness and noise is just the features of your cars, or oak suspension (qashqai and q5) or no noise isolation (qashqai). PS Why do I praise this rubber so much - I rode another Qashqai on another rubber of some kind of Konti-Kontakt . . It's just HELL! for 60 thousand km. it was worn out to holes, and from 40 thousand it was already just scary to drive due to poor braking…

Rubber stood from the factory for the first two and a half seasons without complaints, and then, as if they had replaced such a rumble, it appeared that it lays ears. For comparison, the winter studded Nordman 4 is 2 times quieter on dry asphalt. Her price is 6 thousands, the ceiling, and not 10,000. I will take Nexgen cheaply to replace it, but without any claims for that kind of money.

Different pros: Went with a new car, advantages: on dry pavement it behaves and slows down moderately. Cons below: Hydroplaning on wet pavement. At different speeds and amount of water. Terrible.

Very noisy tires, after the winter - the rumble is in the cabin. It "burned out" very quickly, in almost 3 seasons and a relatively short run, almost nothing was left of it. One thing pleases - excellent handling at any speed. As for the track - it probably depends on the suspension. I have an Outlander XL, the suspension is stiff, any track on this rubber is nothing. But in the winter - just hold on, it winds in a rut even along the Hong Kong Ring Road.

Went as a regular to Qashqai. mileage 50 thousand moderate wear another 20-30 thousand would depart confidently, taking into account the winter of course. Rigid, almost plastic, starts to work with a long run and 30 degree heat. NOISY or I'm sensitive, even the complete soundproofing of the car does not save, I always know what kind of asphalt is under me. Durable, often used on the ground with stones when taking the curb with a loaded car, cut off a piece from the sidewall the size of 5s a…

Chose between this and Toyo Proxes CF2. I chose this one because I drive a lot on the highway and primers. I was afraid that the super soft Toyo would not survive. Although, I would drive around the city, I would definitely buy Toyo. Some pros: Very confident stands on the road, clearly managed. Feels good in puddles at speed. Made in Japan Its cons: No matter what they say, it is really noisy, even with decent sound insulation you can hear it, it doesn’t infuriate, but you can hear it. Narrow

When you're racing on the new autobahn, great tires. But it is worth slowing down to the speed allowed by the traffic rules - a strong rumble begins. And when you turn off the autobahn onto ordinary Soviet asphalt, they buzz so much that you can even stick earplugs in your ears. I have winter studded tires and they make less noise. In short - they were not created for our roads.

4 years, 90 thousand km I think I will last another season, there are no hernias or cuts. (I like to ride on tram tracks) The rubber is very ambiguous. Reliability outweighs everything, but next time I will buy another one.

Constantly have to taxi - keep the steering wheel. Someone may like this, constantly play with the steering wheel, but I prefer to set the steering wheel and drive straight. A couple of times just thrown out of the rut when leaving. At the same time, the price of RunFlat is going through the roof. I REALLY want to sell this rubber and take something softer and more manageable. I close Bridgestone for myself once and for all.

Native tires on RAV 4. Strong tire. 5 seasons gone. 70-80% wear. Japanese tires are strong and sidewalls and without hernias and bumps, but tough. after 3 years - bumps climb out.

stock tires for audi q5 I didn't have to choose. Rubber is not bad if you drive on smooth asphalt, but where can you find it. On ordinary non-federal roads, it is very sensitive to ruts, pits, etc. irregularities. The first time after Toyota Rav4 felt like a kart driver. I thought it was all-wheel drive features, but in the winter I changed the tires and the car became more obedient. And for a season and a half (thousand 30 kilometers) worn out. For the third summer, I could not reach it, I had