Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 75
  • 5
    28
  • 4
    19
  • 3
    17
  • 2
    9
  • 1
    2

Type of review

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Everything is fine, I liked the product, I bought it for a reason.

I bought it with a citroen c4 aircross car, from the salon. Size 235/55 R18/ After 30t. mileage, the rear wheels were worn out almost to zero, there were about 30 protectors left on the front wheels (all-wheel drive car). I work at "Muhos. .nsk", I drive a lot on a gravel road, then I leave for the city -200 km. gravel roads, 300 highway. I think that the gravel was erased on it, because it scours in different directions at speed (there is no such thing on winter tires). On the pavement…

Pros
  • - not very noisy (my personal opinion) - excellent road holding, both dry and wet (asphalt only) - no aquaplaning - reliable (but not durable) - appearance
Cons
  • - quick wear (maybe only in my case, rolled on a gravel road a lot) - on a gravel road, the car walks to the sides, handling deteriorates - on grass, sand, soil - well, just none (yes, they are not for that) - very tight (maybe because of my size)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good purchase.

I drove these tires for 6 seasons on roads with different surfaces: On asphalt - excellent handling and grip; on country roads - full 0 (because it is not intended for this). Conclusion - a good tire for dynamic driving on paved roads. Has pros: Wear-resistant (now serves as a flower bed in the country :))), comfortable noise level, good handling on wet roads. Cons: At temperatures close to 0 it becomes oaky and loses traction.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not exactly what I wanted, but basically everything is fine.

Outlander XL (1.7t with a driver, up to 2.2t loaded, permanent full drive, tires 225-55-18). Was stock from the factory. Drove 35k and erased almost to slicks. The rubber is hard. Very noisy (louder than winter studded). In corners, I had to slow down a bit on a dry road, and on a wet one it almost always blows away even at low speed and the gas released. Holds turns, it seems to me, no better than the same Hakkapelita7 studded. When driving through puddles more than 2 cm deep at speed, the…

Pros
  • strange rubber
Cons
  • Very noisy (louder Hakkapelita7 studded), practically does not hold turns. Poor puddles and wet asphalt as such.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

A little bit not what I expected, generally fine.

on LR Freelender 2, drove for a season and a half, (about 25 thousand km on this particular rubber) - the rubber is almost bald, it rides well on asphalt, it holds the road. Now the tires are already bald - on wet asphalt it blows away in corners. Sidewalls are rigid - there are no hernias. It is easily pierced - for a season and a half about 8 punctures (normally repaired). It scours the gravel road, but keeps the course. Through the mud only at speed, otherwise you will get up. I don’t know…

Pros
  • Rubber only for asphalt. High-speed. On dry asphalt without pretensions. While new, holds the road (in the rain).
Cons
  • resource thousand 40-50 after it becomes bald (almost slick)

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Everything is fine, I liked the product, I bought it for a reason.

Asphalt is her element, the road keeps dry even with 85 percent wear, as long as the wear is not strong hydroplaning - this is not about this rubber. handling at high speeds is excellent. You need to be more careful when leaving the track, after all, this is a highway tire: grass, mud, sand - it does not go. I have 215x65 p17, initially it is on Kodiak, 2 seasons wear is almost 85-90%, total mileage is 60 thousand. - not enough for me. Next season I will take a new one, and no matter how much I

Pros
  • Controllability.
Cons
  • - Noisy - Almost nothing off the track - Increased wear

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Normal product, but wanted more for the money.

Very practical and reliable tires. One problem is that they are poorly controlled on pavement with rutting. The dealer said that this is because of the short base and you have to get used to it))). On winter tires (Hakka 7) this is not close. The car runs like it's on rails. Sinned for uneven tire wear. By chance, I got an almost new one more set of the same tires. Shod - the same problem ! !

Pros
  • Reliable. Strong sidewall, low wear. Went 4 seasons.
Cons
  • There is a significant drawback - this tire does not like rutting. If there is at least a small track on the pavement, the car (I have an Audi Q5) starts jumping left and right. Sometimes it's scary when on the highway and towards the truck.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The product is average, Im not sure its worth the money.

The tires were on the new Tiguan. At first I was pleased, but after 3 years of operation, I was disappointed. I'll change it to Toyota or Conti, I'll write in comparison. Got pros: When it was new, it was very pleasing on the track. It goes confidently at speeds up to 180, it is no longer comfortable. It wasn't very noisy. Normally rowed on a forest washed out primer. Some cons: For 2 seasons, 4 punctures from self-tapping screws and 3 hernias. I changed my shoes for the third season for this…

Revainrating 2 out of 5

So-so quality, price doesn't match quality.

my opinion is tires for 2 years and up to 40 thousand. I got my own rubber with a guarantee that it will pass at least 70 thousand. (funny) but the price is not cheap. I don’t understand when they say that there is a distillation (I have an English assembly) and a shop. and when there is one index on the rubber and the result is another. Pros below: while the new one holds the road. and water too. on the highway Kyiv - chernihiv went 185 track kept well (rubber wear thousand 30) Some cons: for…

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Terrible purchase, only wasted money.

yesterday I crashed the car: I got into a rut where there was water and the car swam, it began to be brought in, as a result, I was thrown onto the bump stop - I tore the entire left side of the car (the car is a new Tiguan R16, it’s good at least on a helmet). A friend of xse has one to one 19 radius - he also complains that it is impossible to drive on a wet road - the car floats.

VW Tiguan ; changed to the same, after hernias. Satisfied Pros below: Good tires, they don’t talk on the road, they hold well in a rut and in the rain, 130 for a long time is great Has some cons: A bit noisy before heating, but then ok; after severe hard pits on 2022n hernia roads, but I think that I was just lucky.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good product, but having its own defects.

I wouldn’t take it a second time, but as an average tire for terrible roads, it’s quite enough if it comes immediately with a new car. Pros: This rubber has only one plus - strength, condity. But almost all the minuses are a consequence of this plus. Got cons: Noisy, heavy, harsh with a fairly average grip in both dry and rainy conditions. The tendency to hydroplaning is average. On dirt in a blurry primer - none, it was not created for this. I won’t say how it behaves at low temperatures…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Nice price, good quality.

I got these tires along with the car. I drove it to Karelia (Kem), got there without problems, not a single puncture, although if the track had to be strained. I traveled a lot off-road, I did not find any difficulties in cross-country ability.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I really like the product, it fully meets my expectations.

I read the reviews and so I believe that a lot depends on the car . I have a Mazda CX-9, the driving monera is aggressive, I drove only 15000 km (I didn’t notice much wear), so far I have no complaints about the rubber! I flew into a not sickly hole and concave the disk, and at least the rubber, no hernia, no wrinkle of the court, I could not even find the place of impact when I dismantled the wheel. For the price and quality, I highly recommend!

Pros
  • Holds the road well
Cons
  • Noisy

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best I ever used, recommend it to everybody.

Holds the road with a bang. I screwed the serpentine to Hong Kong so that I myself became ill. and didn't squeak. 235/55 r18 vw Caravelle. 3 seasons departed a little more left to zero. But in the spring I will change to the same. And everyone who writes about dirt, you even read the name of the rubber for the HP SPORT track ! ! Puddles squeezes out but all within reasonable limits. In general, I was satisfied with the rubber!

Pros
  • Durable, Handling on the road is excellent in rain and dry weather.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Very pleased with this purchase, will recommend it to everyone!

Car Qashqai 2022, front-wheel drive, 2.0 l. Mileage 75,000 km. The car was taken new. By car I drive moderately, I don’t lay turns, although I often drive fast in corners. This tire is from the factory. The car was made in England. The wear resistance of the rubber is phenomenal, the handling is excellent, and what is most interesting, there are still 2 mm left to the wear mark, i. e. I can still ride the season. The next tire is exactly the same. I recommend. I'll attach a photo later.

Pros
  • 1. Excellent handling on the road, including at high speeds. 2. Great wear resistance. 3. Strong, flew into the pits several times, I thought the disk would bend, or there would be a hernia - there was nothing. 4. Easy to balance. 5. Confident driving on wet asphalt (without exceeding a reasonable speed). 6. A couple of times I captured unexpectedly fallen snow, didn’t drive fast, the control is good, you can drive, but only as a last resort (when you change to winter tires, you immediately understand the difference and how much winter tires are safer on snow).
Cons
  • Noisy on the old coarse-grained asphalt, but not critical. With good asphalt is not noisy (it all depends on Shumkov in the car).

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like everything, the price and quality are acceptable.

I drive for such a long time on different cars, despite the fact that I have to change every season, I choose it as reliable, and for those who write what they wear, I advise you to change it on time, and not drive 110,000 as they say, but as for the ground, I drive, but of course it is for asphalt and for soil, off-road and especially snow, choose others, this one is for those who like to drive on asphalt

Pros
  • Excellent road holding on asphalt at any speed, practically without punctures, strong sidewall, holds a fairly heavy car
Cons
  • It wears off quickly, I have it for the season, obviously because of the rigidity, for the same reason it is noisy

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great quality, happy with it one hundred percent!

I'm a big fan of the bridge. The main advantage is that it was pumped up once, ballanced and forgotten. For the entire period of operation. That's how it was with all my breeches. On different machines, different sizes, and different seasons (winter, summer). For me personally, this is the most important parameter. It was Yokohama, very comfortable. Really quiet and soft, but . , the resource is a third less. By the way, for puzoterok on rough asphalt, I think Yoka AC02 will be the best choice.

Pros
  • strong, reliable
Cons
  • relatively noisy

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Never buy this product.

Worst tire I have ever ridden. Noisy to such an extent that after an hour of driving a headache, and the car has a good Shumka. Accordingly, it is tough. Forget comfort, it won't exist at all. At a speed of 100+ it is still somehow acceptable, but it is impossible to drive in the city. He does not like a rut - he falls into all the bumps in the road like a hammer. With each new season, there is more and more noise and rigidity. On the remainder of 50%, it began to slip at the start, although…

Pros
  • Indelible, impenetrable.
Cons
  • Unbearable noise and rigidity, does not hold at 50% wear, casts into a rut like on rails.